Evaluation of Onboard Intelligence Systems DeepASL and SparseSep

Slide Note
Embed
Share

In this evaluation, we assess the performance of two onboard intelligence systems - DeepASL and SparseSep. DeepASL is evaluated for performance, time efficiency, memory usage, energy consumption, and user experience, with a focus on accuracy and robustness. SparseSep is analyzed for its performance in terms of accuracy and robustness, memory utilization, time efficiency, energy consumption, and user experience applicability in real-life scenarios. Strengths and weaknesses of both systems are discussed.


Uploaded on Oct 07, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Onboard Intelligence XINYU YANG

  2. Challenges? 1. Performance (Accuracy, ) 2. Time (Runtime application?) 3. Memory 4. Energy 5. User experience 6.

  3. DeepASL

  4. DeepASL 1. Performance (Accuracy, ) Compelling experiments? Robustness?

  5. DeepASL 2. Time (Runtime application?)

  6. DeepASL 3. Memory

  7. DeepASL 4. Energy

  8. DeepASL 5. User experience Applicable in real life? People (users, developers, ) are willing to use it?

  9. DeepASL Other comments? Strengths/Weaknesses?

  10. SparseSep

  11. SparseSep 1. Performance (Accuracy, ) Will it meet the accuracy requirement? Robustness?

  12. SparseSep 2. Memory

  13. SparseSep 3. Time

  14. SparseSep 4. Energy

  15. SparseSep 5. User experience Applicable in real life? People (users, developers, ) are willing to use it?

  16. SparseSep Other comments? Strength/Weaknesses?

Related


More Related Content