DRRS Design to Meet HB1500 Intent

undefined
 
DRRS Design to Meet HB1500 Intent
 
Shams Siddiqi, Ph.D.
Hunt Energy Network (HEN)
(512) 619-3532
DRRS Workshop II
March 27, 2024
 
MArch 27, 2024
 
2
 
HB1500
 
MArch 27, 2024
 
3
 
Primary Goal of DRRS
 
HB1500: “determine the quantity of services necessary based on historical
variations in generation availability for each season based on a targeted
reliability standard or goal, including intermittency or non-dispatchable
generation facilities and forced outage rates, for dispatchable generation
facilities”
Any reliability standard ultimately adopted will likely require no more than
5-10 GW of firm Load shed that can be rotated during extreme events of
significant duration
Severe winter storms of long duration, with little solar and wind support,
are the most challenging for the ERCOT Grid – about 10 GW of additional
dispatchable resources needed to meet any reasonable reliability standard
According to HB1500, DRRS should be designed to meet this reliability
challenge
With its current suite of Ancillary Services, ERCOT meets all operational
reliability needs as required by NERC and ERCOT has not identified the need
for any additional AS for operational reliability
Thus, DRRS is not required for operational reliability but should be designed
for meeting a targeted reliability standard or goal as specified in HB1500
 
MArch 27, 2024
 
4
 
DRRS Design to Meet Goal
 
DRRS duration requirement should be 24 hours at least for the winter
months and may be as low as 4 hours in all other months and must be
available within 2 hours
DRRS Resources must be offline available (QSGR qualify) until
committed/released by ERCOT with DRRS payment clawed back with
possible penalties if not available during critical times
DRRS will be available to RUC at significantly scaled down startup and min
energy cost – no RUC makewhole payment to DRRS Resources
CLRs must consume at DRRS awarded capacity until released by ERCOT
Non-Spin could be repurposed for DRRS for quick implementation – Non-
Spin ASDCs for non-winter months but much higher ASDC for winter
reflecting 
significant
 costs of long duration dispatchable capacity shortfall
Starting quantity ~6GW for winter (utilize current Non-Spin MWs for other
seasons) with pre-specified growth to meet reliability standard based on
VOLL and LOLP
DRRS costs are allocated LRS and can be self-arranged and traded
Commitment of offline DRRS accounted for in RDPA
 
MArch 27, 2024
 
5
 
DRRS Implementation
 
Non-Spin could be repurposed for DRRS for quick implementation and to
minimize cost impact on Load, or DRRS could be a separate AS
Starting quantity ~6GW in winter season with pre-specified quantities over
future years to meet reliability standard at the earliest possible date
considering time needed to build new dispatchable resources properly
accounting for retiring dispatchable resources
DRRS is procured in DAM and co-optimized with Energy/AS and can be
bilaterally traded and represents a physical commitment hours ahead since
RUC looks hours ahead
Since DRRS quantities and prices would be significantly higher in winter
months, DRRS is targeted to longer-duration dispatchable resources
Seasonal DRRS ASDCs reflecting varying DRRS seasonal quantity needs
would be used to procure DRRS (DRRS ASDC is not tied to segmented
ORDC for winter)
 
MArch 27, 2024
 
6
 
Proposed DRRS Implications
 
ERCOT Grid needs long-duration dispatchable resources to meet any
reasonable reliability standard – proposed DRRS design would incentivize
such resources and thus better meet the stated goal of HB1500
Non-performance clawback and possible penalties will encourage high
availability during scarcity events and the development of firmer fuel supply
During non-winter months, solar ramp hours are relatively easy to forecast
and load forecast errors are known at least a few hours ahead – thus, DRRS
can meet those needs making Non-Spin redundant (online Non-Spin
provides little reliability benefit anyway); thus Non-Spin could be retired
Proposed DRRS would incentivize newer longer-duration dispatchable
resources that thrive on capturing high prices in an IRR saturated market
Proposed DRRS would not adversely impact market prices since RDPA would
reverse any price suppression due to DRRS deployment
This DRRS proposal is much more targeted to longer duration dispatchable
resources and has a significantly better likelihood of resulting in new build
of such capacity whereas PCM is not as targeted and likely to have minimal
impact on new build of such capacity especially with $1B/year cap
Slide Note
Embed
Share

DRRS design aims to meet the requirements of HB1500 in determining the quantity of services needed for reliability standards in ERCOT grid operations. The primary goal is to ensure operational reliability during extreme events with a focus on dispatchable generation facilities. DRRS resources must be available promptly when needed and capable of handling firm load shedding during severe winter storms. The design addresses duration requirements, resource availability, and cost allocation for meeting targeted reliability standards as specified in HB1500.

  • DRRS Design
  • HB1500
  • ERCOT Grid
  • Reliability Standards
  • Energy Network

Uploaded on May 11, 2024 | 1 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. DRRS Design to Meet HB1500 Intent Shams Siddiqi, Ph.D. Hunt Energy Network (HEN) (512) 619-3532 shams@crescentpower.net DRRS Workshop II March 27, 2024

  2. HB1500 MArch 27, 2024 2

  3. Primary Goal of DRRS HB1500: determine the quantity of services necessary based on historical variations in generation availability for each season based on a targeted reliability standard or goal, including intermittency or non-dispatchable generation facilities and forced outage rates, for dispatchable generation facilities Any reliability standard ultimately adopted will likely require no more than 5-10 GW of firm Load shed that can be rotated during extreme events of significant duration Severe winter storms of long duration, with little solar and wind support, are the most challenging for the ERCOT Grid about 10 GW of additional dispatchable resources needed to meet any reasonable reliability standard According to HB1500, DRRS should be designed to meet this reliability challenge With its current suite of Ancillary Services, ERCOT meets all operational reliability needs as required by NERC and ERCOT has not identified the need for any additional AS for operational reliability Thus, DRRS is not required for operational reliability but should be designed for meeting a targeted reliability standard or goal as specified in HB1500 MArch 27, 2024 3

  4. DRRS Design to Meet Goal DRRS duration requirement should be 24 hours at least for the winter months and may be as low as 4 hours in all other months and must be available within 2 hours DRRS Resources must be offline available (QSGR qualify) until committed/released by ERCOT with DRRS payment clawed back with possible penalties if not available during critical times DRRS will be available to RUC at significantly scaled down startup and min energy cost no RUC makewhole payment to DRRS Resources CLRs must consume at DRRS awarded capacity until released by ERCOT Non-Spin could be repurposed for DRRS for quick implementation Non- Spin ASDCs for non-winter months but much higher ASDC for winter reflecting significant costs of long duration dispatchable capacity shortfall Starting quantity ~6GW for winter (utilize current Non-Spin MWs for other seasons) with pre-specified growth to meet reliability standard based on VOLL and LOLP DRRS costs are allocated LRS and can be self-arranged and traded Commitment of offline DRRS accounted for in RDPA MArch 27, 2024 4

  5. DRRS Implementation Non-Spin could be repurposed for DRRS for quick implementation and to minimize cost impact on Load, or DRRS could be a separate AS Starting quantity ~6GW in winter season with pre-specified quantities over future years to meet reliability standard at the earliest possible date considering time needed to build new dispatchable resources properly accounting for retiring dispatchable resources DRRS is procured in DAM and co-optimized with Energy/AS and can be bilaterally traded and represents a physical commitment hours ahead since RUC looks hours ahead Since DRRS quantities and prices would be significantly higher in winter months, DRRS is targeted to longer-duration dispatchable resources Seasonal DRRS ASDCs reflecting varying DRRS seasonal quantity needs would be used to procure DRRS (DRRS ASDC is not tied to segmented ORDC for winter) MArch 27, 2024 5

  6. Proposed DRRS Implications ERCOT Grid needs long-duration dispatchable resources to meet any reasonable reliability standard proposed DRRS design would incentivize such resources and thus better meet the stated goal of HB1500 Non-performance clawback and possible penalties will encourage high availability during scarcity events and the development of firmer fuel supply During non-winter months, solar ramp hours are relatively easy to forecast and load forecast errors are known at least a few hours ahead thus, DRRS can meet those needs making Non-Spin redundant (online Non-Spin provides little reliability benefit anyway); thus Non-Spin could be retired Proposed DRRS would incentivize newer longer-duration dispatchable resources that thrive on capturing high prices in an IRR saturated market Proposed DRRS would not adversely impact market prices since RDPA would reverse any price suppression due to DRRS deployment This DRRS proposal is much more targeted to longer duration dispatchable resources and has a significantly better likelihood of resulting in new build of such capacity whereas PCM is not as targeted and likely to have minimal impact on new build of such capacity especially with $1B/year cap MArch 27, 2024 6

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#