Defining Residential Submarkets in Planning Work

Defining and Using Residential
Submarkets in Planning Work
Clifford A. Lipscomb, Ph.D.
Director of Economic Research
Greenfield Advisors, LLC
Seattle, WA and Atlanta, GA
United States of America
Greenfield Advisors
37-year-old firm headquartered in Seattle,
WA, USA
Real estate valuation, economic research,
survey design and administration,
specialty in complex valuation issues (i.e.
we don’t do appraisals for banks/lenders)
Most of our work is litigation support
Current cool project: patent infringement
The Big Picture
People and households are heterogeneous
(different)
How different are they?
Socioeconomic
Racial
Demographic
Others
How can we measure the differences? Are
they “systematic”?
Why is This Important?
Price prediction (submarkets improve
model accuracy)
Formulation of market strategy
Understanding housing market structure
Improving lenders’ and investors’ ability to
price risk associated with homeownership
Public policy implications
Policy tailored to one “type” may not be best
Policy inertia (is a mid-course correction
possible after a policy is implemented?)
Terminology
What is a market?
What is a submarket?
How can we define submarkets?
Housing stock (similar packages of housing
services)
Geography (traditional neighborhoods)
Household characteristics (data intensive)
Surveys that ask about who are your “peers”
– good for comparative studies
Hybrid methods
Rest of the Presentation
Focus on an Atlanta neighborhood
Talk about external and internal factors
affecting the neighborhood
Discuss how a change in land use can
affect the neighborhood
Home Park
Sales Price Distribution
Determining Submarkets
Motivation – assumptions in the literature
Publically available data was limited
(Census tract block group was smallest unit
available)
Houses are the unit of analysis, so need
that level of detail in demographics
Differences between renters and owners
Door-to-door survey effort
51% response rate
Empirical Model
Round 1: Cluster analysis establishes groups
Round 2: Refines groups into “types” based on a
variation of linear regression model (SUR)
Houses are sorted into types based on the
appraised value that minimizes error
Determines the number of types without
researcher pre-determination!  Because what if
the researcher draws an arbitrary boundary…
 
 
Original Household Types
Submarkets
A: Undergraduate student renters
B: Other student renters, young
professionals, and young married couples
C: Owners and graduate students
Note: Recent research has tightened the distinctions
between submarkets using different econometric
estimators (Belasco, Farmer, and Lipscomb 2012)
Dynamic Issues
What happens to neighborhood if you put
in a pocket park?
Simulation results
Simulation 1: if preference for park access
stays same
Simulation 2: if preference for park is ½ of
current estimate
Location of New Pocket Park
What Happens After
Re-sorting?
Models predict that mix of residents will
change by 30% as a result of pocket park
Student renters are “forced out” as new
owner-occupiers enter the neighborhood
Change in amenity mix = change in
occupant
Did pocket park simply accelerate resident
mix that was going to happen anyway?
Types After Pocket Park
Implications
Policymakers and planners need to plan
with preference heterogeneity in mind
A more granular level of data needed to
complete comprehensive plans
E.g. new MARTA rail stop will be used by
what “type” of households?
E.g. what “types” are attracted to TODs?
Implications (2)
Balancing housing affordability with
housing construction (micro-apartments
targeting urban professionals living alone)
Planners can influence the “types” of
residents attracted to a neighborhood –
influence can be latent or manifest
Planners plan for change and can
influence that change
Summary
Economists and planners often use data at one
geographic scale when analyzing phenomena at
a different scale
Make sure statistical methods are an empirical
translation of your theory
Beware of 
post hoc ergo propter hoc
 fallacy
(“after this, therefore because of this”)
All methods have limitations; so seek to mitigate
them and show relevance relative to other
methods
Contact Information
:
Clifford A. Lipscomb, Ph.D.
Director of Economic Research
Greenfield Advisors, LLC
1870 The Exchange SE, Suite 100
Atlanta, GA 30339
USA
E-mail: 
cliff@greenfieldadvisors.com
Web: 
www.greenfieldadvisors.com
 
Thank you
Slide Note

November 12, 2010

Presentation at the Valuation Colloquium - Greenville, SC

Embed
Share

Clifford A. Lipscomb, Ph.D., discusses the importance of identifying residential submarkets, their impact on price prediction, market strategy formulation, and public policy implications. The presentation explores terminology, factors affecting neighborhoods, and a case study on Atlanta's Home Park.

  • Residential
  • Submarkets
  • Planning
  • Price Prediction
  • Neighborhood

Uploaded on Feb 17, 2025 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Defining and Using Residential Submarkets in Planning Work Clifford A. Lipscomb, Ph.D. Director of Economic Research Greenfield Advisors, LLC Seattle, WA and Atlanta, GA United States of America

  2. Greenfield Advisors 37-year-old firm headquartered in Seattle, WA, USA Real estate valuation, economic research, survey design and administration, specialty in complex valuation issues (i.e. we don t do appraisals for banks/lenders) Most of our work is litigation support Current cool project: patent infringement

  3. The Big Picture People and households are heterogeneous (different) How different are they? Socioeconomic Racial Demographic Others How can we measure the differences? Are they systematic ?

  4. Why is This Important? Price prediction (submarkets improve model accuracy) Formulation of market strategy Understanding housing market structure Improving lenders and investors ability to price risk associated with homeownership Public policy implications Policy tailored to one type may not be best Policy inertia (is a mid-course correction possible after a policy is implemented?)

  5. Terminology What is a market? What is a submarket? How can we define submarkets? Housing stock (similar packages of housing services) Geography (traditional neighborhoods) Household characteristics (data intensive) Surveys that ask about who are your peers good for comparative studies Hybrid methods

  6. Rest of the Presentation Focus on an Atlanta neighborhood Talk about external and internal factors affecting the neighborhood Discuss how a change in land use can affect the neighborhood

  7. Home Park

  8. Sales Price Distribution North Home Park South Home Park Less than $150K $150K 199,999 $200K 249,999 $250K 299,999 $300K + Home Park green space

  9. Determining Submarkets Motivation assumptions in the literature Publically available data was limited (Census tract block group was smallest unit available) Houses are the unit of analysis, so need that level of detail in demographics Differences between renters and owners Door-to-door survey effort 51% response rate

  10. Empirical Model Round 1: Cluster analysis establishes groups Round 2: Refines groups into types based on a variation of linear regression model (SUR) Houses are sorted into types based on the appraised value that minimizes error Determines the number of types without researcher pre-determination! Because what if the researcher draws an arbitrary boundary

  11. Original Household Types Type A Type B Type C

  12. Submarkets A: Undergraduate student renters B: Other student renters, young professionals, and young married couples C: Owners and graduate students Note: Recent research has tightened the distinctions between submarkets using different econometric estimators (Belasco, Farmer, and Lipscomb 2012)

  13. Dynamic Issues What happens to neighborhood if you put in a pocket park? Simulation results Simulation 1: if preference for park access stays same Simulation 2: if preference for park is of current estimate

  14. Location of New Pocket Park Type A Type B Type C

  15. What Happens After Re-sorting? Models predict that mix of residents will change by 30% as a result of pocket park Student renters are forced out as new owner-occupiers enter the neighborhood Change in amenity mix = change in occupant Did pocket park simply accelerate resident mix that was going to happen anyway?

  16. Types After Pocket Park Type A Type B Type C Type A Type B Type C

  17. Implications Policymakers and planners need to plan with preference heterogeneity in mind A more granular level of data needed to complete comprehensive plans E.g. new MARTA rail stop will be used by what type of households? E.g. what types are attracted to TODs?

  18. Implications (2) Balancing housing affordability with housing construction (micro-apartments targeting urban professionals living alone) Planners can influence the types of residents attracted to a neighborhood influence can be latent or manifest Planners plan for change and can influence that change

  19. Summary Economists and planners often use data at one geographic scale when analyzing phenomena at a different scale Make sure statistical methods are an empirical translation of your theory Beware of post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy ( after this, therefore because of this ) All methods have limitations; so seek to mitigate them and show relevance relative to other methods

  20. Contact Information: Clifford A. Lipscomb, Ph.D. Director of Economic Research Greenfield Advisors, LLC 1870 The Exchange SE, Suite 100 Atlanta, GA 30339 USA E-mail: cliff@greenfieldadvisors.com Web: www.greenfieldadvisors.com Thank you

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#