Crimmigration: Key Concepts and Issues

undefined
 
CRIMMIGRATION 101
 
Rachel M. Self, Esq. of Rachel M. Self, P.C, Boston, Chair
 
Hon. Paul M. Gagnon of U.S. Immigration Court, Executive
Office for Immigration Review, Boston
 
Hon. Myong J. Joun, Associate Justice of the Boston Municipal
Court
 
SOURCES OF LAW
 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 USC)
 
Code of Federal Regulations (8 CFR)
 
Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA)
 
1st Circuit and Supreme Court Decisions
 
TYPES OF IMMIGRATION STATUS
TYPES OF IMMIGRATION STATUS
 
U.S. Citizen
Includes Puerto Rico and U.S. Territories
Legal Permanent Resident (“green card”)
Non-Immigrant
Student
Tourist
Other types of Visas
Out of status or Undocumented
Asylum Seekers
Temporary Protected Status
 
THE STATUS HIREARCHY
 
US Citizen (by birth, acquired, derived, naturalized)
 
Lawful Permanent Resident/Conditional Resident
 
TPS, DACA
 
Immigrant Visas
 
Nonimmigrant visas
 
The undocumented
 
Common Acronyms
 
OCC
DHS
ICE
CBP
ERO/DRO
EOIR
USCIS
PD
NTA
LPR
USC
TPS
DACA
BIA
CFR
INA
CIMT
COV
GMC
IJ
VD
DOJ
 
WHAT ICE ISN’T TELLING
YOU ABOUT DETAINERS
 
Important facts about ICE detainers that ICE usually neglects to
mention.
 
1. ICE DETAINER REQUESTS ARE
NOT
 
MANDATORY
 
ICE detainer request is just a request.
There is 
NO PENALTY 
if local agencies don’t comply.
 
No legal requirement for your dept to comply
 
Fed govt has 
no legal right 
to force your dept to hold anyone
beyond the time when they are eligible for release from state or
local custody
 
2. ICE DETAINER REQUESTS ARE
NOT WARRANTS
 
ICE detainer requests do 
NOT
 provide a lawful basis for
arrest OR detention.
Criminal warrant is issued by a judge + probable cause
whereas an ICE detainer is issued by an ICE officer (not
judge), because ICE has “initiated an investigation” into a
person’s status
If ICE detainer is issued, that doesn’t mean the individual is
actually a non-citizen subject to deportation or even that ICE
has probable cause to think so
ICE detainer is NOT a criminal detainer
Criminal detainer can only be issued if there are charges pending in
another jx against a person currently serving a criminal sentence
ICE detainers have VIRTUALLY NOTHING IN COMMON
with criminal detainers
 
3. HOLDING SOMEONE FOR ICE IS
EXPENSIVE
 
Holding people @ ICE’s request is expensive for
state/local.
ICE does not reimburse localities for detaining individuals
until ICE has assumed actual custody of the individual
Can amount to millions of dollars of state/local money being
spent for ICE’s benefit
If you choose to comply with ICE detainers, your agency
faces the costs of legal liability.
Detainer lawsuits are regular occurrences
 
Although request comes from ICE, the choice to comply means
a state/county/city is liable for potential damages.
 
4. ICE FREQUENTLY MAKES
MISTAKES
 
ICE issues erroneous detainers with disturbing regularity.
Example: Rennison Castillo, USC/army vet, was held for 7
months in immigration detention after ICE placed a detainer
despite multiple attempts to prove his citizenship
After release, ICE admitted mistake.
Misspelled his name
Assigned him multiple file numbers
 
5. GETTING INVOLVED WITH ICE
DETAINERS UNDERMINES PUBLIC
SAFETY
 
When you choose to comply with ICE detainers, people in the
community may come to see you as an arm of ICE.
Erosion of people’s trust in your officers
Reluctance to come forward and report crimes for fear of immigration
consequences for themselves or others
By declining to comply with ICE detainer requests, you can:
1.
Maintain a clear distinction between your officers and federal
immigration authorities
2.
Encourage people to report crimes and cooperate in community
policing efforts
3.
Ensure the safety of the whole community.
 
PROTECTING YOUR CLIENTS
WHO HAVE ICE DETAINERS
 
DETAINERS & SECURE
COMMUNITIES
 
Most detainers are lodged against those arrested for 
minor
misdemeanors such as traffic offenses like driving without a
license
Uses fingerprints and FBI data to search automatically after jx
signs up
 
WHAT IS A DETAINER
 
A notification from ICE to state/local jails that:
ICE is investigating whether an individual is removable
ICE has issued Notice to Appear
There is an arrest warrant for the person, or the person has been
ordered removed
Usually transmitted via fax or email
Often sent from LESC in VT
If person is in custody pursuant to a detainer 
before
 the detainer
arrives, possibly illegal
Suspected noncitizen supposed to be given copy, but no requirement to
do so
No effective way to contest while in custody except habeas corpus
 
WHAT A DETAINER IS NOT
 
Not the equivalent of an arrest warrant
A determination that an individual is
deportable/inadmissible
The equivalent of ICE custody over an individual
The equivalent of a criminal detainer
 
WATCH OUT FOR
DISCRIMINATION
 
Sometimes jails tell families that they can’t post bond for
their loved ones on detainers
They 
CAN 
post bond but only starts the 48 hr clock; doesn’t
ensure immediate release
Magistrate shouldn’t raise bond/revoke solely b/c of
detainer
Inmates shouldn’t be classified as a security risk or lose
privileges because of existence of ICE detainer
 
LEGAL AUTHORITY FOR
DETAINER
 
Requires Ice to consider issuing detainer upon request by local/state/federal agency
for persons held on a controlled substances violation
Holding agency initiates process, provides info and details
No standard of proof in statute for lodging a detainer
ICE to expeditiously take custody upon release from other enforcement agency
Not limited to controlled substances arrests
Extends local custody for up to 48 hours excl. weekends and holidays
Law enforcement required to provide all relevant criminal documents
An immigration detainer is 
merely an administrative mechanism to assure that a person
subject to confinement will not be released from custody until the party requesting the
detainer has an opportunity to act.
 
48 HOUR RULE
 
48 hour rule beings:
If criminal case pending, the court orders release and bail is
posted;
If the case is dismissed;
If the individual completes his sentence;
 
The 48 hour rule doesn’t begin when ICE says it does
 
48 HOUR RULE EXAMPLES
 
Example:
Erik’s criminal charge dismissed at 12:21 p.m. on Friday. He is
returned to jail, where he remains over the weekend subject to
ICE detainer. Jail faxes ICE on Tuesday at 10 a.m. stating Erik is
“ready for pickup.” ICE officer calls the jail and reminds jail
that ICE pickup days are Wednesdays and Fridays. The jail
holds Erik until Wednesday, and ICE picks him up at 7 a.m.
Violation?
Yes. Erik should have been released by 12:21 p.m. on
Tuesday.
 
48 HOUR RULE EXAMPLES
 
Note that if the 48-hour clock expires at midnight, it expires
then—not at 8 a.m. when the ICE office opens.
• Remedies:
Motion to suppress in immigration court
Damages actions/injunctive relief v. ICE (
Bivens 
or Federal
Tort Claims Act), or v. locals, 42 USC §1983
Habeas to ensure release
 
HOW IS A DETAINER ISSUED?
 
Immigration Detainer – Notice of Action (Form I-247)
Completed by Ice and sent to state/local law enforcement
agency
Verbal Holds – is that a detainer? 
NO!
 
ARE DETAINERS VOLUNTARY OR
MANDATORY?
 
ICE has conceded that they are “not mandatory as a matter
of law” in statements to MOCs, litigation, etc.
For years however, ICE argued that detainers were
mandatory.
 
SO WHAT IF THEY’RE NOT
MANDATORY?
 
If mandatory, it is federal commandeering of local resources
= unfunded mandate
Detaining individuals solely to verify their immigration status
would raise constitutional concerns
If 
not 
mandatory, the jurisdictions can opt-out of Secure
Communities process or limit its application to actual
“criminal aliens”
 
May 26, 2016 – Moscoso SJ-2016-
0168
 
Judge Spina issued the following order on a G.L. 211 3
Petition:
“it is ORDERED that the petition be, and the same is hereby
allowed, for the reasons set forth in the petition.  Accordingly
it is FURTHER ORDERED that because the trial court is
without authority to hold the petitioner, or otherwise order
him held, on a civil I.C.E. detainer, the defendant must be
released upon posting bail, unless he is held on some other
process”
 
DAMAGES ACTIONS
 
Who do you sue: State/local, ICE, both?
General rule: whoever has control over the body, which is
generally the state/county
 
WHAT STRATEGIES CAN BE USED
TO DEFEAT DETAINERS?
 
112 total jurisdictions (and counting!) limiting ICE holds that
range from outright refusal to comply to more limited
policies
Justice Spina’s Order is not binding precedent, but defense
counsel should argue that honoring such a detainer is
unlawful consistent with Justice Spina’s Order.  Move that the
court release the client notwithstanding the detainer.  File a
motion.  Cite to Justice Spina’s order.
Use this order to advocate for release with the local sherrif of
local DOC.
 
HOW TO MAKE A POLICY WORK
 
Terminate or limit compliance with Ice detainers and any
other warrants that ICE issues e.g. Ice can’t use local or state
resources, tie it to federal reimbursement
Find a clear line in the state penal code for crimes that could
be included and only include those that are the most serious
with a long period of incarceration
Get technical assistance and talk to your criminal defense
attorneys!
 
HOW CAN YOU HELP
SOMEONE WITH A DETAINER?
 
TIPS: HOW DO YOU GET
SOMEONE RELEASED WHO HAS
AN ICE DETAINER?
 
Justice Spina’s Order!!!!
Know your jail, law enforcement agency, and local law
Assess the merits of the individual’s case for release
Negotiating the release of an individual through the local
custodian and/or Ice
Seeking judicial review of custodian action
 
TIPS: ASSESSING THE MERITS OF
THE INDIVIDUAL’S CASE FOR
RELEASE
 
Is there an immigration hold?
Determine whether the immigration hold was issued
erroneously
Strength of the individual’s case for prosecutorial discretion
Likelihood that individual will be detained past the 48 hour
period
 
TIPS: NEGOTIATING RELEASE
THROUGH LOCAL CUSTODIAN
AND/OR ICE
 
Advocacy with local custodian(s) and counsel
Educate the jail on the legal consequences of submitting to the
Ice hold and its non-mandatory nature – This just got a whole lot
easier.
Long-term partnership with community organizations, political
constituencies, and allies to show the greater community impact
of holds and demand a hold policy
 
CAREFUL!!!!
 
Justice Spina’s Order does not mean that ICE agents can’t
arrest your client without the help of state authorities.
 
On the street
At home
Outside the courtroom
 
 
TIPS: LIFT THE DETAINER:
NEGOTIATING RELEASE WITH ICE
 
Erroneously issued (USC or LPR who is not removable)—Call
ICE hotline number (855) 448-6903 to lift the detainer.
Are they a good candidate for immigration relief or
prosecutorial discretion? Ask the Assistant Field Office
Director to cancel the detainer.
Risk: disclosing status may cut against immigration
strategy
• Right point of contact
 
WORK WITH CRIMINAL COUNSEL
 
Criminal attorney may be family’s first call
Remind attorney to call you ASAP if arrested or if detainer lodged (no requirement to
inform even criminal counsel)
Make sure attorney takes scrupulous notes re: timing of plea, dismissal of charges,
expiration of sentence, or time bond posted
Use attorney to determine if jail is stalling releasing client awaiting a written detainer
Use 48-hour window to interview client for immigration, esp. if ICE is likely to transfer
client to detention far away
Confer about whether it would be helpful to have prosecutor request that ICE bring
client back for trial.
 
FILE A LAWSUIT! PETITIONS FOR
WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
 
Violations of the 48-hour period
Writ of Habeas Corpus for violations of the Fourth, Fifth, and
Fourteenth amendments or equivalent state laws
48-hour challenges
 
IMMIGRATION TERMS OF ART
IMMIGRATION TERMS OF ART
 
Good moral character
Crime of Moral Turpitude
Conviction
Sentence
Aggravated Felony
Crime of Violence
 
CRIMES INVOLVING MORAL
CRIMES INVOLVING MORAL
TURPITUDE
TURPITUDE
 
“Crimes that are base, vile or depraved, and contrary to the
accepted rules of morality and the duties owed between
persons or to society in general.”
Different rules depending on if arriving alien, applicant for
admission, or admitted alien (212 vs. 237).
 
AGGRAVATED FELONIES
 
List of crimes that are considered aggravated felonies: INA
§101(a)(43)
Ground of removability only.
212(c), 212(h) waiver available in limited circumstances.
 
CRIMES
CRIMES
 
Is it a conviction?
a.
INA 101(a)(48)(A) – definition of conviction
i.
“a formal judgment of guilt of the respondent entered by a
court or, if the adjudication is withheld, where 1)a judge or
jury has found the alien guilty or the alien has entered a
plea of guilty or of nolo contendre 
or
 has admitted to facts
sufficient to warrant a finding of guilt; and 2) the judge has
ordered some form of punishment, penalty or restraint on
the alien’s liberty to be imposed.
See 
Matter of Cabrera
, 24 I&N Dec. 459
(BIA 2008)
CWOF – usually a conviction.
Is it a petty offense? INA 
§212(a)(2)(A)(ii) or
§237(a)(2)(A)(i).
 
EFFECTS OF CRIMINAL
CONVICTIONS
 
Deportable Offenses
 
Inadmissible Offenses
o
At entry
o
Certain Application
o
Offenses not requiring a conviction
 
Asylum and Particularly Serious Crimes
 
EFFECTS OF CRIMINAL
CONVICTIONS ON APPLICATIONS
 
Ineligibility for relief
o
Cancellation of removal
o
Adjustment of Status
o
Naturalization
 
Discretion
 
DACA INELIGIBILITY
 
Felony conviction
 
Significant Misdemeanor
 
OR Three Non-significant misdemeanors
 
TPS INELIGIBILITY
 
one felony, INA §244(c)(2)(B)(i);
 
one misdemeanor, as defined below and including
Massachusetts misdemeanors, in which the sentence
actually imposed is more than one year of incarceration,
either suspended or committed, 8 C.F.R. §244.1;
 
two misdemeanors, if the sentences actually imposed are
one year or less, INA §244(c)(2)(B)(i); or
 
 a “particularly serious crime” that makes him a danger to
the community, INA §§ 244(c)(2)(B)(ii); 208(b)(2)(A)(ii).
 
Moncrieffe v. Holder, 133 S. Ct.
1678 (2013)
 
http://www.legalactioncenter.org/practice-
advisories/moncrieffe-v-holder-implications-drug-
charges-and-other-categorical-approach-iss
 
The holding
 
The broader implications
 
Descamps v. US, 133 S. Ct. 2276
(2013)
 
http://www.nationalimmigrationproject.org/legalresources
/practice_advisories/pa_Descamps_Practice_Advisory_6-
26-13.pdf
 
The holding
 
The broader implications
 
BURDEN OF PROOF
BURDEN OF PROOF
 
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has the burden
of proving removability by clear and convincing evidence.
See also 
Matter of Rivens
, 25 I&N Dec. 623 (BIA, Oct. 19,
2011).
 
COURT RULES
 
Immigration Court Practice Manual – effective July 1, 2008 –
READ IT!!  (Oh, please read it…and did I mention? READ IT.)
www.usdoj.gov/eoir
 
for Practice Manual, other resources
Follow all filing deadlines and other rules strictly
 
BOND HEARINGS
 
In Boston, bond hearing scheduled within 3 business days of
your written request.
Court’s decision on bond is usually final.
Analysis: flight risk or danger to community. INA 
§236.
Minimum bond amount: $1500.
Bond money is paid to Immigration & Customs Enforcement
(DRO).
 
HUMANIZE YOUR CLIENT
HUMANIZE YOUR CLIENT
 
1.
Make them more than just a file on the desk.
2.
Contact TAU and find out who is handling the hearing and how
they feel about the case
(617) 565-3141.
3.
Reach out to probation officers and corrections officers and any
other law enforcement who could be helpful.
4.
Get affidavits and motions for telephonic hearings.
5.
When unable to get agreement for assistance, subpoena them
(must be done pursuant to Benchbook and local laws).
 
USEFUL PHONE NUMBERS
 
Immigration Court, Boston: (617) 565-3080
Immigration Court, Hartford: (860) 240-3881
Litigation Unit, Boston: (617) 565-3140
Detention and Removal Operations (for posting bonds,
orders of supervision, and finding out where your client is
detained): (781) 359-7500
 
USEFUL WEBSITES
 
EOIR: 
www.usdoj.gov/eoir
Practice Manual, contact information for all courts, application
forms and fee list.
BIA: 
www.usdoj.gov/eoir/biainfo.htm
Practice Manual, contact information.
AILA: 
www.aila.org
Practice advisories, daily updates, other advocacy tools.
 
HELPFUL RESOURCES
 
Kurzban
Immigrant Legal Resource Center: 
http://www.ilrc.org/crimes
American Immigration Council:
http://www.legalactioncenter.org/practice-advisories-topic
National Immigration Project:
http://www.nationalimmigrationproject.org/publications.htm
http://www.justice.gov/civil/docs_forms/REVISED%20Padilla
%20v.%20Kentucky%20Reference%20Guide_11-8-10.pdf
(dated by a good general overview of proceedings)
http://www.justice.gov/eoir/vll/benchbook/resources/Funda
mentals_of_Immigration_Law.pdf (dated by a good general
overview of proceedings)
Join the American Immigration Lawyers’ Association (AILA)
Slide Note
Embed
Share

This informative content covers various aspects of crimmigration, including sources of law, types of immigration status, the status hierarchy, common acronyms in the field, and important facts about ICE detainers. It sheds light on the nuances surrounding ICE detainer requests and emphasizes the distinction between ICE detainer requests and warrants.

  • Crimmigration
  • Immigration Law
  • ICE Detainers
  • Legal Status
  • Acronyms

Uploaded on Sep 29, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. + CRIMMIGRATION 101 Rachel M. Self, Esq. of Rachel M. Self, P.C, Boston, Chair Hon. Paul M. Gagnon of U.S. Immigration Court, Executive Office for Immigration Review, Boston Hon. Myong J. Joun, Associate Justice of the Boston Municipal Court

  2. +SOURCES OF LAW Immigration and Nationality Act (8 USC) Code of Federal Regulations (8 CFR) Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) 1st Circuit and Supreme Court Decisions

  3. +TYPES OF IMMIGRATION STATUS U.S. Citizen Includes Puerto Rico and U.S. Territories Legal Permanent Resident ( green card ) Non-Immigrant Student Tourist Other types of Visas Out of status or Undocumented Asylum Seekers Temporary Protected Status

  4. +THE STATUS HIREARCHY US Citizen (by birth, acquired, derived, naturalized) Lawful Permanent Resident/Conditional Resident TPS, DACA Immigrant Visas Nonimmigrant visas The undocumented

  5. +Common Acronyms OCC NTA CIMT DHS LPR COV ICE USC GMC CBP TPS IJ ERO/DRO DACA VD EOIR BIA DOJ USCIS CFR PD INA

  6. +WHAT ICE ISNT TELLING YOU ABOUT DETAINERS Important facts about ICE detainers that ICE usually neglects to mention.

  7. +1. ICE DETAINER REQUESTS ARE NOT MANDATORY ICE detainer request is just a request. There is NO PENALTY if local agencies don t comply. No legal requirement for your dept to comply Fed govt has no legal right to force your dept to hold anyone beyond the time when they are eligible for release from state or local custody

  8. +2. ICE DETAINER REQUESTS ARE NOT WARRANTS ICE detainer requests do NOT provide a lawful basis for arrest OR detention. Criminal warrant is issued by a judge + probable cause whereas an ICE detainer is issued by an ICE officer (not judge), because ICE has initiated an investigation into a person s status If ICE detainer is issued, that doesn t mean the individual is actually a non-citizen subject to deportation or even that ICE has probable cause to think so ICE detainer is NOT a criminal detainer Criminal detainer can only be issued if there are charges pending in another jx against a person currently serving a criminal sentence ICE detainers have VIRTUALLY NOTHING IN COMMON with criminal detainers

  9. +3. HOLDING SOMEONE FOR ICE IS EXPENSIVE Holding people @ ICE s request is expensive for state/local. ICE does not reimburse localities for detaining individuals until ICE has assumed actual custody of the individual Can amount to millions of dollars of state/local money being spent for ICE s benefit If you choose to comply with ICE detainers, your agency faces the costs of legal liability. Detainer lawsuits are regular occurrences Although request comes from ICE, the choice to comply means a state/county/city is liable for potential damages.

  10. +4. ICE FREQUENTLY MAKES MISTAKES ICE issues erroneous detainers with disturbing regularity. Example: Rennison Castillo, USC/army vet, was held for 7 months in immigration detention after ICE placed a detainer despite multiple attempts to prove his citizenship After release, ICE admitted mistake. Misspelled his name Assigned him multiple file numbers

  11. +5. GETTING INVOLVED WITH ICE DETAINERS UNDERMINES PUBLIC SAFETY When you choose to comply with ICE detainers, people in the community may come to see you as an arm of ICE. Erosion of people s trust in your officers Reluctance to come forward and report crimes for fear of immigration consequences for themselves or others By declining to comply with ICE detainer requests, you can: Maintain a clear distinction between your officers and federal immigration authorities 1. Encourage people to report crimes and cooperate in community policing efforts 2. Ensure the safety of the whole community. 3.

  12. +PROTECTING YOUR CLIENTS WHO HAVE ICE DETAINERS

  13. +DETAINERS & SECURE COMMUNITIES Most detainers are lodged against those arrested for minor misdemeanors such as traffic offenses like driving without a license Uses fingerprints and FBI data to search automatically after jx signs up

  14. +WHAT IS A DETAINER A notification from ICE to state/local jails that: ICE is investigating whether an individual is removable ICE has issued Notice to Appear There is an arrest warrant for the person, or the person has been ordered removed Usually transmitted via fax or email Often sent from LESC in VT If person is in custody pursuant to a detainer before the detainer arrives, possibly illegal Suspected noncitizen supposed to be given copy, but no requirement to do so No effective way to contest while in custody except habeas corpus

  15. +WHAT A DETAINER IS NOT Not the equivalent of an arrest warrant A determination that an individual is deportable/inadmissible The equivalent of ICE custody over an individual The equivalent of a criminal detainer

  16. +WATCH OUT FOR DISCRIMINATION Sometimes jails tell families that they can t post bond for their loved ones on detainers They CAN post bond but only starts the 48 hr clock; doesn t ensure immediate release Magistrate shouldn t raise bond/revoke solely b/c of detainer Inmates shouldn t be classified as a security risk or lose privileges because of existence of ICE detainer

  17. +LEGAL AUTHORITY FOR DETAINER Requires Ice to consider issuing detainer upon request by local/state/federal agency for persons held on a controlled substances violation Holding agency initiates process, provides info and details No standard of proof in statute for lodging a detainer ICE to expeditiously take custody upon release from other enforcement agency Not limited to controlled substances arrests Extends local custody for up to 48 hours excl. weekends and holidays Law enforcement required to provide all relevant criminal documents An immigration detainer is merely an administrative mechanism to assure that a person subject to confinement will not be released from custody until the party requesting the detainer has an opportunity to act.

  18. +48 HOUR RULE 48 hour rule beings: If criminal case pending, the court orders release and bail is posted; If the case is dismissed; If the individual completes his sentence; The 48 hour rule doesn t begin when ICE says it does

  19. +48 HOUR RULE EXAMPLES Example: Erik s criminal charge dismissed at 12:21 p.m. on Friday. He is returned to jail, where he remains over the weekend subject to ICE detainer. Jail faxes ICE on Tuesday at 10 a.m. stating Erik is ready for pickup. ICE officer calls the jail and reminds jail that ICE pickup days are Wednesdays and Fridays. The jail holds Erik until Wednesday, and ICE picks him up at 7 a.m. Violation? Yes. Erik should have been released by 12:21 p.m. on Tuesday.

  20. +48 HOUR RULE EXAMPLES Note that if the 48-hour clock expires at midnight, it expires then not at 8 a.m. when the ICE office opens. Remedies: Motion to suppress in immigration court Damages actions/injunctive relief v. ICE (Bivens or Federal Tort Claims Act), or v. locals, 42 USC 1983 Habeas to ensure release

  21. +HOW IS A DETAINER ISSUED? Immigration Detainer Notice of Action (Form I-247) Completed by Ice and sent to state/local law enforcement agency Verbal Holds is that a detainer? NO!

  22. +ARE DETAINERS VOLUNTARY OR MANDATORY? ICE has conceded that they are not mandatory as a matter of law in statements to MOCs, litigation, etc. For years however, ICE argued that detainers were mandatory.

  23. +SO WHAT IF THEYRE NOT MANDATORY? If mandatory, it is federal commandeering of local resources = unfunded mandate Detaining individuals solely to verify their immigration status would raise constitutional concerns If not mandatory, the jurisdictions can opt-out of Secure Communities process or limit its application to actual criminal aliens

  24. +May 26, 2016 Moscoso SJ-2016- 0168 Judge Spina issued the following order on a G.L. 211 3 Petition: it is ORDERED that the petition be, and the same is hereby allowed, for the reasons set forth in the petition. Accordingly it is FURTHER ORDERED that because the trial court is without authority to hold the petitioner, or otherwise order him held, on a civil I.C.E. detainer, the defendant must be released upon posting bail, unless he is held on some other process

  25. +DAMAGES ACTIONS Who do you sue: State/local, ICE, both? General rule: whoever has control over the body, which is generally the state/county

  26. +WHAT STRATEGIES CAN BE USED TO DEFEAT DETAINERS? 112 total jurisdictions (and counting!) limiting ICE holds that range from outright refusal to comply to more limited policies Justice Spina s Order is not binding precedent, but defense counsel should argue that honoring such a detainer is unlawful consistent with Justice Spina s Order. Move that the court release the client notwithstanding the detainer. File a motion. Cite to Justice Spina s order. Use this order to advocate for release with the local sherrif of local DOC.

  27. +HOW TO MAKE A POLICY WORK Terminate or limit compliance with Ice detainers and any other warrants that ICE issues e.g. Ice can t use local or state resources, tie it to federal reimbursement Find a clear line in the state penal code for crimes that could be included and only include those that are the most serious with a long period of incarceration Get technical assistance and talk to your criminal defense attorneys!

  28. +HOW CAN YOU HELP SOMEONE WITH A DETAINER?

  29. +TIPS: HOW DO YOU GET SOMEONE RELEASED WHO HAS AN ICE DETAINER? Justice Spina s Order!!!! Know your jail, law enforcement agency, and local law Assess the merits of the individual s case for release Negotiating the release of an individual through the local custodian and/or Ice Seeking judicial review of custodian action

  30. +TIPS: ASSESSING THE MERITS OF THE INDIVIDUAL S CASE FOR RELEASE Is there an immigration hold? Determine whether the immigration hold was issued erroneously Strength of the individual s case for prosecutorial discretion Likelihood that individual will be detained past the 48 hour period

  31. +TIPS: NEGOTIATING RELEASE THROUGH LOCAL CUSTODIAN AND/OR ICE Advocacy with local custodian(s) and counsel Educate the jail on the legal consequences of submitting to the Ice hold and its non-mandatory nature This just got a whole lot easier. Long-term partnership with community organizations, political constituencies, and allies to show the greater community impact of holds and demand a hold policy

  32. + CAREFUL!!!! Justice Spina s Order does not mean that ICE agents can t arrest your client without the help of state authorities. On the street At home Outside the courtroom

  33. +TIPS: LIFT THE DETAINER: NEGOTIATING RELEASE WITH ICE Erroneously issued (USC or LPR who is not removable) Call ICE hotline number (855) 448-6903 to lift the detainer. Are they a good candidate for immigration relief or prosecutorial discretion? Ask the Assistant Field Office Director to cancel the detainer. Risk: disclosing status may cut against immigration strategy Right point of contact

  34. +WORK WITH CRIMINAL COUNSEL Criminal attorney may be family s first call Remind attorney to call you ASAP if arrested or if detainer lodged (no requirement to inform even criminal counsel) Make sure attorney takes scrupulous notes re: timing of plea, dismissal of charges, expiration of sentence, or time bond posted Use attorney to determine if jail is stalling releasing client awaiting a written detainer Use 48-hour window to interview client for immigration, esp. if ICE is likely to transfer client to detention far away Confer about whether it would be helpful to have prosecutor request that ICE bring client back for trial.

  35. +FILE A LAWSUIT! PETITIONS FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS Violations of the 48-hour period Writ of Habeas Corpus for violations of the Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth amendments or equivalent state laws 48-hour challenges

  36. +IMMIGRATION TERMS OF ART Good moral character Crime of Moral Turpitude Conviction Sentence Aggravated Felony Crime of Violence

  37. +CRIMES INVOLVING MORAL TURPITUDE Crimes that are base, vile or depraved, and contrary to the accepted rules of morality and the duties owed between persons or to society in general. Different rules depending on if arriving alien, applicant for admission, or admitted alien (212 vs. 237).

  38. +AGGRAVATED FELONIES List of crimes that are considered aggravated felonies: INA 101(a)(43) Ground of removability only. 212(c), 212(h) waiver available in limited circumstances.

  39. +CRIMES Is it a conviction? a. INA 101(a)(48)(A) definition of conviction a formal judgment of guilt of the respondent entered by a court or, if the adjudication is withheld, where 1)a judge or jury has found the alien guilty or the alien has entered a plea of guilty or of nolo contendre or has admitted to facts sufficient to warrant a finding of guilt; and 2) the judge has ordered some form of punishment, penalty or restraint on the alien s liberty to be imposed. See Matter of Cabrera, 24 I&N Dec. 459 (BIA 2008) CWOF usually a conviction. i. Is it a petty offense? INA 212(a)(2)(A)(ii) or 237(a)(2)(A)(i).

  40. +EFFECTS OF CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS Deportable Offenses Inadmissible Offenses o At entry o Certain Application o Offenses not requiring a conviction Asylum and Particularly Serious Crimes

  41. +EFFECTS OF CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS ON APPLICATIONS Ineligibility for relief o Cancellation of removal o Adjustment of Status o Naturalization Discretion

  42. +DACA INELIGIBILITY Felony conviction Significant Misdemeanor OR Three Non-significant misdemeanors

  43. +TPS INELIGIBILITY one felony, INA 244(c)(2)(B)(i); one misdemeanor, as defined below and including Massachusetts misdemeanors, in which the sentence actually imposed is more than one year of incarceration, either suspended or committed, 8 C.F.R. 244.1; two misdemeanors, if the sentences actually imposed are one year or less, INA 244(c)(2)(B)(i); or a particularly serious crime that makes him a danger to the community, INA 244(c)(2)(B)(ii); 208(b)(2)(A)(ii).

  44. +Moncrieffe v. Holder, 133 S. Ct. 1678 (2013) http://www.legalactioncenter.org/practice- advisories/moncrieffe-v-holder-implications-drug- charges-and-other-categorical-approach-iss The holding The broader implications

  45. +Descamps v. US, 133 S. Ct. 2276 (2013) http://www.nationalimmigrationproject.org/legalresources /practice_advisories/pa_Descamps_Practice_Advisory_6- 26-13.pdf The holding The broader implications

  46. +BURDEN OF PROOF The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has the burden of proving removability by clear and convincing evidence. See also Matter of Rivens, 25 I&N Dec. 623 (BIA, Oct. 19, 2011).

  47. +COURT RULES Immigration Court Practice Manual effective July 1, 2008 READ IT!! (Oh, please read it and did I mention? READ IT.) www.usdoj.gov/eoir for Practice Manual, other resources Follow all filing deadlines and other rules strictly

  48. +BOND HEARINGS In Boston, bond hearing scheduled within 3 business days of your written request. Court s decision on bond is usually final. Analysis: flight risk or danger to community. INA 236. Minimum bond amount: $1500. Bond money is paid to Immigration & Customs Enforcement (DRO).

  49. +HUMANIZE YOUR CLIENT Make them more than just a file on the desk. 1. Contact TAU and find out who is handling the hearing and how they feel about the case (617) 565-3141. 2. Reach out to probation officers and corrections officers and any other law enforcement who could be helpful. 3. Get affidavits and motions for telephonic hearings. 4. When unable to get agreement for assistance, subpoena them (must be done pursuant to Benchbook and local laws). 5.

  50. +USEFUL PHONE NUMBERS Immigration Court, Boston: (617) 565-3080 Immigration Court, Hartford: (860) 240-3881 Litigation Unit, Boston: (617) 565-3140 Detention and Removal Operations (for posting bonds, orders of supervision, and finding out where your client is detained): (781) 359-7500

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#