Comprehensive Review of Soap Production Experiment
This detailed review analyzes a soap production experiment conducted by Nafsika Koutava and Team Fryganiotis I.Y.N.T., highlighting the strengths and weaknesses identified by the reporter and opponent. Suggestions for improvement and points of disagreement are also discussed.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Review -Problem No.16 Soap Production Nafsika Koutava -Team Fryganiotis I.Y.N.T.
Reporter -Pros & Cons 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Excellent definition of the phenomenon. Structured and persuasive presentation. Presence of visual aid & demonstrations. Well-conducted experiments. Interesting results. Understanding graphs. 1. 2. 3. 4. Lack of hypothesis. Didn t explain the experimental setup. Could test and other additives like butter. Experiments conducted in a non-controlled environment. Results not presented. No possible errors and reasons behind them explained. Unclear method(cold/hot) Not enough data presented. No error bars in the graphs 10. Missed some parameters like pH, lather, during time 5. 6. 7. 8. 9.
Opponent -Pros & Cons 1. 2. He mentioned the lack of hypotheses Opponent highlighted the lack of parameters considered. He noticed there were no errors bars considered in the graphs. 1. He didn't notice or mentioned to if the soap was made with the hot or cold process . He insisted too much on the volume and density of the soap and spent too much time on it. He didn't insist on the reasons behind the errors in the experiments. Aggressive and ironic 2. 3. 3. 4.
REPORTER VS OPPONENT-POINTS DISCUSSED 1. Asked how the reporter measured the volume of the soap Said that salt soap is not antibacterial asked how the reporter measured the foam production 1. 2. 3. Did not answer to the question Disagreed Didn t fully answer the question 2. 3.
Our opinion is that the volume of the soap could be measured with a simple volumetric container. We also believe that the soaps are antibacterial, proof for that is the recent researches about the coronavirus.
Suggestions for further improvement Repeat the experiment in order for the results to be more valid. Reporter should explain the experiments better Test more parameters Include error bars
ALL YOU ALL FOR YOUR ATTENTION
