Committee 1: Student Competition
The Committee for the Student Competition at URosario, UFRJ, UG, UTP, UAalborg, and UANL, in collaboration with Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, is responsible for establishing guidelines and rules for the competition. Criteria for the jury composition, promoting the competition, and defining the competition output are part of their tasks. The guidelines focus on various aspects such as the learning process, interdisciplinary work, collaboration with local stakeholders, project sustainability, and international contextualization. Specific verifiable indicators and total points are outlined for each criterion, ensuring a comprehensive evaluation process for the competition.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Committee 1: Student Competition URosario, UFRJ, UG, UTP, UAalborg, UANL Responsible partner: Universidad Aut noma de Nuevo Le n (UANL)
Task Establish guidelines and competition rules Proposal on composition of jury (in collaboration with Com 3) Promoting the competition Proposal output of the competition
Establishing guidelines and competition rules Guidelines Total points or Jury Agreement Criteria 1. Learning process (PBL) 2. Interdisciplinary work 3. Collaboration with local stakeholders 4. Project s contribution to sustainability at the studied territory / project s feasibility 5. International contextualization of the project 6. Supporting the work 25 25 15 15 10 10
Guidelines Criteria Verifiable indicator Total points a. Drafting of the project appropriate to the level of training. b. Theoretical frames / concepts in accordance with the level of training 25 points or c. The problem includes the analysis of a diversity of variables. 1. Learning process (PBL) Jury Agreement d. The project carried out sufficient preliminary research citation. e. The used methodology for developing the project is consistent with the settled goals.
Guidelines Criteria Verifiable indicator Total points a. The used methodology for the analysis allows for reading the territories in its complexity and its integrity. 25 points or b. Interdisciplinary composition of the students group. 2. Interdisciplinary work Jury Agreement c. Definition of roles inside the students group. d. Interdisciplinary disciplines of the teachers who advise the process.
Guidelines Criteria Verifiable indicator Total points a. Terrain visits were made for knowing the community needs in the project. 15 points or 3. Collaboration with local stakeholders b. The points of view of local actors (organizations, institutions of public / private) were taken into account during the process. Jury Agreement
Guidelines Criteria Verifiable indicator Total points a. Argumentation for selecting the problem. 4. Project s contribution to sustainability at the studied territory / project s feasibility 15 points or b. The intervention alternatives are scientifically and technically feasible. Jury Agreement c. The project is based on realities of specific territories.
Guidelines Criteria Verifiable indicator Total points a. The project aims at least to one of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG 11). 5. International contextualization of the project 10 points or Jury b. Students knowledge about the relation of the project with the international context. Agreement
Rules 1. The teams will be composed by four or five members. 2. Each team only can be composed by: a. Undergraduate students. b. Enrolled students during the competition. c. Students from at least two studies programs. 3. Each educative institution is responsible for the selection of the team members. 4. The projects have to be done during the time of the Citylab experience. 5. Each project must have the recommendation and signature of professors who advised the process.
Rules 6. All the institutions have to send a video related with its project at least 15 days before the competition. 7. Each project will be evaluated in two times: a. By the evaluation of the video. b. During a posters presentation at The Citylab Students Fair. 8. Each team has to present two posters at The Citylab Students Fair: a. The size of each poster will be A1 or 90 cm X 60 cm. b. One poster has to show the process of the project. c. The other poster has to show the project by itself. 9. After observing the projects, the jury will have a discussion, and the members will determinate the winner team.
Proposal on composition of jury (in collaboration with Com 3) The Project coordinator: Tom Coppens. A Columbus Association member: Daniel Samoilovich. A United Cities and Local Governments (UCLG) member: Sara Hoeflich. A Universidad del Rosario member (as guest institution and project co- coordinator): Mar a Jimena Rodr guez Pinz n. A member from the European Universities: Andr s Felipe Valderrama Pineda.
Promoting the competition Pending: To define with other committees XXX
Proposal output of the competition Pending: To define with other committees XXX
