Campaign Rhetoric
Rhetoric, the art of persuasive language use, plays a crucial role in political campaigns, focusing on public speaking to sway audience opinions. The ethical implications, such as the use of noble ideas versus dishonest strategies, are also key considerations. Factors affecting persuasiveness include language choice, visual imagery, emotional appeal, delivery, and audience beliefs. The study of rhetoric delves into effective symbol use and the impact of propaganda, emphasizing the importance of ethical communication in influencing public opinion.
Uploaded on Mar 07, 2024 | 0 Views
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Rhetoric Rhetoric is the use of language to please or persuade (wordnetweb.princeton.edu) The main focus of the study of rhetoric has been on public speaking with the intent to persuade an audience to accept the speaker s position Especially political speech
Another view A more expansive view would see rhetoric as the study of the effective use of symbols
Political campaigns and rhetoric One could argue that all persuasive strategies and tactics in campaign communication can be evaluated according to the scholarship of rhetoric Theories and research on persuasion Speechmaking is the topic most directly tied to traditional rhetoric
Ethics Since at least as long ago as the ancient Greeks there has been an ethical debate over the use of various persuasive strategies Outright lies Misleading presentation Failure to reveal pertinent information Use of emotional arguments rather than logical ones
On the other hand, use of noble, uplifting ideas to persuade may be an important contributor to laudable behavior or social betterment Speeches allow the candidate to communicate directly with the electorate without the mediation of newspeople, spokespersons, etc. An opportunity to inform, persuade and inspire the audience
Aristotle Pathos emotion Ethos speaker character Logos logic or reason
What factors affect persuasiveness? Language use Visual imagery Framing Emotion Delivery Audience involvement/beliefs
Propaganda Propaganda is persuasive media content
Institute for Propaganda Analysis In the hope of reducing the impact of irrational propaganda on the populace in the wake of WWI, IPA was formed A number of studies, articles meant to help people see through false and misleading presentation, critique propaganda
Seven propaganda devices Name calling Glittering generalities Transfer Testimonial Plain folks Card stacking Band wagon
Rhetors use a number of techniques to connect their favored policies with beliefs that are widely revered and to connect those they oppose to ideas that are widely seen as evil or repugnant
Are misconceptions corrected over time? Misconceptions about the health care bill are still circulating
Is emotion or logic more persuasive? For most people most of the time, emotional appeals are more persuasive Impact decreases as audience knowledge increases
The role of the audience A strong tendency toward biased reception, retention Ignore disconfirming evidence Interpret ambiguous information as support Consider sources that deliver information contrary to beliefs to be biased Seek out confirmatory content, avoid disconfirmatory Cable TV, Internet/Web have made this much easier
The role of the audience Gain pleasure from group support, intellectual competition More the case with committed partisans May actively demonstrate support, chant with the speaker, boo the opposition, etc.
Existing knowledge The more knowledgeable an individual is on a topic the less persuadable she is Complicated and powerful schema The less knowledgeable and individual is, the more persuadable he is, and the more peripheral cues are effective in persuasion
Framing Constructing a larger worldview that sets the context for the interpretation of events, people, issues and issue positions, etc. Once in place it is hard to change both at the individual and aggregate levels Pro Choice v. Pro Life Frames are constructed through rhetoric and invoked through language
Lakoff The Difference Between Framing and Messaging Framing is the most commonplace thing we do with thought and language. Frames are the cognitive structures we think with. They are physical, embodied in neural circuitry. Frames come in systems. Their circuitry is strengthened and often made permanent through use: the more the circuits are used, the stronger they get. Effective frames are not isolated. They build on, and extend, other frames already established. All words are defined in terms of conceptual frames. When the words are heard, the frames are strengthened -- not just the immediate frames, but the whole system.
High-level, moral frames matter more Most framing is unconscious Framing is long-term Prototype frames Bi-conceptual frames Contested concepts
According to Lakoff, opinion differences between liberals and conservatives follow from the fact that they subscribe with different strength to two different metaphors about the relationship of the state to its citizens. Both see governance through metaphors of the family.
Conservatives would subscribe more strongly and more often to a model that he calls the "strict father model" and has a family structured around a strong, dominant "father" (government), and assumes that the "children" (citizens) need to be disciplined to be made into responsible "adults" (morality, self-financing). Once the "children" are "adults", though, the "father" should not interfere with their lives: the government should stay out of the business of those in society who have proved their responsibility.
In contrast, Lakoff argues that liberals place more support in a model of the family, which he calls the "nurturant parent model", based on "nurturant values", where both "mothers" and "fathers" work to keep the essentially good "children" away from "corrupting influences" (pollution, social injustice, poverty, etc.). Lakoff says that most people have a blend of both metaphors applied at different times, and that political speech works primarily by invoking these metaphors and urging the subscription of one over the other.
Current frames Tax and spend liberals Socialism Tea Party patriots War on Terrorism War on Drugs Illegal aliens Bailout
Goals of public speeches Provide important information to the audience Persuade listeners to prefer you to your opposition Generate a positive view of yourself Generate a negative view of your opponents Generate media coverage Sound bites that further your campaign
Major speech forms (Trent) Announcement speech Nomination acceptance speech News conferences Apologia Why I m Running
Announcement speech Goals: Clearly signals candidate s intention to run May serve to discourage competition Indicate why the candidate is running Initiate the themes of the campaign Strategies Timing Place Who do you share the spotlight with? Content
Announcement speech content Three typical themes: Candidates announce that they are, in fact, running They explain why they are running They suggest the likelihood of their victory
Timing of announcement Hagel Obama
Follow-up Publicity-gaining strategies Walking tour of state (Missouri governor Walking Joe Teasdale) Follow-up communications Endorsements Travels Kucinich reannouncement tour
Acceptance address Goals/purposes of the address The candidate publicly assumes the role of a candidate/leader of the party Generate a strong positive response from the immediate audience Unify the party Serve as a strong persuasive message Immediate audience Remote audience (TV)
Acceptance strategies Simplified partisan statements Laments about the present and celebrations about the future Stress on the crucial nature of the election Attempts to seek support from the entire constituency Using biography Comparison with opponent
Apologia Goals Explain statement or behavior that casts doubts on the suitability of the candidate Explain the behavior or statement in a positive light Justify the behavior Remove the topic from public discussion
