A Comparative Analysis of UBNT Rocket5AC Prism and ePMP2000 Products
This detailed comparison delves into the performance metrics of UBNT Rocket5AC Prism and ePMP2000 products, covering aspects like firmware versions, operational capacity, GPS sync, sector performance, throughput in different scenarios, and subscriber module connections. The analysis provides valuable insights for networking professionals evaluating these products for their specific needs.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
UBNT Rocket5AC Prism vs ePMP2000 Product tested: Rocket5AC Prism Firmware: 8.3.0(official) vs ePMP 2000 Firmware 3.5
UBNT AC: Capacity Up to 60 CPEs can be connected in fixed-frame mode as of airOS v8.3. (up to 100 CPEs is announced for Gen2)
UBNT GPS Sync: PtMP Sector Performance UBNT AC (5ms 67/33) vs ePMP2000 (5ms 75/25), 20 MHz, MCS fixed to QAM-64, No Interference TCP Unidirectional 90 83 80 70 70 70 70 71 Throughput, Mbps 69 69 68 60 50 40 25 30 18 18 18 20 19 10 15 15 14 0 1 10 Number of Subscriber Modules 20 30 ePMP UL UBNT UL ePMP DL UBNT DL
UBNT GPS Sync: PtMP Sector Performance UBNT AC (5ms 67/33) vs ePMP2000 (5ms 75/25), 20 MHz, MCS fixed to QAM-64, Uplink Interference TCP Unidirectional 80 69 67 66 66 70 60 Throughput, Mbps 50 45 44 42 40 40 30 18 20 11 8 7 10 8 8 6 5 1 0 10 20 30 Number of Subscriber Modules ePMP UL UBNT UL ePMP DL UBNT DL
UBNT GPS Sync: PtMP Sector Performance UBNT AC (5ms 67/33) vs ePMP2000 (5ms 75/25), 40 MHz, MCS fixed to QAM-64, No Interference TCP Unidirectional 160 148 146 144 140 147 142 122 140 139 120 Throughput, Mbps 100 80 52 60 38 38 36 40 40 31 20 28 27 0 1 10 Number of subscriber Modules 20 30 ePMP UL UBNT UL ePMP DL UBNT DL
UBNT GPS Sync: PtMP Sector Performance UBNT AC (5ms 67/33) vs ePMP2000 (5ms 75/25), 40 MHz, MCS fixed to QAM-64, Uplink Interference TCP Unidirectional 160 146 145 143 134 140 113 120 110 107 Throughput, Mbps 100 87 80 60 40 25 23 18 16 20 23 19 16 16 0 1 10 20 30 Number of Subscriber Modules ePMP UL UBNT UL ePMP DL UBNT DL
UBNT GPS Sync: PtMP Sector Performance SECTOR T-PUT WITH 30 SMS (TCP UNIDIRECTIONAL) WITH NO INTERFERENCE, NO MCS LIMITATION ePMP UL UBNT UL ePMP DL UBNT DL 80 40MHz/8ms/50-50 130 32 30 40MHz/5ms/67-33 Operational Mode 120 155 63 54 40MHz/5ms/50-50 97 123 16 16 20MHz/5ms/67-33 71 80 36 40 20MHz/5ms/50-50 44 57 0 20 40 60 80 Throughput, Mbps 100 120 140 160 180
UBNT GPS Sync: PtMP Sector Performance SECTOR T-PUT WITH 30 SMS (UDP BIDIRECTIONAL) WITH NO INTERFERENCE, NO MCS LIMITATION ePMP UL UBNT UL ePMP DL UBNT DL 78 40MHz/8ms/50-50 128 29 0 40MHz/5ms/67-33 119 Operational Mode 0 68 0 40MHz/5ms/50-50 94 0 16 10 20MHz/5ms/67-33 70 75 37 39 20MHz/5ms/50-50 45 47 0 20 40 60 Throughput, Mbps 80 100 120 140 *0 high packets losses with any rate running through
UBNT GPS Sync: PtMP Sector Performance SECTOR T-PUT WITH 30 SMS (UDP BIDIRECTIONAL) WITH CO-CHANNEL INTERFERENCE IN UPLINK, NO MCS LIMITATION UBNT UL ePMP UL UBNT DL ePMP DL 40 40MHz/8ms/50-50 65 0 17 40MHz/5ms/67-33 0 Operational Mode 119 0 52 40MHz/5ms/50-50 0 92 6 8 20MHz/5ms/67-33 40 70 0 24 20MHz/5ms/50-50 0 44 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Throughput, Mbps *0 DL traffic got stuck on UBNT AP AC
UBNT GPS Sync: PtMP Sector Performance SECTOR T-PUT WITH 30 SMS (TCP BIDIRECTIONAL) WITH CO-CHANNEL INTERFERENCE IN UPLINK, NO MCS LIMITATION UBNT UL ePMP UL UBNT DL ePMP DL 31 40MHz/8ms/50-50 87 9 20 40MHz/5ms/67-33 91 Operational Mode 114 24 48 40MHz/5ms/50-50 82 94 5 9 20MHz/5ms/67-33 51 68 11 23 20MHz/5ms/50-50 34 42 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Throughput, Mbps
