SEARS-MT Initiative: Enhancing Mathematics Teaching Quality in Southeast Asia

 
Ui Hock CHEAH
 
Phase 1
 
From Mid 2012 – March 2013
Early preparations leading to the First Workshop held
on  12 -14 Mar 2013
 
Workshop 1
 
12 – 14 Mar 2013
Consultants from Australia, Japan, Malaysia
Participants from Thailand, Indonesia, Malaysia,
Philippines
Result: First draft of the SEARS-MT after much brain
storming
 
Workshop 2
 
 2 – 5 July 2013
Consultants from Australia and Japan
Country Experts from 9 Southeast Asian Countries:
Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, 
Laos, Malaysia,
Myanmar, Philippines, Thailand, Timor Leste,
Vietnam
 
 
Result of the  Workshop 2: A SEARS-MT document
endorsed by the 9 countries of Southeast Asia
9 country reports
 
Country Reports
 
Each country report was written to answer the
following questions:
 
 
1. How are judgments made about the quality of
mathematics teachers and mathematics teaching in
the country?
 
2. What are the guidelines that are used to make these
judgments about mathematics teaching and
mathematics teachers’ quality?
 
3. What aspects of quality mathematics teaching
require further exploration and support?
 
Issues concerning SEARS-MT
 
The standards are aspirational. How can this be
actualized in each country?
What local descriptors can best illustrate how the
standards are manifested in each country?
Further research need to specify specifically the
standards for specific levels e.g. what is the minimum
content knowledge needed by teachers to teach
elementary and high school?
Do we need different standards for beginning,
intermediate and master teachers?
Slide Note
Embed
Share

The SEARS-MT Initiative aimed to improve mathematics teaching quality in Southeast Asia through workshops with consultants and country experts, resulting in a comprehensive SEARS-MT document endorsed by nine countries. Country reports delved into judgments, guidelines, and areas needing support, while addressing issues on manifesting standards at different teacher levels and content knowledge requirements. The initiative highlighted the importance of actualizing aspirational standards and local descriptors to enhance teaching quality.


Uploaded on Aug 28, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Ui Hock CHEAH

  2. Phase 1 From Mid 2012 March 2013 Early preparations leading to the First Workshop held on 12 -14 Mar 2013

  3. Workshop 1 12 14 Mar 2013 Consultants from Australia, Japan, Malaysia Participants from Thailand, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines Result: First draft of the SEARS-MT after much brain storming

  4. Workshop 2 2 5 July 2013 Consultants from Australia and Japan Country Experts from 9 Southeast Asian Countries: Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Thailand, Timor Leste, Vietnam

  5. Result of the Workshop 2: A SEARS-MT document endorsed by the 9 countries of Southeast Asia 9 country reports

  6. Country Reports Each country report was written to answer the following questions: 1. How are judgments made about the quality of mathematics teachers and mathematics teaching in the country? 2. What are the guidelines that are used to make these judgments about mathematics teaching and mathematics teachers quality? 3. What aspects of quality mathematics teaching require further exploration and support?

  7. Issues concerning SEARS-MT The standards are aspirational. How can this be actualized in each country? What local descriptors can best illustrate how the standards are manifested in each country? Further research need to specify specifically the standards for specific levels e.g. what is the minimum content knowledge needed by teachers to teach elementary and high school? Do we need different standards for beginning, intermediate and master teachers?

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#