Airport Construction Delivery Methods Comparison
Explore different construction delivery methods such as Design-Build, Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR), and Design-Bid-Build for airport projects. Understand the pros and cons of each method to make informed decisions based on factors like timeline, cost savings, risk management, and control over the project.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Operations/Construction/Planning Duluth International Airport ATCT Architecture and Engineering RFQ Update ATCT Construction Delivery Method 2023 Construction Season Update VMS Software Change Over Duluth Sky Harbor Airport Airport Terminal Program Sky Harbor Airport Terminal Design
Design - Build A single entity who controls all aspects of design and construction. Pros: Cons: Faster overall timeline to completion Design -> Construction Autonomy Efficient Communication Can see cost savings Construction can start before final design is complete Longer design time Cannot have a separate construction company oversee construction Greater risk of change orders Less control once a GMP has been agreed too Too many unknowns with the FAA Overall new to airport industry
Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) A construction manager hired by the owner to complete design and construction under a Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) Pros: Cons: Most of the time accompanied by a GMP Can see cost savings Transfer of risk from owner to CM Longer design time Too many unknowns with the FAA Less control once a GMP has been agreed too Potential conflicts as CM is also the GC.
Design - Bid - Build Firm that designs a project, puts it out for bid, and then hires GC/CMA to complete construction. Pros: Cons: Traditional and familiar to the DAA Greatest speed during design phase Greatest flexibility during design phase Designer will oversee construction through completion A longer process overall No contractor input in design
Why Did the DAA Choose Design-Bid-Build? Too many unknowns at this point Speed needed during the design phase Most flexible to respond to guidance changes Familiar to the DAA/FAA
Operations/Construction/Planning Duluth International Airport ATCT Architecture and Engineering RFQ Update ATCT Construction Delivery Method 2023 Construction Season Update VMS Software Change Over Duluth Sky Harbor Airport Airport Terminal Program Sky Harbor Airport Terminal Design
Operations/Construction/Planning Duluth International Airport ATCT Architecture and Engineering RFQ Update ATCT Construction Delivery Method 2023 Construction Season Update VMS Software Change Over Duluth Sky Harbor Airport Airport Terminal Program Sky Harbor Airport Terminal Design
