Excellence Through Innovation Award Overview
This presentation showcases the Excellence Through Innovation Award process, including a brief description of the project, leadership mission, out-of-the-box thinking, impact and replicability focus, rubric details, and evaluation criteria for the award. Also, it highlights the expectations and marks distribution for innovative projects emphasizing leadership, strategic thinking, and future impact.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Excellence Through Innovation Award
Leadership Our Mission
Out-of-the-box-thinking Our Mission
Impact, Enthusiasm & Replicability Our Mission
Thank You For Your Consideration
Rubric The following show the expectations for each criterion.
Excellence Through Innovation Award Rubric 1 -3 MARKS NOT ANSWERED, INAPPROPRIATE, INEFFECTIVE 7-9 MARKS EXTRAORDINARY, INSIGHTFUL, STRATEGIC This project thoroughly highlights innovative leadership and details plans for future innovative work that is currently taking place or set to take place in the near future. This project demonstrates clear out-of-the-box or cutting-edge thinking. Novel strategies were developed to address the challenge at hand. Resources available were strategically used to enhance the implementation of the project. 4-6 MARKS ADEQUATE, COMPETENT, SATISFACTORY CRITERIA This project shows little to no innovative leadership with little reference to how this will be used in future innovative works. The project clearly demonstrated innovative leadership and has set the stage for potential future innovative work. Leadership This project does not demonstrate cutting-edge thinking. The project used unoriginal strategies to address the challenge at hand. Resources available were either not used or inappropriately used. This project demonstrates some out- of-the-box or cutting-edge thinking. This project used some novel strategies to address the challenges at hand. Resources available were used efficiently and effectively. Out-of-the-box- thinking
Excellence Through Innovation Award Rubric 1 -3 MARKS NOT ANSWERED, INAPPROPRIATE, INEFFECTIVE 7-9 MARKS EXTRAORDINARY, INSIGHTFUL, STRATEGIC This project provides clear and effective steps that can be applied to challenges beyond the initial scope. The strategies, resources, and ideas used can be widely applied to address future challenges. This project details lasting change and evidence for effective applications towards future situations. 4-6 MARKS ADEQUATE, COMPETENT, SATISFACTORY CRITERIA This project outlines some clear steps that can be applied to other challenges outside the parameters described. Some of the strategies, resources, and ideas used can be widely used to address other challenges and can be adapted for future use. The project shows evidence of lasting success and some applicability for future situations. This project does not demonstrate widespread applicability. Strategies, resources, and ideas are not viable outside the scope of this project. It is not indicated how the innovation can be adapted for future use. The success of the project is limited to the current situation and does not show adequate evidence for applicability in future situations. Replicability
Excellence Through Innovation Award Rubric 1 -3 MARKS NOT ANSWERED, INAPPROPRIATE, INEFFECTIVE 7-9 MARKS EXTRAORDINARY, INSIGHTFUL, STRATEGIC There is a clear overview of the evaluation process and the critical success factors were used to measure the success of the program, product or service. Data and metrics were used to evaluate key performance measures. The key performance measures connect with the goal and objectives. There is a clear understanding of how the results were collected. The support material is used effectively to clearly demonstrate the project to show how the project made fundamental changes and/or moved the club forward. 4-6 MARKS ADEQUATE, COMPETENT, SATISFACTORY CRITERIA The results are unclear. The outcomes are not measured. There is little or no understanding of the impact of the project. The key performance measures have not been identified. There is no data or metrics provided to demonstrate the success of the program, product or service. There is no explanation about what was done or why. The support material do not demonstrate success of the program, product, or service to show how the project made fundamental changes and/or moved the club forward. The evaluation measures were connected to the objectives that were set and the methods of measurement were appropriate. There is an overview of the planning, development, implementation, learnings, and evaluation. The support material is used to demonstrate the success of the program, product, or service to show how the project made fundamental changes and/or moved the club forward. Impact/Enthusiasm
