Y Chromosomal Haplogroups in Genetic Studies

 
Using Y chromosomal haplogroups in
genetic association studies and
suggested implications
 
Translation:
 “Can (non-recombining) paternal ancestry
 
         information be of any use in GWAS?”
 
Erzurumluoglu
 et al
., Apr 2016
 
Journal club: 15/06/16
Mesut Erzurumluoglu
 
Nice review
:
Use of Y chromosome and mitochondrial DNA population structure in tracing
human migrations. Underhill 
et al.
, 2007, Ann Rev Genet
Fantastic website
:
http://www.eupedia.com/europe/origins_haplogroups_europe.shtml
 
Introduction to Population Genetics
 
Example of transmission of
autosomes (and X
chromosome) to offspring
 
Father
 
Mother
 
Children
 
 
Recombination event
during meiosis
 
Inheriting Y-DNA and mtDNA
 
National Geographic
 
Y-DNA phylogenetic tree
 
Underhill 
et al
, Dec 2007
 
Haplogroups
 
“Group of haplotypes which share a
common ancestor with a SNP mutation”
Exercise next slide
Can give information about ancestry,
bottlenecks (e.g. war, catastrophe),
migrations and disease
Where anthropology, history and genetics
meets
 
Haplogroups – Exercise
 
SNP 1
 
SNP 1
 
SNP 1
 
SNP 2
 
SNP 2
 
SNP 2
 
SNP 3
 
SNP 4
 
SNP 5
 
SNP 6
 
SNP 7
 
SNP 8
 
SNP 6
 
6 individuals (males) genotyped at 8 Y-DNA SNP loci
How many haplogroups (clusters) are there?
 
Haplogroups
 
SNP 1
 
SNP 1
 
SNP 1
 
SNP 2
 
SNP 3
 
SNP 4
 
SNP 5
 
SNP 7
 
Haplogroup A
Ancestral SNP: SNP1
 
Haplogroup B
Ancestral SNP: SNP2
 
Haplogroup B1
Ancestral SNP: SNP6
 
Introduction to study
 
In apparently homogeneous populations (as defined by
PCA), there is still Y-DNA haplogroup variation which
will result from population history.
Therefore, hidden stratification and/or differential
phenotypic effects by Y-DNA haplogroups could exist
To test this, we hypothesised that stratifying individuals
according to their Y-DNA haplogroups before testing
associations between autosomal SNPs and phenotypes
will yield difference in association
Chose to study BMI as a few Y-DNA haplogroups have
been directly associated with cardio-metabolic
diseases
Larger sample sizes in ALSPAC and 1958BC
BMI studies were well-established at the time of study
(2012)
 
Theory
 
Is there Y-DNA variability and sub-clustering within a PCA defined
‘homogenous’ cluster (e.g. in CEU)?
 
A real life example would be the North/South sub-clustering that one observes
in some populations (e.g. Italian)
 
PC1
 
PC2
 
Y-DNA haplogroup
R and I?
 
Aims and objectives
 
Derive Y-DNA haplogroups of 6,537 males
from two cohorts
ALSPAC (N=5,080, 816 Y-DNA SNPs)
1958 Birth Cohort (N=1,457, 1,849 Y-DNA
SNPs)
Carry out association study within different
strata using 32 (published) BMI SNPs
Explore (sub)stratification within PCA
defined groups
Does it exist?
What effect? If any…
 
Methods
 
Genome-wide SNP chip genotyping of 9,912 individuals
QC – PLINK
Individuals
Mismatch of sex
Minimal or excessive heterozygosity
<0.320 and >0.345 for the Sanger data
<0.310 and >0.330 for the LabCorp data
Individual missingness >3%
Cryptic relatedness >10% IBD
Non-European (and White) ancestry
SNPs
MAF <1%
Call rate <95%
HWE P<5e-7
Pseudo-autosomal region
Imputation – MaCH
 
Methods (continued)
 
Y-DNA haplogroup determination – Yfitter
Haplogroups clustered under ‘Clade’ name
Association study between BMI and the Y-DNA
haplogroups in ALSPAC - Stata
Individuals in haplogroup R used as baseline (coded as ‘0’),
and individuals in haplogroup I coded as ‘
1
Covariates: Age, age^
2
 and top 10 PCs
Analysis of the effects of Y-DNA haplogroups on SNPs
associated with BMI - Stata
32 SNPs associated with BMI (Speliotes 
et al
, 2010)
Covariates: Age, age^
2
 and top 10 PCs
Likelihood ratio test
Compare the two regression models: With and without an
interaction term (genotype dosage x Y-DNA haplogroup)
Replication in 1958BC - Stata
 
Results – ALSPAC
9,912 participants with
500,527 genotyped SNPs
Y-DNA haplogroup clades R
(72%) and I (19%)
8,365 unrelated
individuals
QC
Y-DNA
5,080 males with Y-DNA
haplogroup data
Y-DNA Clades
Haplogroup
 
Results – ALSPAC Y-DNA profile
Results – ALSPAC Y-DNA profile
 
Y-DNA haplogroups in ALSPAC
ALSPAC has within it individuals belonging to 12 of the major Y-DNA haplogroups (C, E, G, H, I,
J, L, N, O, Q, R, T), albeit only 5 of the groups have 50 (>1%) or more individuals in them. These
five clades are E, G, I, J and R and have 153 (3%), 94 (1.9%), 960 (19%), 142 (2.8%) and 3564
(72%) individuals in them respectively.
 
Results – 1958BC Y-DNA profile
Results – 1958BC Y-DNA profile
 
Y-DNA haplogroups in 1958 Birth Cohort (Dataset: EGAD00000000022)
1958BC has within it individuals belonging to five major Y-DNA haplogroups (E, I, J, C, R), albeit
2 of the groups have less than 50 individuals in them. The clades E, I, J, C and R have 44 (3%),
296 (20%), 34 (2%), 1 and 1078 (74%) individuals in them respectively.
 
Results – Direct Association
Results – Direct Association
 
Linear regression between BMI and Y-DNA haplogroup I in ALSPAC and 1958BC
The z-test for heterogeneity shows that the effect size of Y-DNA haplogroup I on BMI is
differential depending on the cohort (albeit not to be taken seriously as result has not been
replicated somewhere else – see discussion slide)
 
Figures a-c: Subgroup analysis comparing effect size of rs8050136 on BMI in two Y-DNA
haplogroups
The statistics above represent p values from the likelihood ratio test for interaction between Y-DNA
haplogroup I and rs8050136 (
FTO
). Heterogeneity tests (z test) comparing Y-DNA haplogroups I
and R yielded p values of 0.005, 0.4169 and 0.014 for a, b and c respectively. ggplot2 package in R
was used to create the plot.
 
Results – Interaction
Results – Interaction
 
ALSPAC
 
1958BC
 
ALSPAC + 1958BC
 
Results – Sub-clustering
Results – Sub-clustering
 
PC1
 
PC2
 
Y-DNA haplogroup vs top two principal components in ALSPAC individuals
Plotting the Y-DNA haplogroup clades on a PCA plot reveals that there is 
no 
apparent sub-clustering
within the ALSPAC individuals. Thus adding Y-DNA haplogroup information as covariates to control
for additional population stratification in ALSPAC is not needed
 
Conclusions
 
Haplogroup R is the most frequent (72%) and I
the second most common Y-DNA haplogroup
(19%) in ALSPAC (and 1958BC)
There was no strong evidence of association
between Y-DNA haplogroups and BMI
P=0.066 in ALSPAC
P=0.107 in 1958 cohort
One instance of heterogeneity (p= 0.008)
between the two haplogroups was observed
Beta=0.266 (SE=0.066) and 0.079 (SE=0.032) in Y-
DNA haplogroup I and R respectively
But result not replicated in 1958BC
No sub-clustering observed in ALSPAC
 
Discussion
 
Population stratification is a potential confounder in genetic
association studies. Haplotypic variation and sub-clustering
can still be present even after accounting for principal
components
Largest Y-DNA haplogroup analysis
Largest Y-DNA haplogroup profile for the (South-West of
the) UK
First analysis of its kind
i.e. a stratified approach using Y-DNA haplogroups
No sub-clustering observed in ALSPAC
Structure in common variant analysis does not seem to be a
problem after controlling for principal components
If result was replicated, Y-DNA haplogroup I could potential
have been a marker for an (unknown) epigenetic (GxE) or
epistatic (GxG) interaction – following slide
 
Discussion
 
Stratified analysis of Y-DNA haplogroups could be
used to:
(i)
Inform genetic association studies by identifying which
haplogroup(s) account for the association
(ii)
Assess the strength of known associations and
observing whether it still holds in all Y-DNA
haplogroups
(iii)
Observe an effect modification
(iv)
In relation to point (iii), determine whether the effect
modification observed gives a hint about epigenetic
(GxE) interactions or epistasis (GxG) occurring
between the autosomal loci being analysed and the Y-
DNA loci associated with the haplogroup(s) in which
one observes that effect modification
(i)
Y-DNA (or mtDNA) haplogroup info could be a way of
identifying sub-groups of individuals for different
traits/diseases. Real-life example: BiDil (a drug for the
treatment of heart failure in self-identified black patients)
 
Limitations of Y-DNA haplogroup
studies
 
Y-DNA haplogroup analyses excludes
females
Sample size, especially in deeper branches
of the Y-DNA phylogenetic tree
Very hard to find independent cohorts to
replicate studies
ALSPAC and 1958BC studies kids and adults
Even Europe-based (non-UK) cohorts have
remarkably different Y-DNA haplogroup
profiles
 
Appendices
 
European Y-DNA haplogroups
 
 
European mtDNA haplogroups
 
 
My haplogroups
 
Y-DNA haplogroup = R1b1b2a
 
R1b1b2 is the most common haplogroup in western Europe (>50% of
men). Ancient representatives of the haplogroup were among the first
people to repopulate the western part of Europe after the Ice Age
ended about 12,000 years ago.
 
Region: Europe
Example Populations: Irish, Basques, British, French
 
23andme
 
My haplogroups
 
mtDNA haplogroup = H1
 
Haplogroup H1 is widespread in Europe, especially the western part of
the continent. It originated about 13,000 years ago (likely in the Iberian
peninsula), not long after the Ice Age ended
 
Region: Europe, Near East, Central Asia, Northwestern Africa
Example Populations: Norway (30%), Spanish (25%), Berbers, Lebanese
Highlight: H1 appears to have been common in Doggerland, an ancient land now flooded by
the North Sea.
 
23andme
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Exploring the utility of non-recombining paternal ancestry information in Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) through the analysis of Y chromosomal haplogroups. This review delves into the implications of using Y chromosome and mitochondrial DNA data in tracing human migrations, ancestry, bottlenecks, and disease patterns. The study also highlights the importance of considering Y-DNA haplogroups in association studies to uncover hidden stratifications and differential phenotypic effects. The research involves investigating the relationship between Y-DNA haplogroups and traits such as BMI and cardio-metabolic diseases using large sample sizes from established studies.

  • Genetics
  • Y Chromosome
  • Haplogroups
  • Population Genetics
  • GWAS

Uploaded on Oct 01, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Using Y chromosomal haplogroups in genetic association studies and suggested implications Erzurumluoglu et al., Apr 2016 Translation: Can (non-recombining) paternal ancestry information be of any use in GWAS? Nice review: Use of Y chromosome and mitochondrial DNA population structure in tracing human migrations. Underhill et al., 2007, Ann Rev Genet Fantastic website: http://www.eupedia.com/europe/origins_haplogroups_europe.shtml Journal club: 15/06/16 Mesut Erzurumluoglu

  2. Introduction to Population Genetics Father Mother Children Example of transmission of autosomes (and X chromosome) to offspring Recombination event during meiosis

  3. Inheriting Y-DNA and mtDNA National Geographic

  4. Y-DNA phylogenetic tree Underhill et al, Dec 2007

  5. Haplogroups Group of haplotypes which share a common ancestor with a SNP mutation Exercise next slide Can give information about ancestry, bottlenecks (e.g. war, catastrophe), migrations and disease Where anthropology, history and genetics meets

  6. Haplogroups Exercise SNP 1 SNP 1 SNP 4 SNP 1 SNP 3 SNP 5 SNP 8 SNP 6 SNP 2 SNP 6 SNP 2 SNP 2 SNP 7 6 individuals (males) genotyped at 8 Y-DNA SNP loci How many haplogroups (clusters) are there?

  7. Haplogroups SNP 1 SNP 4 SNP 6 SNP 2 SNP 2 SNP 1 SNP 1 SNP 7 SNP 3 SNP 8 SNP 5 SNP 6 SNP 2 Haplogroup A Ancestral SNP: SNP1 Haplogroup B1 Ancestral SNP: SNP6 Haplogroup B Ancestral SNP: SNP2

  8. Introduction to study In apparently homogeneous populations (as defined by PCA), there is still Y-DNA haplogroup variation which will result from population history. Therefore, hidden stratification and/or differential phenotypic effects by Y-DNA haplogroups could exist To test this, we hypothesised that stratifying individuals according to their Y-DNA haplogroups before testing associations between autosomal SNPs and phenotypes will yield difference in association Chose to study BMI as a few Y-DNA haplogroups have been directly associated with cardio-metabolic diseases Larger sample sizes in ALSPAC and 1958BC BMI studies were well-established at the time of study (2012)

  9. Theory Y-DNA haplogroup R and I? PC1 PC2 Is there Y-DNA variability and sub-clustering within a PCA defined homogenous cluster (e.g. in CEU)? A real life example would be the North/South sub-clustering that one observes in some populations (e.g. Italian)

  10. Aims and objectives Derive Y-DNA haplogroups of 6,537 males from two cohorts ALSPAC (N=5,080, 816 Y-DNA SNPs) 1958 Birth Cohort (N=1,457, 1,849 Y-DNA SNPs) Carry out association study within different strata using 32 (published) BMI SNPs Explore (sub)stratification within PCA defined groups Does it exist? What effect? If any

  11. Methods Genome-wide SNP chip genotyping of 9,912 individuals QC PLINK Individuals Mismatch of sex Minimal or excessive heterozygosity <0.320 and >0.345 for the Sanger data <0.310 and >0.330 for the LabCorp data Individual missingness >3% Cryptic relatedness >10% IBD Non-European (and White) ancestry SNPs MAF <1% Call rate <95% HWE P<5e-7 Pseudo-autosomal region Imputation MaCH

  12. Methods (continued) Y-DNA haplogroup determination Yfitter Haplogroups clustered under Clade name Association study between BMI and the Y-DNA haplogroups in ALSPAC - Stata Individuals in haplogroup R used as baseline (coded as 0 ), and individuals in haplogroup I coded as 1 Covariates: Age, age^2 and top 10 PCs Analysis of the effects of Y-DNA haplogroups on SNPs associated with BMI - Stata 32 SNPs associated with BMI (Speliotes et al, 2010) Covariates: Age, age^2 and top 10 PCs Likelihood ratio test Compare the two regression models: With and without an interaction term (genotype dosage x Y-DNA haplogroup) Replication in 1958BC - Stata

  13. Results ALSPAC 9,912 participants with 500,527 genotyped SNPs QC 8,365 unrelated individuals Y-DNA Haplogroup 5,080 males with Y-DNA haplogroup data Y-DNA Clades Y-DNA haplogroup clades R (72%) and I (19%)

  14. Results ALSPAC Y-DNA profile Y-DNA haplogroups in ALSPAC ALSPAC has within it individuals belonging to 12 of the major Y-DNA haplogroups (C, E, G, H, I, J, L, N, O, Q, R, T), albeit only 5 of the groups have 50 (>1%) or more individuals in them. These five clades are E, G, I, J and R and have 153 (3%), 94 (1.9%), 960 (19%), 142 (2.8%) and 3564 (72%) individuals in them respectively.

  15. Results 1958BC Y-DNA profile Y-DNA haplogroups in 1958 Birth Cohort (Dataset: EGAD00000000022) 1958BC has within it individuals belonging to five major Y-DNA haplogroups (E, I, J, C, R), albeit 2 of the groups have less than 50 individuals in them. The clades E, I, J, C and R have 44 (3%), 296 (20%), 34 (2%), 1 and 1078 (74%) individuals in them respectively.

  16. Results Direct Association Linear regression between BMI and Y-DNA haplogroup I in ALSPAC and 1958BC The z-test for heterogeneity shows that the effect size of Y-DNA haplogroup I on BMI is differential depending on the cohort (albeit not to be taken seriously as result has not been replicated somewhere else see discussion slide)

  17. Results Interaction ALSPAC 1958BC ALSPAC + 1958BC Figures a-c: Subgroup analysis comparing effect size of rs8050136 on BMI in two Y-DNA haplogroups The statistics above represent p values from the likelihood ratio test for interaction between Y-DNA haplogroup I and rs8050136 (FTO). Heterogeneity tests (z test) comparing Y-DNA haplogroups I and R yielded p values of 0.005, 0.4169 and 0.014 for a, b and c respectively. ggplot2 package in R was used to create the plot.

  18. Results Sub-clustering PC1 PC2 Y-DNA haplogroup vs top two principal components in ALSPAC individuals Plotting the Y-DNA haplogroup clades on a PCA plot reveals that there is no apparent sub-clustering within the ALSPAC individuals. Thus adding Y-DNA haplogroup information as covariates to control for additional population stratification in ALSPAC is not needed

  19. Conclusions Haplogroup R is the most frequent (72%) and I the second most common Y-DNA haplogroup (19%) in ALSPAC (and 1958BC) There was no strong evidence of association between Y-DNA haplogroups and BMI P=0.066 in ALSPAC P=0.107 in 1958 cohort One instance of heterogeneity (p= 0.008) between the two haplogroups was observed Beta=0.266 (SE=0.066) and 0.079 (SE=0.032) in Y- DNA haplogroup I and R respectively But result not replicated in 1958BC No sub-clustering observed in ALSPAC

  20. Discussion Population stratification is a potential confounder in genetic association studies. Haplotypic variation and sub-clustering can still be present even after accounting for principal components Largest Y-DNA haplogroup analysis Largest Y-DNA haplogroup profile for the (South-West of the) UK First analysis of its kind i.e. a stratified approach using Y-DNA haplogroups No sub-clustering observed in ALSPAC Structure in common variant analysis does not seem to be a problem after controlling for principal components If result was replicated, Y-DNA haplogroup I could potential have been a marker for an (unknown) epigenetic (GxE) or epistatic (GxG) interaction following slide

  21. Discussion Stratified analysis of Y-DNA haplogroups could be used to: (i) Inform genetic association studies by identifying which haplogroup(s) account for the association (ii) Assess the strength of known associations and observing whether it still holds in all Y-DNA haplogroups (iii) Observe an effect modification (iv) In relation to point (iii), determine whether the effect modification observed gives a hint about epigenetic (GxE) interactions or epistasis (GxG) occurring between the autosomal loci being analysed and the Y- DNA loci associated with the haplogroup(s) in which one observes that effect modification (i) Y-DNA (or mtDNA) haplogroup info could be a way of identifying sub-groups of individuals for different traits/diseases. Real-life example: BiDil (a drug for the treatment of heart failure in self-identified black patients)

  22. Limitations of Y-DNA haplogroup studies Y-DNA haplogroup analyses excludes females Sample size, especially in deeper branches of the Y-DNA phylogenetic tree Very hard to find independent cohorts to replicate studies ALSPAC and 1958BC studies kids and adults Even Europe-based (non-UK) cohorts have remarkably different Y-DNA haplogroup profiles

  23. Appendices

  24. European Y-DNA haplogroups

  25. European mtDNA haplogroups

  26. My haplogroups Y-DNA haplogroup = R1b1b2a R1b1b2 is the most common haplogroup in western Europe (>50% of men). Ancient representatives of the haplogroup were among the first people to repopulate the western part of Europe after the Ice Age ended about 12,000 years ago. Region: Europe Example Populations: Irish, Basques, British, French 23andme

  27. My haplogroups mtDNA haplogroup = H1 Haplogroup H1 is widespread in Europe, especially the western part of the continent. It originated about 13,000 years ago (likely in the Iberian peninsula), not long after the Ice Age ended Region: Europe, Near East, Central Asia, Northwestern Africa Example Populations: Norway (30%), Spanish (25%), Berbers, Lebanese Highlight: H1 appears to have been common in Doggerland, an ancient land now flooded by the North Sea. 23andme

More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#