Trust in Judicial Institutions: Impact of Debt Mediation Experience

How does citizens’ experience of debt mediation affect
their trust in judicial institutions?
The case of the collective debt settlement (CDS) procedure
in Belgium
Workshop “Trusting the State? Law, Bureaucraties and Politics”
29/09/2023
Marie Gerrienne, PhD student, ULiège
Outline of the
presentation
1. Introduction
2. The procedure of collective debt settlement (CDS)
3. Research questions
4. Methodology
5. Findings
5.1. Defining trust
5.2. Trusting CDS professionals
5.3. Trusting a stigmatizing procedure
5.4. Trusting the justice system?
6. Conclusion
 
 
 
1
.
 
I
n
t
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
Over-indebtedness = 
inability of an individual to meet their debts
Public problem => inscription in the law
Research in France (Plot, 2013) => over-indebtedness procedures
as a way of imposing dominant economic behaviour
=> Belgian case from the perspective of the “beneficiaries” of the
procedure
 
 
 
2
. 
The 
CDS 
procedure
How does CDS work?
 
Debt mediator’s role: managing the budget
 
 
3. Research questions
H
ow do debtors talk about their interactions with CDS
professionals, e.g. their debt mediator, in the procedure of CDS?
How do they trust and place hopes in the procedure considering
the stigmatisation they are facing?
H
ow does this affect trust in the justice system in general for
over-indebted citizens? 
 
 
 
4
.
 
M
e
t
h
o
d
o
l
o
g
y
 
 
5. Findings
 
 
5.1. Defining trust
Garfinkel (cited in Quéré, 2001):
Trust = “fulfillment of expectations” = normal,
ordinary
Mistrust = ignorance of common sense
Negative definition of trust
 
 
5.2. Trusting CDS professionals
Social workers :
Non-judgment
Empathic attitudes
Transparent discourses
 
“M: So, you think she inspired trust in you? 
I: Yes. She was fair. She said how things were going, she didn’t lie, she really
explained how things were going to work and that was that. She didn’t try to
embellish things; she really told it like it was.”
Debtor in CDS (F), 25
th
 May 2023
 
“[...] we’re all social workers except for one colleague who’s a legal
assistant, and we’ve all done the compulsory debt mediation training,
which is really the first step towards being able to work in this field, and
so our main objective is to establish a relationship of trust with the debtor
[...]”
Social worker (F) in a PSWC in the region of Liège, 2nd December 2021
 
Lawyer debt mediators : the most important relationship
“I’d say the most important thing is contact with the mediator, that’s the most
important thing for a mediated person, that there’s good communication [...].”
Debtor in CDS (M)
, interviewed on 10
th
 June 2023
 
Elements of “non-mistrust” :
Availability and response time
Regularity of payments
Consideration and non-judgment
Egality in front of the law
 
“And from the mediator, the way she sometimes talks to me or whatever, I have
the impression that for her, I’m a looser who’s over-indebted because she’s done
everything and anything, and who tries not to pay her bills and deny the thing
[...]. Sometimes I feel a bit like I’m being misunderstood in that sense.”
Debtor in CDS (F), 22
nd
 May 2023
 
“So I’m going to say, it’s regulated, he can’t do what he wants. We
can’t do what we want, but neither can he.”
Debtors in CDS (F), 19
th
 May 2023
 
 
5.3. Trusting a stigmatizing procedure
Budget management, justifications…
3 elements:
Protective dimension
Moral dimension
Comparative dimension
 
“[...] I learned to work on myself and to tell myself yes, you did
stupid things, yes you pay them, but precisely you pay them,
you are punished for what you did, and you take your
punishment and you do it. And again, it’s like a prisoner
serving his sentence. For me it’s financial, but here I am, I’m
serving my financial pain and so in the end, I’m proud because
I held on [...].”
Debtor in CDS (F), 19
th
 May 2023
 
“I must say that when I read about the collective debt
settlement group, sometimes I say to myself that I am
very lucky to have a lawyer mediator like that.”
Debtor in CDS (F), 17
th
 May 2023
 
5.4. Trusting the justice system?
 
Irrelevance of the link between trust in the
procedure and trust in the justice system as a
whole
Distinction with the “criminal world”
Importance of the debt mediator’s figure
“ [...] I don’t think debt mediation has anything to do with the
courts. Whether you trust the law or not. It’s the relationship you
have with your mediator that’s more important.”
Debtor in CDS (M), 10
th
 June 2023
“In more private areas like that, I will say financial, divorce,
recognition, debt, I trust the justice system. 
But
 I have
acquaintances around me where it is more towards the prison
environment and sentences, and there I do not particularly agree
with justice.”
Debtor in CDS (F), 19
th
 May 2023
M: And you consider that you trust the justice system?
I: Yes, I think we can trust.
M: Despite your experience with the mediator which is not always easy.
I: Yes, but hey, it’s different, it’s not because it went badly with her that with someone
else it would automatically go badly.
M: You consider it to be really related to her personally rather than to the system.
I: Yes, it’s not the system, it’s the person herself, let’s say. We are not going to put
everyone in the same basket, as they say.”
Debtor in CDS (F), 7
th
 June 2023
 
 
6. Conclusion
 
It seems that people in CDS do not extend their
satisfactions or critics in the procedure to the whole
system
Several elements can erode trust in CDS
professionals: unavailability, feeling of being judged,
etc.
If we look at the procedure as a set of rules =>
constraints as a price to pay
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Explore how citizens' experiences of debt mediation, specifically the Collective Debt Settlement procedure in Belgium, influence their trust in judicial institutions. The study delves into defining trust, the CDS procedure, research questions regarding interactions with professionals, stigmatization, and trust in the justice system for over-indebted citizens.

  • Trust
  • Debt Mediation
  • Judicial Institutions
  • Citizens Experience
  • Collective Debt Settlement

Uploaded on Sep 15, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. How does citizens experience of debt mediation affect their trust in judicial institutions? The case of the collective debt settlement (CDS) procedure in Belgium Workshop Trusting the State? Law, Bureaucraties and Politics 29/09/2023 Marie Gerrienne, PhD student, ULi ge

  2. Outline of the presentation 1. Introduction 2. The procedure of collective debt settlement (CDS) 3. Research questions 4. Methodology 5. Findings 5.1. Defining trust 5.2. Trusting CDS professionals 5.3. Trusting a stigmatizing procedure 5.4. Trusting the justice system? 6. Conclusion

  3. 1. Introduction

  4. Over-indebtedness = inability of an individual to meet their debts Public problem => inscription in the law Research in France (Plot, 2013) => over-indebtedness procedures as a way of imposing dominant economic behaviour => Belgian case from the perspective of the beneficiaries of the procedure

  5. 2. The CDS procedure

  6. How does CDS work? Analysis of the debtor s request and approval (or not) Admissibility Lawyer or social worker Appointment with the debtor and budget definition Designation of a debt mediator and continuation of the procedure Approval of the plan

  7. Debt mediators role: managing the budget Debtor s income Repayment of creditors Mediator s fees Left to live

  8. 3. Research questions

  9. How do debtors talk about their interactions with CDS professionals, e.g. their debt mediator, in the procedure of CDS? How do they trust and place hopes in the procedure considering the stigmatisation they are facing? How does this affect trust in the justice system in general for over-indebted citizens?

  10. 4. Methodology

  11. 17 semi-directive interviews 3 men/14 women Social media

  12. 5. Findings

  13. 5.1. Defining trust Garfinkel (cited in Qu r , 2001): Trust = fulfillment of expectations = normal, ordinary Mistrust = ignorance of common sense Negative definition of trust

  14. 5.2. Trusting CDS professionals Social workers : Non-judgment Empathic attitudes Transparent discourses

  15. M: So, you think she inspired trust in you? I: Yes. She was fair. She said how things were going, she didn t lie, she really explained how things were going to work and that was that. She didn t try to embellish things; she really told it like it was. Debtor in CDS (F), 25thMay 2023

  16. [...] were all social workers except for one colleague whos a legal assistant, and we ve all done the compulsory debt mediation training, which is really the first step towards being able to work in this field, and so our main objective is to establish a relationship of trust with the debtor [...] Social worker (F) in a PSWC in the region of Li ge, 2nd December 2021

  17. Lawyer debt mediators : the most important relationship I d say the most important thing is contact with the mediator, that s the most important thing for a mediated person, that there s good communication [...]. Debtor in CDS (M), interviewed on 10thJune 2023

  18. Elements of non-mistrust : Availability and response time Regularity of payments Consideration and non-judgment Egality in front of the law

  19. And from the mediator, the way she sometimes talks to me or whatever, I have the impression that for her, I m a looser who s over-indebted because she s done everything and anything, and who tries not to pay her bills and deny the thing [...]. Sometimes I feel a bit like I m being misunderstood in that sense. Debtor in CDS (F), 22ndMay 2023

  20. So Im going to say, its regulated, he cant do what he wants. We can t do what we want, but neither can he. Debtors in CDS (F), 19thMay 2023

  21. 5.3. Trusting a stigmatizing procedure Budget management, justifications 3 elements: Protective dimension Moral dimension Comparative dimension

  22. [...] I learned to work on myself and to tell myself yes, you did stupid things, yes you pay them, but precisely you pay them, you are punished for what you did, and you take your punishment and you do it. And again, it s like a prisoner serving his sentence. For me it s financial, but here I am, I m serving my financial pain and so in the end, I m proud because I held on [...]. Debtor in CDS (F), 19thMay 2023

  23. I must say that when I read about the collective debt settlement group, sometimes I say to myself that I am very lucky to have a lawyer mediator like that. Debtor in CDS (F), 17thMay 2023

  24. 5.4. Trusting the justice system? Irrelevance of the link between trust in the procedure and trust in the justice system as a whole Distinction with the criminal world Importance of the debt mediator s figure

  25. [...] I dont think debt mediation has anything to do with the courts. Whether you trust the law or not. It s the relationship you have with your mediator that s more important. Debtor in CDS (M), 10thJune 2023

  26. In more private areas like that, I will say financial, divorce, recognition, debt, I trust the justice system. But I have acquaintances around me where it is more towards the prison environment and sentences, and there I do not particularly agree with justice. Debtor in CDS (F), 19thMay 2023

  27. M: And you consider that you trust the justice system? I: Yes, I think we can trust. M: Despite your experience with the mediator which is not always easy. I: Yes, but hey, it s different, it s not because it went badly with her that with someone else it would automatically go badly. M: You consider it to be really related to her personally rather than to the system. I: Yes, it s not the system, it s the person herself, let s say. We are not going to put everyone in the same basket, as they say. Debtor in CDS (F), 7thJune 2023

  28. 6. Conclusion

  29. It seems that people in CDS do not extend their satisfactions or critics in the procedure to the whole system Several elements can erode trust in CDS professionals: unavailability, feeling of being judged, etc. If we look at the procedure as a set of rules => constraints as a price to pay

More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#