Transverse Motion in Particle Accelerators

undefined
 
Eric Prebys, FNAL
 
 
Let’s look at the Hill’ equation again…
We can write the general solution as a linear combination of a “sine-like”
and “cosine-like” term                                       where
 
 
 
When we plug this into the original equation, we see that
 
Since 
a
 and 
b
 are arbitrary, each function must 
independently
 satisfy the
equation. We further see that when we look at our initial conditions
 
 
 
So our transfer matrix becomes
 
USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan. 20-31, 2013
 
Lecture 4 - Transverse Motion 1
 
2
 
 
If we know the transfer matrix or one period, we can explicitly calculate
the lattice functions at the ends
 
 
 
If we know the lattice functions at one point, we can use the transfer
matrix to transfer them to another point by considering the following two
equivalent things
Going around the ring, starting and ending at point 
a
, then proceeding to point 
b
Going from point 
a
 to point 
b
, 
then
 going all the way around the ring
 
USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan. 20-31, 2013
 
Lecture 4 - Transverse Motion 1
 
3
 
Recall:
 
 
Using
 
We can now evolve the 
J
 matrix at any point as
 
 
 
Multiplying this mess out and gathering terms, we get
 
 
 
USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan. 20-31, 2013
 
Lecture 4 - Transverse Motion 1
 
4
 
 
Drift of length L:
 
 
 
 
Thin focusing (defocusing) lens:
 
USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan. 20-31, 2013
 
Lecture 4 - Transverse Motion 1
 
5
 
 
The general expressions for motion are
 
 
We form the combination
 
 
 
 
 
If you don’t get out much, you recognize this as the general equation for
an ellipse
 
USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan. 20-31, 2013
 
Lecture 4 - Transverse Motion 1
 
6
 
Area = πA
2
 
Particle will trace out the
ellipse on subsequent
revolutions
 
 
As particles go through the lattice, the Twiss parameters will vary
periodically:
 
β = max
α = 0
maximum
 
β = decreasing
α >0
focusing
 
β = min
α = 0
minimum
 
β = increasing
α < 0
defocusing
 
USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan. 20-31, 2013
 
7
 
Lecture 4 - Transverse Motion 1
 
Motion at each
point bounded by
 
 
It’s important to remember that the betatron function represents a
bounding envelope 
to the beam motion, not the beam motion itself
 
USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan. 20-31, 2013
 
Lecture 4 - Transverse Motion 1
 
8
 
Normalized particle trajectory
 
Trajectories over multiple turns

s
 
is also effectively the 
local
wave number
  which determines
the rate of 
phase advance
 
Closely spaced strong quads
 
 small β 
 
small aperture, lots of wiggles
Sparsely spaced weak quads
 
 large β 
 
 
large aperture, few wiggles
 
 
As particles go around a ring, they
will undergo a number of
betatrons oscillations ν
(sometimes 
Q
) given by
 
 
 
 
This is referred to as the “tune”
 
We can generally think of the tune in two parts:
 
Ideal
orbit
 
Particle trajectory
 
6
.
7
 
Integer :
magnet/aperture
optimization
 
Fraction:
Beam Stability
 
USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan. 20-31, 2013
 
9
 
Lecture 4 - Transverse Motion 1
 
 
If the tune is an integer, or low order rational number, then the effect of any
imperfection or perturbation will tend be reinforced on subsequent orbits.
When we add the effects of coupling between the planes, we find this is also
true for 
combinations
 of the tunes from both planes, so in general, we want
to avoid
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Many instabilities occur when something perturbs the tune of the beam, or
part of the beam, until it falls onto a resonance, thus you will often hear
effects characterized by the “tune shift” they produce.
 
“small” integers
 
Avoid lines in
the “tune plane”
 
USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan. 20-31, 2013
 
10
 
Lecture 4 - Transverse Motion 1
 
(We’ll talk about this in 
much 
more detail soon, but in general…)
 
 
If each particle is described by an ellipse with a
particular amplitude, then an 
ensemble
 of particles will
always remain within a bounding ellipse of a particular
area:
 
Area = 
 
Either leave the 
 out, or include it explicitly as a “unit”. Thus
 microns (CERN) and
 
-mm-mr (FNAL)
Are actually the same units (just remember you’ll never have to explicity
use 
 in the calculation)
 
USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan. 20-31, 2013
 
11
 
Lecture 4 - Transverse Motion 1
 
 
Because distributions normally have long tails, we have to adopt a
convention for defining the emittance.  The two most common are
Gaussian (electron machines, CERN):
 
 
 
 
95% Emmittance (FNAL):
 
 
 
It is also useful to talk about the “Admittance”: the area of the
largest amplitude ellipese which can propagate through a beam line
 
USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan. 20-31, 2013
 
Lecture 4 - Transverse Motion 1
 
12
 
Limiting half-aperture
 
 
In our discussions up to now, we assume that all fields scale with
momentum, so our lattice remains the same, but what happens to the
ensemble of particles?  Consider what happens to the slope of a particle as
the forward momentum.
 
 
 
 
If we evaluate the emittance at a point where 
=0, we have
 
USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan. 20-31, 2013
 
Lecture 4 - Transverse Motion 1
 
13
 
Normalized
emittance
 
Printed copy has lots of typos!
 
 
In our previous discussion, we implicitly assumed that the distribution of
particles in phase space followed the ellipse defined by the lattice function
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Once injected, these particles will
follow the path defined by the lattice
ellipse, effectively increasing the
emittance
 
USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan. 20-31, 2013
 
Lecture 4 - Transverse Motion 1
 
14
 
Area = 
 
…but there’s no guarantee
What happens if this it’s not?
 
Lattice
ellipse
 
Injected
particle
distribution
 
Effective
(increased)
emittance
 
 
In our definition and derivation of the lattice function, a closed path
through a periodic system.  This definition doesn’t exist for a beam line,
but once we know the lattice functions at one point, we know how to
propagate the lattice function down the beam line.
 
USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan. 20-31, 2013
 
Lecture 4 - Transverse Motion 1
 
15
 
 
 
When extracting beam from a ring, the initial optics of the beam line are
set by the optics at the point of extraction.
 
 
 
 
 
 
For particles from a source, the initial lattice functions can be defined by
the distribution of the particles out of the source
 
USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan. 20-31, 2013
 
Lecture 4 - Transverse Motion 1
 
16
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Exploring the formalism and calculations related to transverse motion in particle accelerators, including the Hill equation, transfer matrices, lattice functions, and example drift calculations. The content delves into the mathematical foundations and practical applications of analyzing particle beam dynamics in accelerators.

  • Particle accelerators
  • Transverse motion
  • Transfer matrices
  • Lattice functions
  • Beam dynamics

Uploaded on Sep 20, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Transverse Motion 2 Eric Prebys, FNAL

  2. Some Formalism x + = ( ) 0 K s x Let s look at the Hill equation again We can write the general solution as a linear combination of a sine-like and cosine-like term where ( ) ( aC s x = ) 0 ( ; 1 ) 0 ( = S C + 0 = ) ( ) s = bS s = C S ) 0 ( ; 0 ) 0 ( 1 When we plug this into the original equation, we see that ( ( ) ( ) ( + s C s K s C a ) ( ) 0 = + + ) ( ) ( ) ( ) b S s K s S s Since a and b are arbitrary, each function must independently satisfy the equation. We further see that when we look at our initial conditions ) 0 ( ) 0 ( ) 0 ( S b C a x + = = + = = x aC bS a = a x 0 x 0 = ) 0 ( ) 0 ( ) 0 ( b b So our transfer matrix becomes ) ( s x ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) x x x s x s C s S s 0 0 = = M 0 0 ( ) ( ) ( ) x x x s C s S s Lecture 4 - Transverse Motion 1 USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan. 20-31, 2013 2

  3. Calculating the Lattice functions If we know the transfer matrix or one period, we can explicitly calculate the lattice functions at the ends M + sin sin cos sin sin = cos 1 ( ) M = = 2 cos ; sin 1 cos Tr 2 If we know the lattice functions at one point, we can use the transfer matrix to transfer them to another point by considering the following two equivalent things Going around the ring, starting and ending at point a, then proceeding to point b Going from point a to point b, then going all the way around the ring + = + M M M M ( , ) ( M , ) ( , ) ( , ) s C s s s s s + s C s sb b b b a b a C a M a + = 1 M M ( , ) ( , ) ( , ) ( , ) s C s s s s s s s b b b a a a b a sa Recall: ( ) s ( ) s s s J ( ) s ( ) ( ) + = + I M I J ( , ) cos M 2 ( ) sin 2 + s C s s ( ) + = 1 I J J M cos 2 ( ) sin 2 ( , ) M cos 2 ( M ) sin 2 ( , ) s s s = s s s b b a a b a 1 J J ( ) ( , ) ( ) ( , ) s s s s s s b b a a b a Lecture 4 - Transverse Motion 1 USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan. 20-31, 2013 3

  4. Calculating the Lattice functions (contd) 22 21 m m m m m m Using 11 12 22 12 = 1 M M ( , ) ( , ) s s s s b a b a m m 21 11 We can now evolve the J matrix at any point as ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) s s s s m m m m 11 12 22 12 b b a a = = J ( ) s b ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) s s s s m m m m 21 22 21 11 b b a a Multiplying this mess out and gathering terms, we get ( ( ( 2 ) ( 21 b m m s ) ( ) ( ) + ( ) ( ) s m m m m m m m m s 11 22 12 21 11 21 12 22 b a ( ( ) ) ( ( ) ) ) ) = 2 11 2 12 ( ) 2 ( ) s m m m m s 11 12 b a 2 21 2 22 ( ) m m s 22 a Lecture 4 - Transverse Motion 1 USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan. 20-31, 2013 4

  5. Examples Drift of length L: a(s)=a0-g0s b(s)= b0-2a0s+g0s2 g (s)=g0 a(s) b(s) g (s) a(0) b(0) g (0) -s s2 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 s M = = -2s 0 Thin focusing (defocusing) lens: 1 f 1 f = 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 f = = = M 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 f 1 f 2 f 1 f 1 = + 0 2 0 0 0 2 Lecture 4 - Transverse Motion 1 USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan. 20-31, 2013 5

  6. Physical Implications = A ; = + cos ( ) x A s The general expressions for motion are ( ) = + cos sin x We form the combination g x2+2ax x +b x = A2g bcos2f -2a2cos2f -2asinfcosf +a2cos2f +sin2f +2asinfcosf ( = A2 g b -a2 ( = A2= constant 2 ) ( ) )cos2f +sin2f If you don t get out much, you recognize this as the general equation for an ellipse ' x A Area = A2 A Particle will trace out the ellipse on subsequent revolutions x Lecture 4 - Transverse Motion 1 USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan. 20-31, 2013 6

  7. Interpretation (contd) As particles go through the lattice, the Twiss parameters will vary periodically: s x x x x x x x x x x = max = 0 maximum = decreasing >0 focusing = min = 0 minimum = increasing < 0 defocusing Motion at each point bounded by ( ) ( ) x s A s Lecture 4 - Transverse Motion 1 USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan. 20-31, 2013 7

  8. Conceptual understanding of It s important to remember that the betatron function represents a bounding envelope to the beam motion, not the beam motion itself Normalized particle trajectory Trajectories over multiple turns ( ) / 1 2 = + ( ) ( ) sin ( ) x s A s s s ds ( (s)is also effectively the local wave number which determines the rate of phase advance 0 = ( ) s ) s Closely spaced strong quads small small aperture, lots of wiggles Sparsely spaced weak quads large large aperture, few wiggles Lecture 4 - Transverse Motion 1 USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan. 20-31, 2013 8

  9. Betatron tune Particle trajectory As particles go around a ring, they will undergo a number of betatrons oscillations (sometimes Q) given by 1 Ideal orbit ds = 2 ( ) s This is referred to as the tune We can generally think of the tune in two parts: 6.7 Integer : Fraction: Beam Stability magnet/aperture optimization 9 Lecture 4 - Transverse Motion 1 USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan. 20-31, 2013

  10. Tune, stability, and the tune plane (We ll talk about this in much more detail soon, but in general ) If the tune is an integer, or low order rational number, then the effect of any imperfection or perturbation will tend be reinforced on subsequent orbits. When we add the effects of coupling between the planes, we find this is also true for combinations of the tunes from both planes, so in general, we want to avoid (resonant integer = y y x x k k instabilit y) fract. part of Y tune Avoid lines in the tune plane small integers fract. part of X tune Many instabilities occur when something perturbs the tune of the beam, or part of the beam, until it falls onto a resonance, thus you will often hear effects characterized by the tune shift they produce. Lecture 4 - Transverse Motion 1 USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan. 20-31, 2013 10

  11. Emittance If each particle is described by an ellipse with a particular amplitude, then an ensemble of particles will always remain within a bounding ellipse of a particular area: 2 + + x x x ' x x = 2 or x Area = Either leave the out, or include it explicitly as a unit . Thus microns (CERN) and -mm-mr (FNAL) Are actually the same units (just remember you ll never have to explicity use in the calculation) 11 Lecture 4 - Transverse Motion 1 USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan. 20-31, 2013

  12. Definitions of Emittance and Admittance Because distributions normally have long tails, we have to adopt a convention for defining the emittance. The two most common are Gaussian (electron machines, CERN): 2 = contains ; 39% of the beam x 95% Emmittance (FNAL): e95=6psx 2 ; contains 95% of the beam b It is also useful to talk about the Admittance : the area of the largest amplitude ellipese which can propagate through a beam line d A = Limiting half-aperture 2 Lecture 4 - Transverse Motion 1 USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan. 20-31, 2013 12

  13. Adiabatic Damping Printed copy has lots of typos! In our discussions up to now, we assume that all fields scale with momentum, so our lattice remains the same, but what happens to the ensemble of particles? Consider what happens to the slope of a particle as the forward momentum. p + p + = 1 x x x x p p p p = 0 0 x x xp xp 0p p = x x + 0p p p p 0 0 If we evaluate the emittance at a point where =0, we have e =p gTx2+bT x ( ) 2 2dp p= -2edp ( ) de = 2pbT x d x = -2pbT x psin2y +d p de p0 p= e0 de = -edp = -dp p ep = constant = e0p0 eN gb e g0b0 gb Normalized emittance e = e0 Lecture 4 - Transverse Motion 1 USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan. 20-31, 2013 13

  14. Mismatch and Emittance Dilution In our previous discussion, we implicitly assumed that the distribution of particles in phase space followed the ellipse defined by the lattice function ' x Lattice ellipse ' x but there s no guarantee What happens if this it s not? x x Injected particle distribution Area = Once injected, these particles will follow the path defined by the lattice ellipse, effectively increasing the emittance ' x x Effective (increased) emittance Lecture 4 - Transverse Motion 1 USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan. 20-31, 2013 14

  15. Beam Lines In our definition and derivation of the lattice function, a closed path through a periodic system. This definition doesn t exist for a beam line, but once we know the lattice functions at one point, we know how to propagate the lattice function down the beam line. ( out, M ) in out in out in out in ( ) ( ) ( ) + m m m m m m m m 11 22 2 12 21 11 21 12 22 out in ( ( ) ) ( ( ) ) ( ( ) ) = 2 11 2 12 m m m m 11 12 out in 2 21 2 22 2 m m m m 21 22 out in Lecture 4 - Transverse Motion 1 USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan. 20-31, 2013 15

  16. Establishing Initial Conditions When extracting beam from a ring, the initial optics of the beam line are set by the optics at the point of extraction. in in in For particles from a source, the initial lattice functions can be defined by the distribution of the particles out of the source in in in Lecture 4 - Transverse Motion 1 USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan. 20-31, 2013 16

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#