The Rise and Fall of Bernard Madoff and His Securities Firm

MADOFF
SECURITIES
Course: Auditing                                                          Giulia Surini - 473585
Bernard Lawrence Madoff
Born on 29
th
 April 1938, New York City
As a teenager he dreamed of becoming a
“major player” in the world of high finance
In 1960 he graduated with a political science
degree
After the graduation he set up a brokerage
firm: Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities
LLC
For five decades he was the senior executive
of Madoff Securities
He accumulated more than one billion dollars
During its expansion
Madoff Securities traded only securities of small over-the-
counter companies
Madoff thought that NYSE’s rules were anticompetitive and
inconsistent with a free market economy
In 1962 Madoff expanded his firm to include investment
advisory services, becoming its most important line of
business
In 1971 he was one of the founder of NASDAQ
stock exchange and years later he was being the
chairman of NASDAQ for three years.
In early years of the 21
st
 century, Madoff Securities
was the largest “
market maker
” on the NASDAQ
By the late 2008, the total value  of costumer
accounts that Madoff Securities managed had
reached $65 billion.
During its expansion
Why so many investors entrusted
their money to Madoff’s firm?
Impressive rates of return
Madoff serve as an investment adviser to numerous
celebrities or other wealthy people but most of the
money he managed come from “feeder firms” and the
individuals who committed their funds to these firm
were typically unaware to the connection with Madoff.
The end of success
On 10 December 2008, Madoff told his two sons
who worked with him that the impressive returns of
the previous decades had been fraudulent; those
returns had been produced by a 
Ponzi scheme
.
His sons notified the confession to the Securities
and Exchange Commission (SEC) and in the
evening FBI agents arrested Madoff.
Everyone were shocked to learn that the largest
investment fraud could go undetected for decades.
Who was the auditor?
Friehling & Horowitz 
was a small accounting firm with two
employees: the active accountant was David Friehling who had
performed the annual audits of Madoff Securities and signed
off on the firm’s unqualified audit opinions.
Friehling’s firm was a member of American Institute of
Certified Public Accountant (AICPA).
He was not required:
to submit the peer review program for CPA firm;
to have a periodic peer review at the state level.
In March 2009 they find out that Friehling, his fim
and his family members had about $15 million
invested in funds managed by Madoff.
These investments were against the 
independence
rules of an auditor.
David Friehling was the second person arrested
and the federal prosecutors charged him with
securities fraud and aiding and abetting an
investment fraud; the prosecutors didn’t declare
that Friehling was aware of Madoff’s fraudulent
scheme but he had conducted “sham audits” on
Madoff Securities
It wasn’t the first time in which
SEC investigated about Madoff
In the previous two decades SEC received a series of complaints
by 
Harry Markopolos
, but the investigation concluded without
any serious infractions of the laws
In 2005 he identified 29 “
red flags
Markopolos gave to SEC also some mathematical
analysis in which he demonstrated that there was
not sufficient transaction volume in the options
market
Three key factors
:
1.
Madoff targeted investors who are unlikely to
question his investment strategy
2.
His impeccable credentials all around the
financial environment
3.
Failure of the regulatory oversight function for
the stock market
After the arrest
On December 2008 passed legislation requiring New York
accounting firms that provide attest services to be peer
reviewed every three years
On March 12, 2009 Bernie Madoff appeared in a court-house
in New York City with eleven counts of fraud, money
laundering, perjury and theft pending
He refused to implicate anyone of his family or subordinates
Three months later the Judge sentenced him to 150 years in
federal prison
On February 2009, KPMG became the first of the Big Four
firms to be named as a defendant in a civil lawsuit triggered
by the Madoff fraud
In early 2009, President Obama replaced the SEC chairman;
new procedures for investment adviser firms:
Annual “surprise audits”
Internal control audits by independent accounting firms
To ensure that credible allegations would be investigated
Examples
Journalists
High-profile politicians
Nobel Prize winners
...
1. Research recent development involving this
case. Summarize these development in a bullet
format.
Two
 sons: Mark killed himself in 2010, Andrew died for cancer in 2014
In 2012 his brother Peter pleaded guilty with 10 years for the
connection in the fraud
The Madoff Victim Fund
2. Suppose that a large investment firm had
approximately 10% of its total assets invested in
funds managed by Madoff Securities. What audit
procedures should the investment firm’s
independent auditors have applied to those assets?
The auditor has to verify the existence and the valuation of the
investment; verification of investments may be carried out by
employing the following procedures:
Verification of transactions
Physical inspection
Examination of valuation and disclosure
Analytical review procedures
3. 
Describe the nature and purpose of a “peer
review”. Would peer reviews of Friehling &
Horowitz have likely resulted in the discovery
of the Madoff fraud? Why or why not?
Peer review is a process by which a qualified CPA firm reviews
the operational procedures of another CPA firm to ensure that
those procedures meet certain standards.
A
 peer review of Friehling & Horowitz would have detected the
Madoff fraud because it was senseless that a firm with just
one accountant could manage a company with the size of
Madoff Securities
4. Professional auditing standards discuss
the three key “conditions” that are typically
present when a financial fraud occurs and
identify a lengthy list of “fraud risk factors”.
Briefly explain the difference between a
fraud “condition” and a “fraud risk factor”
and provide examples of each.
Conditions for fraud
Fraud risk factors
The auditor is required to evaluate whether fraud risk factors
indicate incentives or pressures to perpetrate fraud,
opportunities to carry out fraud or attitudes used to justify a
fraudulent action.
E
xamples:
Recurring negative cash flows from operations or an inability to
generate cash flows from operations while reporting earnings and
earnings growth
Significant financial interests in the entity
Need to obtain additional debt or equity financing to stay competitive
– including financing of major research and development or capital
expenditures
5. In addition to the reforms mentioned in this
case, recommend other financial reporting
and auditing-related reforms that would likely
be effective in preventing or detecting frauds
similar to that perpetrated by Madoff.
Improve transparency on the auditor’s work
T
raining for auditors focused on corruption and fraud
awareness
T
raining for SEC authorities
Thank you for your attention!
References
M
adoff Securities
Auditing slides
http://www.madoffvictimfund.com/
https://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/06/27/peter-madoff-
expected-to-plead-guilty/?hp
http://deepakinfo.tripod.com/icai/gn/GN-22.pdf
http://www.ifac.org/system/files/downloads/a012-2010-
iaasb-handbook-isa-240.pdf
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Bernard Lawrence Madoff, a former prominent figure in high finance, founded Madoff Securities and revolutionized the securities market. However, his firm's success was built on a fraudulent scheme that collapsed in 2008, causing immense losses to investors.

  • Bernard Madoff
  • Securities
  • Investment
  • Fraud
  • Financial Scandal

Uploaded on Sep 18, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. MADOFF MADOFF SECURITIES SECURITIES Course: Auditing Giulia Surini - 473585

  2. Bernard Lawrence Madoff Born on 29thApril 1938, New York City As a teenager he dreamed of becoming a major player in the world of high finance In 1960 he graduated with a political science degree After the graduation he set up a brokerage firm: Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC For five decades he was the senior executive of Madoff Securities He accumulated more than one billion dollars

  3. During its expansion Madoff Securities traded only securities of small over-the- counter companies Securities of most large companies were traded on the New York Stock Exchange Madoff thought that NYSE s rules were anticompetitive and inconsistent with a free market economy He democratize the securities market in the US and he reduced the transaction costs of trading securities One of the first firms to use computer to expedite the processing of securities transactions In 1962 Madoff expanded his firm to include investment advisory services, becoming its most important line of business

  4. During its expansion In 1971 he was one of the founder of NASDAQ stock exchange and years later he was being the chairman of NASDAQ for three years. In early years of the 21st century, Madoff Securities was the largest market maker on the NASDAQ Market maker Market maker: Broker-dealer firm that accepts the risk of holding a certain number of shares of a particular security in order to facilitate trading in that security By the late 2008, the total value of costumer accounts that Madoff Securities managed had reached $65 billion.

  5. Why so many investors entrusted their money to Madoff s firm? Impressive rates of return 10 15 % Madoff serve as an investment adviser to numerous celebrities or other wealthy people but most of the money he managed come from feederfirms and the individuals who committed their funds to these firm were typically unaware to the connection with Madoff.

  6. The end of success On 10 December 2008, Madoff told his two sons who worked with him that the impressive returns of the previous decades had been fraudulent; those returns had been produced by a Ponzi His sons notified the confession to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and in the evening FBI agents arrested Madoff. Everyone were shocked to learn that the largest investment fraud could go undetected for decades. Ponzi scheme scheme.

  7. Who was the auditor? Friehling Friehling & & Horowitz employees: the active accountant was David Friehling who had performed the annual audits of Madoff Securities and signed off on the firm s unqualified audit opinions. Horowitz was a small accounting firm with two Friehling s firm was a member of American Institute of Certified Public Accountant (AICPA). He was not required: to submit the peer review program for CPA firm; to have a periodic peer review at the state level. New York was one of the six states that didn t have a mandatory peer review program for accounting firms

  8. In March 2009 they find out that Friehling, his fim and his family members had about $15 million invested in funds managed by Madoff. These investments were against the independence rules of an auditor. David Friehling was the second person arrested and the federal prosecutors charged him with securities fraud and aiding and abetting an investment fraud; the prosecutors didn t declare that Friehling was aware of Madoff s fraudulent scheme but he had conducted shamaudits on Madoff Securities independence

  9. It wasnt the first time in which SEC investigated about Madoff In the previous two decades SEC received a series of complaints by Harry Harry Markopolos Markopolos, but the investigation concluded without any serious infractions of the laws In 2005 he identified 29 red red flags flags Madoff refused to allow the Big Four auditor to review his financial records; ; Madoff Securities was audited by a one-man accounting firm; Madoff refused to provide his clients with online access to their accounts

  10. Markopolos gave to SEC also some mathematical analysis in which he demonstrated that there was not sufficient transaction volume in the options market Three key factors Three key factors: 1. Madoff targeted investors who are unlikely to question his investment strategy 2. His impeccable credentials all around the financial environment 3. Failure of the regulatory oversight function for the stock market

  11. After the arrest On December 2008 passed legislation requiring New York accounting firms that provide attest services to be peer reviewed every three years On March 12, 2009 Bernie Madoff appeared in a court-house in New York City with eleven counts of fraud, money laundering, perjury and theft pending He refused to implicate anyone of his family or subordinates Three months later the Judge sentenced him to 150 years in federal prison

  12. On February 2009, KPMG became the first of the Big Four firms to be named as a defendant in a civil lawsuit triggered by the Madoff fraud In early 2009, President Obama replaced the SEC chairman; new procedures for investment adviser firms: Annual surprise audits Internal control audits by independent accounting firms To ensure that credible allegations would be investigated Examples Journalists High-profile politicians Nobel Prize winners ...

  13. 1. Research recent development involving this 1. Research recent development involving this case. Summarize these development in a bullet case. Summarize these development in a bullet format. format. Two sons: Mark killed himself in 2010, Andrew died for cancer in 2014 In 2012 his brother Peter pleaded guilty with 10 years for the connection in the fraud The Madoff Victim Fund www.madoffvictimfund.com

  14. 2. Suppose that a large investment firm had 2. Suppose that a large investment firm had approximately 10% of its total assets invested in approximately 10% of its total assets invested in funds managed by Madoff Securities. What audit funds managed by Madoff Securities. What audit procedures should the investment firm s procedures should the investment firm s independent auditors have applied to those assets? independent auditors have applied to those assets? The auditor has to verify the existence and the valuation of the investment; verification of investments may be carried out by employing the following procedures: Verification of transactions Physical inspection Examination of valuation and disclosure Analytical review procedures

  15. 3. Describe the nature and purpose of a peer Describe the nature and purpose of a peer review . Would peer reviews of review . Would peer reviews of Friehling Horowitz have likely resulted in the discovery Horowitz have likely resulted in the discovery of the Madoff fraud? Why or why not? of the Madoff fraud? Why or why not? Friehling & & Peer review is a process by which a qualified CPA firm reviews the operational procedures of another CPA firm to ensure that those procedures meet certain standards. A peer review of Friehling & Horowitz would have detected the Madoff fraud because it was senseless that a firm with just one accountant could manage a company with the size of Madoff Securities

  16. 4. Professional auditing standards discuss 4. Professional auditing standards discuss the three key conditions that are typically the three key conditions that are typically present when a financial fraud occurs and present when a financial fraud occurs and identify a lengthy list of fraud risk factors . identify a lengthy list of fraud risk factors . Briefly explain the difference between a Briefly explain the difference between a fraud condition and a fraud risk factor fraud condition and a fraud risk factor and provide examples of each. and provide examples of each. Conditions for fraud Conditions for fraud

  17. Fraud risk factors Fraud risk factors The auditor is required to evaluate whether fraud risk factors indicate incentives or pressures to perpetrate fraud, opportunities to carry out fraud or attitudes used to justify a fraudulent action. Examples: Recurring negative cash flows from operations or an inability to generate cash flows from operations while reporting earnings and earnings growth Significant financial interests in the entity Need to obtain additional debt or equity financing to stay competitive including financing of major research and development or capital expenditures

  18. 5. In addition to the reforms mentioned in this 5. In addition to the reforms mentioned in this case, recommend other financial reporting case, recommend other financial reporting and auditing and auditing- -related reforms that would likely related reforms that would likely be effective in preventing or detecting frauds be effective in preventing or detecting frauds similar to that perpetrated by Madoff. similar to that perpetrated by Madoff. Improve transparency on the auditor s work Training for auditors focused on corruption and fraud awareness Training for SEC authorities

  19. Thank you for your attention!

  20. References Madoff Securities Auditing slides http://www.madoffvictimfund.com/ https://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/06/27/peter-madoff- expected-to-plead-guilty/?hp http://deepakinfo.tripod.com/icai/gn/GN-22.pdf http://www.ifac.org/system/files/downloads/a012-2010- iaasb-handbook-isa-240.pdf

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#