The Relationship Between Language and Music: Insights from Semantics

 
N
ATURAL
 L
ANGUAGE
 S
EMANTICS
 
AND
 M
USIC
 
 
OFAI-Lecture Series
March 8
, 2023
 
Winfried Lechner
National and Kapodistrian
University of Athens
B
EFORE
 
WE
 
BEGIN
…. 
WHAT
 
THIS
 
IS
 (
NOT
) 
ABOUT
 
This presentation will be concerned with:
o
Meanings of 
linguistic
 expressions
o
Linguistic meanings undergirding 
concepts
o
Syntax, 
distributional
 invariants and meaning
But this talk will not touch upon:
o
Meaning and truth/truth-conditions
o
Connotations, social meaning, expressive meaning, …
o
Emotional expression of music 
(Rousseau, Herder, Helmholtz,….)
o
Koelsch’s taxonomy of musical meaning 
(Koelsch 2012)
o
Music as part of 
Super Semantics
 
(see Schlenker 2022;
 Migotti
2019
;
 Migotti and Zaradzki 2019
;
 Zaradzki
 2
021
)
2
 
B
EFORE
 
WE
 
BEGIN
…. 
WHAT
 
THIS
 
IS
 (
NOT
) 
ABOUT
 
Topic: 
 
The relation between 
meaning
 in natural/human
 
language and tonal, western music.
Observation: 
Linguistics and musicology differ greatly in
methodology, history and sociology.
Ojectives
o
Identify 
meaningful 
congruences
o
What are issues that do 
not
 make sense?
o
Possibly
 meaningful questions
 
Caveat
: 
I am a linguist with limited knowledge of musical theory!
 
3
 
O
VERVIEW
 
Language vs. Music
Denotation and Reference
The hidden complexity of meaning
Concepts
Consequences for music
Inferences
Quotations
 
4
L
ANGUAGE
 
VS
. M
USIC
 
Language (natural) 
=
def 
 a discrete, combinatorial, compositional,
recursive system for the 
conversion of meaning into sound
 
Music
Language (formal I)
 =
def
 
the set of all strings generated by a
generative grammar
 
Music
Language (formal II) 
=
def
 
a feature calculus/set of production
rules generating strings without meaning
 
Music. 
Opens up the possibility to study 
expressive power
 of
music by inspecting propertries of strings. Where is it located
on the Chomsky hierarchy? 
(
Rohrmeier 2011)
5
 
L
ANGUAGE
 
VS
. M
USIC
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
Marin Mersenne (1588-1648): 
Harmonie Universelle.
2
Lerdahl, Fred and Ray Jackendoff. 1983.
 A Generative Theory of Tonal Music
. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
 
6
M
ODALITY
 
Modality. 
Language is a mind internal system that can be
externalized by different physical means.
 
Acoustic: spoken languages
 
Visual: sign languages
 
Tactile: Pro tactile sign languages
 
non sensory: internal language/monologue
 
Modality in 
music
 
Acoustic
 
Visual music, 
synaesthesia
 
 
Tactile
 
non sensory: internal musical monologue?
7
D
UALITY
 
OF
 P
ATTERNING
 
Emergence of meaning from meaningless primitives:
 
Duality of patterning
 (Hockett, 1960) is the property of
human language that enables combinatorial structure on two
distinct levels: meaningless sounds can be combined into
meaningful morphemes and words, which themselves could
be combined further.”
 
de Boer, B., Sandler, W., & Kirby, S. (2012). New perspectives on duality of patterning:
 
Introduction to the special issue. 
Language and Cognition
4
(4).
Compare this to 
mathematics
, where every symbol is assigned a
designated meaning:
o
ciphers
: 1, 2, .... 0
o
operators: +, x
o
brackets
: (.
), <.>, …
8
F
ORM
-M
EANING
 M
ISMATCHES
 
Ambiguity. 
One form, more than one meaning. The mapping
from form to meaning is – 
prima facie
not functional
!
(1)
Show me the 
bat
.
(2)
Mary spotted the thief 
with the binoculars
.
(3)
John saw 
her duck
.
(4)
Sally invited 
one linguist
 to 
every party
.
Ellipsis.
 Meaning without form:
(5)
 John saw her duck, and Bill did, too.
Expletives.
 Form without meaning:
(6)
a. That John won is obvious.
 
b. 
It
 is obvious that John won.
 
 
 
9
 
O
VERVIEW
 
Language vs. Music
Denotation and Reference
The hidden complexity of meaning
Concepts
Consequences for music
Inferences
Quotations
 
10
D
ENOTATION
 
Denotation.
 
 
For any expression 
α
, the denotation of 
α
.
   
Symbolic: 
α
is 
the semantic value of 
α
.
Semantic competence.
 
The ability of competent speakers of a
language L to assign a denotation to every syntactically well-
formed expression of L.
(1)
Heinrich Ignaz Franz Biber’s son was the supervisor of
Wolfgang Amadé Mozart’s father.
Three foundational questions
Q1. What is the denotation of the larges units (sentences)?
Q2. What are the meanings of the smallest units/atoms?
Q3. How are the parts combined to form complex meanings?
11
R
EFERENCE
 
Reference
. 
The relation which obtains between a natural
language expression and an 
individual
 in the world.
o
Some nominal expressions are
 
referential
:
(1)
Joe Biden
(2)
the president of the USA, this book over there
o
The referent can be 
abstract
:
(3)
 
this sentence/thought you just produced
(4)
 
the 13
th
 century
o
Other natural language expressions 
lack reference
 all together:
(5)
Santa Clause, Hamlet, Batman, Vulcan   (evaluated in ‘our world’)
(6)
the largest prime number
(7)
no book, every book, most books
(8)
run
Verb
, tall
Adjective
, under
Preposition
12
R
EFERENCE
 ≠ D
ENOTATION
 
Sign.
 
Arbitrary relation between form and meaning
Charles Sanders Peirce (1839-1914) 
  
Ferdinand de Saussure (1857-1913
)
 
 
 
 
 
Arbitrary
 
≠ random! 
Arbitrary relations are systematic, but not grounded.
Example for random mapping from form to meaning:
 
For Mary, June 1, 9am, in Athens: 
 
tree
 
= 
 
tree
 
For Mary, June 1, 10am, in Athens:
 
tree
 
=  
 
dog
 
For John, June 1, 9am, in Athens: 
 
tree
 
=  
 
3,1415....
13
 
O
VERVIEW
 
Language vs. Music
Denotation and Reference
The hidden complexity of meaning
Concepts
Consequences for music
Inferences
Quotations
 
14
R
EFERENCE
 ≠ D
ENOTATION
 
Common misconception. 
Words/signs relate mind internal
representations (
concepts
) to 
reality
. Meanings are 
functions
from linguistic forms to objects in the
 
world
.
 
  
 
Denotation = Reference
Problem 1. 
Expressions without reference.
  
 
        (Batman, Vulcan,…)
Problem 2 
(a variety of ambiguity)
. 
Even with arguably
referential expressions such as 
names
, the relation between
language and the world is 
not
 
functional
.
 
15
<
A
MBIGUITY
 
BY
 
D
OUBLE
 V
ISION
 
 
(1)
Bill will win (the election).
(2)
Bill will 
not
 win.
 
(3)
Mary thinks that Bill will win.
(4)
Mary thinks that Bill will 
not
 
win.
 
‘Double vision’ scenario verifying (3) and (4).
 
Mary is professionally
acquainted with Bill, a promising candidate for the general elections, and
is convinced that he will win. In the evening before the election, Mary
joins a group of friends at a bar and they watch an interview with Bill on
TV. Being drunk, Mary does not recognize Bill. Moreover, Mary does not
like Bill’s performance and believes that that guy on TV will loose.
  
(Quine, Willard van Orman.  1956. Quantifiers and propositional attitudes. 
Journal of
 
 
Philosophy 
53:177–187.)
16
 
Contradiction
 (can’t be both true)
 
No contradiction
 (can both be true)
D
OUBLE
 V
ISION
 
AND
 
CONCEPTS
 
There is a 
concept
 (or 
guise
) of Bill for Mary, such that Mary thinks
that
 
Bill will win
 under that concept.
There is a 
concept
 (or 
guise
) of Bill for Mary, such that Mary thinks
that
 
Bill will 
not
 win
 under that concept.
Consequence.
 The name 
Bill
 is 
ambiguous
 and denotes one of two
concepts
, depending on Mary’s 
acquaintance relation 
to Bill.
(1)
Bill
Mary-live
 
=
 
the person Mary is acquainted with in reality
(2)
Bill
Mary-TV
  
=  
 
the person Mary is acquainted with
because she
   
saw that person on TV
Analyzing 
Bill
 as ambiguous provides an analysis for double vision:
(3)
Mary thinks that 
Bill
Mary-live
 will win.
 
       
 
true
(4)
Mary thinks that 
Bill
Mary-TV
 will 
not
 win. 
  
true
17
I
NTERIM
 S
UMMARY
 
(1)
 
Mary thinks that 
Bill
Mary-live
 will win.
(2)
 
Mary thinks that 
Bill
Mary-TV
  will win.
Formally, 
Bill
 denotes a 
function 
from 
possible individuals
 (‘Mary live’,
‘Mary watching TV’) to possible individuals (‘Bill live’, ‘Bill on TV’).
Taking stock
Concepts are (rather complex) 
functions
.
Semantic competence
 consists in the ability to acquire, compute and
combine such functions.
Meaning is 
not
 
reference
 to objects in the world (or a fictional world).
18
Consequence for 
musical semantics
When searching for meaning in other systems (music),
one should 
not
 look for possibly abstract 
individuals
 as values in
the semantic domain, but for 
functions
.
T
HEORY
 
OF
 M
IND
 
 
(1)
   
Mary thinks that Bill
 
will win.
 
(1)
 
 
The speaker’s 
representation
 of
     
Mary’s belief that Bill will win.
Theory of mind (ToM).
 The ability to reconstruct somebody else‘s
mental representations. ToM is instrumental for social interaction
(planning, collaborative action, lying,...).
ToM and language. 
On some accounts, ToM is dependent upon the
acquisition of the semantics of 
think/believe
-predicates.
Musical ToM?
 The ability to reconstruct somebody else‘s musical
representations (harmony, rhythm, melody,... ).
Some observations
ToM is not necessarily language dependent.
Concepts can be 
complex
 and inferred.
Complex concepts are 
compositional
.
19
E
XTENSION
 
AND
 
INTENSION
 
Each sign has 
two dimensions 
of meaning (Rudolf Carnap)
Extension
: meaning at a particular context (time/place)
Intension
: time/space independent meaning (
≈ concept
).
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Extension ≈ Intension + Context 
(i.e. time/place of evaluation)
20
 
O
VERVIEW
 
Language vs. Music
Denotation and Reference
The hidden complexity of meaning
Concepts
Consequences for music
Inferences
Quotations
 
21
C
ONCEPTS
 
AS
 
DEFINITIONS
 
Question
. 
What 
are
 concepts?
A. Concepts as 
definitions
.
 Manifestations of a concept meet all the
necessary and sufficient conditions for that concept.
 
Example
: 
Bachelor =
def 
Unmarried + Man
Problem 1. 
How to define ‘necessary’ and ‘sufficient’?
 
Example
: 
Table=
def
 
four legs and a plane surface 
(Fodor 1981
)
 
   
but
    
 and
 
Problem 2. 
Even closely related concepts have different satisfaction
conditions.
(1)
Necessary conditions for 
healthy: 
 
‘healthy in 
every
 respect’
(2)
Necessary conditions for 
Sick:
 
 
‘unhealthy in 
some
 respect’
22
C
ONCEPTS
 
AS
 
PROTOYPES
 
B. Concepts as 
prototypes. 
 Manifestations of the same concept are
more similar than manifestations of different concept.
Problem 1 – compositionality
 (Jerry Fodor): 
Pet fish
 is neither typical
pet nor a typical fish.
Problem 2. 
How to quantify ‘similarity’?
 
 
Observation.
 
In general, similarity is context dependent.
(1)
(Regarding weight,) an elephant is similar to a car.
(2)
(Regarding color,) an elephant is similar to a flea.
 
Which two individuals of A, B and C fall under the concept
 bird?
23
S
TATISTICAL
 
CONCEPTS
 
C. Concepts as 
averages. 
Manifestations of the same concept are
bound together by being above statistical average.
Problem. 
How to define ‘average’?
 
Scenario
. 
2.5 is the threshold for positive health test. Dan excels in
two of categories, but fails in the third one. Sam consistently scores
low, but above average in all three tests.
 
Question.
 Who is healthier, Dan or Sam?
Predicted: Dan
 
Average health Dan: (5+5+2)/3 = 4
 
Average health Sam: (3+3+3)/3 = 3
 
Experimentally
 
confirmed intuitions: Sam
 
(From Sasson, Galit. 2013. A typology of multidimensional adjectives. 
Journal of Semantics
 30: 335-380.)
24
C
ONCEPTS
: I
NNATENESS
 & 
UNIVERSALITY
 
Nativism vs. Empiricism.
 Are concepts innate or learned?
Pro nativism
Mental computations require 
representations
 
(R. Gallistel)
Compositionality
 of concepts suggests innateness.
Some concepts cannot be learned (Fodor; see 
table
).
Perception and reasoning presupposes Kantian 
categories.
Concepts are not human specific (location, food quality,…)
There is no good theory of concept acquisition.
 
Contra nativism
Human made concepts (
phone
, 
tone row, atomic weight)
There are cultural dependent concepts (
Hell, democracy,…).
Some concepts are processed more effectively than others.
25
C
ONCEPTS
?
Question: 
But what 
are 
concepts after all?
Operative (rather unimpressive) definition:
Conclusion so far
Concepts are implicated in the formation of 
categories.
Concepts are (non-trivial) functions, hence possible values
also for 
meanings in music
.
If a system has 
symbolic rules
, it has concepts (for details
see below).
26
 
O
VERVIEW
 
Language vs. Music
Denotation and Reference
The hidden complexity of meaning
Concepts
Consequences for music
Inferences
Quotations
 
27
C
ONSEQUENCES
 
FOR
 
MUSIC
 
Rules in language
Lexicon: list of atomic signs (form - meaning correspondences)
Each form is assigned a 
category
: N (noun), V (verb), A (adjective),…
Rules 
are 
category sensitive
.
(1)
a.  
 
Sentence
 
 NP VP
 b. 
 
John slept
 
=
 
The individual John is a member of the sleepers.
(2)
a.    *Sentence
 
 AP VP 
    
(not attested in natural language)
 b.
 
*
Tired slept
  = 
The tired individual is a member of the sleepers.
Endocentricity
: Rules create structures in which each larger 
phrase
contains a node of matching category (e.g. 
N
P 
 a 
N
 b)
.
Observation 1. 
Rules 
Categories
 
   
(=  No categories  No r
ules)
  
    
(“No rules without categories.”)
Observation 2. 
Endocentricity  
Categories
    
(“Endocentricity presupposes categories.”)
28
C
ONSEQUENCES
 
FOR
 
MUSIC
 
 
 
 
Corollary 1
. 
If categories are lexically determined 
(but see Baker 2005)
, and if
music lacks a lexicon there are 
no categories
 in music.
 
Observation 1. 
Rules 
    
 categories
 
Observation 2. 
Endocentricity  categories
Corollary 2.
 
Given that categories underlie the existence of headed
structures, music 
lacks endocentric structure
.
  
Observation 3. 
Rules operate on categories & create endocentric trees.
 
 
 
29
(Absurd) Consequence of the 
No Musical Lexicon 
Hypothesis
Since music lacks categories and endocentic structure
there are 
no rules in music.
No Musical
 
Lexicon
 Hypothesis 
(Katz & Pesetsky 2009)
There are no form-meaning pairs in music. Music has no lexicon.
C
ONSEQUENCES
 
FOR
 
MUSIC
 
Possible objection.
 Categories do not emerge from the syntactic part
of the signs (partitioning of the forms), but are 
semantically grounded
.
Problem. 
There are no semantic invariants for syntactic categories
(noun, verb, adjective,…).
 
Nouns denote things/objects 
(
prime number, Batman, 
double vision)
 
Verbs denote actions (
to know, to exist)
Y
Adjectives denote properties (also true of verbs and nouns).
Conclusion.
 Linguistic categories are not semantically grounded, at
least not in an obvious way.
Consequence 1.
 
Since in music there are rules, music 
has
 a lexicon!
A 
musical lexicon
 
is just not made up of simple Saussurian signs.
Consequence 2. 
Music might be better understood in terms of
theories which collapse syntactic and semantic rules (
Categorial
Grammar
, 
Granroth-Wilding & 
Stedman 2017).
30
C
ATEGORIAL
 
GRAMMAR
 
Categorial Grammar (CG) 
(Richard Montague, Mark Steedman, Anna Szabolcsi, i.a.)
Syntactic & semantic rules are part of the lexical entries
Small number of combinators
Lexical categories 
reflect 
distributional invariants
(1)
 
‘sleep’, ‘run’, … are of category NP
S
    
(a sign that combines with an NP and creates a sentence)
(2)
‘John’, ‘the dog’,…. are of category NP
 
(a sign that serves as input to NP
S to creates a sentence)
Music and CG.
 
Harmonic chord progression (cadences) can be
modeled in categorial framwork 
(Granroth-Wilding & 
Steedman 2017)
.
  (3)
  
IV – V –  I
  (4) 
Lexical entry for the IV 
here  
 
IV‘ is 
of category 
V
I
(combines with the 
dominant
 and results in the tonic
)
31
M
USICAL
 L
EXICON
 
Absence of denotations for musical primitives does 
not
 entail
absence of a 
lexicon for music
.
A 
musical lexicon
 collects 
distributional invariants
 (cf.
distributional semantics).
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Observation.
 This dynamic perspective looks a lot similar to
Heim/Kamp style 
Dynamic Semantics
, where meanings are
modeled as the
 potential change they induce in a context
.
32
Conjecture about 
musical semantics
o
The meaning of a musical primitive is the 
set of its
possible contexts
.
o
Meanings of complex expressions are 
functions
 from
contexts to the meaning of the primitives.
 
O
VERVIEW
 
Language vs. Music
Denotation and Reference
The hidden complexity of meaning
Concepts
Consequences for music
Inferences
Quotations
 
33
I
NFERENCES
 
Inferences
 describe logical relations between syntactic objects
(in proof theory/ calculus) or semantic objects (model theory).
1. Logical entailment.
 A entails B if B cannot be false if A is true.
 
(1)
  
Sally read 
all
 books.
   
 
Sally read 
all brown
 books.
 
(2)
  
John sings 
and
 dances.
   
 
John sings.
2. Presuppositions.
 Information that can be infered and is taken for
granted by the speaker.
 
(3)
  
Mary 
began
 playing the flute in 2000.
   
 
Mary has not played the flute before 2000.
 
(4)
  
The
 turtle died.
   
 
There was exactly one (contextually salient) turtle.
34
I
NFERENCES
 
3. Implicatures.
 Information that follows from an utterance
without being logically entailed.
 
(1)
  
John has 
three children
.
 
 
 
 
 
John has not more
 
than three children. 
 
(
implicature
)
 
Cancellability
o
An inference is 
cancelled
 if negating it or taking it back does
not result in inconsistency/infelicity/queasiness.
o
Implicatures can be cancelled, logical entailments and
presuppositions can’t.
35
D
ISTINGUISHING
 
AMONG
 
INFERENCES
 
Logical entailments can
not
 be cancelled
 
(1)
 
Sally read 
all
 books.
 
(2)
 
Sally did 
not
 read 
all
 books.
 
 
(
Contradiction
)
Implicatures can be cancelled
 
Context.
 Citizens with 
three children
 are eligible for tax reduction.
 
(3)
 
John has 
three
 children. So he can apply for tax reduction.
 
(4)
 
In fact, John does 
not
 have three children, he
 has 
four
.
      
(
No 
contradiction
)
Presuppositions can
not
 be cancelled
 
(5)
 
 
 
Mary 
stopped
 smoking. 
 
(
 
Mary used to smoke.)
 
(6)
 
    #In fact, she has 
not 
smoked before.
 
   (
Infelicitous
)
36
I
NFERENCES
 
IN
 
MUSIC
 
MUSIC
o
Are inferences about chord or rhythmic progressions
entailments, implicatures or presuppositions?
o
Are musical inferences best captured in terms of a syntactic,
formal calculus (proof theory) or in terms of their semantic
properties (model theory)?
o
Preparations
 (cf. Rohrmeier) as implicated presuppositions?
 
A first stab
: Read ‘G prepares C’ as C triggers the (cancellable)
implicature that G presupposes C?
o
Idea: Is it possible to ‘cancel’ inferences? How?
37
 
O
VERVIEW
 
Language vs. Music
Denotation and Reference
The hidden complexity of meaning
Concepts
Consequences for music
Inferences
Quotations
 
38
Q
UOTATION
 
Direct quotation
  (1)
 
 
 
‘Aristotle’ refers to Aristotle.
  (2) 
 
Quine said ‘Quotations are interesting’.
(1)
  
 
The string 
‘Aristotle’ refers to Aristotle.
Mixed quotation
  (3)
  
Alice said that life "is difficult to understand.”
(3)
  
 
Alice said that life is difficult to understand and
   
she used the string ‘is difficult to understand’.
Quasi quotation (
Quine‘s corner quotes)
.
 Read
 
n+1
  as
„concatenate the value of n with 
+‘ and with the value of 1“
 
  (4)
 
If n is a natural number, then 
n+1
 is a natural number.
 
  (5)
 
If 2 is a natural number, then 2+1 is a natural number.
    
If 3 is a natural number, then 3+1 is a natural number.
39
Q
UOTATION
 
AND
 
MUSIC
 
Music. 
Citation of motives and forms is ubiquitious.
Question.
 Is there an analogue to mixed or quasi quotation?
Possible example for a complex case of quotation:
 
The march in the fourth and final movement of Shostakovich’s
Symphony No. 5, whose sincerity is still under debate. Did Stalin
get what he wanted (a triumphant celebration of the Soviet)? Was
Mravinskij right in his assessment that the officials were served
well? What did Shostakovich really 
quote
?
 
Further, related areas of exploration
: Can the study of irony,
metaphor, fictional truth in language (see work by Daniel Altshuler,
Emar Meier) inform us about similar notions in music?
 
40
S
UMMARY
 
Natural language 
meaning
 is 
not
 
reference based
.
Semantic 
competence
 consists in the ability to acquire and
compositionally combine intensions/
concepts
.
Intensions (concepts) are probably the basis of the 
Theory of Mind
.
While there is no good theory of concepts, formal semantics
provides a good 
operational
 
characterization of concepts
.
[not discussed today] Linguistic study of concepts affords insights
into vagueness, indeterminacy, gradability, and genericity.
The absence of signs 
does not entail that music lacks a lexicon.
Musical meaning can possibly be modeled in terms of
 distributional
invariances.
If musical inferences and quotations fall into distinct classes,
linguistic instruments/methods might turn out to be of use.
41
 
P
OSTSCRIPT
: 
A
 
QUESTION
 
OF
 
PERSONAL
 
CURIOSITY
 
 
 
Why are there so many 
musicians
 interested in and
knowledgeable about the formal (mathematical, logical,
acoustic, neurological,…) properties of their subject matter,
 
but so few poets, playwrites, authors - or even linguists?
 
42
 
S
ELECTED
 
REFERENCES
 
Arbib, Michael (ed.) 2013. 
Language, Music and the Brain. 
Cambridge,
MA: MIT Press; papers in 
Part 2: Action, Emotion,
and the Semantics
Granroth-Wilding, Mark and Mark Steedman. 2014. A robust parser-
interpreter for jazz chord sequences. 
Journal of New Music
Research 
43.4: 355–374.
Koelsch, Stefan. 2012. 
Brain and Music.
 Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
chapter 10
.
Schlenker, Philippe. 2019. Prolegomena to Music Semantics. 
Review of
Philosophy & Psychology 
10: 35-111.
 
43
Slide Note
Embed
Share

This presentation by Winfried Lechner delves into the intricate connection between language semantics and music, exploring the meanings of linguistic expressions and the underlying concepts. It compares methodologies of linguistics and musicology, analyzing the denotation and reference in language and music, and highlighting the complexities of meaning in both realms. The talk touches on linguistic expressions, syntax, and meaningful congruences, shedding light on how language and music interact in terms of composition and sound generation.

  • Language semantics
  • Musicology
  • Linguistic expressions
  • Denotation
  • Meaning complexities

Uploaded on Sep 21, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. NATURAL LANGUAGE SEMANTICS AND MUSIC OFAI-Lecture Series March 8, 2023 Winfried Lechner National and Kapodistrian University of Athens

  2. BEFORE WE BEGIN. WHAT THIS IS (NOT) ABOUT This presentation will be concerned with: o Meanings of linguistic expressions o Linguistic meanings undergirding concepts o Syntax, distributional invariants and meaning But this talk will not touch upon: o Meaning and truth/truth-conditions o Connotations, social meaning, expressive meaning, o Emotional expression of music (Rousseau, Herder, Helmholtz, .) o Koelsch s taxonomy of musical meaning (Koelsch 2012) o Music as part of Super Semantics (see Schlenker 2022; Migotti 2019; Migotti and Zaradzki 2019; Zaradzki 2021) 2

  3. BEFORE WE BEGIN. WHAT THIS IS (NOT) ABOUT Topic: The relation between meaning in natural/human language and tonal, western music. Observation: Linguistics and musicology differ greatly in methodology, history and sociology. Ojectives o Identify meaningful congruences o What are issues that do not make sense? o Possibly meaningful questions Caveat: I am a linguist with limited knowledge of musical theory! 3

  4. OVERVIEW Language vs. Music Denotation and Reference The hidden complexity of meaning Concepts Consequences for music Inferences Quotations 4

  5. LANGUAGE VS. MUSIC Language (natural) =def a discrete, combinatorial, compositional, recursive system for the conversion of meaning into sound Music Language (formal I) =defthe set of all strings generated by a generative grammar Music Language (formal II) =defa feature calculus/set of production rules generating strings without meaning Music. Opens up the possibility to study expressive power of music by inspecting propertries of strings. Where is it located on the Chomsky hierarchy? (Rohrmeier 2011) 5

  6. LANGUAGE VS. MUSIC Language Music Discrete (atomic units) 1 Combinatorial Compositional (but see below) 2 Recursive Truth conditional Lexicon (atomic form meaning pairs) see below Categories see below Ambiguity Ellipsis (meaning without form) Expletives (form without meaning) Modality independent Duality of patterning 1Marin Mersenne (1588-1648): Harmonie Universelle. 2Lerdahl, Fred and Ray Jackendoff. 1983. A Generative Theory of Tonal Music. Cambridge MA: MIT Press. 6

  7. MODALITY Modality. Language is a mind internal system that can be externalized by different physical means. Acoustic: spoken languages Visual: sign languages Tactile: Pro tactile sign languages non sensory: internal language/monologue Modality in music Acoustic Visual music, synaesthesia Tactile non sensory: internal musical monologue? 7

  8. DUALITY OF PATTERNING Emergence of meaning from meaningless primitives: Duality of patterning (Hockett, 1960) is the property of human language that enables combinatorial structure on two distinct levels: meaningless sounds can be combined into meaningful morphemes and words, which themselves could be combined further. de Boer, B., Sandler, W., & Kirby, S. (2012). New perspectives on duality of patterning: Introduction to the special issue. Language and Cognition, 4(4). Compare this to mathematics, where every symbol is assigned a designated meaning: o ciphers: 1, 2, .... 0 o operators: +, x o brackets: (.), <.>, 8

  9. FORM-MEANING MISMATCHES Ambiguity. One form, more than one meaning. The mapping from form to meaning is prima facie not functional! (1) Show me the bat. (2) Mary spotted the thief with the binoculars. (3) John saw her duck. (4) Sally invited one linguist to every party. Ellipsis. Meaning without form: (5) John saw her duck, and Bill did, too. Expletives. Form without meaning: (6) a. That John won is obvious. b. It is obvious that John won. 9

  10. OVERVIEW Language vs. Music Denotation and Reference The hidden complexity of meaning Concepts Consequences for music Inferences Quotations 10

  11. DENOTATION Denotation. For any expression , the denotation of . Symbolic: is the semantic value of . Semantic competence.The ability of competent speakers of a language L to assign a denotation to every syntactically well- formed expression of L. (1) Heinrich Ignaz Franz Biber s son was the supervisor of Wolfgang Amad Mozart s father. Three foundational questions Q1. What is the denotation of the larges units (sentences)? Q2. What are the meanings of the smallest units/atoms? Q3. How are the parts combined to form complex meanings? 11

  12. REFERENCE Reference. The relation which obtains between a natural language expression and an individual in the world. o Some nominal expressions are referential: (1) Joe Biden (2) the president of the USA, this book over there o The referent can be abstract: (3) this sentence/thought you just produced (4) the 13thcentury o Other natural language expressions lack reference all together: (5) Santa Clause, Hamlet, Batman, Vulcan (evaluated in our world ) (6) the largest prime number (7) no book, every book, most books (8) runVerb, tallAdjective, underPreposition 12

  13. REFERENCE DENOTATION Sign. Arbitrary relation between form and meaning Ferdinand de Saussure (1857-1913) Charles Sanders Peirce (1839-1914) Arbitrary random! Arbitrary relations are systematic, but not grounded. Example for random mapping from form to meaning: For Mary, June 1, 9am, in Athens: For Mary, June 1, 10am, in Athens: For John, June 1, 9am, in Athens: tree = tree = tree = tree dog 3,1415.... 13

  14. OVERVIEW Language vs. Music Denotation and Reference The hidden complexity of meaning Concepts Consequences for music Inferences Quotations 14

  15. REFERENCE DENOTATION Common misconception. Words/signs relate mind internal representations (concepts) to reality. Meanings are functions from linguistic forms to objects in the world. Denotation = Reference Problem 1. Expressions without reference. (Batman, Vulcan, ) Problem 2 (a variety of ambiguity). Even with arguably referential expressions such as names, the relation between language and the world is not functional. 15

  16. AMBIGUITY BY DOUBLE VISION (1) Bill will win (the election). (2) Bill will not win. Contradiction (can t be both true) < (3) Mary thinks that Bill will win. (4) Mary thinks that Bill will not win. No contradiction (can both be true) Double vision scenario verifying (3) and (4). Mary is professionally acquainted with Bill, a promising candidate for the general elections, and is convinced that he will win. In the evening before the election, Mary joins a group of friends at a bar and they watch an interview with Bill on TV. Being drunk, Mary does not recognize Bill. Moreover, Mary does not like Bill s performance and believes that that guy on TV will loose. (Quine, Willard van Orman. Philosophy 53:177 187.) 1956. Quantifiers and propositional attitudes. Journal of 16

  17. DOUBLE VISION AND CONCEPTS There is a concept (or guise) of Bill for Mary, such that Mary thinks that Bill will win under that concept. There is a concept (or guise) of Bill for Mary, such that Mary thinks that Bill will not win under that concept. Consequence. The name Bill is ambiguous and denotes one of two concepts, depending on Mary s acquaintance relation to Bill. (1) (2) BillMary-live BillMary-TV because she = the person Mary is acquainted with in reality = the person Mary is acquainted with saw that person on TV Analyzing Bill as ambiguous provides an analysis for double vision: (3) Mary thinks that BillMary-livewill win. (4) Mary thinks that BillMary-TVwill not win. true true 17

  18. INTERIM SUMMARY (1) Mary thinks that BillMary-livewill win. (2) Mary thinks that BillMary-TVwill win. Formally, Bill denotes a function from possible individuals ( Mary live , Mary watching TV ) to possible individuals ( Bill live , Bill on TV ). Taking stock Concepts are (rather complex) functions. Semantic competence consists in the ability to acquire, compute and combine such functions. Meaning is notreference to objects in the world (or a fictional world). Consequence for musical semantics When searching for meaning in other systems (music), one should not look for possibly abstract individuals as values in the semantic domain, but for FUNCTIONS. 18

  19. THEORY OF MIND (1) (1) Mary thinks that Billwill win. The speaker s representation of Mary s belief that Bill will win. Theory of mind (ToM).The ability to reconstruct somebody else s mental representations. ToM is instrumental for social interaction (planning, collaborative action, lying,...). ToM and language. On some accounts, ToM is dependent upon the acquisition of the semantics of think/believe-predicates. Musical ToM?The ability to reconstruct somebody else s musical representations (harmony, rhythm, melody,... ). Some observations ToM is not necessarily language dependent. Concepts can be complex and inferred. Complex concepts are compositional. 19

  20. EXTENSION AND INTENSION Each sign has two dimensions of meaning (Rudolf Carnap) Extension: meaning at a particular context (time/place) Intension: time/space independent meaning ( concept). INTENSION/CONCEPT EXTENSION March 08, 2008: Barack Obama PRESIDENT OF THE USA March 08, 2023: Joe Biden July 21, 1969: Neil Armstrong, Buzz Aldrin MAN ON THE MOON Oct. 03, 2019: { } March 08, 2023, 7pm, Athens: {WL, } AWAKEAdjective March 08, 2023, 7pm, Vienna: {FN, } (or {}) universally: {2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, } PRIME NUMBER Extension Intension + Context (i.e. time/place of evaluation) 20

  21. OVERVIEW Language vs. Music Denotation and Reference The hidden complexity of meaning Concepts Consequences for music Inferences Quotations 21

  22. CONCEPTS AS DEFINITIONS Question. What are concepts? A. Concepts as definitions. Manifestations of a concept meet all the necessary and sufficient conditions for that concept. Example: BACHELOR =DEFUNMARRIED + MAN Problem 1. How to define necessary and sufficient ? Example: TABLE=DEFfour legs and a plane surface (Fodor 1981) but and Problem 2. Even closely related concepts have different satisfaction conditions. (1) Necessary conditions for HEALTHY: (2) Necessary conditions for SICK: healthy in every respect unhealthy in some respect 22

  23. CONCEPTS AS PROTOYPES B. Concepts as prototypes. Manifestations of the same concept are more similar than manifestations of different concept. Problem 1 compositionality (Jerry Fodor): PET FISH is neither typical pet nor a typical fish. Problem 2. How to quantify similarity ? Observation. In general, similarity is context dependent. (1) (Regarding weight,) an elephant is similar to a car. (2) (Regarding color,) an elephant is similar to a flea. Which two individuals of A, B and C fall under the concept BIRD? A: humming bird B: chicken C: drone can fly humming sound < 100g 23

  24. STATISTICAL CONCEPTS C. Concepts as averages. Manifestations of the same concept are bound together by being above statistical average. Problem. How to define average ? Scenario. 2.5 is the threshold for positive health test. Dan excels in two of categories, but fails in the third one. Sam consistently scores low, but above average in all three tests. 6 Question. Who is healthier, Dan or Sam? 5 Blood pressure Pulse Predicted: Dan 4 3 Average health Dan: (5+5+2)/3 = 4 Average health Sam: (3+3+3)/3 = 3 2 1 Blood sugar Experimentally confirmed intuitions: Sam 0 Dan Sam (From Sasson, Galit. 2013. A typology of multidimensional adjectives. Journal of Semantics 30: 335-380.) 24

  25. CONCEPTS: INNATENESS & UNIVERSALITY Nativism vs. Empiricism. Are concepts innate or learned? Pro nativism Mental computations require representations (R. Gallistel) Compositionality of concepts suggests innateness. Some concepts cannot be learned (Fodor; see TABLE). Perception and reasoning presupposes Kantian categories. Concepts are not human specific (location, food quality, ) There is no good theory of concept acquisition. Contra nativism Human made concepts (PHONE, TONE ROW, ATOMIC WEIGHT) There are cultural dependent concepts (HELL, DEMOCRACY, ). Some concepts are processed more effectively than others. 25

  26. CONCEPTS? Question: But what are concepts after all? Operative (rather unimpressive) definition: Concept =Def mental representation that makes it possible to categorize new objects Conclusion so far Concepts are implicated in the formation of categories. Concepts are (non-trivial) functions, hence possible values also for meanings in music. If a system has symbolic rules, it has concepts (for details see below). 26

  27. OVERVIEW Language vs. Music Denotation and Reference The hidden complexity of meaning Concepts Consequences for music Inferences Quotations 27

  28. CONSEQUENCES FOR MUSIC Rules in language Lexicon: list of atomic signs (form - meaning correspondences) Each form is assigned a category: N (noun), V (verb), A (adjective), Rules are category sensitive. (1) a. Sentence NP VP b. John slept = The individual John is a member of the sleepers. (2) a. *Sentence AP VP b. *Tired slept (not attested in natural language) = The tired individual is a member of the sleepers. Endocentricity: Rules create structures in which each larger phrase contains a node of matching category (e.g. NP a N b). Observation 1. Rules Categories (= No categories No rules) ( No rules without categories. ) Observation 2. Endocentricity Categories ( Endocentricity presupposes categories. ) 28

  29. CONSEQUENCES FOR MUSIC No Musical Lexicon Hypothesis (Katz & Pesetsky 2009) There are no form-meaning pairs in music. Music has no lexicon. Corollary 1. If categories are lexically determined (but see Baker 2005), and if music lacks a lexicon there are no categories in music. Observation 1. Rules Observation 2. Endocentricity categories categories Corollary 2. Given that categories underlie the existence of headed structures, music lacks endocentric structure. Observation 3. Rules operate on categories & create endocentric trees. (Absurd) Consequence of the No Musical Lexicon Hypothesis Since music lacks categories and endocentic structure there are no rules in music. 29

  30. CONSEQUENCES FOR MUSIC Possible objection. Categories do not emerge from the syntactic part of the signs (partitioning of the forms), but are semantically grounded. Problem. There are no semantic invariants for syntactic categories (noun, verb, adjective, ). Nouns denote things/objects (prime number, Batman, double vision) Verbs denote actions (to know, to exist) Adjectives denote properties (also true of verbs and nouns). Y Conclusion. Linguistic categories are not semantically grounded, at least not in an obvious way. Consequence 1. Since in music there are rules, music has a lexicon! A musical lexicon is just not made up of simple Saussurian signs. Consequence 2. Music might be better understood in terms of theories which collapse syntactic and semantic rules (Categorial Grammar, Granroth-Wilding & Stedman 2017). 30

  31. CATEGORIAL GRAMMAR Categorial Grammar (CG) (Richard Montague, Mark Steedman, Anna Szabolcsi, i.a.) Syntactic & semantic rules are part of the lexical entries Small number of combinators Lexical categories reflect distributional invariants (1) sleep , run , are of category NP S (a sign that combines with an NP and creates a sentence) (2) John , the dog , . are of category NP (a sign that serves as input to NP S to creates a sentence) Music and CG. Harmonic chord progression (cadences) can be modeled in categorial framwork (Granroth-Wilding & Steedman 2017). (3) IV V I (4) Lexical entry for the IV here IV is of category V I (combines with the dominant and results in the tonic) 31

  32. MUSICAL LEXICON Absence of denotations for musical primitives does not entail absence of a lexicon for music. A musical lexicon collects distributional invariants (cf. distributional semantics). Conjecture about musical semantics o The meaning of a musical primitive is the set of its possible contexts. o Meanings of complex expressions are functions from contexts to the meaning of the primitives. Observation. This dynamic perspective looks a lot similar to Heim/Kamp style Dynamic Semantics, where meanings are modeled as the potential change they induce in a context. 32

  33. OVERVIEW Language vs. Music Denotation and Reference The hidden complexity of meaning Concepts Consequences for music Inferences Quotations 33

  34. INFERENCES Inferences describe logical relations between syntactic objects (in proof theory/ calculus) or semantic objects (model theory). 1. Logical entailment. A entails B if B cannot be false if A is true. (1) Sally read all books. Sally read all brown books. (2) John sings and dances. John sings. 2. Presuppositions. Information that can be infered and is taken for granted by the speaker. (3) Mary began playing the flute in 2000. Mary has not played the flute before 2000. (4) The turtle died. There was exactly one (contextually salient) turtle. 34

  35. INFERENCES 3. Implicatures. Information that follows from an utterance without being logically entailed. (1) John has three children. John has not more than three children. (implicature) Cancellability o An inference is cancelled if negating it or taking it back does not result in inconsistency/infelicity/queasiness. o Implicatures can be cancelled, logical entailments and presuppositions can t. 35

  36. DISTINGUISHING AMONG INFERENCES Logical entailments cannot be cancelled (1) (2) Sally read all books. Sally did not read all books. (Contradiction) Implicatures can be cancelled Context. Citizens with three children are eligible for tax reduction. (3) (4) John has three children. So he can apply for tax reduction. In fact, John does not have three children, he has four. (No contradiction) Presuppositions cannot be cancelled (5) Mary stopped smoking. ( (6) #In fact, she has not smoked before. Mary used to smoke.) (Infelicitous) 36

  37. INFERENCES IN MUSIC MUSIC o Are inferences about chord or rhythmic progressions entailments, implicatures or presuppositions? o Are musical inferences best captured in terms of a syntactic, formal calculus (proof theory) or in terms of their semantic properties (model theory)? o Preparations (cf. Rohrmeier) as implicated presuppositions? A first stab: Read G prepares C as C triggers the (cancellable) implicature that G presupposes C? o Idea: Is it possible to cancel inferences? How? 37

  38. OVERVIEW Language vs. Music Denotation and Reference The hidden complexity of meaning Concepts Consequences for music Inferences Quotations 38

  39. QUOTATION Direct quotation (1) Aristotle refers to Aristotle. (2) Quine said Quotations are interesting . (1) The string Aristotle refers to Aristotle. Mixed quotation (3) Alice said that life "is difficult to understand. (3) Alice said that life is difficult to understand and she used the string is difficult to understand . Quasi quotation (Quine s corner quotes). Read n+1 as concatenate the value of n with + and with the value of 1 (4) If n is a natural number, then n+1 is a natural number. (5) If 2 is a natural number, then 2+1 is a natural number. If 3 is a natural number, then 3+1 is a natural number. 39

  40. QUOTATION AND MUSIC Music. Citation of motives and forms is ubiquitious. Question. Is there an analogue to mixed or quasi quotation? Possible example for a complex case of quotation: The march in the fourth and final movement of Shostakovich s Symphony No. 5, whose sincerity is still under debate. Did Stalin get what he wanted (a triumphant celebration of the Soviet)? Was Mravinskij right in his assessment that the officials were served well? What did Shostakovich really quote? Further, related areas of exploration: Can the study of irony, metaphor, fictional truth in language (see work by Daniel Altshuler, Emar Meier) inform us about similar notions in music? 40

  41. SUMMARY Natural language meaning is not reference based. Semantic competence consists in the ability to acquire and compositionally combine intensions/concepts. Intensions (concepts) are probably the basis of the Theory of Mind. While there is no good theory of concepts, formal semantics provides a good operational characterization of concepts. [not discussed today] Linguistic study of concepts affords insights into vagueness, indeterminacy, gradability, and genericity. The absence of signs does not entail that music lacks a lexicon. Musical meaning can possibly be modeled in terms of distributional invariances. If musical inferences and quotations fall into distinct classes, linguistic instruments/methods might turn out to be of use. 41

  42. POSTSCRIPT: A QUESTION OF PERSONAL CURIOSITY Why are there so many musicians interested in and knowledgeable about the formal (mathematical, logical, acoustic, neurological, ) properties of their subject matter, but so few poets, playwrites, authors - or even linguists? 42

  43. SELECTED REFERENCES Arbib, Michael (ed.) 2013. Language, Music and the Brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; papers in Part 2: Action, Emotion, and the Semantics Granroth-Wilding, Mark and Mark Steedman. 2014. A robust parser- interpreter for jazz chord sequences. Journal of New Music Research 43.4: 355 374. Koelsch, Stefan. 2012. Brain and Music. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. chapter 10. Schlenker, Philippe. 2019. Prolegomena to Music Semantics. Review of Philosophy & Psychology 10: 35-111. 43

More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#