The Federal Civil False Claims Act (FCA)

The GOOD, the BAD, and the UGLY
The Federal [Civil] False Claims Act (FCA) 
The FCA fills a gap in the federal law for the
pursuit of  “fraudsters” – those who cheat the
government.
How?  Why?
Because:
The FCA does not require proof of a
defendant’s criminal intent.
The FCA does not impose the criminal burden
of proof on the government.
 
1
The GOOD
The FCA permits the government to recover
THREE TIMES the amount of government
funds stolen by the fraud, waste, and abuse
(damages) when either:
 (1) criminal prosecution was successfully
accomplished, yet has not resulted in complete
recovery of the government’s damages; or,
(2) criminal prosecution is not feasible.
 
2
The “Lincoln Law” - Passed in 1863 -
Signed into law by President Lincoln
The FCA is found in Title 31 U.S.C. § 3729, 
et
seq
. (
et seq
. is a contraction for the Latin phrase
et sequentia” 
which means “and the following
ones,”) the sections following section 3729 of
Title 31, sections 3730, 3731, 3732, and 3733,
provide details of the various aspects of the FCA.
 
3
THE BAD . . . (Acts, that is.)
Section 3729 provides the definition
of the 
prohibited activities.
 
4
The “Et Seq.” Qui Tams
The “Whistleblower” Section
Section 3730, is the 
qui tam 
or “whistleblower”
actions section which allows a 
private person 
to
file an FCA action “for the person and for the United
States government.”
2
5
Et Seq. – Time, Burden, and Estoppel
Section 3731 provides for Nationwide
Subpoena Power,
the Statute Of Limitations,
the Burden of Proof, and
Criminal Conviction Estoppel;
3
6
Et Seq. - Venue & Jurisdiction
Section
 3732 provides the 
venue 
(where the acts
occurred),
personal jurisdiction (
where a person can be
subjected to a court’s authority
) 
and
the court’s 
subject matter jurisdiction
(
whether the court can assert its authority)
of an FCA action;
4
7
Et Seq. - Civil Investigative Demands
Section 3733 provides for Civil
Investigative Demands 
(
CIDs
)
 - a
government investigation tool).
5
8
The BAD 
Presenting False or Fraudulent Claims
(a) Liability for Certain Acts.-
(1) In general. Subject to paragraph (2), any person
who ---
 (a)(1) (A) knowingly presents, or causes to be
presented a false or fraudulent claim for payment or
approval;
6
9
The BAD –
Making and Using False Information
(a)(1)(B) knowingly makes, uses, or causes to
be made or used, a false record or statement
material to a false or fraudulent claim;
 
10
The BAD –
Conspiracy
(a)(1) (C) conspires to commit a violation of
subparagraph (A), (B), (D), (E), (F), or )G);
 
11
The BAD –
Reverse” False Claims
(a)(1)(D) has possession, custody, or control of
property or money used, or to be used, by the
Government and, knowingly delivers, or
causes to be delivered, LESS THAN all of that
money or property;
 
12
The BAD –
Fraudulent Receipts
(a)(1)(E) is authorized to make or deliver a
document certifying receipt of property used,
or to be used, by the Government and,
intending to defraud the Government, makes
or delivers the receipt without completely
knowing that the information on the receipt is
true;
 
13
The BAD –
Receiving Stolen Government Property
(a)(1)(F) knowingly buys, or receives as a
pledge of an obligation or debt, public
property from an officer or employee of
the Government, or a member of the
Armed Forces, who lawfully may not sell
or pledge property; or
7
14
The BAD –
Deceptive Information
(a)(1)(G) knowingly makes, uses, or causes to
be made or used, a 
false record or statement
material to 
an obligation to pay or transmit
money or property to the Government, or
knowingly conceals or knowingly and
improperly avoids or decreases an obligation
to pay or transmit money or property to the
Government.
 
15
“Materiality”
(4) the term “material” means having a natural
tendency to Influence
, or be 
capable of influencing
, the
Payment or Receipt of money or property;
materiality depends on “whether the false statement has
a natural 
tendency to influence 
agency action or is
capable
 
of
 
influencing 
agency action.” 
U.S. ex rel.
Bennett v. Genetics & IVF Institute, Inc., 199 F. 3d
1328 (4
th
 cir 1999) (unreported)
 
16
The UGLY -
3 times Damages PLUS Penalties
is liable to the United States Government for a
civil penalty of not less than $5,000 [$5,500
since 2009] and not more than $10,000
[$11,000 since 2009] , as adjusted by the
Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment
Act of 1990 (28 U.S.C. 2461 note: Public Law
104-410), plus 3 times the amount of damages
which the Government sustains because of the
act of that person.
 
17
Reduced Damages Amounts If Confessed
Within 30 Days of Knowledge
(a)(2) Reduced Damages – If the court finds
that –
 (A) the person committing the violation of this
subsection furnished officials of the United
States responsible for investigating false
claims violations with all information known
to such person about the violation within 30
days after the date on which the defendant first
obtained the information;
 
18
Full Cooperation
(a)(2)(B) such person fully cooperated with any
Government investigation of such violation; and
(a)(2)(C) at the time such person furnished the United
States with the information about the violation, no
criminal prosecution, civil action, or administrative
action had commenced under this title with respect to
such violation, and the person did not have actual
knowledge of the existence of an investigation into
such violation;
 
19
Two, Not Three, Times Damages
the court may assess not less than 2 times the
amount of damages which the Government
sustains because of the act of that person.
(a)(3) 
Costs of Civil Actions 
-- A person
violating this subsection shall 
also be liable 
to
the United States Government for the 
costs of
a civil action 
brought 
to recover 
any such
penalty or damages
.
 
20
Definitions- Knowing/ly
No “Specific Intent” to Defraud Need be Shown
3729(b) Definitions. – For purposes of this section,
   (1) the term “knowing” and “knowingly--”
        (A) mean that a person, with respect to
information—
              (i) has actual knowledge of the information;
              (ii) acts in deliberate ignorance of the truth or
falsity of the information; or
              iii) acts in reckless disregard of the truth or
falsity of the information; and
(B) require no proof of specific intent to defraud.
 
21
Deliberate Ignorance
The government may prove that the defendant
acted "knowingly" by proving,
that this defendant deliberately closed his eyes to
what would otherwise have been obvious to him.
No one can avoid responsibility for a violation by
deliberately ignoring what is obvious.
a person's knowledge of a particular fact may be
shown from a deliberate or intentional ignorance
or deliberate or intentional blindness to the
existence of that fact.
31
22
Claim Defined
3729(b)(2) the term “claim”
     (A) means any 
Request
 Or 
Demand
, whether under
a 
Contract Or Otherwise
, for
Money Or Property and
Whether Or Not 
the United States has 
Title
 
to the money
or property, that –
           (i) is Presented to an officer, employee, or agent of
the United States; or is made to a contractor, grantee, or
other Recipient , if the money or property is to be 
Spent Or
Used On The Government’s Behalf Or To Advance A
Government program or interest
, and
            (ii) 
IF
 
the 
United States 
Government
 
23
Past, Present or Future U.S. Money
3729(b)(2)(ii)(I) 
PROVIDES Or HAS
PROVIDED
,
ANY PORTION 
of the money or property
requested or demanded , 
OR
(II) 
WILL REIMBURSE 
such contractor,
grantee, or other recipient for any portion of
the money or property which is requested or
demanded; and
 
24
HOWEVER -“Claim” is Not a Federal
Employee’s Pay
3729(b)(2)(B) does NOT include requests or
demands for money or property that the
Government has paid to an individual as
Compensation For Federal Employment or as
an Income Subsidy with No Restrictions on
that individual's Use of the money or property;
 
25
“Obligation” Defined
(3) the term “OBLIGATION” means an
established Duty, 
Whether Or Not Fixed
,
arising from an Express Or Implied
contractual, grantor-grantee, or licensor-
licensee relationship, from a fee-based or
similar relationship, from statute or regulation,
or from 
Retention Of Any Overpayment
; and
 
26
Contrast -
Elements of 
CRIMINAL
 Conspiracy
(1) agreeing to 
make or use 
a false record or
false statement;
(2) with the 
intent to defraud 
the Government;
(3)
 
intending
 that the false record or false
statement would cause the Government
 
to pay
the false or fraudulent claim;
 
27
Elements of Conspiracy
under the FCA
(1) “knowingly” agreeing to 
make or use 
a false
record or false statement;
(2) with actual knowledge, or in deliberate
ignorance of, the truth or falsity of, or in reckless
disregard of, the truth or falsity of, the false
record or false statement;
(3)
 
with actual knowledge, or in deliberate
ignorance of the truth or falsity of, or in reckless
disregard of the truth or falsity of, the false record
or false statement;
17
28
Violations of Statutes and Regulations
. . . a violation of a statute or regulation does
not, by itself, trigger FCA liability
“it is the 
False Certification 
of compliance
which creates liability 
when
 
Certification
 
is a
Prerequisite
 to obtaining a government
benefit.”
United States ex rel. Hopper v.
Anton, 91 F.3d 1261, 1266 (9th Cir.1996)
(“Violations of laws, rules, or regulations
alone do not create a cause of action under
the FCA.”);
19
29
False Certification Of Compliance with
Regulations 
Alone
 is Not A Violation
“A false certification of compliance with a statute or
regulation cannot serve as the basis for a[n] . . . action
under the FCA 
unless
 payment is conditioned on that
certification.”  
Harrison v. Westinghouse Savannah
River Co ., 
176 F.3d 776, 786 (4th Cir.1999).
Same,
 
 
X Corp. v. Doe, 816 F. Supp. 1086, (ED Va.
1993)
20
30
Objective Falsehood
There must be the use of a “lie” to support a false
claim -
the
 
False Claims Act cannot be construed to
include a run-of-the-mill breach of contract action
that is devoid of any 
objective falsehood.
“fraud may only be found in 
expressions of
fact 
which (1) admit of being adjudged true or
false in a way that (2) admit of empirical
verification.”
U.S. ex rel. Wilson v Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc.,
525 F. 3d 370 (4
th
 Cir 2008)
 
31
What is 
Fraud
?
"Fraud" is an intentional or deliberate
misrepresentation of the truth
for the purpose of inducing another, in reliance
on it, to part with a thing of value or to
surrender a legal right.
Fraud, then, is a deceit which, whether
perpetrated by words, conduct, or silence, is
designed to cause another to act upon it to his
or her legal injury.
29
32
Compare With Criminal Intent
Knowingly False As To A Material Fact
A 
claim is false if it was 
untrue when
made,
and was then 
known to be untrue
when made,
by the 
person making it or causing it
to be made.
22
33
Fraudulent As To A Material Fact
A claim is fraudulent if it was 
falsely made 
or
caused to be made
with the intent to defraud
.
24
34
Fictitious As To A Material Fact
A claim is 
fictitious
 if it is 
not real
 
or if it 
does
not correspond to what actually happened,
and the 
person
 making it or causing it to be
made 
knew
 that it was 
not real at the time
 
it
was made.
23
35
Knowingly
26
36
Intent To Defr
aud
To act with criminal intent to defraud means to
act 
knowingly
AND with the 
specific 
intent to deceive
,
for the 
purpose
 
of
 
causing
 some financial or
property 
loss 
to the United States.
(1 Sand, Siffert, Loughlin, and Reiss, 
Modern
Federal Jury Instructions, Section 18-7).
27
37
Intent
To act with an "intent to defraud" means to act
knowingly and with the intention or the purpose
to deceive or to cheat.
An intent to defraud is accompanied, ordinarily,
by a desire or a purpose to bring about some gain
or benefit to oneself or some other person or by a
desire or a purpose to cause some loss to some
person.
(2 Devitt, Blackmar and O'Malley, 
Federal Jury
Practice and Instructions, § 40.14 (4th ed. 1990)).
28
38
What Is "Fraudulent
?"
A statement, claim or document is "fraudulent"
if it was falsely made,
or made with reckless indifference as to its
truth or falsity,
and made or caused to be made with an intent
to deceive.
(1A O’Malley, Grenig and Lee, 
Federal Jury
Practice and Instructions, §16.08 (5th ed.
2000)).
30
39
But Not Mistake, Negligence, Or
Carelessness
You may not conclude that the defendant  had
knowledge, however, from proof of a mistake,
negligence, carelessness, or a belief in an inaccurate
proposition.
(1A O’Malley, Grenig and Lee, Federal Jury Practice
and Instructions §17.09 (5th Ed. 2000 );  
United
States v. Mancuso
, 42 F.3d 836, 846-47 (4th Cir.
1994)
; United States v. Whittington
, 26 F.3d 456, 461
(4th Cir. 1994); 
United States v. Schnabel
, 939 F.2d
197 (4th Cir. 1991)).
32
40
Slide Note
Embed
Share

The Federal Civil False Claims Act (FCA) addresses fraud against the government without requiring proof of criminal intent. It allows for recovery of stolen funds and whistleblower actions, with defined prohibited activities and legal provisions for prosecution. The FCA fills a critical gap in federal law for pursuing fraudsters.

  • Federal law
  • Fraud
  • Whistleblower
  • Legal provisions

Uploaded on Oct 05, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The GOOD, the BAD, and the UGLY The Federal [Civil] False Claims Act (FCA) The FCA fills a gap in the federal law for the pursuit of fraudsters those who cheat the government. How? Why? Because: The FCA does not require proof of a defendant s criminal intent. The FCA does not impose the criminal burden of proof on the government. 1

  2. The GOOD The FCA permits the government to recover THREE TIMES the amount of government funds stolen by the fraud, waste, and abuse (damages) when either: (1) criminal prosecution was successfully accomplished, yet has not resulted in complete recovery of the government s damages; or, (2) criminal prosecution is not feasible. 2

  3. The Lincoln Law - Passed in 1863 - Signed into law by President Lincoln The FCA is found in Title 31 U.S.C. 3729, et seq. (et seq. is a contraction for the Latin phrase et sequentia which means and the following ones, ) the sections following section 3729 of Title 31, sections 3730, 3731, 3732, and 3733, provide details of the various aspects of the FCA. 3

  4. THE BAD . . . (Acts, that is.) Section 3729 provides the definition of the PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES. 4

  5. The Et Seq. Qui Tams The Whistleblower Section Section 3730, is the qui tam or whistleblower actions section which allows a PRIVATE PERSON to file an FCA action for the person and for the United States government. 2 5

  6. Et Seq. Time, Burden, and Estoppel Section 3731 provides for Nationwide Subpoena Power, the Statute Of Limitations, the Burden of Proof, and Criminal Conviction Estoppel; 3 6

  7. Et Seq. - Venue & Jurisdiction Section 3732 provides the VENUE (where the acts occurred), PERSONAL JURISDICTION (where a person can be subjected to a court s authority) and the court s SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION (whether the court can assert its authority) of an FCA action; 4 7

  8. Et Seq. - Civil Investigative Demands Section 3733 provides for Civil Investigative Demands (CIDs) - a government investigation tool). 5 8

  9. The BAD Presenting False or Fraudulent Claims (a) Liability for Certain Acts.- (1) In general. Subject to paragraph (2), any person who --- (a)(1) (A) knowingly presents, or causes to be presented a false or fraudulent claim for payment or approval; 6 9

  10. The BAD Making and Using False Information (a)(1)(B) knowingly makes, uses, or causes to be made or used, a false record or statement material to a false or fraudulent claim; 10

  11. The BAD Conspiracy (a)(1) (C) conspires to commit a violation of subparagraph (A), (B), (D), (E), (F), or )G); 11

  12. The BAD Reverse False Claims (a)(1)(D) has possession, custody, or control of property or money used, or to be used, by the Government and, knowingly delivers, or causes to be delivered, LESS THAN all of that money or property; 12

  13. The BAD Fraudulent Receipts (a)(1)(E) is authorized to make or deliver a document certifying receipt of property used, or to be used, by the Government and, intending to defraud the Government, makes or delivers the receipt without completely knowing that the information on the receipt is true; 13

  14. The BAD Receiving Stolen Government Property (a)(1)(F) knowingly buys, or receives as a pledge of an obligation or debt, public property from an officer or employee of the Government, or a member of the Armed Forces, who lawfully may not sell or pledge property; or 7 14

  15. The BAD Deceptive Information (a)(1)(G) knowingly makes, uses, or causes to be made or used, a false record or statement material to an obligation to pay or transmit money or property to the Government, or knowingly conceals or knowingly and improperly avoids or decreases an obligation to pay or transmit money or property to the Government. 15

  16. Materiality (4) the term material means having a natural tendency to Influence, or be capable of influencing, the Payment or Receipt of money or property; materiality depends on whether the false statement has a natural tendency to influence agency action or is capableofinfluencing agency action. U.S. ex rel. Bennett v. Genetics & IVF Institute, Inc., 199 F. 3d 1328 (4th cir 1999) (unreported) 16

  17. The UGLY - 3 times Damages PLUS Penalties is liable to the United States Government for a civil penalty of not less than $5,000 [$5,500 since 2009] and not more than $10,000 [$11,000 since 2009] , as adjusted by the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990 (28 U.S.C. 2461 note: Public Law 104-410), plus 3 times the amount of damages which the Government sustains because of the act of that person. 17

  18. Reduced Damages Amounts If Confessed Within 30 Days of Knowledge (a)(2) Reduced Damages If the court finds that (A) the person committing the violation of this subsection furnished officials of the United States responsible for investigating false claims violations with all information known to such person about the violation within 30 days after the date on which the defendant first obtained the information; 18

  19. Full Cooperation (a)(2)(B) such person fully cooperated with any Government investigation of such violation; and (a)(2)(C) at the time such person furnished the United States with the information about the violation, no criminal prosecution, civil action, or administrative action had commenced under this title with respect to such violation, and the person did not have actual knowledge of the existence of an investigation into such violation; 19

  20. Two, Not Three, Times Damages the court may assess not less than 2 times the amount of damages which the Government sustains because of the act of that person. (a)(3) Costs of Civil Actions -- A person violating this subsection shall also be liable to the United States Government for the costs of a civil action brought to recover any such penalty or damages. 20

  21. Definitions- Knowing/ly No Specific Intent to Defraud Need be Shown 3729(b) Definitions. For purposes of this section, (1) the term knowing and knowingly-- (A) mean that a person, with respect to information (i) has actual knowledge of the information; (ii) acts in deliberate ignorance of the truth or falsity of the information; or iii) acts in reckless disregard of the truth or falsity of the information; and (B) require no proof of specific intent to defraud. 21

  22. Deliberate Ignorance The government may prove that the defendant acted "knowingly" by proving, that this defendant deliberately closed his eyes to what would otherwise have been obvious to him. No one can avoid responsibility for a violation by deliberately ignoring what is obvious. a person's knowledge of a particular fact may be shown from a deliberate or intentional ignorance or deliberate or intentional blindness to the existence of that fact. 31 22

  23. Claim Defined 3729(b)(2) the term claim (A) means any Request Or Demand, whether under a Contract Or Otherwise, for Money Or Property and Whether Or Not the United States has Title to the money or property, that (i) is Presented to an officer, employee, or agent of the United States; or is made to a contractor, grantee, or other Recipient , if the money or property is to be Spent Or Used On The Government s Behalf Or To Advance A Government program or interest, and (ii) IF the United States Government 23

  24. Past, Present or Future U.S. Money 3729(b)(2)(ii)(I) PROVIDES Or HAS PROVIDED, ANY PORTION of the money or property requested or demanded , OR (II) WILL REIMBURSE such contractor, grantee, or other recipient for any portion of the money or property which is requested or demanded; and 24

  25. HOWEVER -Claim is Not a Federal Employee s Pay 3729(b)(2)(B) does NOT include requests or demands for money or property that the Government has paid to an individual as Compensation For Federal Employment or as an Income Subsidy with No Restrictions on that individual's Use of the money or property; 25

  26. Obligation Defined (3) the term OBLIGATION means an established Duty, Whether Or Not Fixed, arising from an Express Or Implied contractual, grantor-grantee, or licensor- licensee relationship, from a fee-based or similar relationship, from statute or regulation, or from Retention Of Any Overpayment; and 26

  27. Contrast - Elements of CRIMINAL Conspiracy (1) agreeing to make or use a false record or false statement; (2) with the intent to defraud the Government; (3) intending that the false record or false statement would cause the Governmentto pay the false or fraudulent claim; 27

  28. Elements of Conspiracy under the FCA (1) knowingly agreeing to make or use a false record or false statement; (2) with actual knowledge, or in deliberate ignorance of, the truth or falsity of, or in reckless disregard of, the truth or falsity of, the false record or false statement; (3) with actual knowledge, or in deliberate ignorance of the truth or falsity of, or in reckless disregard of the truth or falsity of, the false record or false statement; 17 28

  29. Violations of Statutes and Regulations . . . a violation of a statute or regulation does not, by itself, trigger FCA liability it is the False Certification of compliance which creates liability when Certification is a Prerequisite to obtaining a government benefit. United States ex rel. Hopper v. Anton, 91 F.3d 1261, 1266 (9th Cir.1996) ( Violations of laws, rules, or regulations alone do not create a cause of action under the FCA. ); 19 29

  30. False Certification Of Compliance with Regulations Alone is Not A Violation A false certification of compliance with a statute or regulation cannot serve as the basis for a[n] . . . action under the FCA unless payment is conditioned on that certification. Harrison v. Westinghouse Savannah River Co ., 176 F.3d 776, 786 (4th Cir.1999). Same, X Corp. v. Doe, 816 F. Supp. 1086, (ED Va. 1993) 20 30

  31. Objective Falsehood There must be the use of a lie to support a false claim - theFalse Claims Act cannot be construed to include a run-of-the-mill breach of contract action that is devoid of any OBJECTIVE FALSEHOOD. fraud may only be found in EXPRESSIONSOF FACT which (1) admit of being adjudged true or false in a way that (2) admit of empirical verification. U.S. ex rel. Wilson v Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 525 F. 3d 370 (4th Cir 2008) 31

  32. What is FRAUD? "Fraud" is an intentional or deliberate misrepresentation of the truth for the purpose of inducing another, in reliance on it, to part with a thing of value or to surrender a legal right. Fraud, then, is a deceit which, whether perpetrated by words, conduct, or silence, is designed to cause another to act upon it to his or her legal injury. 29 32

  33. Compare With Criminal Intent Knowingly False As To A Material Fact A claim is false if it was untrue when made, and was then known to be untrue when made, by the person making it or causing it to be made. 22 33

  34. Fraudulent As To A Material Fact A claim is fraudulent if it was falsely made or caused to be made with the intent to defraud. 24 34

  35. Fictitious As To A Material Fact A claim is fictitious if it is not real or if it does not correspond to what actually happened, and the person making it or causing it to be made knew that it was not real at the time it was made. 23 35

  36. Knowingly An act is done knowingly if it is done voluntarily and purposefully, and NOT done by mistake, carelessness or other innocent reason. However, the government does not have to prove that the defendant knew of the relevant legal provisions governing his conduct, as long as it proves that the defendant knew that the claim was false or fictitious. There is also no need for the prosecution to prove that the government relied on the false claim. 26 36

  37. Intent To Defraud To act with criminal intent to defraud means to act knowingly AND with the specific intent to deceive, for the purpose of causing some financial or property loss to the United States. (1 Sand, Siffert, Loughlin, and Reiss, Modern Federal Jury Instructions, Section 18-7). 27 37

  38. Intent To act with an "intent to defraud" means to act knowingly and with the intention or the purpose to deceive or to cheat. An intent to defraud is accompanied, ordinarily, by a desire or a purpose to bring about some gain or benefit to oneself or some other person or by a desire or a purpose to cause some loss to some person. (2 Devitt, Blackmar and O'Malley, Federal Jury Practice and Instructions, 40.14 (4th ed. 1990)). 28 38

  39. What Is "Fraudulent?" A statement, claim or document is "fraudulent" if it was falsely made, or made with reckless indifference as to its truth or falsity, and made or caused to be made with an intent to deceive. (1A O Malley, Grenig and Lee, Federal Jury Practice and Instructions, 16.08 (5th ed. 2000)). 30 39

  40. But Not Mistake, Negligence, Or Carelessness You may not conclude that the defendant had knowledge, however, from proof of a mistake, negligence, carelessness, or a belief in an inaccurate proposition. (1A O Malley, Grenig and Lee, Federal Jury Practice and Instructions 17.09 (5th Ed. 2000 ); United States v. Mancuso, 42 F.3d 836, 846-47 (4th Cir. 1994); United States v. Whittington, 26 F.3d 456, 461 (4th Cir. 1994); United States v. Schnabel, 939 F.2d 197 (4th Cir. 1991)). 32 40

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#