Systematic Review Slide Set Overview
This systematic review slide set provides a structured approach to presenting key information such as the review process, PICOST framework, inclusion/exclusion criteria, risk of bias evaluations for RCTs and non-RCTs, and more. The content is concise, visually appealing, and tailored for a 15-minute presentation format.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Systematic Review Slide Set Total of 7 (no studies) to 15 slides (maximum) using standard format. Total presentation time 15 mins. Almost all information should be able to be cut and pasted from SR. Please delete these text boxes when not needed anymore. Insert Short PICOST title Domain lead: Name and #COI Content Experts: Names and #COI Taskforce: Name Essential slide. Estimated presentation time 20 sec
Systematic Review Slide Set Systematic Review Slide Set Process Please state whether KSU (who?), ESR (who?) or Task Force based SR Was topic reviewed previously? Yes/No If yes, what year(s) Existing CoSTR: Yes/No Year Essential slide. Estimated time <30 sec
Systematic Review Slide Set Systematic Review Slide Set PICOST Population: Intervention: Comparison: Outcomes: Study Design: Timeframe: Essential slide. Paste from PICOST. Estimated time <30 sec
Inclusion/Exclusion & Articles Found Systematic Review Slide Set Systematic Review Slide Set List Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria including dates searched Insert Number of Articles Found on Search Insert Number of Articles Finally Evaluated Essential slide. Paste (as picture or text) from SR. Estimated time <30 sec
Systematic Review Slide Set Systematic Review Slide Set Risk of Bias in RCTS Manuscript Randomization process Deviation from intended intervention Missing outcome data Measurement of outcome Selection of reported result Low Outcomes to which this assessment applies All outcomes Overall Perkins et al, 2018 Jacobs et al, 2011 Olasveengen et al, 2009 Low Low Some concernsa Low Low Some concernsa Low Low Low Low Low All outcomes Highb Low Low Some concernsc Low All outcomes High Essential slide(s). Paste summary of bias assessments here (estimated time 30 sec). If no RCTs: state no RCTs identified Paste from SR.
Systematic Review Slide Set Systematic Review Slide Set Risk of Bias in nonRCTS Outcomes to which this assessment applies Deviation from intended intervention Classification of interventions Study Selective reporting Confounding Missing data Selection Outcomes Overall (author, year) All Agostinucci, 20111 Critical Low Low Low Low Low Moderate Critical outcomes All Blumenstein, 20152 Critical Low Low Low Moderate Low Moderate Critical outcomes All Cesana, 20173 Critical Critical Low Low Low Low Moderate Critical outcomes All Chen, 20084 Critical Low Low Low Low Low Moderate Critical outcomes Essential slide(s). Paste summary of bias assessments here (estimated time 30 sec). If no nonRCTs included: state no nonRCTs included Paste from SR.
Systematic Review Slide Set Systematic Review Slide Set Evidence profile table(s) Essential slide. Estimated time <60 sec. One of up to 3 (maximum) Evidence Profile slides (in standard format) for all outcomes designated as critical . May refer to more than one question per slide if necessary. Could be pasted from word, gradepro.org or SR.
Proposed Consensus on Science statements Systematic Review Slide Set Systematic Review Slide Set Insert Summary statement(s) from SR For the important outcome of survival to hospital discharge we have identified moderate quality evidence (downgraded for indirectness) from two RCTs enrolling 421 patients showing no benefit (OR 0.81 95% CI 0.33 2.01). We did not identify any evidence to address the critical outcome of neurologically intact survival . Essential slide (minimum of one slide). Estimated time <60 sec. Insert Summary statement(s) from SR.
Draft Treatment Recommendations Systematic Review Slide Set Systematic Review Slide Set Insert draft Treatment Recommendations (including direction, strength of evidence grade and quality of evidence): eg. We recommend against X in comparison to Y for OHCA (strong recommendation, high quality of evidence). Values and preferences statement: In making this recommendation we place a higher value on not allocating resources to an ineffective intervention over any yet to be proven benefit for critical or important outcomes. For weak recommendation would use the word suggest instead of recommend . Recommendations can obviously be for or againstroutine or specific use. Essential slide (one or two slides only). Estimated time <60 sec. Insert draft Treatment recommendations from SR team.
Knowledge Gaps (eg. ETT vs BVM) Systematic Review Slide Set Systematic Review Slide Set Other specific PICOs that would be helpful Relationship with training to ETT success Specific research required in-hospital airway studies Essential slide (one slide only). Estimated time <30 sec
