Safety Regulation of PBN Operations Workshop Insights

undefined
Safety Regulation of PBN
Operations
Filippo Tomasello
Rulemaking officer
25 May 2011
25 May 2011
ICAO EUR – PBN Workshop
2
“Specific” approval
is not the “normal” solution
Instrument Rated (IR) pilots
 normally authorized (by law):
FCL.605 IR – 
Privileges
ref. EASA Opinion 04/2010; 27 Aug 2010:
(a) 
fly aircraft in IFR with minimum DH of 200 ft
(b) In case of multi-engine IR, even lower when the
applicant has undergone specific training
(c) ….
Rule FCL.605 (and all other EASA rules for FCL) is expected to
be 
adopted by the European Commission during 2011
… but national rules in the EU, based on JAR-FCL are similar
Underlying assumptions:
 operations well established in
the community; suitable training programmes for IR;
airworthiness certification; safe radio-navigation signal; etc….
25 May 2011
ICAO EUR – PBN Workshop
3
8 requirements behind privileges
1.
Aircraft (and avionics) has 
airworthiness
approval
 covering the envisaged IFR operations
2.
OPS of not challenging 
complexity
3.
Concept/systems “mature” (= operationally used
since a sufficient number of years = 
not “new”
)
4.
Associated 
risk is tolerable
, including
5.
Accuracy, integrity, availability and continuity of 
radio-
navigation signals
6.
Safety oversight of
 procedure designers
7.
Accuracy and integrity of 
NAV data base
8.   Suitable 
training standards and (periodic)
checking procedures for  pilots established
25 May 2011
ICAO EUR – PBN Workshop
4
MNPS operations were “new” in 1977
FAA AC 91-49 (23 Aug 1977)
d. Lateral separation in NAT-MNPS airspace is reduced
(1978) from 120 NM to 60 NM = 
more complexity
e. decided by ICAO that all operators desiring to use MNPS
must 
show that equipment and procedures
 are
capable of continuously complying with specifications
U.S. operators to FAA (= 
to competent authority
)
Operators who have long-range navigation equipment
installed (and certified) may be issued
Letters of Authorization
to operate in NAT-MNPS airspace
Specific
Approval (SPA
)
The 8 requirements
were not satisfied
25 May 2011
ICAO EUR – PBN Workshop
5
Authorization, Approval or SPA?
Is the semantics sufficiently standardised?
No definitions in Annex 6
 for
authorization, acceptance, approval or
specific approval
a “
normal
” case seems to exist:
Par. 2.2.4.7 of Part II (Intl GA) .. aeroplanes in IFR
shall comply with instrument approach procedures
approved by the State
specific
” is used in particular cases:
Par. 2.2.2.2 of Part II to … fly below aerodrome minima
25 May 2011
ICAO EUR – PBN Workshop
6
General authorization through rules
Par 2.3.1.1 Annex 6 Part II
An aeroplane shall be operated:
a)
In compliance with the terms of its
airworthiness certificate or
equivalent
b)
Within the operating limitations
prescribed by the certifying
authority of the State of Registry
c)
…. And of course by a pilot
enjoying sufficient privileges
Par 2.4.11 Annex 6 Part II
All turbine-engined
authorised
 
to carry more
than nine passengers….
No SPA known for No of pax
The word
“authorization
” in Annex 6
does NOT
necessarily
mean SPA
25 May 2011
ICAO EUR – PBN Workshop
7
Is “approval” always “specific”?
Par. 3, Attach 3.B to Annex 6 Part II
The State should indicate through
approval 
of a Minimum Equipment List
(MEL) ….
Is the approval of the MEL
“specific”?
25 May 2011
ICAO EUR – PBN Workshop
8
Authorization for PBN
Par 2.5.2.2 Annex 6 Part II
For PBN operations
, in addition:
a)
Equipment compliant with the PBN specification
b)
Authorized by State of Registry
Authorization can be issued:
Through general rules
Through 
OPS spec
 attached to AOC for CAT operators
(of course not for G.A.)
As 
privilege
 to IR pilots (when all the other
requirements are fulfilled), including for aerial work and
general aviation
Through a 
Specific Approval
 (e.g. letter of
authorisation)
…..etc.
States have
several choices
25 May 2011
ICAO EUR – PBN Workshop
9
General rules in EU OPS
Regulation 859/2008 (
applies only to
operators of CAT by aeroplanes
):
1.175 General for 
air operator certification
(c) 3. satisfy Authority that can conduct safe operations
(g) 2. procedures for the supervision of operations
(l) ensure that every flight is conducted in accordance
with the provisions of the 
Operations Manual
(n) ensure that 
aeroplanes are equipped and crews
are qualified
 for the area and type of operation
(o) comply with the 
maintenance
 requirements
Many possibilities for approvals/oversight
25 May 2011
ICAO EUR – PBN Workshop
10
Appendix 1 to EU OPS 1.175
Contents of the 
Air Operator Certificate:
(c) Description of the type of 
operations authorised
(f) Authorised areas of operation
(g) Special limitations
(h) 
Special authorisations/approvals
 e.g.:
CAT II/CAT III (including approved minima)
(MNPS) Minimum navigation performance specifications
(ETOPS) Extended range operation twin engined
aeroplanes
(RNAV) Area navigation
(RVSM) Reduced vertical separation minima
Transportation of dangerous goods
Authorisation to provide cabin crew safety training
Normal authorization or special
approval are almost the same x CAT?
25 May 2011
ICAO EUR – PBN Workshop
11
PBN in EU OPS 1.243
Operation in areas with specified
navigation performance requirements
(a) Operator shall ensure that an 
aeroplane
operated 
where navigation performance
requirements have been specified, is
certified
 according to these requirements, and
if required,
 that the Authority has
granted the relevant 
operational approval
(b) Operator shall ensure that all contingency
procedures, specified by the authority, have
been included in the 
Operations Manual
Possible non-uniformity
25 May 2011
ICAO EUR – PBN Workshop
12
EASA OPS Rules
Apply to:
CAT 
(by aeroplane or helicopter)
SPO
 (= aerial work)
NCC
 = Non-Commercial Operators of “Complex” aircraft
(e.g. business or corporate aviation)
NCO
= Non-Commercial Operators of “non-complex”
aircraft (e.g. light and sport private aviation)
NPA 2009-02b proposed 
SPA
(
of unlimited validity
)
for certain types of operations, including:
PBN
B-RNAV (RNAV 5)
Much larger scope than
EU OPS (= JAR OPS 1)
25 May 2011
ICAO EUR – PBN Workshop
13
NPA 2009-02b (January 2009)
OPS.SPA.001.SPN Operations in areas with specified
performance based navigation (SPN) 
(a), (b) only if the 
operator has been approved
 by
the competent authority
(c) To obtain approval 
operator shall
:
(1) demonstrate navigation equipment functionality …
(2) 
training programme for the flight crew
(3) establish operating procedures specifying:
(i) equipment to be carried, including MEL
(ii) crew composition and experience
(iii), (iv) normal and contingency procedures
(v) incident reporting
(vi) specific regional procedures, in case of MNPS
(vii) 
navigation database integrity, in case of PBN
Uniform common rules
25 May 2011
ICAO EUR – PBN Workshop
14
CRD 2009-02b.4 (November 2010)
Part SPA
SPA.PBN.100 
PBN operations
 
Aircraft shall only be operated where
performance-based navigation (PBN) is
established, if the operator has been granted an
approval by the competent authority
No specific approval is required for
RNAV5
 (basic area navigation, B-RNAV)
Opinion to be delivered during 2011
Adoption expected in 2012
25 May 2011
ICAO EUR – PBN Workshop
15
25 May 2011
ICAO EUR – PBN Workshop
16
Regional/National safety rules
 
ICAO SARPs
 
National competent authority
Air Operator
Contracted NAV Data Provider
Safety
oversight
Safety
oversight
Safety
oversight
Safety
oversight
Data providers contracted
Air Operator
25 May 2011
ICAO EUR – PBN Workshop
17
25 May 2011
ICAO EUR – PBN Workshop
18
The will of the EU legislator
Whereas:
In its Communication of 15 November 2005
entitled “Extending the tasks of the European
Aviation Safety Agency – an agenda for 2010”,
the Commission announced its intention to
progressively extend the tasks of the European
Aviation Safety Agency ("the Agency"), with a
view towards a
"total system approach",
to aerodrome/airport safety and interoperability,
Air Navigation Services ("ANS") and Air Traffic
Management ("ATM")
Recital 
1 EASA BR
25 May 2011
ICAO EUR – PBN Workshop
19
Certification of avionics not sufficient
25 May 2011
ICAO EUR – PBN Workshop
20
Navigation Service in SES
Regulations 549 and 550/2004
Facilities and services that provide aircraft with
positioning and timing (Art. 2.30; 549)
GNSS clearly fells into this definition
NAV providers (= NSP) can be individually certified
(Art. 7.3; 550)
No identical requirement exist for other transport modes
EGNOS initiated before (…. unfortunately!!!!)
Planning for certification of 
Galileo NSP should
initiate as soon as possible
    …. EASA available to advise
25 May 2011
ICAO EUR – PBN Workshop
21
Regional/National safety rules
 
SATNAV
SP
ICAO SARPs
 
Regional/National competent authority
Air Operator
Certified
Data
Provider
Safety
over
sight
Safety
over
sight
Safety
over
sight
Certified NAV data providers
25 May 2011
ICAO EUR – PBN Workshop
22
Operational Suitability Data (OSD)
GNSS has changed NAV
NAV has a tradition for “specific approval” (SPA)
SPA has unlimited validity
Even COM is evolving (e.g. data link)
But for COM no SPA is required
OSD allows to define (and mandate) specific
training requirements
:
Whenever there is a relevant change
“key elements”
 under responsibility of the (S)TC holder
Implementation of said requirements is checked through
regular oversight of pilots/operators
http://www.easa.europa.eu/rulemaking/docs/crd/2009/CR
D%202009-
01%20(EN,%20comment%20response%20summary%20a
nd%20resulting%20text).pdf
Rules for OSD in force in 2012
25 May 2011
ICAO EUR – PBN Workshop
23
Conclusion
All aviation operations require
approval/authorization (“normal” or “specific”)
For CAT operators several ways (AOC, OPS Spec,
Manual, etc…)
For G.A. the easiest way is through pilot’s
privileges
When the 8 safety requirements …
…. are 
not satisfied
                                 
SPA
Opinion for EASA OPS will follow CRD (= only
BRNAV exempted from SPA)
…but EASA is drafting 
Pre-RIA for new task
MDM.062
 in order to replace the SPA for some
PBN OPS (e.g. straight in RNP APCH)
OSD is an emerging concept, possibly safer than
SPA
undefined
Questions?
Thanks for the attention
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Safety regulation of performance-based navigation (PBN) operations is crucial for Instrument Rated (IR) pilots to ensure safe and efficient IFR flying. This includes specific requirements and privileges, such as minimum decision heights, airworthiness approval, mature systems, and suitable training standards. The workshop also discusses the history and significance of MNPS operations, emphasizing the importance of meeting specific requirements for operating in NAT-MNPS airspace. Additionally, the workshop addresses the semantics and standardization of authorization, approval, and specific approval in aviation regulations.

  • PBN operations
  • Safety regulation
  • IR pilots
  • MNPS operations
  • Authorization

Uploaded on Sep 15, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Safety Regulation of PBN Operations Filippo Tomasello Rulemaking officer 25 May 2011

  2. Specific approval is not the normal solution Instrument Rated (IR) pilots normally authorized (by law): FCL.605 IR Privileges ref. EASA Opinion 04/2010; 27 Aug 2010: (a) fly aircraft in IFR with minimum DH of 200 ft (b) In case of multi-engine IR, even lower when the applicant has undergone specific training (c) . Rule FCL.605 (and all other EASA rules for FCL) is expected to be adopted by the European Commission during 2011 but national rules in the EU, based on JAR-FCL are similar Underlying assumptions: operations well established in the community; suitable training programmes for IR; airworthiness certification; safe radio-navigation signal; etc . 25 May 2011 ICAO EUR PBN Workshop 2

  3. 8 requirements behind privileges Aircraft (and avionics) has airworthiness approval covering the envisaged IFR operations OPS of not challenging complexity Concept/systems mature (= operationally used since a sufficient number of years = not new ) Associated risk is tolerable, including 5. Accuracy, integrity, availability and continuity of radio- navigation signals 6. Safety oversight of procedure designers 7. Accuracy and integrity of NAV data base 8. Suitable training standards and (periodic) checking procedures for pilots established 1. 2. 3. 4. 25 May 2011 ICAO EUR PBN Workshop 3

  4. MNPS operations were new in 1977 FAA AC 91-49 (23 Aug 1977) d. Lateral separation in NAT-MNPS airspace is reduced (1978) from 120 NM to 60 NM = more complexity e. decided by ICAO that all operators desiring to use MNPS must show that equipment and procedures are capable of continuously complying with specifications U.S. operators to FAA (= to competent authority) Operators who have long-range navigation equipment installed (and certified) may be issued Letters of Authorization to operate in NAT-MNPS airspace The 8 requirements were not satisfied Specific Approval (SPA) 25 May 2011 ICAO EUR PBN Workshop 4

  5. Authorization, Approval or SPA? Is the semantics sufficiently standardised? No definitions in Annex 6 for authorization, acceptance, approval or specific approval a normal case seems to exist: Par. 2.2.4.7 of Part II (Intl GA) .. aeroplanes in IFR shall comply with instrument approach procedures approved by the State specific is used in particular cases: Par. 2.2.2.2 of Part II to fly below aerodrome minima 25 May 2011 ICAO EUR PBN Workshop 5

  6. General authorization through rules Par 2.3.1.1 Annex 6 Part II An aeroplane shall be operated: a) In compliance with the terms of its airworthiness certificate or equivalent b) Within the operating limitations prescribed by the certifying authority of the State of Registry c) . And of course by a pilot enjoying sufficient privileges Par 2.4.11 Annex 6 Part II All turbine-engined authorisedto carry more than nine passengers . No SPA known for No of pax The word authorization in Annex 6 does NOT necessarily mean SPA 25 May 2011 ICAO EUR PBN Workshop 6

  7. Is approval always specific? Par. 3, Attach 3.B to Annex 6 Part II The State should indicate through approval of a Minimum Equipment List (MEL) . Is the approval of the MEL specific ? 25 May 2011 ICAO EUR PBN Workshop 7

  8. Authorization for PBN Par 2.5.2.2 Annex 6 Part II For PBN operations, in addition: a) Equipment compliant with the PBN specification b) Authorized by State of Registry States have several choices Authorization can be issued: Through general rules Through OPS spec attached to AOC for CAT operators (of course not for G.A.) As privilege to IR pilots (when all the other requirements are fulfilled), including for aerial work and general aviation Through a Specific Approval (e.g. letter of authorisation) ..etc. 25 May 2011 ICAO EUR PBN Workshop 8

  9. General rules in EU OPS Regulation 859/2008 (applies only to operators of CAT by aeroplanes): 1.175 General for air operator certification (c) 3. satisfy Authority that can conduct safe operations (g) 2. procedures for the supervision of operations (l) ensure that every flight is conducted in accordance with the provisions of the Operations Manual (n) ensure that aeroplanes are equipped and crews are qualified for the area and type of operation (o) comply with the maintenance requirements Many possibilities for approvals/oversight 25 May 2011 ICAO EUR PBN Workshop 9

  10. Appendix 1 to EU OPS 1.175 Contents of the Air Operator Certificate: (c) Description of the type of operations authorised (f) Authorised areas of operation (g) Special limitations Normal authorization or special approval are almost the same x CAT? (h) Special authorisations/approvals e.g.: CAT II/CAT III (including approved minima) (MNPS) Minimum navigation performance specifications (ETOPS) Extended range operation twin engined aeroplanes (RNAV) Area navigation (RVSM) Reduced vertical separation minima Transportation of dangerous goods Authorisation to provide cabin crew safety training 25 May 2011 ICAO EUR PBN Workshop 10

  11. PBN in EU OPS 1.243 Operation in areas with specified navigation performance requirements (a) Operator shall ensure that an aeroplane operated where navigation performance requirements have been specified, is certified according to these requirements, and Possible non-uniformity if required, that the Authority has granted the relevant operational approval (b) Operator shall ensure that all contingency procedures, specified by the authority, have been included in the Operations Manual 25 May 2011 ICAO EUR PBN Workshop 11

  12. EASA OPS Rules Apply to: CAT (by aeroplane or helicopter) SPO (= aerial work) NCC = Non-Commercial Operators of Complex aircraft (e.g. business or corporate aviation) NCO= Non-Commercial Operators of non-complex aircraft (e.g. light and sport private aviation) Much larger scope than EU OPS (= JAR OPS 1) NPA 2009-02b proposed SPA (of unlimited validity) for certain types of operations, including: PBN B-RNAV (RNAV 5) 25 May 2011 ICAO EUR PBN Workshop 12

  13. NPA 2009-02b (January 2009) OPS.SPA.001.SPN Operations in areas with specified performance based navigation (SPN) (a), (b) only if the operator has been approved by the competent authority Uniform common rules (c) To obtain approval operator shall: (1) demonstrate navigation equipment functionality (2) training programme for the flight crew (3) establish operating procedures specifying: (i) equipment to be carried, including MEL (ii) crew composition and experience (iii), (iv) normal and contingency procedures (v) incident reporting (vi) specific regional procedures, in case of MNPS (vii) navigation database integrity, in case of PBN 25 May 2011 ICAO EUR PBN Workshop 13

  14. CRD 2009-02b.4 (November 2010) Part SPA SPA.PBN.100 PBN operations Aircraft shall only be operated where performance-based navigation (PBN) is established, if the operator has been granted an approval by the competent authority No specific approval is required for RNAV5 (basic area navigation, B-RNAV) Opinion to be delivered during 2011 Adoption expected in 2012 25 May 2011 ICAO EUR PBN Workshop 14

  15. SPA for PBN in EASA OPS (CRD) Operation AMC Specific Op. Approval CAT SPO Y Y No No Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y NCC Y No Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y NCO Y No Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y RNAV 10 RNAV 5 (B) RNAV 2 RNAV 1 (P) RNP 4 Basic RNP 1 APCH/LNAV APCH/L/VNAV APCH/LPV RNP AR 20-12 20-4 // 20-16 // 20-XX 20-27 20-27 20-28 20-26 25 May 2011 ICAO EUR PBN Workshop 15

  16. Data providers contracted ICAO SARPs Regional/National safety rules National competent authority Safety oversight Safety oversight Air Operator Air Operator Safety oversight Safety oversight Contracted NAV Data Provider 25 May 2011 ICAO EUR PBN Workshop 16

  17. Evolution RNP APCH in Europe (excluding AR) Requirement No Topic 2009 1 Airworthiness No AMC 2 Complexity No more complex than ILS Cat I 3 Maturity PBN not explicit in EU OPS 4 Risks RNP also includes on board monitoring 5 GNSS Signal in Space responsibilities 6 Procedure designers provisions 7 Data bases Responsibility of operator 8 Competence of pilots Year 2011 AMC 20-27 2013 +AMC 20-28 PBN in draft EASA SPA EASA OPS in force No clear legal EGNOS SSP certified Art 2.2(c)(ii) Reg. 73/2010 EASA oversight No common EU EASA rules No common EU provisions EASA FCL amended + OSD 25 May 2011 ICAO EUR PBN Workshop 17

  18. The will of the EU legislator Whereas: In its Communication of 15 November 2005 entitled Extending the tasks of the European Aviation Safety Agency an agenda for 2010 , the Commission announced its intention to progressively extend the tasks of the European Aviation Safety Agency ("the Agency"), with a view towards a "total system approach", to aerodrome/airport safety and interoperability, Air Navigation Services ("ANS") and Air Traffic Management ("ATM") Recital 1 EASA BR 25 May 2011 ICAO EUR PBN Workshop 18

  19. Certification of avionics not sufficient Segment Constituents/Elements Classification and borders of airspace volumes ATS routes (including instrument procedures) Published AIS Navigation Data Integrated Nav. (avionics) Navigation receiver(s) Nav. Signal in Space (SIS) Ground segment Information to ATCOs Airport Lights Responsibility of State aviation authority Airspace Airspace designers** AIS Providers* Data providers** Manufacturers & Air Operators Airborne Space NAV SP* Ground ATS provider* Aerodrome operators** 25 May 2011 ICAO EUR PBN Workshop 19

  20. Navigation Service in SES Regulations 549 and 550/2004 Facilities and services that provide aircraft with positioning and timing (Art. 2.30; 549) GNSS clearly fells into this definition NAV providers (= NSP) can be individually certified (Art. 7.3; 550) No identical requirement exist for other transport modes EGNOS initiated before ( . unfortunately!!!!) Planning for certification of Galileo NSP should initiate as soon as possible . EASA available to advise 25 May 2011 ICAO EUR PBN Workshop 20

  21. Certified NAV data providers ICAO SARPs Regional/National safety rules Regional/National competent authority Safety over sight Safety over sight Safety over sight SATNAV SP Certified Data Provider Air Operator 25 May 2011 ICAO EUR PBN Workshop 21

  22. Operational Suitability Data (OSD) GNSS has changed NAV NAV has a tradition for specific approval (SPA) SPA has unlimited validity Even COM is evolving (e.g. data link) But for COM no SPA is required OSD allows to define (and mandate) specific training requirements: Whenever there is a relevant change key elements under responsibility of the (S)TC holder Implementation of said requirements is checked through regular oversight of pilots/operators http://www.easa.europa.eu/rulemaking/docs/crd/2009/CR D%202009- 01%20(EN,%20comment%20response%20summary%20a nd%20resulting%20text).pdf Rules for OSD in force in 2012 25 May 2011 ICAO EUR PBN Workshop 22

  23. Conclusion All aviation operations require approval/authorization ( normal or specific ) For CAT operators several ways (AOC, OPS Spec, Manual, etc ) For G.A. the easiest way is through pilot s privileges When the 8 safety requirements . are not satisfiedSPA Opinion for EASA OPS will follow CRD (= only BRNAV exempted from SPA) but EASA is drafting Pre-RIA for new task MDM.062 in order to replace the SPA for some PBN OPS (e.g. straight in RNP APCH) OSD is an emerging concept, possibly safer than SPA 25 May 2011 ICAO EUR PBN Workshop 23

  24. Thanks for the attention Questions?

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#