Reasoning with Dependency Structures and Lexicographic Definitions using Unit Graphs

undefined
Reasoning with Dependency Structures
and Lexicographic Definitions
using Unit Graphs
Maxime Lefrançois, Fabien Gandon
[ maxime.lefrancois | fabien.gandon ] @inria.fr
 
Depling’13, August 30
th
 2013, Prague
Knowledge Representation
answers recurrent needs
represent
manipulate
query
reason
share
...
here: applied to the linguistic domain
Meaning-Text Theory
2
Lefrançois, Gandon, Reasoning  with Dependency  Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs
 
3
Choose Formalism
Populate
Applications
t
Lefrançois, Gandon, Reasoning  with Dependency  Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs
 
4
Choose Formalism
Populate
Applications
t
Lefrançois, Gandon, Reasoning  with Dependency  Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs
5
Semantic Actant Slots (SemASlots)
= Participants of the linguistic situation denoted by L
that have a favoured position in sentences constructed with L
Linguistic Predicates
Need 
1
: Theory of Semantic Actants
(Mel’cuk, 2004)
Lefrançois, Gandon, Reasoning  with Dependency  Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs
6
Semantic Actant Slots (SemASlots)
= Participants of the linguistic situation denoted by L
that have a favoured position in sentences constructed with L
Linguistic Predicates
Need 1: Theory of Semantic Actants
(Mel’cuk, 2004)
+ linguistic criterions
Lefrançois, Gandon, Reasoning  with Dependency  Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs
7
Linguistic Predicates
Need 1: Theory of Semantic Actants
(Mel’cuk, 2004)
Lefrançois, Gandon, Reasoning  with Dependency  Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs
(
to eat
)
(Paul ; eggs ; 
plate
)
logical
predicate
 
8
Linguistic Predicates
Need 1: Theory of Semantic Actants
(Mel’cuk, 2004)
Lefrançois, Gandon, Reasoning  with Dependency  Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs
(
outil
)
(Paul ; Untangle)
(
outil
)
(Paul ; Carpenter)
(
to eat
)
(Paul ; eggs ; 
plate
)
logical
predicate
 
9
Linguistic Predicates
Need 1: Theory of Semantic Actants
(Mel’cuk, 2004)
Lefrançois, Gandon, Reasoning  with Dependency  Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs
(
outil
)
(Paul ; Untangle)
(
outil
)
(Paul ; Carpenter)
(
to eat
)
(Paul ; eggs ; 
plate
)
logical
predicate
 
Existing KR Formalisms
Semantic Web Formalisms
RDF  - 
oriented labelled graphs
   
OWL - 
Description Logics
SPARQL - Query, ...
10
Lefrançois, Gandon, Reasoning  with Dependency  Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs
Existing KR Formalisms
Semantic Web Formalisms
RDF  - 
oriented labelled graphs
   
No Semantics
OWL - 
Description Logics
   
Only binary relations
  
Reify ? -> No Semantics
11
Lefrançois, Gandon, Reasoning  with Dependency  Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs
Existing KR Formalisms
Conceptual Graphs
Sowa
Oriented labelled Graphs
Sowa drew his inspiration from Tesnière
Rules, reasoning,
 
(
Baget, Mugnier, Chein
, ...)
Concepts and Relations definitions, 
(Sowa, Leclère, ...)
12
Lefrançois, Gandon, Reasoning  with Dependency  Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs
Existing KR Formalisms
Conceptual Graphs
   
Alternation Concept – Relation
13
Lefrançois, Gandon, Reasoning  with Dependency  Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs
14
t
The Unit Graphs Formalism
a graph-based formalism,
to represent linguistic units
Choose Formalism
Populate
Applications
Lefrançois, Gandon, Reasoning  with Dependency  Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs
15
t
Draw inspiration from GC
and
Develop a RDF syntax
to exchange knowledge
The Unit Graphs Formalism
Choose Formalism
Populate
Applications
Lefrançois, Gandon, Reasoning  with Dependency  Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs
16
t
The Unit Graphs Formalism
Choose Formalism
Populate
Applications
Lefrançois, Gandon, Reasoning  with Dependency  Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs
Draw inspiration from GC
and
Develop a RDF syntax
to exchange knowledge
17
t
The Unit Graphs Formalism
What reasoning capabilities ?
Choose Formalism
Populate
Applications
Lefrançois, Gandon, Reasoning  with Dependency  Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs
1. Choose Formalism
18
Needs, problems
Existing Knowledge Representation Formalisms
The Unit Graphs formalism
Unit Graphs
Rules and Definitions
Reasoning with Unit Graphs
Logical Semantics
Entailment problem
Lefrançois, Gandon, The Unit Graphs Framework: Linguistic Knowledge Representation
19
Units 
 Representations
(c.f., Mel’čuk, 2004)
Unit Types 
– Lexicon
Lefrançois, Gandon, Reasoning  with Dependency  Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs
20
Unit Types
Lefrançois, Gandon, Reasoning  with Dependency  Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs
Specify How their units are to be linked
to other units in Unit Graphs
through 
Actantial Structure
:
Actant Slots (ASlots)
Signatures
 
 
21
Unit Graphs
are defined over a Support
Lefrançois, Gandon, Reasoning  with Dependency  Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs
22
Unit Graphs
are defined over a Support
Lefrançois, Gandon, Reasoning  with Dependency  Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs
Primitive Unit Types (PUTs)
    Lexical unit type ANIMAL
Grammatical unit type 
Verb
, 
Noun
, 
plur
Surface Semantic unit type 
(
animal
)
 
C
o
n
j
u
n
c
t
i
v
e
 
U
n
i
t
 
T
y
p
e
s
 
(
P
U
T
s
)
A
 
U
n
i
t
 
m
a
y
 
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
 
o
f
 
s
e
v
e
r
a
l
 
c
o
n
j
o
i
n
t
 
P
U
T
s
   { 
def
, 
plur
, ANIMAL } (
(
the animals
)
)
23
Unit Graphs
are defined over a Support
Lefrançois, Gandon, Reasoning  with Dependency  Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs
Primitive Unit Types (PUTs)
    Lexical unit type ANIMAL
Grammatical unit type 
Verb
, 
Noun
, 
plur
Surface Semantic unit type 
(
animal
)
 
Are pre-ordered
 
plur     pluralizable
       
 
/
animal
\         /
dog
\
24
Unit Graphs
are defined over a Support
Lefrançois, Gandon, Reasoning  with Dependency  Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs
Unit Types specify how their units
are to be linked through
Actantial Structure
Actant Slots (ASlots)
Signatures
 
 
25
Unit Graphs
are defined over a Support
Lefrançois, Gandon, Reasoning  with Dependency  Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs
Actant Slots
Have Symbols
    
 
Deep Semantics: lexicalized semantic roles
    Surface Semantics: Numbers
 
Deep Syntax: Roman numerals
May be Obligatory,
 Optional, Prohibited
 
  
26
Organization of the Unit Types Hierarchy 
with respect to a unique ASymbol s
The complete Unit Types Hierarchy 
is an intricated superposition of such figures
Lefrançois, Gandon, Reasoning  with Dependency  Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs
27
Unit Graphs
are defined over a Support
Lefrançois, Gandon, Reasoning  with Dependency  Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs
Signatures
denote the type of units
that fill an ASlot 
s
 of a unit of a type 
t
28
As we go down the hierarchy,
 
signatures may only be specialized
Lefrançois, Gandon, Reasoning  with Dependency  Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs
29
Unit Graphs
are defined over a Support
Lefrançois, Gandon, Reasoning  with Dependency  Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs
Circumstantial Symbols:
Deep and Surface Semantics: 
none
Deep Syntax: 
ATTR, COORD, APPEND
...
Are organized in hierarchy
ex: 
ATTR       
deep syntactic CSymbol
Are signed
30
Unit Graphs
are defined over a Support
Lefrançois, Gandon, Reasoning  with Dependency  Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs
31
Unit Graphs
are defined over a Support
Unit nodes
Unit nodes labels : a type + a marker
Actantial triples
Circumstantial triples
Declared equivalences of unit nodes
Lefrançois, Gandon, Reasoning  with Dependency  Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs
32
Unit Graphs
are defined over a Support
Lefrançois, Gandon, Reasoning  with Dependency  Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs
33
Unit Graphs
are defined over a Support
Lefrançois, Gandon, Reasoning  with Dependency  Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs
1. Choose Formalism
34
Needs, problems
Existing Knowledge Representation Formalisms
The Unit Graphs formalism
Unit Graphs
Rules and Definitions
Reasoning with Unit Graphs
Logical Semantics
Entailment problem
Lefrançois, Gandon, The Unit Graphs Framework: Linguistic Knowledge Representation
35
Lefrançois, Gandon, Reasoning  with Dependency  Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs
Unit Graphs Homomorphism
« Is UG 
G
 contained in UG 
H
 ? »
Oriented Labelled Graphs Homomorphism
arcs must be preserved
labels may get specialized
36
Lefrançois, Gandon, Reasoning  with Dependency  Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs
Unit Graphs Homomorphism
37
Lefrançois, Gandon, Reasoning  with Dependency  Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs
Unit Graphs Rules
A Hypothesis 
H
A Conclusion 
G
A partial mapping from nodes of 
H
 to nodes of 
C
38
Lefrançois, Gandon, Reasoning  with Dependency  Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs
Unit Graphs Rules
A rule 
R
 is Applicable to 
G
iif there is a homomorphism 
H
->
G
Apply rule 
R
: add 
C
 to 
G
 and merge nodes
39
Lefrançois, Gandon, Reasoning  with Dependency  Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs
PUT Definitions
1. Choose Formalism
40
Needs, problems
Existing Knowledge Representation Formalisms
The Unit Graphs formalism
Unit Graphs
Rules and Definitions
Reasoning with Unit Graphs
Logical Semantics
Entailment problem
Lefrançois, Gandon, The Unit Graphs Framework: Linguistic Knowledge Representation
41
Lefrançois, Gandon, Reasoning  with Dependency  Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs
Reasoning with Unit Graphs
42
Lefrançois, Gandon, Reasoning  with Dependency  Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs
Logical Semantics of UGs: Closure
43
Lefrançois, Gandon, Reasoning  with Dependency  Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs
Logical Semantics of 
UGs: Closure
44
Lefrançois, Gandon, Reasoning  with Dependency  Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs
Logical Semantics of 
UGs: Closure
45
Lefrançois, Gandon, Reasoning  with Dependency  Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs
Logical Semantics of 
UGs: Closure
46
Lefrançois, Gandon, Reasoning  with Dependency  Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs
Logical Semantics of 
UGs: Closure
47
Lefrançois, Gandon, Reasoning  with Dependency  Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs
Logical Semantics of 
UGs: Closure
48
Lefrançois, Gandon, Reasoning  with Dependency  Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs
Logical Semantics of 
UGs: Closure
49
Lefrançois, Gandon, Reasoning  with Dependency  Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs
Logical Semantics of 
UGs: Closure
50
Lefrançois, Gandon, Reasoning  with Dependency  Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs
Logical Semantics of 
UGs: Closure
51
Lefrançois, Gandon, Reasoning  with Dependency  Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs
Logical Semantics of 
UGs: Closure
1. Choose Formalism
52
Needs, problems
Existing Knowledge Representation Formalisms
The Unit Graphs formalism
Unit Graphs
Rules and Definitions
Reasoning with Unit Graphs
Logical Semantics
Entailment problem
Lefrançois, Gandon, The Unit Graphs Framework: Linguistic Knowledge Representation
53
Lefrançois, Gandon, Reasoning  with Dependency  Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs
Reasoning with Unit Graphs
G
 entails 
H
if and only if
there is a homomorphism from 
H
 to 
cl
(
G
)
54
Lefrançois, Gandon, Reasoning  with Dependency  Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs
Future Work
Problem: risk of infinite closure
need to find conditions :
on the hierarchy of Unit Types
on the set of definitions
Conclusions
55
Linguistic Knowledge Representation
The Unit Graphs Formalism
Hierarchy of Unit Types
Hierarchy of Circumstantial Symbols
Unit Graphs
Rules and Definitions
Reasoning with UGs
Logical Semantics: Unit Graph Closure
Entailment equivalent to the homomorphism problem
Lefrançois, Gandon, Reasoning  with Dependency  Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs
undefined
Reasoning with Dependency Structures
and Lexicographic Definitions
using Unit Graphs
 
Depling’13, August 30
th
 2013, Prague
Thank you
Slide Note
Embed
Share

This piece discusses the application of knowledge representation in addressing recurrent needs related to manipulating, querying, reasoning, and sharing information, particularly in the linguistic domain of Meaning-Text Theory. Maxime Lefrançois and Fabien Gandon explore formalisms, such as the theory of semantic actants and linguistic predicates, to represent participants and semantic roles in linguistic situations. The use of unit graphs provides a structured approach to reasoning with dependency structures and lexicons to enhance understanding and analysis.

  • Knowledge representation
  • Dependency structures
  • Lexicographic definitions
  • Unit graphs
  • Meaning-Text Theory

Uploaded on Oct 03, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Depling13, August 30th 2013, Prague Reasoning with Dependency Structures and Lexicographic Definitions using Unit Graphs Maxime Lefran ois, Fabien Gandon [ maxime.lefrancois | fabien.gandon ] @inria.fr

  2. Lefranois, Gandon, Reasoning with Dependency Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs 2 Knowledge Representation answers recurrent needs represent manipulate query reason share ... here: applied to the linguistic domain Meaning-Text Theory

  3. Lefranois, Gandon, Reasoning with Dependency Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs 3 Choose Formalism Populate Applications t

  4. Lefranois, Gandon, Reasoning with Dependency Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs 4 Choose Formalism Populate Applications t 1. Choose Formalism

  5. Lefranois, Gandon, Reasoning with Dependency Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs 5 Need 1: Theory of Semantic Actants (Mel cuk, 2004) Linguistic Predicates Semantic Actant Slots (SemASlots) = Participants of the linguistic situation denoted by L that have a favoured position in sentences constructed with L

  6. Lefranois, Gandon, Reasoning with Dependency Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs 6 Need 1: Theory of Semantic Actants (Mel cuk, 2004) Linguistic Predicates Semantic Actant Slots (SemASlots) = Participants of the linguistic situation denoted by L that have a favoured position in sentences constructed with L

  7. Lefranois, Gandon, Reasoning with Dependency Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs 7 Need 1: Theory of Semantic Actants (Mel cuk, 2004) logical predicate Linguistic Predicates optional (to eat)(Paul ; eggs ; plate)

  8. Lefranois, Gandon, Reasoning with Dependency Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs 8 Need 1: Theory of Semantic Actants (Mel cuk, 2004) logical predicate Linguistic Predicates optional (to eat)(Paul ; eggs ; plate) split (outil)(Paul ; Untangle) (outil)(Paul ; Carpenter)

  9. Lefranois, Gandon, Reasoning with Dependency Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs 9 Need 1: Theory of Semantic Actants (Mel cuk, 2004) logical predicate Linguistic Predicates optional (to eat)(Paul ; eggs ; plate) split (outil)(Paul ; Untangle) (outil)(Paul ; Carpenter) an actant may be a predicate

  10. Lefranois, Gandon, Reasoning with Dependency Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs 10 Existing KR Formalisms Semantic Web Formalisms RDF - oriented labelled graphs OWL - Description Logics SPARQL - Query, ...

  11. Lefranois, Gandon, Reasoning with Dependency Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs 11 Existing KR Formalisms Semantic Web Formalisms RDF - oriented labelled graphs No Semantics OWL - Description Logics Only binary relations Reify ? -> No Semantics

  12. Lefranois, Gandon, Reasoning with Dependency Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs 12 Existing KR Formalisms Conceptual Graphs SowaOriented labelled Graphs Sowa drew his inspiration from Tesni re Rules, reasoning,(Baget, Mugnier, Chein, ...) Concepts and Relations definitions, (Sowa, Lecl re, ...)

  13. Lefranois, Gandon, Reasoning with Dependency Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs 13 Existing KR Formalisms Conceptual Graphs Alternation Concept Relation

  14. Lefranois, Gandon, Reasoning with Dependency Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs 14 Choose Formalism Populate Applications t The Unit Graphs Formalism a graph-based formalism, to represent linguistic units

  15. Lefranois, Gandon, Reasoning with Dependency Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs 15 Choose Formalism Populate Applications t The Unit Graphs Formalism Draw inspiration from GC and Develop a RDF syntax to exchange knowledge

  16. Lefranois, Gandon, Reasoning with Dependency Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs 16 Choose Formalism Populate Applications t The Unit Graphs Formalism Draw inspiration from GC and Develop a RDF syntax to exchange knowledge

  17. Lefranois, Gandon, Reasoning with Dependency Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs 17 Choose Formalism Populate Applications t The Unit Graphs Formalism What reasoning capabilities ?

  18. Lefranois, Gandon, The Unit Graphs Framework: Linguistic Knowledge Representation 18 1. Choose Formalism Needs, problems Existing Knowledge Representation Formalisms The Unit Graphs formalism Unit Graphs Rules and Definitions Reasoning with Unit Graphs Logical Semantics Entailment problem

  19. Lefranois, Gandon, Reasoning with Dependency Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs 19 Unit Types Lexicon Units Representations (c.f., Mel uk, 2004)

  20. Lefranois, Gandon, Reasoning with Dependency Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs 20 Unit Types Specify How their units are to be linked to other units in Unit Graphs through Actantial Structure: Actant Slots (ASlots) Signatures

  21. Lefranois, Gandon, Reasoning with Dependency Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs 21 Unit Graphs are defined over a Support

  22. Lefranois, Gandon, Reasoning with Dependency Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs 22 Unit Graphs are defined over a Support Hierarchy of Unit Types Primitive Unit Types (PUTs) Lexical unit type ANIMAL Grammatical unit type Verb, Noun, plur Surface Semantic unit type (animal) Conjunctive Unit Types (PUTs) A Unit may consist of several conjoint PUTs { def, plur, ANIMAL } ((the animals))

  23. Lefranois, Gandon, Reasoning with Dependency Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs 23 Unit Graphs are defined over a Support Hierarchy of Unit Types Primitive Unit Types (PUTs) Lexical unit type ANIMAL Grammatical unit type Verb, Noun, plur Surface Semantic unit type (animal) Are pre-ordered plur /animal\ pluralizable /dog\

  24. Lefranois, Gandon, Reasoning with Dependency Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs 24 Unit Graphs are defined over a Support Hierarchy of Unit Types Unit Types specify how their units are to be linked through Actantial Structure Actant Slots (ASlots) Signatures

  25. Lefranois, Gandon, Reasoning with Dependency Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs 25 Unit Graphs are defined over a Support Hierarchy of Unit Types Actant Slots Have Symbols Deep Semantics: lexicalized semantic roles Surface Semantics: Numbers Deep Syntax: Roman numerals May be Obligatory, Optional, Prohibited

  26. Lefranois, Gandon, Reasoning with Dependency Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs 26 radix obligat prohibet absurd Organization of the Unit Types Hierarchy with respect to a unique ASymbol s The complete Unit Types Hierarchy is an intricated superposition of such figures

  27. Lefranois, Gandon, Reasoning with Dependency Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs 27 Unit Graphs are defined over a Support Hierarchy of Unit Types Signatures denote the type of units that fill an ASlot s of a unit of a type t

  28. Lefranois, Gandon, Reasoning with Dependency Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs 28 As we go down the hierarchy, signatures may only be specialized

  29. Lefranois, Gandon, Reasoning with Dependency Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs 29 Unit Graphs are defined over a Support Hierarchy of Circumstantial Symbols Circumstantial Symbols: Deep and Surface Semantics: none Deep Syntax: ATTR, COORD, APPEND ... Are organized in hierarchy ex: ATTR deep syntactic CSymbol Are signed

  30. Lefranois, Gandon, Reasoning with Dependency Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs 30 Unit Graphs are defined over a Support Unit Node Markers Arbitrary Symbols Every Element of M identifies a specific unit; Multiple elements of M may identify the same unit.

  31. Lefranois, Gandon, Reasoning with Dependency Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs 31 Unit Graphs are defined over a Support Unit nodes Unit nodes labels : a type + a marker Actantial triples Circumstantial triples Declared equivalences of unit nodes

  32. Lefranois, Gandon, Reasoning with Dependency Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs 32 Unit Graphs are defined over a Support

  33. Lefranois, Gandon, Reasoning with Dependency Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs 33 Unit Graphs are defined over a Support

  34. Lefranois, Gandon, The Unit Graphs Framework: Linguistic Knowledge Representation 34 1. Choose Formalism Needs, problems Existing Knowledge Representation Formalisms The Unit Graphs formalism Unit Graphs Rules and Definitions Reasoning with Unit Graphs Logical Semantics Entailment problem

  35. Lefranois, Gandon, Reasoning with Dependency Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs 35 Unit Graphs Homomorphism Is UG G contained in UG H ? Oriented Labelled Graphs Homomorphism arcs must be preserved labels may get specialized

  36. Lefranois, Gandon, Reasoning with Dependency Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs 36 Unit Graphs Homomorphism

  37. Lefranois, Gandon, Reasoning with Dependency Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs 37 Unit Graphs Rules A Hypothesis H A Conclusion G A partial mapping from nodes of H to nodes of C

  38. Lefranois, Gandon, Reasoning with Dependency Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs 38 Unit Graphs Rules A rule R is Applicable to G iif there is a homomorphism H->G Apply rule R: add C to G and merge nodes

  39. Lefranois, Gandon, Reasoning with Dependency Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs 39 PUT Definitions

  40. Lefranois, Gandon, The Unit Graphs Framework: Linguistic Knowledge Representation 40 1. Choose Formalism Needs, problems Existing Knowledge Representation Formalisms The Unit Graphs formalism Unit Graphs Rules and Definitions Reasoning with Unit Graphs Logical Semantics Entailment problem

  41. Lefranois, Gandon, Reasoning with Dependency Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs 41 Reasoning with Unit Graphs

  42. Lefranois, Gandon, Reasoning with Dependency Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs 42 Logical Semantics of UGs: Closure

  43. Lefranois, Gandon, Reasoning with Dependency Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs 43 Logical Semantics of UGs: Closure

  44. Lefranois, Gandon, Reasoning with Dependency Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs 44 Logical Semantics of UGs: Closure

  45. Lefranois, Gandon, Reasoning with Dependency Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs 45 Logical Semantics of UGs: Closure

  46. Lefranois, Gandon, Reasoning with Dependency Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs 46 Logical Semantics of UGs: Closure

  47. Lefranois, Gandon, Reasoning with Dependency Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs 47 Logical Semantics of UGs: Closure

  48. Lefranois, Gandon, Reasoning with Dependency Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs 48 Logical Semantics of UGs: Closure

  49. Lefranois, Gandon, Reasoning with Dependency Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs 49 Logical Semantics of UGs: Closure

  50. Lefranois, Gandon, Reasoning with Dependency Structures and Lex. Definitions using Unit Graphs 50 Logical Semantics of UGs: Closure

More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#