Principles and Advantages of Process-Based River Restoration

 
T. Beechie, D. Sear, J. Olden, G. Pess, J. Buffington,
H. Moir, P. Roni, M. Pollock
2010, BioScience, v. 60
Purpose of the Paper
 
River and land management causing decline of river
health
Exponential rise in stress on ecosystem
Constant increase in human demand for water and land
Need to synthesize restoration concepts and practice
Guiding principles for sustainable river restoration
 
Explanation of process-based restoration and its
advantages
Overview
 
What is process-based restoration?
 
Advantages of process-based restoration
 
Four principles of process-based restoration
 
Classes of restoration
What is process-based restoration?
 
 
Restoration of normative rates and magnitudes of
processes
Physical
Chemical
Biological
 
Focus on correcting anthropogenic disruptions
Minimal corrective intervention
Advantages
 
Control vs. Restore
 
Popular methods
Tend to follow legal mandates
Restore narrowly-defined aspects of river ecosystems
Creates habitats that conform to a standard
“Good” habitat
Controls processes to create habitat
Results in artificial and unnaturally static habitats
Process-based Method
 
Works with sediment and discharge regimes
 
Identifies driving processes of stream degradation
 
Restores processes to promote self-restoration of
stream
The Principles
 
Four guidelines
1.
Target the root causes of habitat and ecosystem change
 
2.
Tailor restoration actions to local potential
 
3.
Match the scale of restoration to the scale of physical and
biological processes
 
4.
Be explicit about expected outcomes, including recovery
time
1
st
 Principle - Target
 
Don’t deal with symptoms; deal with the cause(s)
A “good” habitat may have unaddressed system drivers
 
Designed to correct human alterations
2
nd
 Principle - Tailor
 
Each reach is unique
Relatively narrow range of channel and riparian
conditions
Restoration should follow unique conditions
 
Identify natural potential
Historical analysis
Assessment of disruptions to primary driving processes
3
rd
 Principle - Scale
 
Actions must affect entirety of afflicted area
On both a physical scale and biological scale
 
Most restoration projects at reach scale or smaller
Most processes at reach scale or larger
 
Most restoration projects at headwaters or small
tributaries
Most severe habitat changes at lowland floodplains and
deltas
4
th
 Principle - Predict
 
Use quantitative predictions
Helps set appropriate expectations of project
 
Provide general range of possible outcomes
Often difficult to predict outcome, but helps provide
expectations as well
 
Applying Principles
 
Need to put the right projects in the right places
Provide the greatest ecosystem benefit at the least cost
 
Set appropriate expectations for ecosystem response
 
Planning based on two questions:
1.
How have changes in riverine habitats affected biota?
2.
What are the ultimate causes of changes in riverine
habitats?
 
Classes
 
Three restoration classes
Full restoration
Preferred
Partial restoration
Normally best achievable goal, but still good
Habitat creation
Last resort
Full Restoration
 
Return river to natural regime
Restore all natural processes
Sustainment of habitats and biota
Examples
Blocking drainage channels
Increases flooding
Adding wood structures at natural jam points
Forms pools and overbank flooding
Removing nonnative trees
Restore nature riparian vegitation
Partial Restoration
 
Restore select processes
Mimic essential components of natural hydrograph
Most common class
Optimal for areas with limitations from land use or
other human activity
 
Example
Managing flow regime in a dammed river
Improves ecosystem health
Habitat Creation
 
Treatment of symptoms, but not causes
Not process-based
Sometimes only option in urbanized and heavy land
use areas
Results in a static imitation of a habitat that could
naturally exist
 
Example
Reintroduction of wood into river system
Treats loss of wood but not cause of wood loss
 
Conclusion
 
Process-based restoration
Treats causes of degradation, not just symptoms
Restoration of natural river regime
Principles
Provides guidelines for sustainable restoration efforts
Target, Tailor, Scale, Predict
Restoration classes
Determined by type and magnitude of land use
Slide Note
Embed
Share

This paper discusses the decline of river health due to human activities, emphasizing the need for sustainable restoration practices. It explores process-based restoration, highlighting its benefits and principles such as targeting root causes, matching restoration scale to environmental processes, and focusing on self-restoration mechanisms. The approach contrasts with traditional methods by promoting natural habitat formation through minimal intervention and addressing anthropogenic disruptions effectively.

  • River restoration
  • Sustainability
  • Process-based approach
  • Ecosystem health
  • Restoration principles

Uploaded on Sep 10, 2024 | 2 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. T. Beechie, D. Sear, J. Olden, G. Pess, J. Buffington, H. Moir, P. Roni, M. Pollock 2010, BioScience, v. 60

  2. Purpose of the Paper River and land management causing decline of river health Exponential rise in stress on ecosystem Constant increase in human demand for water and land Need to synthesize restoration concepts and practice Guiding principles for sustainable river restoration Explanation of process-based restoration and its advantages

  3. Overview What is process-based restoration? Advantages of process-based restoration Four principles of process-based restoration Classes of restoration

  4. What is process-based restoration? Restoration of normative rates and magnitudes of processes Physical Chemical Biological Focus on correcting anthropogenic disruptions Minimal corrective intervention

  5. Advantages Control vs. Restore Popular methods Tend to follow legal mandates Restore narrowly-defined aspects of river ecosystems Creates habitats that conform to a standard Good habitat Controls processes to create habitat Results in artificial and unnaturally static habitats

  6. Process-based Method Works with sediment and discharge regimes Identifies driving processes of stream degradation Restores processes to promote self-restoration of stream

  7. The Principles Four guidelines Target the root causes of habitat and ecosystem change 1. Tailor restoration actions to local potential 2. Match the scale of restoration to the scale of physical and biological processes 3. Be explicit about expected outcomes, including recovery time 4.

  8. 1stPrinciple - Target Don t deal with symptoms; deal with the cause(s) A good habitat may have unaddressed system drivers Designed to correct human alterations

  9. 2ndPrinciple - Tailor Each reach is unique Relatively narrow range of channel and riparian conditions Restoration should follow unique conditions Identify natural potential Historical analysis Assessment of disruptions to primary driving processes

  10. 3rdPrinciple - Scale Actions must affect entirety of afflicted area On both a physical scale and biological scale Most restoration projects at reach scale or smaller Most processes at reach scale or larger Most restoration projects at headwaters or small tributaries Most severe habitat changes at lowland floodplains and deltas

  11. 4thPrinciple - Predict Use quantitative predictions Helps set appropriate expectations of project Provide general range of possible outcomes Often difficult to predict outcome, but helps provide expectations as well

  12. Applying Principles Need to put the right projects in the right places Provide the greatest ecosystem benefit at the least cost Set appropriate expectations for ecosystem response Planning based on two questions: How have changes in riverine habitats affected biota? 1. 2. What are the ultimate causes of changes in riverine habitats?

  13. Classes Three restoration classes Full restoration Preferred Partial restoration Normally best achievable goal, but still good Habitat creation Last resort

  14. Full Restoration Return river to natural regime Restore all natural processes Sustainment of habitats and biota Examples Blocking drainage channels Increases flooding Adding wood structures at natural jam points Forms pools and overbank flooding Removing nonnative trees Restore nature riparian vegitation

  15. Partial Restoration Restore select processes Mimic essential components of natural hydrograph Most common class Optimal for areas with limitations from land use or other human activity Example Managing flow regime in a dammed river Improves ecosystem health

  16. Habitat Creation Treatment of symptoms, but not causes Not process-based Sometimes only option in urbanized and heavy land use areas Results in a static imitation of a habitat that could naturally exist Example Reintroduction of wood into river system Treats loss of wood but not cause of wood loss

  17. Conclusion Process-based restoration Treats causes of degradation, not just symptoms Restoration of natural river regime Principles Provides guidelines for sustainable restoration efforts Target, Tailor, Scale, Predict Restoration classes Determined by type and magnitude of land use

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#