Philosophy: A Guide to Understanding Human Thought

 
Making Sense of Philosophy
 
How to Understand & Conceptualize the Complicated Study of Human Thought
 
Presented by Rev. Deric McCurry
“Whatchu Know?!”
 
Philosophy is complicated and confusing
Framework for better foundational understanding of philosophy
Philosophy 101 in an hour
Focus Points
Overview of Philosophy
Philosophy in Debate
Logic
Epistemology
Overview of Philosophy
 
Logic
Reasoning based on a strict set of validity principles
Epistemology
Theories of knowledge that seek truth & understanding
Teleology
Deontology
Metaphysics
Theories that deal with existence & principles of existence
Axiology/Aesthetics
Discussion of beauty
 
Overview of Philosophy
 
Logic
Reasoning based on a strict set of validity principles
Epistemology
Theories of knowledge that seek truth & understanding
Teleology
Deontology
Metaphysics
Theories that deal with existence & principles of existence
Axiology/Aesthetics
Discussion of beauty
Metaphysics & Aesthetics in Debate
 
Prominent Metaphysical Philosophies
Baudrillard
Symbolic exchange
Heidegger
If today was your last day
Nietzsche
Is existence better than nothing at all
Use of Aesthetics in Debate
Environmentalism
Extinctionalism
Logic in Debate
 
Inductive Reasoning
Conclusion follows with highest probability
Deductive Reasoning
Conclusion is necessitated
Socratic Method
Truth seeking through persistent questioning
Logic in Debate
 
Rationally Persuasive Argumentation
Debate
Claim
Warrant
Impact
Real World
Warranted Inference
All true premises
No independent line of argument against the conclusion
Argument does not beg the question
Burden of proof
Logical Fallacies
 
Ad Hominem
Attacking the debater not the argument
Argument from omniscience/authority
You/one person doesn’t know everything about
anything
Appeal to ignorance/force/pity
Appealing to lack of evidence/knowledge or to
power/feeling sorry for something as proof
Argumentum ad populum/Bandwagon/tradition
Just because something is popular/has always
been done doesn’t make it right
Post hoc, ergo propter hoc
Correlation = causation
 
Red Herring
Changing subject
Slippery Slope
Domino-effect
Straw man
Mispresenting your opponent’s argument and
refuting it
Two wrongs make a right
Justifying “wrong” actions based on precedent
Is-Ought
Just because something is some way does not
mean it should be
False Dichotomy
Argument says there are only two options: A or B,
when there are C, D, E…
Epistemology – Teleology
 
Teleology
Looking at the end result of an action to see if the results are good
Aristotle Virtue Ethics
Being virtuous
Innately doing right
Crossroads of bravery & wisdom
Is this something everyone possesses?
Utilitarian Theories
Calculus of utility
Many people equate greatest good for greatest number (WRONG!)
Maximizing utility
The metric (well-being/prevention of harm) determines the utility
Epistemology – Teleology
 
Social Contract Theories
Infinite number of them
US Constitution
Locke
State of nature is good but is made better through order
Hobbes
State of nature is evil and requires order
Rousseau
Man is free but everywhere is in chains
How to structure society in the world we live in
Pragmatism
Most practical solution to situation, doesn’t intend to make everything better/happy just closure
Epistemology – Teleology
 
Marxism
Material conflict
Proletariat and Bourgeoise
Conflict between the forces of production and means of production
Solution
Common ownership of production/consumerism
Creation of classless society
“From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs”
Libertarianism
Laissez-faire
Cosmopolitanism
Globalization
Epistemology – Teleology
 
Egalitarianism
Equality/Equity
Relativism
Knowledge is situational (culture)
Intercultural communication
Some would argue this is wisdom
Epistemology – Deontology
 
Deontology
Doing the right thing in every situation regardless of the outcome
Altruism
Doing the right thing because you have a second order desire to do so
Conception of morality
Desire
Harry Frankfurt
Benevolence/Beneficence
Doing the right action because you have a first order desire to do so
 
Epistemology – Deontology
 
Immanuel Kant & Kantian Ethics
Categorical Imperative
First Formulation
“Act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law without
contradiction.”
You believe in and uphold your morals with consistent action
Golden rule
Maxim – absolute truth
Second Formulation
“Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of any other, never merely as a means to
an end, but always at the same time as an end.”
Treating people humanely as you strive for an end is an end in itself
Third Formulation
“Therefore, every rational being must so act as if he were through his maxim always a legislating member in the universal
‘kingdom of ends.’”
Never forget that you have a continuing responsibility based on your morals
Treat everyone as you would treat yourself based on the Categorical Imperative
Epistemology - Politics
 
Liberalism (not Democratic Liberal)
Rejection of power politics/Emphasis on diplomacy
Quid pro quo
International/interorganizational cooperation and governing bodies
I.e. favors the UN
Realism
States/government entities rational but self-interested actors
International politics is anarchic
International/interorganizational cooperation occurs to assure mutual self-interest
Ensure self-preservation
Machiavellianism
Rawls & Nozick – Socioeconomic Justice
John Rawls
 
 
Justice as fairness
Veil of Ignorance
Maximize position
Liberty Principle
Everyone Guaranteed Same Liberties
Difference Principle
Differences benefit least advantaged
Redistribution of wealth
Fair equality of opportunity
Robert Nozick
 
Minimal State
State exists merely for safety
Anarcho-capitalism
Entitlement Theory
Principle of justice in acquisition
Historical approach
Principle of justice in transfer
Principle of rectification of injustice
Conclusion
 
Four Branches of Philosophy
Four Branches of Philosophy
Logic
Epistemology
Metaphysics
Aesthetics
Logic & Epistemology in Debate
Discussion/Questions
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Dive into the intricate world of philosophy with a comprehensive guide presented by Rev. Deric McCurry. Gain insights into logic, epistemology, metaphysics, and aesthetics, and explore prominent philosophies through debates on existence, truth-seeking, and persuasive reasoning methods.

  • Philosophy
  • Understanding
  • Human Thought
  • Logic
  • Epistemology

Uploaded on Sep 12, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Making Sense of Philosophy How to Understand & Conceptualize the Complicated Study of Human Thought Presented by Rev. Deric McCurry

  2. Whatchu Know?! Philosophy is complicated and confusing Framework for better foundational understanding of philosophy Philosophy 101 in an hour Focus Points Overview of Philosophy Philosophy in Debate Logic Epistemology

  3. Overview of Philosophy Logic Reasoning based on a strict set of validity principles Epistemology Theories of knowledge that seek truth & understanding Teleology Deontology Metaphysics Theories that deal with existence & principles of existence Axiology/Aesthetics Discussion of beauty

  4. Overview of Philosophy Logic Reasoning based on a strict set of validity principles Epistemology Logic Reasoning based on a strict set of validity principles Epistemology Theories of knowledge that seek truth & understanding Theories of knowledge that seek truth & understanding Teleology Teleology Deontology Deontology Metaphysics Theories that deal with existence & principles of existence Axiology/Aesthetics Metaphysics Theories that deal with existence & principles of existence Axiology/Aesthetics Discussion of beauty Discussion of beauty

  5. Metaphysics & Aesthetics in Debate Prominent Metaphysical Philosophies Baudrillard Symbolic exchange Heidegger If today was your last day Nietzsche Is existence better than nothing at all Use of Aesthetics in Debate Environmentalism Extinctionalism

  6. Logic in Debate Inductive Reasoning Conclusion follows with highest probability Deductive Reasoning Conclusion is necessitated Socratic Method Truth seeking through persistent questioning

  7. Logic in Debate Rationally Persuasive Argumentation Debate Claim Warrant Impact Real World Warranted Inference All true premises No independent line of argument against the conclusion Argument does not beg the question Burden of proof

  8. Logical Fallacies Red Herring Changing subject Slippery Slope Domino-effect Straw man Mispresenting your opponent s argument and refuting it Two wrongs make a right Justifying wrong actions based on precedent Is-Ought Just because something is some way does not mean it should be False Dichotomy Argument says there are only two options: A or B, when there are C, D, E Ad Hominem Attacking the debater not the argument Argument from omniscience/authority You/one person doesn t know everything about anything Appeal to ignorance/force/pity Appealing to lack of evidence/knowledge or to power/feeling sorry for something as proof Argumentum ad populum/Bandwagon/tradition Just because something is popular/has always been done doesn t make it right Post hoc, ergo propter hoc Correlation = causation

  9. Epistemology Teleology Teleology Looking at the end result of an action to see if the results are good Aristotle Virtue Ethics Being virtuous Innately doing right Crossroads of bravery & wisdom Is this something everyone possesses? Utilitarian Theories Calculus of utility Many people equate greatest good for greatest number (WRONG!) Maximizing utility The metric (well-being/prevention of harm) determines the utility

  10. Epistemology Teleology Social Contract Theories Infinite number of them US Constitution Locke State of nature is good but is made better through order Hobbes State of nature is evil and requires order Rousseau Man is free but everywhere is in chains How to structure society in the world we live in Pragmatism Most practical solution to situation, doesn t intend to make everything better/happy just closure

  11. Epistemology Teleology Marxism Material conflict Proletariat and Bourgeoise Conflict between the forces of production and means of production Solution Common ownership of production/consumerism Creation of classless society From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs Libertarianism Laissez-faire Cosmopolitanism Globalization

  12. Epistemology Teleology Egalitarianism Equality/Equity Relativism Knowledge is situational (culture) Intercultural communication Some would argue this is wisdom

  13. Epistemology Deontology Deontology Doing the right thing in every situation regardless of the outcome Altruism Doing the right thing because you have a second order desire to do so Conception of morality Desire Harry Frankfurt Benevolence/Beneficence Doing the right action because you have a first order desire to do so

  14. Epistemology Deontology Immanuel Kant & Kantian Ethics Categorical Imperative First Formulation Act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law without contradiction. You believe in and uphold your morals with consistent action Golden rule Maxim absolute truth Second Formulation Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of any other, never merely as a means to an end, but always at the same time as an end. Treating people humanely as you strive for an end is an end in itself Third Formulation Therefore, every rational being must so act as if he were through his maxim always a legislating member in the universal kingdom of ends. Never forget that you have a continuing responsibility based on your morals Treat everyone as you would treat yourself based on the Categorical Imperative

  15. Epistemology - Politics Liberalism (not Democratic Liberal) Rejection of power politics/Emphasis on diplomacy Quid pro quo International/interorganizational cooperation and governing bodies I.e. favors the UN Realism States/government entities rational but self-interested actors International politics is anarchic International/interorganizational cooperation occurs to assure mutual self-interest Ensure self-preservation Machiavellianism

  16. Rawls & Nozick Socioeconomic Justice John Rawls Robert Nozick Justice as fairness Minimal State State exists merely for safety Veil of Ignorance Anarcho-capitalism Maximize position Entitlement Theory Liberty Principle Principle of justice in acquisition Everyone Guaranteed Same Liberties Historical approach Difference Principle Principle of justice in transfer Differences benefit least advantaged Principle of rectification of injustice Redistribution of wealth Fair equality of opportunity

  17. Conclusion Four Branches of Philosophy Four Branches of Philosophy Logic Epistemology Metaphysics Aesthetics Logic & Epistemology in Debate Discussion/Questions

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#