Past Interaction Between TAMP and MnSHIP

The history and updates of the Transportation Asset Management Plan (TAMP) and the Minnesota State Highway Investment Plan (MnSHIP) are detailed in the provided content. The interaction, pilot projects, pavement and bridge targets, maintenance strategies, and incorporation of revised targets are discussed, highlighting the collaborative efforts and strategic planning in managing the state highway network.

• Transportation
• Infrastructure
• Asset Management
• Highway Investment
• Minnesota

maryannag Follow

Uploaded on Feb 26, 2025 | 0 Views

Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

Presentation Transcript

1. Past Interaction Between TAMP and MnSHIP Josh Pearson Office of Transportation System Management 9/24/2020

2. Minnesota State Highway Investment Plan Directs capital investment on state highway network Fiscally constrained, 20-year plan Due within one year of SMTP adoption January 2023 at the latest Not project specific Update process to begin late 2020 2

3. MnSHIP update process 3

4. TAMP/MnSHIP History 2018 TAMP (draft) 2014 (Pilot) TAMP TAMP/MnSHIP Update 2013 MnSHIP 2017 MnSHIP 2019 TAMP 4

5. 2014 TAMP Pilot TAMP completed in 2014 System 2013 MnSHIP 2014 TAMP Pavement Interstate 2% Poor 70% Good 2% Poor 70% Good Revised the targets for pavement and bridge Pavement Other NHS 2% Poor 70% Good 4% Poor 65% Good Added new targets for other assets Pavement Non-NHS 3% Poor 65% Good 10% Poor 60% Good Culverts/deep stormwater tunnels Bridge NHS 2% Poor 84% Good/ Satisfactory 2% Poor 55% Good Overhead sign structures High mast light towers Bridge Non-NHS 8% Poor 80% Good/ Satisfactory 8% Poor 50% Good Started to work on additional assets for inclusion in the 2019 TAMP (ITS, signals, lighting, pedestrian infrastructure, buildings, and noise walls) 5

6. 2014 TAMP Maintenance and operations strategies from 2013 MnSHIP and Highway System Operations Plan (HSOP) included in TAMP Life-cycle planning scenarios and cost analysis compared strategies with and without maintenance Future expected capital investment in preventive and reactive maintenance based on BARC and PM setasides in CHIP and in more high-level terms TAMP used HSOP budget from 2012-2015 to discuss operation and maintenance budget needs 6

7. 2017 MnSHIP Incorporated revised pavement and bridge targets from 2014 TAMP to update 20-year investment needed to maintain targets through 2037 Roadside infrastructure performance levels used 2014 TAMP data and measures (if available) for performance level development and outcomes where Performance level 0 & 1 Expected outcomes based on investment level Performance level 2 Investment needed maintain current condition Performance level 3 Investment needed to reach draft targets No discussion of prioritization of assets within Roadside Infrastructure 7

8. 2017 MnSHIP Split of state revenue sources between Capital and Operations/ Maintenance discussed during development of revenue projections While Federal-Aid Highway Program is restricted to State Road Construction use, more discretion is permitted for revenues collected at the state level Chose a split in growth rates so that the expected the loss of future purchasing power defined as the gap between funding and inflationary increases is the same for both budgets (same as split in 2013 MnSHIP) $2,400 Trunk Highway Fund Amounts (Millions) $2,100 $1,800 $1,500 $1,200 $900 $600 $300 $0 ($300) 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 Debt Service Operations & Maintenance State Capital Target Formula 8 Bond Revenue Better Roads (Fund Balance) Federal

9. 2017 MnSHIP Initial steps to consider pavement capital investment impact on ops and maintenance budgets Discussed impact of investment direction on maintenance budget in Unmet Need section in Chapter 6 Performance Level Data Performance Level 0 Performance Level 1 Performance Level 2 Performance Level 3 Performance Level 4 Outcomes 2% 5% 2% 2% 2% (Interstate) 18% (Other NHS) 24% (Non-NHS) (Interstate) 11% (Other NHS) 14% (Non-NHS) (Interstate) 4% (Other NHS) 14% (Non-NHS) (Interstate) 4% (Other NHS) 10% (Non-NHS) (Interstate) 3% (Other NHS) 4% (Non-NHS) Investment Need $9.6 billion $11.3 billion $13.8 billion $15.0 billion $18.4 billion Est. Maintenance Costs (per year average) $27.8 million (18-27) $26.5 million (28-37) $27.6 million (18-27) $24.7 million (28-37) $27.5 million (18-27) $24.2 million (28-37) $27.5 million (18-27) $23.8 million (28-37) $27.3 million (18-27) $23.3 million (28-37) Maintenance Cost in 2037 $30.1 million $29.2 million $28.1 million $27.7 million $24.9 million

10. 2018/2019 TAMP Included new assets not in 2014 TAMP Signals and lighting Noise walls Buildings Pedestrian infrastructure ITS infrastructure All assets included discussion of capital and maintenance funding to maintain assets and life cycle planning scenarios Initial data collection, condition ratings, and draft targets for some of the new assets were incorporated into Roadside Infrastructure investment category in MnSHIP but were not officially adopted Performance measures and targets were later revised for some assets and officially adopted in the 2019 TAMP Reference to HSOP was removed, as that plan has since been retired, removing connection to operations 10

11. 2018/2019 TAMP Updated 10-year planned investment and additional need based on MnSHIP investment direction and CHIP projects Yearly planned pavement and bridge investment and lanes miles/deck area to be completed included for annual consistency review Pavement and bridge was shown by FHWA work type Initial Construction Maintenance Preservation Rehabilitation Reconstruction 11

12. Ideas for TAMP/MnSHIP Updates Discuss prioritization of assets in TAMP and incorporate prioritization in MnSHIP Roadside Infrastructure discussion Review and evaluate 2023-2042 revenue projections to consider operation/maintenance and capital split and possibly adjust the split based on capital investments Evaluate impact of underinvesting in capital improvements on maintenance budgets for pavement, bridge, and other assets Evaluate impact on future capital and maintenance needs when investing in mobility/expansion using total cost of ownership data 12

13. What are other ways we can better integrate maintenance and operations into TAMP and MnSHIP? 13

14. Thank you! Josh Pearson Joshua.pearson@state.mn.us 14