NAPLAN Performance Analysis and Business Plan Targets
S
C
H
O
O
L
B
O
A
R
D
O
P
E
N
M
E
E
T
I
N
G
NAPLAN 2019
2 DECEMBER
•
Business Plan targets based around ‘Like school’ comparison
•
Statistically similar backgrounds
•
ICSEA = Index of Community Socio-Educational Advantage
•
95% of WA schools sat NAPLAN Online
WHO ARE OUR LIKE SCHOOLS?
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
•
2019 Cohort sizes
•
Year 3 – 52 Students
•
Year 5 – 81 Students
•
2018 Cohort sizes
•
Year 3 - 76
•
Year 5 - 79
•
2017 Cohort sizes
•
Year 3 - 75
•
Year 5 - 88
NUMERACY
BUSINESS PLAN TARGET
Consistently match or exceed the mean score of WA like
schools in Year 3 and 5 in NAPLAN
TARGET NOT MET
YR 3 NUMERACY
BUSINESS PLAN TARGET
Maintain the % of students in the top two proficiency bands at or above WA like
schools.
CPS – 60% (31 students) LIKE SCHOOLS – 68%
TARGET NOT MET
MISSED BY 8% = 4 STUDENTS
18 students
13 students
YR 5 NUMERACY
BUSINESS PLAN TARGET
Maintain the % of students in the top two proficiency bands at or above WA like
schools.
CPS – 51% Like schools – 56%
TARGET NOT MET
MISSED BY 4% = 3 STUDENTS
12
students
29 students
NUMERACY OVERVIEW
BUSINESS PLAN TARGET
The stable cohort demonstrates high progress/High achievement 2017-2019 on
the School Online progress vs achievement quadrant
TARGET MET
READING
BUSINESS PLAN TARGET
Consistently match or exceed the mean score of WA like schools in Year 3
and 5 NAPLAN
TARGET MET – Year 5
TARGET NOT MET - Year 3
YR 3 READING
BUSINESS PLAN TARGET
Maintain the % of students in the top two proficiency bands at or above 70%.
CPS – 73% LIKE SCHOOLS – 78%
TARGET MET
21 students
17 students
BUSINESS PLAN TARGET
Maintain the % of students in the top two proficiency bands at or above 70%
CPS – 63% LIKE SCHOOLS – 60%
TARGET NOT MET
MISSED BY 7% = 6 STUDENTS
YR 5 READING
20 students
31 students
READING
BUSINESS PLAN TARGET
Consistently match or exceed WA like schools First Cut data in On-Entry to Year
3 progress
TARGET NOT MET
MISSED BY 19% = 15 STUDENTS
READING
BUSINESS PLAN TARGET
Stable cohort performance to match or exceed WA Like schools data in First Cut
‘high’ and ‘very high’ progress between years 3-5.
TARGET MET IN HIGH PROGRESS
TARGET NOT MET in VH PROGRESS
Difficult to measure with a large number of students with
‘assumed’
moderate
progress
.
READING OVERVIEW
WRITING
BUSINESS PLAN TARGET
Consistently match or exceed the mean score of WA like schools in Year 3
and 5 NAPLAN.
TARGET NOT MET
WRITING
BUSINESS PLAN TARGET
Relative Assessment will show the school has arrested the downward trend in
NAPLAN Writing
TARGET NOT MET
WRITING
BUSINESS PLAN TARGET
The First Cut ‘High’ and ‘Very High’ progress of boys between Years 3- 5
matches or exceeds that of WA like schools.
TARGET NOT MET
MISSED BY 10% = 8 STUDENTS
WRITING 2019
BUSINESS PLAN TARGET
The number of students making ‘low’ or ‘very low’ progress to reduce
to below WA like schools in First Cut data between Years 3 and 5.
TARGET NOT MET
MISSED BY 7% = 6 STUDENTS IN TOTAL
WRITING OVERVIEW
WRITING DATA
•
Tuesday 14 May –
BLACK TUESDAY
•
WA was the worse affected (time differences and
geographical location)
•
Every 30 seconds the data is saved and sent to the
firewall in the Eastern states.
•
The firewall not adequately tuned.
•
28 May – Another attempt
•
** Years 5/7/9 students wrote more online than on
paper. Quantity noticeable more, not necessarily quality.
PROGRESS AND ACHIEVEMENT
COMPARED TO LIKE SCHOOLS
IN SUMMARY
•
Out of the 12 targets we met 3
•
The targets that we missed, weren’t by much
•
We have achieved ‘High Progress and High Achievement in
Reading and Numeracy’
•
This data informs our forward planning for new Business Plan
The content discusses the NAPLAN performance of like schools in Western Australia, including cohort sizes, numeracy targets, and reading goals. It highlights specific schools and outlines the business plan objectives related to numeracy and reading proficiency in Year 3 and Year 5 students. The analysis reveals where the targets were met or missed, providing a comprehensive overview of the educational landscape to inform future strategies.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
SCHOOL BOARD OPEN MEETING NAPLAN 2019 2 DECEMBER
WHO ARE OUR LIKE SCHOOLS? Business Plan targets based around Like school comparison Statistically similar backgrounds ICSEA = Index of Community Socio-Educational Advantage 95% of WA schools sat NAPLAN Online 2017 All Saints College (Bull Creek) Chrysalis Montessori (Glendalough) Holy Spirit PS (City Beach) Swanbourne PS West Leederville PS 2018 Blue Gum Montessori (Bibra Lake) Freshwater Bay PS (Claremont) St Columbas Catholic PS (South Perth) St Mary s Anglican Girls School Subiaco PS Wesley College City Beach PS 2019 Data is not available from ACARA until March 2020. Currently under a rigorous process at the curriculum, assessment and reporting authority.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 2019 Cohort sizes Year 3 52 Students Year 5 81 Students 2018 Cohort sizes Year 3 - 76 Year 5 - 79 2017 Cohort sizes Year 3 - 75 Year 5 - 88
NUMERACY BUSINESS PLAN TARGET Consistently match or exceed the mean score of WA like schools in Year 3 and 5 in NAPLAN TARGET NOT MET
YR 3 NUMERACY BUSINESS PLAN TARGET Maintain the % of students in the top two proficiency bands at or above WA like schools. CPS 60% (31 students) LIKE SCHOOLS 68% TARGET NOT MET MISSED BY 8% = 4 STUDENTS 18 students 13 students
YR 5 NUMERACY BUSINESS PLAN TARGET Maintain the % of students in the top two proficiency bands at or above WA like schools. CPS 51% Like schools 56% TARGET NOT MET MISSED BY 4% = 3 STUDENTS 12 students 29 students
NUMERACY OVERVIEW BUSINESS PLAN TARGET The stable cohort demonstrates high progress/High achievement 2017-2019 on the School Online progress vs achievement quadrant TARGET MET
READING BUSINESS PLAN TARGET Consistently match or exceed the mean score of WA like schools in Year 3 and 5 NAPLAN TARGET MET Year 5 TARGET NOT MET - Year 3
YR 3 READING BUSINESS PLAN TARGET Maintain the % of students in the top two proficiency bands at or above 70%. CPS 73% LIKE SCHOOLS 78% TARGET MET 21 students 17 students
YR 5 READING BUSINESS PLAN TARGET Maintain the % of students in the top two proficiency bands at or above 70% CPS 63% LIKE SCHOOLS 60% TARGET NOT MET MISSED BY 7% = 6 STUDENTS 20 students 31 students
READING BUSINESS PLAN TARGET Consistently match or exceed WA like schools First Cut data in On-Entry to Year 3 progress TARGET NOT MET MISSED BY 19% = 15 STUDENTS
READING BUSINESS PLAN TARGET Stable cohort performance to match or exceed WA Like schools data in First Cut high and very high progress between years 3-5. TARGET MET IN HIGH PROGRESS TARGET NOT MET in VH PROGRESS Difficult to measure with a large number of students with assumed moderate progress.
WRITING BUSINESS PLAN TARGET Consistently match or exceed the mean score of WA like schools in Year 3 and 5 NAPLAN. TARGET NOT MET
WRITING BUSINESS PLAN TARGET Relative Assessment will show the school has arrested the downward trend in NAPLAN Writing TARGET NOT MET 2017 2018 2019 Year 3 Year 5
WRITING BUSINESS PLAN TARGET The First Cut High and Very High progress of boys between Years 3- 5 matches or exceeds that of WA like schools. TARGET NOT MET MISSED BY 10% = 8 STUDENTS
WRITING 2019 BUSINESS PLAN TARGET The number of students making low or very low progress to reduce to below WA like schools in First Cut data between Years 3 and 5. TARGET NOT MET MISSED BY 7% = 6 STUDENTS IN TOTAL
WRITING DATA Tuesday 14 May BLACK TUESDAY WA was the worse affected (time differences and geographical location) Every 30 seconds the data is saved and sent to the firewall in the Eastern states. The firewall not adequately tuned. 28 May Another attempt ** Years 5/7/9 students wrote more online than on paper. Quantity noticeable more, not necessarily quality.
PROGRESS AND ACHIEVEMENT COMPARED TO LIKE SCHOOLS
IN SUMMARY Out of the 12 targets we met 3 The targets that we missed, weren t by much We have achieved High Progress and High Achievement in Reading and Numeracy This data informs our forward planning for new Business Plan
