Love or Hate? Relationships in "Taming of the Shrew

Love or Hate? Relationships in
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Scenes in the play depict both love and hate simultaneously, portraying complex dynamics between characters like Petruchio and Kate. Their relationship undergoes tests, challenges, and transformations, highlighting the contrast between love and hate. As the characters navigate through these emotions, the audience is invited to contemplate the power of choice and its impact on their lives.

  • Love
  • Hate
  • Relationships
  • Taming of the Shrew
  • Choices

Uploaded on Mar 05, 2025 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. SPC/FAO Workshop on Climate Change June 5thto 8th Key messages and outcomes of relevance to small scale fisheries

  2. SPC/FAO Workshop on Climate Change Fifteen PICTs, senior fisheries officers, national focal points for climate change and disaster risk management in PICTs, Not-for-profit organisations and Funding bodies The objective: i) Use information from a comprehensive vulnerability assessment of climate change implications for fisheries to ii) identify priority actions

  3. How much fish do we eat? Fish consumption in rural areas (kg/person/year) % % Animal protein 50-94 % 77 % 43 Subsistence fishing 47-91 % % 62 % 115 11 % 11 % >150 150 % 10 61 98 33 75 90 50 25 21 55 Examples only Range x-y% Source: Bell et al. (2009), Gillett (2009)

  4. Plans to use fish for food security Provide 35 kg of fish per person per year Maintain traditional fish consumption where it is >35 kg

  5. Factors affecting availability of fish Population growth Year Population (million) 2012 10 2035 15 2050 18 2100 27? Source: SPC Statistics for Development Programme

  6. Effects of population growth on availability of fish per person Fiji Solomon Islands 50 50 Availability of reef fish per person (kg) Availability of reef fish per person (kg) 40 40 35 kg 35 kg 3 7 9 30 30 13 21 20 20 35 32 28 26 10 22 10 14 0 0 2035 2050 2100 2035 2050 2100 Year Year

  7. Effects of climate change Today 2035 (-2 to -5%) 2050 (-20%) 2100 (-20 to -50%)

  8. Additional effects of climate change Fiji Solomon Islands 50 50 Availability of reef fish per capita (kg) Availability of reef fish per capita (kg) 40 40 35 kg 35 kg 3 7 7 7 9 30 30 13 15 16 21 24 20 20 35 34 32 28 28 28 26 10 22 20 10 19 14 11 0 0 2035 2050 2100 2035 2050 2100 Year Year Additional effects of climate change Effects of population growth

  9. How best to fill the gap? Solomon Islands 2035 (33,947 t) 64% 27% 2050 (41,345 t) 46% 43% 2100 (68,910 t) 24% 11% 61% 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Fish needed (tonnes x 1000) Fish needed for food security tonnes (x1000) Coastal fisheries Freshwater fisheries Pond aquaculture Tuna (and bycatch)

  10. Key facts Population growth will have a much stronger effect on availability of fish from reef fisheries than climate change Shortages of reef fish will occur in many PICTs Most of the gap will need to be filled by tuna

  11. Adaptations and policies Practical measures are needed to minimise and fill the gap Poorly-managed fisheries a) Fish needed by growing population Quantity of fish/habitat Fish habitat Fish available from coastal stocks stocks Fish available from Gap in supply of fish to be filled Time Well-managed fisheries b) Fish needed by growing population Quantity of fish/habitat Fish habitat Fish available from stocks Fish available from coastal stocks Time

  12. Adaptation decision framework Addresses climate change Long-term Loss Long-term Gain Near-term Loss Lose-Lose X X Lose-Win Addresses present drivers Win-Lose Win-Win Near-term Gain x X X After Grafton (2010)

  13. Win-win adaptations to minimise gap L-L L-W Manage and restore vegetation cover in catchments W-L W-W Improves resilience of coral reef, mangrove and seagrass habitats

  14. Win-win adaptations to minimise gap L-L L-W Sustain production of fish stocks W-L W-W Maintaining spawning adults will help ensure replenishment and build resilience of key species

  15. Win-win adaptations to fill gap L-L L-W Increase access to tuna with anchored inshore Fish Aggregating Devices (FADs) W-L W-W

  16. Win-win adaptations to fill gap L-L L-W Improve post-harvest methods W-L W-W

  17. Win-win adaptations to fill the gap L-L L-W Develop coastal fisheries for small pelagic species ? W-L W-W

  18. Other adaptations L-L L-W Moratoriums to rebuild sea cucumber fisheries W-L W-W

  19. Suggested supporting policies Strengthen governance of agriculture, forestry and mining practices to prevent soil loss and pollution, to safeguard fish habitats and water quality Apply primary fisheries management to coastal and freshwater stocks to maintain their potential for replenishment

  20. Suggested supporting policies Restrict export of reef fish to retain them for national food security (does not apply to deepwater snapper) Increase access to tuna for the food security by reducing national allocations to industrial fleets

  21. Key investments Revegetation of catchments to trap sediment and maintain riparian (stream side) buffer zones Implement community-based ecosystem approach to fisheries management

  22. Key investments Surveys of best sites for installing inshore FADs Programmes to install and maintain FADs Evaluate merits of micro-credit schemes to develop fisheries around FADs; expand pond aquaculture; and scale-up post-harvest processing

  23. Conclusions Win-win adaptations are available to reduce risks and capitalise on opportunities Supporting policies and investments are needed Integrate adaptations, policies and investments into national strategies and action plans for climate change, including community-based actions supported by partners

  24. Thank you

More Related Content