Long-term Planning and the Effects of the European Common Currency on Economic Development

 
Long-term planning and the effects of
Long-term planning and the effects of
the European Common Currency on
the European Common Currency on
economic development of a country
economic development of a country
 
Raivo Vare
Raivo Vare
Head of the supervisory 
Head of the supervisory 
council 
council 
of
of
the Estonian
the Estonian
 Development Fund
 Development Fund
 
Riga 24.11.2011
 
The case
The case
 
Based on Estonian case to show, how
principal decisions, once made and
maintained long enough, are making
difference and bring success, but shall
not be considered as final and need to
be revisited and developed
 
24.11.2011
 
2
 
Estonia as a case – preconditions 1
Estonia as a case – preconditions 1
 
Size matters - small country, rapid reactions
Open economy model & exports orientation
High share of FDI
Currency board
Yet low-cost-economy
Geopolitically challenged – difference in
approaching euro
Public mentality advantage
 
 
24.11.2011
 
3
 
Estonia as a case – preconditions 2
Estonia as a case – preconditions 2
 
Public sector low debt and budget surplus, kept constantly
by all governements + accumulation of state reserves
Late arrival of (over)borrowing wave
Participation in the chain of global exports of capital goods
to Asia through target export markets - Finland and Sweden
Pure luck
 
– inflation criteria momentum because of the crisis +
absence of the Governement bonds and respective criteria
reference
 
-  Scandinavian influence, especially in FDI and banking
 
-  political usefulness of acceptance of EE to eurozone on a
larger scale at the very peak of the crisis as a good example
 
 
 
24.11.2011
 
4
 
Some decisions with long-term
Some decisions with long-term
implications 1
implications 1
 
EEK pegged to DEM 8:1 right from the
beginnning – 1992
Cleaning of the commercial banking sector –
1992-1997 in the very harsh way
Flat taxation – 1993
Privatization by Treuhandt model – 1993-1998
State budget surplus 1994-2007 (except 1999) –
formation of reserves
New commercial and civil legislation – 1991-
1995
 
24.11.2011
 
5
 
Some decisions with long-term
Some decisions with long-term
implications 2
implications 2
 
Principal decision to join EU – 1996-97 and
fulfillment of 
aquis communitaire
Waiving of tax on the re-invested profits – 2000
Internal devaluation and substantial austerity
program (which continues) during the crisis to
preserve the currency board and enter the
eurozone -2009
etc. etc.
=> All these and numerous other decisions have
paved the way for Estonia to join finally the
eurozone
 
 
24.11.2011
 
6
 
EURO!
EURO!
 
Positive:
EE as small country, slim and fit, pretty
competitive, geographically well positioned,
accustomed to live by means available not
wishes disireable => speedy adjustment and
recovery
EE has founded its place in international
division of labor
34th in the world ranking of HDI
Influx of FDI enabled by euro - new wave of
first of all from Scandinavian neighbourhood
 
24.11.2011
 
7
 
EURO?
EURO?
 
But: when we arrived the party, it was almost over and
the time comes to pay the bill
Uncertainty about not only eurozone but even EU as
such
Development of two-speed Europe and EE’s placement
in this process?
Lagging behind the core states has become apparently
visible
High dependancy ratio on FDI and exports jeopardised
by the eurocrisis
Influence of deleveraging  on businesses and demand
=> How to catch up? => Need for longterm efforts and
respective planning
 
24.11.2011
 
8
 
Challenges ahead
Challenges ahead
 
Eurozone break-up or preservation -> planning for
both with the recognition of the need for the
continuation of the present austerity policies
In any case – some waver of the sovereignity is ahead
in relation to crisis prevention, management and
resolution mechanism for fiscal and financial
sustainability whether the “core  zone” or the wider
one (e.g. to European supervisory institution,
European deposit insurance corp.
 , 
European banking
resolution authority
)
Preparing for lesser and more precisely targeted EU
support money influx -> especially important for
planning of infrastructure development
 
 
 
 
24.11.2011
 
9
 
Disadvantages of the periphery
Disadvantages of the periphery
 
Main disadvantage – geographical distance
Solution: intensive transport connections and
respective development of the infrastructure
Infrastructure planning and construction –
very longterm process and requires especially
careful and effective approach
Regional specifics: physical infrastructure is a
mutual problem for all 3B and Poland,
requireing common approach (RailBaltic,
ViaBaltica,  SSS etc. – is it there?
 
24.11.2011
 
10
 
Vision for growth
Vision for growth
 
Estonian Development Foundation with extensive participation
of 1000 different people has developed the Growth Vision 2018
The work was facilitated by 4 scenarios
The excercise was to develop some ideas how to catch up the
core of Europe and be successful in the new circumstances
The main starting point
 
 – new times demand new approaches as the previous success
is not a guarantee for the future advancement;
 
- EURO helps, but not guarantees success (Greek or Portugal
case)
 
- regional co-ordinated development is a key factor
Main suprise: only 3 out of 9 main key goals and aspirations are
pure economical ones. The rest are related to so called soft
areas!
 
24.11.2011
 
11
 
24.11.2011
 
12
 
24.11.2011
 
13
 
Degree of Baltic Rim     Regional Cooperation
 
Economic Climate in Estonia’s External Markets
 
Harmonious
Strong
 
Fragmented
Weak
 
Strong recovery from the crisis and favorable export conditions
 
Painful recovery from the crisis and tense export conditions
 
Skype Island
 
Hanseatic
League II
 
State Returns
 
Southern Finland
 
(inward orientation)
 
(present situation)
 
(best option for protectionist
development case)
 
(outbound and
collaborative)
 
24.11.2011
 
14
 
Problems of planning
Problems of planning
 
Present planning is mainly linear (e.g. EU 2020,
state budgeting (3Y strategy and annual),
majority of the businesses)
Doing slightly more doesn’t make a difference
in quality improvement we need -> switch to
landmark-based prioritised and focused policy
on the state level
Constant scenario update is must
Plan B is ultimate prerequisite in turbulent
times like now
 
24.11.2011
 
15
 
Problems of planning
Problems of planning
 
Plan without vision is not an option for a small state,
but vision without proper planning and execution is
doomed (like eurocrisis has perfectly shown)
Regional co-operation 
is immanent, but difficult to achieve on
macro level (e.g. Baltic common infrastructure projects like
Visiginas, RB, LNG), although good examples even during the
crisis (Banking support deal between Swedish and Baltic
Central Banks)
Quality leap requires a 
reset in planning 
for the longer
perspective and smart focusing on priorities
EURO doesn’t make a big difference, but sets
more influential framework environment for
planning at all levels
 
 
24.11.2011
 
16
Slide Note
Embed
Share

This article by Raivo Vare, Head of the Supervisory Council of the Estonian Development Fund, discusses the impacts of the European Common Currency on the long-term economic development of a country. The focus is on analyzing the implications and strategies related to adopting a common currency for sustainable growth and prosperity.

  • Economic development
  • European currency
  • Long-term planning
  • Raivo Vare
  • Estonian Development Fund

Uploaded on Feb 20, 2025 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Long-term planning and the effects of the European Common Currency on economic development of a country Raivo Vare Head of the supervisory council of the Estonian Development Fund Riga 24.11.2011

  2. The case Based on Estonian case to show, how principal decisions, once made and maintained long enough, are making difference and bring success, but shall not be considered as final and need to be revisited and developed 24.11.2011 2

  3. Estonia as a case preconditions 1 Size matters - small country, rapid reactions Open economy model & exports orientation High share of FDI Currency board Yet low-cost-economy Geopolitically challenged difference in approaching euro Public mentality advantage 24.11.2011 3

  4. Estonia as a case preconditions 2 Public sector low debt and budget surplus, kept constantly by all governements + accumulation of state reserves Late arrival of (over)borrowing wave Participation in the chain of global exports of capital goods to Asia through target export markets - Finland and Sweden Pure luck inflation criteria momentum because of the crisis + absence of the Governement bonds and respective criteria reference - Scandinavian influence, especially in FDI and banking - political usefulness of acceptance of EE to eurozone on a larger scale at the very peak of the crisis as a good example 24.11.2011 4

  5. Some decisions with long-term implications 1 EEK pegged to DEM 8:1 right from the beginnning 1992 Cleaning of the commercial banking sector 1992-1997 in the very harsh way Flat taxation 1993 Privatization by Treuhandt model 1993-1998 State budget surplus 1994-2007 (except 1999) formation of reserves New commercial and civil legislation 1991- 1995 24.11.2011 5

  6. Some decisions with long-term implications 2 Principal decision to join EU 1996-97 and fulfillment of aquis communitaire Waiving of tax on the re-invested profits 2000 Internal devaluation and substantial austerity program (which continues) during the crisis to preserve the currency board and enter the eurozone -2009 etc. etc. => All these and numerous other decisions have paved the way for Estonia to join finally the eurozone 24.11.2011 6

  7. EURO! Positive: EE as small country, slim and fit, pretty competitive, geographically well positioned, accustomed to live by means available not wishes disireable => speedy adjustment and recovery EE has founded its place in international division of labor 34th in the world ranking of HDI Influx of FDI enabled by euro - new wave of first of all from Scandinavian neighbourhood 24.11.2011 7

  8. EURO? But: when we arrived the party, it was almost over and the time comes to pay the bill Uncertainty about not only eurozone but even EU as such Development of two-speed Europe and EE s placement in this process? Lagging behind the core states has become apparently visible High dependancy ratio on FDI and exports jeopardised by the eurocrisis Influence of deleveraging on businesses and demand => How to catch up? => Need for longterm efforts and respective planning 24.11.2011 8

  9. Challenges ahead Eurozone break-up or preservation -> planning for both with the recognition of the need for the continuation of the present austerity policies In any case some waver of the sovereignity is ahead in relation to crisis prevention, management and resolution mechanism for fiscal and financial sustainability whether the core zone or the wider one (e.g. to European supervisory institution, European deposit insurance corp. , European banking resolution authority) Preparing for lesser and more precisely targeted EU support money influx -> especially important for planning of infrastructure development 24.11.2011 9

  10. Disadvantages of the periphery Main disadvantage geographical distance Solution: intensive transport connections and respective development of the infrastructure Infrastructure planning and construction very longterm process and requires especially careful and effective approach Regional specifics: physical infrastructure is a mutual problem for all 3B and Poland, requireing common approach (RailBaltic, ViaBaltica, SSS etc. is it there? 24.11.2011 10

  11. Vision for growth Estonian Development Foundation with extensive participation of 1000 different people has developed the Growth Vision 2018 The work was facilitated by 4 scenarios The excercise was to develop some ideas how to catch up the core of Europe and be successful in the new circumstances The main starting point new times demand new approaches as the previous success is not a guarantee for the future advancement; - EURO helps, but not guarantees success (Greek or Portugal case) - regional co-ordinated development is a key factor Main suprise: only 3 out of 9 main key goals and aspirations are pure economical ones. The rest are related to so called soft areas! 24.11.2011 11

  12. 24.11.2011 12

  13. Strong recovery from the crisis and favorable export conditions Economic Climate in Estonia s External Markets Hanseatic League II (outbound and collaborative) Skype Island (best option for protectionist development case) Fragmented Weak Harmonious Strong Degree of Baltic Rim Regional Cooperation State Returns Southern Finland (present situation) (inward orientation) Painful recovery from the crisis and tense export conditions 24.11.2011 13

  14. 24.11.2011 14

  15. Problems of planning Present planning is mainly linear (e.g. EU 2020, state budgeting (3Y strategy and annual), majority of the businesses) Doing slightly more doesn t make a difference in quality improvement we need -> switch to landmark-based prioritised and focused policy on the state level Constant scenario update is must Plan B is ultimate prerequisite in turbulent times like now 24.11.2011 15

  16. Problems of planning Plan without vision is not an option for a small state, but vision without proper planning and execution is doomed (like eurocrisis has perfectly shown) Regional co-operation is immanent, but difficult to achieve on macro level (e.g. Baltic common infrastructure projects like Visiginas, RB, LNG), although good examples even during the crisis (Banking support deal between Swedish and Baltic Central Banks) Quality leap requires a reset in planning for the longer perspective and smart focusing on priorities EURO doesn t make a big difference, but sets more influential framework environment for planning at all levels 24.11.2011 16

More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#