Kenya Rapid Water Program: Enhancing Water Management in Ngoroglowa Rock Catchment

Slide Note
Embed
Share

A detailed plan and support system for implementing water management strategies in Kenya's Ngoroglowa Rock Catchment area, with analyses of current water usage, future demand projections, potential maps, classification of interventions, and associated costs and efficiency. The area shows high potential for animal production and domestic water use.


Uploaded on Sep 22, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. KENYA RAPID PROGRAM WATER PLAN SUPPORT FOR 3R IMPLEMENTATION NGORGOLOWA ROCK CATCHMENT

  2. WATER GAP CALCULATED WITH WATER NEED TOOL-AW USERS CURRENT USE (M3/Y) FUTURE DEMAND WATER GAP [YEAR] (M3/Y) [YEAR] (M3/Y) DOMESTIC 7320 264414 19121 LIVESTOCK 115942 156157 40215 AGRICULTURE 0 0 0 TOTAL 123262 182598 29336

  3. 3 R POTENTIAL MAPS

  4. 3R POTENTIE MAP CLASSIFICATION 3E Mountains high porosity, weathering products and suitable for storage 3D- flat and gentle, slopping, porosity and weathering products variables.

  5. 3R CLASSIFICATION RELATED INTERVENTION GROUP Zone 3D- A---Pans and Valley Dams G- Close tanks Zone 3E- A---Pans and Valley Dams D Shallow ground water ,Wells and river bank infiltration F--- Galley plugging ,Check dams and other run-off reduction/Infiltration measures G- Close tanks

  6. 3R CLASSIFICATION RELATED USER GROUP Intervention Domestic Livestock Agriculture Groups Group D MAR/Tube Recharge Treatment is needed Good Option Limited Amount or Very expensive Riverbank Good Option , Check Good option Good Option Infiltration Water Quality Shallow Well with Good option , Check Good Option Limited Amount or hand pump water quality Very expensive Group E Flood water Not advised , if no Good Option Good option spreading or spate other option irrigation treatment is necessary

  7. 3R CLASSIFICATION RELATED INTERVENTION GROUP USERS 3R INTERVENTION POTENTIAL COSTS EFFICIENCY [D/L/A] YIELD (M3) (U$D) (U$D/M3) Livestock Sub surface dams 25,000 25,000 1 Livestock Riverbank Infiltration 14600 15,000 1 Livestock MAR or Tube recharge 8000 20000 2.5 Domestic 5x Rock catchments 276 5,520 20 Domestic Production Borehole 29,200 50,000 2 Total 77,076 115,520 26.5

  8. OBSERVATIONS / REMARKS The area is basically has high potential for animal production and domestic water use .

Related


More Related Content