Insights into Luminous Efficiency in Meteoroid Research

 
Luminous efficiency
 
Margaret Campbell-Brown
University of Western Ontario
 
Luminous efficiency
 
Fraction of kinetic energy emitted as light
 
 
Depends on:
Speed
Composition of meteoroid
Spectral response of detector
Mass
 
Theoretical
Optical observations
Optical/radar
Laboratory
Artificial meteors
Past Work
 
Past Work
 
Verniani (1965)
Super Schmidt meteors
drag equation + luminous intensity equation 
luminous efficiency
361 meteors recorded by the Super Schmidt
cameras
Assumed follows τ = τ
0
v
n
n = 1.01 ± 0.15
τ
0 
is based on one meteor (and ‘confirmed’ by
artificial meteor experiments)
 
Past Work
 
Ayers et al. 1970
artificial meteors
iron and nickel
Assume follows τ = τ
0
v
n
Maximum speed 8 km/s
n = 1.9 ± 0.4
rescaled in 1976 by Ceplecha & McCrosky
 
 
 
 
Past Work
 
Becker & Friichtenicht (1971)  & Becker &
Slattery (1973)
lab experiments
Micron-sized projectiles of iron, copper,
aluminum, silicon
Not free molecular flow
Up to 40 km/s
 
Past Work
 
Weryk & Brown (2013)
Simultaneous radar (CMOR) and optical (CAMO)
Assume ionization efficiency of Jones (1997) is
correct
Suggest that video masses are an order of
magnitude smaller than previous work
 
Difficulties
 
Optical observations: need non-fragmenting
meteors, precise decelerations
Theoretical: Excitation cross sections not well
known at meteor energies
Radar/optical: need an ionization efficiency
Lab experiments: need to have the right flow
regime, range of materials
Artificial meteors: expensive, only low speeds
possible
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Explore luminous efficiency in meteoroid research at the University of Western Ontario, with past work by various researchers spanning different methodologies and materials. Discover the complexities of optical observations and the impact of meteor speed on kinetic energy emitted as light.

  • Meteoroid Research
  • Luminous Efficiency
  • Optical Observations
  • University of Western Ontario
  • Scientific Studies

Uploaded on Oct 05, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Luminous efficiency Margaret Campbell-Brown University of Western Ontario

  2. Luminous efficiency Fraction of kinetic energy emitted as light Depends on: Speed Composition of meteoroid Spectral response of detector Mass

  3. 0.06 0.05 Theoretical Optical observations Optical/radar Laboratory Artificial meteors 0.04 Luminous Efficiency (%) 0.03 0.02 0.01 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 Velocity (km/s) Hill et al 2005 Ceplecha&McCrosky 1976 Ayers(stone) 1970 Ayers(Iron) 1970 Opik 1955 constant Verniani 1964 Halliday 1981 Revelle&Rajan 1979 Saidov&Simek 1989 Becker&Slattery 1973 Ceplecha&Revelle 2005 Cook et al 1963 Hill et al. corrected Becker&Friichtenicht1971 Jones&Halliday 2001 Weryk&Brown 2013

  4. Past Work 10 1 luminous efficiency, % 0.1 Hill, Rogers, Hawkes (2005) Ceplecha & McCrosky (1976) Verniani (1965) Weryk & Brown (2013) 0.01 0.001 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 meteor speed, km/s based on Weryk & Brown (2013)

  5. Past Work Verniani (1965) Super Schmidt meteors drag equation + luminous intensity equation luminous efficiency 361 meteors recorded by the Super Schmidt cameras Assumed follows = 0vn n = 1.01 0.15 0 is based on one meteor (and confirmed by artificial meteor experiments)

  6. Past Work Ayers et al. 1970 artificial meteors iron and nickel Assume follows = 0vn Maximum speed 8 km/s n = 1.9 0.4 rescaled in 1976 by Ceplecha & McCrosky

  7. Past Work Becker & Friichtenicht (1971) & Becker & Slattery (1973) lab experiments Micron-sized projectiles of iron, copper, aluminum, silicon Not free molecular flow Up to 40 km/s

  8. Past Work Weryk & Brown (2013) Simultaneous radar (CMOR) and optical (CAMO) Assume ionization efficiency of Jones (1997) is correct Suggest that video masses are an order of magnitude smaller than previous work

  9. Difficulties Optical observations: need non-fragmenting meteors, precise decelerations Theoretical: Excitation cross sections not well known at meteor energies Radar/optical: need an ionization efficiency Lab experiments: need to have the right flow regime, range of materials Artificial meteors: expensive, only low speeds possible

More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#