Insights into Geography SKE Program at MMU

Geography SKE
Dr Susan Bermingham & Jo Baynham
MMU
Pragmatic and personal insights
Planning the geographical content and T&L
activities
Marketing and recruitment
Staffing the taught sessions, guidance for
tutors
Monitoring student engagement
Behind the scenes
Geographical Content
Use of A level syllabuses
Early in our planning for the 2016 SKE we
generated a list of about 25 topics. These
were circulated to potential tutors from Feb
2016 to indicate their interest in planning a
session.
Feedback from students and tutors led to
some tweaks to the 2017 timetable.
Marketing & Recruitment
Leaflet for events
Guidance to MMU interviewers re SKE as a
conditional offer
Online presence
Admissions & CPD partnerships support
Numbers: 2016 – 23 students
2017 – 23 PGCE students & 1 teacher
2016 Students
Degree
       
Uni
  
Last studied geography
Geography
       
Salford
   
1997
Geography
       
Bangor
   
2016
Geology
       
Futy
   
2011
Law
         
MMU
   
2009
Environmental Science and Applied Biological Science
 
UWE, London
  
1984
History
        
MMU
   
2002
Geography
       
Northumbria
  
2016
Geography
       
UoM
   
2013
Geography
       
MMU
   
2016
Geography
       
UoM
   
2015
Society and Cities
      
Sheffield
  
2007
Criminology and Sociology
     
Liverpool
  
2003
Human Geog
       
Leeds
   
2015
Geography
       
Bangor
   
2016
Outdoor Studies
      
MMU
   
2007
Geography
       
Nottingham
  
2016
Environmental Science
     
?
   
?
  
Military and International history
    
Salford
   
2002
Geography
       
MMU
   
2011
Outdoor Studies
      
MMU
 
Physical Geography
      
MMU
   
2016
Politics
        
Newcastle
  
2011
Geography
       
Salford
   
2016
2017 Students
45 made contact via email or phone with
regards to the SKE - led to 24 on the SKE
course, plus drop in Tutor.
Insights from drop in tutor
Just a note to thank you for inviting me as a
student on the SKE course in the summer. As a
current member of staff who was asked to
teach geography on the primary programme,
it was a very useful course. It brought me right
up to date with the latest strategies and gave
me the confidence to apply half remembered
content to teach it effectively this year.
Uni & Degree 2017 students
Liverpool John Moores
   
Outdoor Education with Environmental Science
Derby
      
Geology
UoM
      
Geography
Leeds
      
Human Geography
      
Geography and Education
Birmingham
    
Geology
Man Poly
    
Humanities and Social Science
Salford
     
Geography
LJMU
      
Sports Science
UoM
      
Geology
Northumbria
    
History
Leeds
      
Environmental Management
Queens, Belfast
    
Land Use and Environmental Management
National University of Ireland, Galway
 
Psychological Studies and Sociology
UoM
      
Geology
Leeds
      
Geography
UCLAN
     
Tourism, Leisure and Management
Salford
     
Geography
Kenyatta / Keele / Salford
  
Environmental Studies
Salford
     
Media performance
Lancaster
    
Marketing  and organisation studies
UoM
      
Geography
Trier, Germany
    
Geography and English
Insights from tutors (MMU)
…they all seemed positive and it was very enjoyable  - the
mixture of experts and newbies was interesting …and
possibly challenging  - so pitching it was always tricky  - I
remember the 2ndary PE lady  - so so keen as she was new.
I can only comment for the 2016 sessions but I thought it
worked really well for those students who had not studied
Geography. I thought it was great that every topic got its
own day and thought the organisation was good. I certainly
felt like I was given enough time to go into the required
detail. In the last week students began to expect that the
sessions would tell them how to teach rather than cover
subject knowledge. This caused a few issues.
Pitching level of sessions a challenge
Staffing the Face to Face 4 weeks
Joint planning & development of the SKE
between :
Geography and Environmental Management
tutors in School of Science and the
Environment
&
Geography education tutors within School of
Teacher Education and Professional
Development
2016 Face to Face sessions
2017 Face to Face sessions
Changes/Challenges
Feedback from students – 2 days rather than 1
Tutor availability
It did take quite a long time for the payment
to be arranged/several admin loop holes to
jump through.
Self study weeks
Guidance from other SKE tutors
Geog SKE planning meetings
Mandatory activities plus choices
Self Study
Following four weeks of face to face sessions, students are now
required to complete four weeks of self-study of approximately 100
hours. If students were absent during the face to face sessions they
will need to add an additional 5 hours per day missed.
Please create a google drive folder named as your surname and first
name e.g. Baynham, J
Share this folder with Jo (j.baynhammmu@gmail.com)
You need to plan the next four weeks of your study.  This document
needs to be submitted by Monday 18 July by 5pm.
This document must be submitted to your tutor via Googledrive
submission prior to the four week self-study time. All tasks must be
completed and, wherever required, submitted via Googledrive by
Monday 15 August by 5 pm.
Mandatory Tasks
1.
GCSE Controlled Assessment
2.
A level Project
3.
Past A Level Papers
4.
Education Visits
5.
Subject Knowledge Confidence Audit x 3
Self selected Tasks
During the SKE you will have identified strengths
and weaknesses in your own subject knowledge.
Select a minimum of 10 geographical areas from
the 20 taught days to focus upon.  At various
points you have been signposted to additional
activities, projects and further reading (suggested
activities document). You may have also
identified other resources or projects you wish to
pursue. Please outline the additional activities
here (although it is noted that this list is not
exhaustive and may develop during your self-
study time).
Challenges
2016 two tutors monitored students for first 2
weeks, then 1 tutor last few weeks.
2017 one tutor monitored all students.
Takes time – annotated with insert comments
their self study planner on a regular basis
3 students 2017 failed to complete within
deadlines. 1 failed the course. 2 did complete
within extension time, have struggled on PGCE.
Student Insights
'I found the teaching activities
really useful, and incorporated
them into my teaching practice. I
also thought it was a good
refresher on the subject content
that I had studied previously.‘
Student 2017
Teacher Tutor Insights
The teaching was a positive experience for me as the students were engaged
and keen to participate in the activities. The evidence in the mini plenaries
suggested they came away with improved understanding. I can’t comment on
the outcomes of the tasks set after the session.
Teaching was challenging from the point of view of the topic which is very
synoptic. There are so many aspects of knowledge pulled together for success
in this topic. That being the case, it’s even more difficult than usual to pitch
because of the uncertainties of so many aspects of prior geographical
knowledge amongst the student group. I went in prepared to be
flexible,  went in around the middle and adjusted. So activity choice needs to
reflect this.
In connection with the synopticity, there’s a lot to teach. With hindsight, I
would have tried to link with the climate change topic, also being taught on
the SKE and sought economy from there. As it was, we were pushed for time,
but they went away with lots of resources and references to follow up.
Student Insight
I graduated from UoB with a Msci in geology
and the SKE was the perfect refresher course.
It was intense but covered the perfect mix of
human and physical topics to a detailed level!
The perfect start to my PGCE year and
definitely made me feel more confident re
subject knowledge before starting my first
placement!
Associate Tutor Insights
Found the two courses very intense.  Four weeks of input on just geography is a lot to expect even from
the most enthusiastic geographers and then they have to do four weeks of their own research.  Much
more intensive than a university course or an A Level.  Students need to be dedicated and sometimes,
maybe, they have chosen geography as the subject that most meets their needs to become teachers
(i.e. fits with their own degree) rather than their passion!  The difficulty is, when else would we do it,
when the participants are already finishing their own courses, or working?
I’ve only come across online SKEs before.  The difference with face to face courses is that you have to
devise teaching strategies to interest, engage and involve the participants in their learning.  Online, you
can just expect them to do their own research and copy from a set of Powerpoints I guess.
I found the two groups had different expectations of the course, and maybe we need to make sure they
have the same expectations as the deliverers!  Maybe we need to know little bit more about them and
their academic background in a bit more depth?
I need to make sure I am aware of the references and resources they have.  I should also be providing
more academic references for my topics, but then, I’m not sure I am up to date enough either to give
them the latest journal references, for example.  Does the University take ‘Geography’?  I think I felt I
had to give them everything and didn’t give them enough responsibility to do their own research.
Insights from Geog Subject Co-
ordinator
Those students who didn’t attend the SKE feel
like they have missed out, especially in the
first week of term but more recently as well
Opportunities to use examples of different
ways of teaching whilst focusing on subject
knowledge – trainees continue to use this
throughout the year
All would benefit from face to face SKE!
Insights from SKE co-ordinator
Enjoyable planning and teaching geography
Routes onto the SKE – managing recruitment
Managing expectations of students and staff
Bit of a worry in May 2017 that we had over
recruited. 20-25 seems an effective group size
for us.
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Pragmatic insights into planning geographical content and teaching activities, along with marketing and recruitment efforts at MMU's Geography SKE program. The program emphasizes using A-level syllabuses for content planning, engaging potential tutors, and monitoring student engagement. It showcases the diverse backgrounds of students and the positive impact of the course on tutors' confidence and teaching strategies.

  • Geography
  • MMU
  • SKE program
  • Insights
  • Education

Uploaded on Sep 14, 2024 | 1 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Geography SKE Dr Susan Bermingham & Jo Baynham MMU

  2. Pragmatic and personal insights Planning the geographical content and T&L activities Marketing and recruitment Staffing the taught sessions, guidance for tutors Monitoring student engagement Behind the scenes

  3. Geographical Content Use of A level syllabuses Early in our planning for the 2016 SKE we generated a list of about 25 topics. These were circulated to potential tutors from Feb 2016 to indicate their interest in planning a session. Feedback from students and tutors led to some tweaks to the 2017 timetable.

  4. Marketing & Recruitment Leaflet for events Guidance to MMU interviewers re SKE as a conditional offer Online presence Admissions & CPD partnerships support Numbers: 2016 23 students 2017 23 PGCE students & 1 teacher

  5. 2016 Students Degree Geography Geography Geology Law Environmental Science and Applied Biological Science History Geography Geography Geography Geography Society and Cities Criminology and Sociology Human Geog Geography Outdoor Studies Geography Environmental Science Military and International history Geography Outdoor Studies Physical Geography Politics Geography Uni Salford Bangor Futy MMU UWE, London MMU Northumbria UoM MMU UoM Sheffield Liverpool Leeds Bangor MMU Nottingham ? Salford MMU MMU MMU Newcastle Salford Last studied geography 1997 2016 2011 2009 1984 2002 2016 2013 2016 2015 2007 2003 2015 2016 2007 2016 ? 2002 2011 2016 2011 2016

  6. 2017 Students 45 made contact via email or phone with regards to the SKE - led to 24 on the SKE course, plus drop in Tutor.

  7. Insights from drop in tutor Just a note to thank you for inviting me as a student on the SKE course in the summer. As a current member of staff who was asked to teach geography on the primary programme, it was a very useful course. It brought me right up to date with the latest strategies and gave me the confidence to apply half remembered content to teach it effectively this year.

  8. Uni & Degree 2017 students Liverpool John Moores Derby UoM Leeds Outdoor Education with Environmental Science Geology Geography Human Geography Geography and Education Geology Humanities and Social Science Geography Sports Science Geology History Environmental Management Land Use and Environmental Management Psychological Studies and Sociology Geology Geography Tourism, Leisure and Management Geography Environmental Studies Media performance Marketing and organisationstudies Geography Geography and English Birmingham Man Poly Salford LJMU UoM Northumbria Leeds Queens, Belfast National University of Ireland, Galway UoM Leeds UCLAN Salford Kenyatta / Keele / Salford Salford Lancaster UoM Trier, Germany

  9. Insights from tutors (MMU) they all seemed positive and it was very enjoyable - the mixture of experts and newbies was interesting and possibly challenging - so pitching it was always tricky - I remember the 2ndary PE lady - so so keen as she was new. I can only comment for the 2016 sessions but I thought it worked really well for those students who had not studied Geography. I thought it was great that every topic got its own day and thought the organisation was good. I certainly felt like I was given enough time to go into the required detail. In the last week students began to expect that the sessions would tell them how to teach rather than cover subject knowledge. This caused a few issues. Pitching level of sessions a challenge

  10. Staffing the Face to Face 4 weeks Joint planning & development of the SKE between : Geography and Environmental Management tutors in School of Science and the Environment & Geography education tutors within School of Teacher Education and Professional Development

  11. 2016 Face to Face sessions Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Ben Introduction & Hazards Jo Weather & Climate Sue Urban & Rural Jo Energy Security Sue & Jo Health Ian Coasts Ben Water Cycle & Flooding Jo Extreme Environments Ian Rivers & Fieldwork Ben Ecosystems Lee Stats & Field Skills Sue Children s Geographies Urban Fieldwork Jane Tectonics & Volcanoes Sue L Globalisation Andrew Population & migration Andrew Oceans & Global Governance Lee GIS Ian Geology Jane Climate Change

  12. 2017 Face to Face sessions Monday Jo and Sue Jo Intro Sue Place & Space Tuesday Jo Weather and climate Wednesday Ben (Ian pm) Floods & Water Cycle Fieldtrip to Didsbury Sue L Extreme Environments Thursday Ian Geology Friday Jo and Sue Health Jane Stats & Field Skills Mike Energy Security including Carbon Cycle Sue B Urban & Rural / Population & Migration Ian River Fieldtrip Jane Plate tectonics & Volcanoes Jane Plate Tectonics Vol/Eqs/Tsuna mi Ben Ecosystems Fieldtrip Thomas GIS Sue L Globalisation Jane Climate Change Group Work Day Urban Investigation Ian Coasts Sue Global Governance & Oceans Jo Next steps Valeria Education for Sustainable Development

  13. Changes/Challenges Feedback from students 2 days rather than 1 Tutor availability It did take quite a long time for the payment to be arranged/several admin loop holes to jump through.

  14. Self study weeks Guidance from other SKE tutors Geog SKE planning meetings Mandatory activities plus choices

  15. Self Study Following four weeks of face to face sessions, students are now required to complete four weeks of self-study of approximately 100 hours. If students were absent during the face to face sessions they will need to add an additional 5 hours per day missed. Please create a google drive folder named as your surname and first name e.g. Baynham, J Share this folder with Jo (j.baynhammmu@gmail.com) You need to plan the next four weeks of your study. This document needs to be submitted by Monday 18 July by 5pm. This document must be submitted to your tutor via Googledrive submission prior to the four week self-study time. All tasks must be completed and, wherever required, submitted via Googledrive by Monday 15 August by 5 pm.

  16. Mandatory Tasks 1. GCSE Controlled Assessment 2. A level Project 3. Past A Level Papers 4. Education Visits 5. Subject Knowledge Confidence Audit x 3

  17. Self selected Tasks During the SKE you will have identified strengths and weaknesses in your own subject knowledge. Select a minimum of 10 geographical areas from the 20 taught days to focus upon. At various points you have been signposted to additional activities, projects and further reading (suggested activities document). You may have also identified other resources or projects you wish to pursue. Please outline the additional activities here (although it is noted that this list is not exhaustive and may develop during your self- study time).

  18. Challenges 2016 two tutors monitored students for first 2 weeks, then 1 tutor last few weeks. 2017 one tutor monitored all students. Takes time annotated with insert comments their self study planner on a regular basis 3 students 2017 failed to complete within deadlines. 1 failed the course. 2 did complete within extension time, have struggled on PGCE.

  19. Student Insights 'I found the teaching activities really useful, and incorporated them into my teaching practice. I also thought it was a good refresher on the subject content that I had studied previously. Student 2017

  20. Teacher Tutor Insights The teaching was a positive experience for me as the students were engaged and keen to participate in the activities. The evidence in the mini plenaries suggested they came away with improved understanding. I can t comment on the outcomes of the tasks set after the session. Teaching was challenging from the point of view of the topic which is very synoptic. There are so many aspects of knowledge pulled together for success in this topic. That being the case, it s even more difficult than usual to pitch because of the uncertainties of so many aspects of prior geographical knowledge amongst the student group. I went in prepared to be flexible, went in around the middle and adjusted. So activity choice needs to reflect this. In connection with the synopticity, there s a lot to teach. With hindsight, I would have tried to link with the climate change topic, also being taught on the SKE and sought economy from there. As it was, we were pushed for time, but they went away with lots of resources and references to follow up.

  21. Student Insight I graduated from UoB with a Msci in geology and the SKE was the perfect refresher course. It was intense but covered the perfect mix of human and physical topics to a detailed level! The perfect start to my PGCE year and definitely made me feel more confident re subject knowledge before starting my first placement!

  22. Associate Tutor Insights Found the two courses very intense. Four weeks of input on just geography is a lot to expect even from the most enthusiastic geographers and then they have to do four weeks of their own research. Much more intensive than a university course or an A Level. Students need to be dedicated and sometimes, maybe, they have chosen geography as the subject that most meets their needs to become teachers (i.e. fits with their own degree) rather than their passion! The difficulty is, when else would we do it, when the participants are already finishing their own courses, or working? I ve only come across online SKEs before. The difference with face to face courses is that you have to devise teaching strategies to interest, engage and involve the participants in their learning. Online, you can just expect them to do their own research and copy from a set of Powerpoints I guess. I found the two groups had different expectations of the course, and maybe we need to make sure they have the same expectations as the deliverers! Maybe we need to know little bit more about them and their academic background in a bit more depth? I need to make sure I am aware of the references and resources they have. I should also be providing more academic references for my topics, but then, I m not sure I am up to date enough either to give them the latest journal references, for example. Does the University take Geography ? I think I felt I had to give them everything and didn t give them enough responsibility to do their own research.

  23. Insights from Geog Subject Co- ordinator Those students who didn t attend the SKE feel like they have missed out, especially in the first week of term but more recently as well Opportunities to use examples of different ways of teaching whilst focusing on subject knowledge trainees continue to use this throughout the year All would benefit from face to face SKE!

  24. Insights from SKE co-ordinator Enjoyable planning and teaching geography Routes onto the SKE managing recruitment Managing expectations of students and staff Bit of a worry in May 2017 that we had over recruited. 20-25 seems an effective group size for us.

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#