Insights from ET-ISB Workshop on Low-Frequency Noise and GWADW 2021

 
Report on the ET-ISB workshop
29-31 March 2021
 
Low-Frequency noise
 
Kate Dooley and Conor Mow-Lowry
GWADW 2021, where is the beach? edition
 
 
ET Instrument Science Board
 
Introductory workshop from 29-31 March
First meeting spanning all 6 Divisions of the ISB, both an
introduction and a workshop on some ‘big questions’:
-
What will be the mirror temperature for ET-LF?
-
How can we deal with the realities of low-frequency noise?
-
What are the facility limits?
 
We are looking through the 2G+ ‘lens’ at low-f noise, aiming to
address the (current) hardest problems at the design stage
 
Low-frequency noise
 
ET is not 10x better
than 2
nd
 gen
detectors, it is a
million times 
better
at 3Hz.
 
 
[Thanks to Michal Was and Denis Martynov for low-f noise estimates]
L
o
w
-
f
 
n
o
i
s
e
S
u
s
p
e
n
s
i
o
n
O
p
t
i
c
s
I
n
t
e
r
f
e
r
o
m
e
t
e
r
A
c
t
i
v
e
 
N
o
i
s
e
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
Spanning at least 4 of 6 ISB divisions
A
c
h
i
e
v
a
b
l
e
i
s
o
l
a
t
i
o
n
R
M
S
 
m
o
t
i
o
n
 
i
n
I
F
O
 
D
o
F
s
R
e
s
i
d
u
a
l
d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
t
i
a
l
 
m
o
t
i
o
n
&
 
s
c
a
t
t
e
r
 
B
r
e
a
k
o
u
t
 
R
o
o
m
s
:
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
n
o
i
s
e
A
n
g
u
l
a
r
 
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
s
M
y
r
i
a
d
 
c
o
u
p
l
i
n
g
s
t
o
 
D
A
R
M
 
Can we i
dentify primary noise drivers instead of
playing ‘whack-a-mole’ with the couplings?
Couplings are not simple in practice…
 
We cannot s
imply fix
ASC noise by improving
spot-centering or
balancing coil drives
(etc). There are hard
limits to this process.
[Jenne Driggers, GWADW,
sometime pre-Corona]
https://agenda.infn.it/event/
15928/contributions/89735/
Technical noise becomes fundamental
 
One relatively simple
example is DAC noise for
test-mass actuation. It
links open-loop motion in
DARM to ‘fundamental’
technical noise.
[Paolo Ruggi, ET-ISB workshop]
https://apps.et-
gw.eu/tds/?content=3&r=17573
 
“Systems”
considerations in
GWDs
 
https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-G2001539
 
Taken from Brian Lantz’s
recent LVK talk
 
For ET we need to
plan, from the
beginning, to deal
with the auxiliary
controls, dynamic
range, and realistic
considerations of
non-linearities.
 
Adopting a baseline target for the seismic
platform
 
Some ‘concrete’ suggestions
 
Form a flow of requirements from IFO down
Assemble existing inputs and models
Identify critical unknowns
Make first estimates for controls effects
 
Anchor simulations and estimations in 2
nd
 gen experience
 
How do we join ET?
 
Check our our welcome page:
https://wiki.et-gw.eu/ISB/WelcomePage
 
And contact your 
helpful Division Chairs:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
They will assist you help you join the collaboration,
where you can 
shape the next generation
 of
gravitational-wave detector
 
 
ANM:
  
Jan Harms - 
jan.harms@gssi.it
   
Conor Mow-Lowry – 
c.m.mow-lowry@vu.nl
Suspensions: 
 
Franceso Fidecaro - 
francesco.fidecaro@unipi.it
   
Alessandro Bertolini – 
alberto@nikhef.nl
Slide Note
Embed
Share

The ET Instrument Science Board held a workshop focusing on addressing key challenges related to low-frequency noise in gravitational wave detectors. Experts discussed topics such as mirror temperature, dealing with low-frequency noise realities, and facility limits. The workshop highlighted the significant improvement low-frequency noise offers over 2nd-generation detectors, explored various divisions of the ISB, and delved into technical noise fundamentals. Key takeaways included the complexities of couplings, the importance of identifying primary noise drivers, and the impact of technical noise on system considerations in gravitational wave detectors.

  • Gravitational wave detectors
  • Low-frequency noise
  • ET-ISB workshop
  • GWADW 2021
  • Technical noise

Uploaded on Aug 17, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Report on the ET-ISB workshop 29-31 March 2021 Low-Frequency noise Kate Dooley and Conor Mow-Lowry GWADW 2021, where is the beach? edition https://indico.ego-gw.it/event/173/

  2. ET Instrument Science Board Introductory workshop from 29-31 March First meeting spanning all 6 Divisions of the ISB, both an introduction and a workshop on some big questions : - What will be the mirror temperature for ET-LF? - How can we deal with the realities of low-frequency noise? - What are the facility limits? We are looking through the 2G+ lens at low-f noise, aiming to address the (current) hardest problems at the design stage

  3. Low-frequency noise ET is not 10x better than 2ndgen detectors, it is a million times better at 3Hz. [Thanks to Michal Was and Denis Martynov for low-f noise estimates]

  4. Spanning at least 4 of 6 ISB divisions Breakout Rooms: Suspension Angular controls Low-f noise RMS motion in IFO DoFs Optics Myriad couplings to DARM Interferometer Achievable isolation Residual differential motion & scatter Active Noise Mitigation Environmental noise Can we identify primary noise drivers instead of playing whack-a-mole with the couplings?

  5. Couplings are not simple in practice We cannot simply fix ASC noise by improving spot-centering or balancing coil drives (etc). There are hard limits to this process. [Jenne Driggers, GWADW, sometime pre-Corona] https://agenda.infn.it/event/ 15928/contributions/89735/

  6. Technical noise becomes fundamental One relatively simple example is DAC noise for test-mass actuation. It links open-loop motion in DARM to fundamental technical noise. [Paolo Ruggi, ET-ISB workshop] https://apps.et- gw.eu/tds/?content=3&r=17573

  7. Systems considerations in GWDs Taken from Brian Lantz s recent LVK talk https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-G2001539

  8. For ET we need to plan, from the beginning, to deal with the auxiliary controls, dynamic range, and realistic considerations of non-linearities.

  9. Adopting a baseline target for the seismic platform

  10. Some concrete suggestions Form a flow of requirements from IFO down Assemble existing inputs and models Identify critical unknowns Make first estimates for controls effects Anchor simulations and estimations in 2ndgen experience

  11. How do we join ET? Check our our welcome page: https://wiki.et-gw.eu/ISB/WelcomePage And contact your helpful Division Chairs: Jan Harms - jan.harms@gssi.it Conor Mow-Lowry c.m.mow-lowry@vu.nl Suspensions: Franceso Fidecaro - francesco.fidecaro@unipi.it Alessandro Bertolini alberto@nikhef.nl ANM: They will assist you help you join the collaboration, where you can shape the next generation of gravitational-wave detector

More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#