Innovative Strategies for Lake Erie Watershed Health
Nutrient Workgroup Members:
L
a
r
r
y
A
n
t
o
s
c
h
L
i
s
a
F
r
e
d
e
S
c
u
d
d
e
r
M
a
c
k
e
y
,
c
h
a
i
r
B
r
i
a
n
M
i
l
l
e
r
A
l
S
t
e
i
n
m
a
n
T
heme 1: Seek Advice and Recommendations on Innovative
Strategies to Address Legacy Phosphorus
Charge Question to GLAB:
Please identify any strategies, using traditional or innovative technologies or methods, to
reduce legacy phosphorus within the Lake Erie watershed (and other Great Lakes and
tributaries thereto).
1
Charge Question to GLAB:
Balancing the need for the continued production of agricultural commodities in the
Great Lakes region, the contribution to excess nutrient loading in Lake Erie
associated with agricultural production activities, and the need to significantly
reduce the extent and duration of HABs on Lake Erie, what innovative actions could
reasonably be taken to accelerate the reduction of excess nutrients and HABs or
duration of HAB events in Lake Erie?
Consider if there are new or different applications of traditional federal funding
sources, opportunities to partner with the private sector (including tourism, drinking
water systems, and others affected by HABs), or community-driven or market-based
approaches to financing water quality improvements.
Theme 2: Seek Advice and Recommendations on Managing
Excess Nutrients
2
Theme 1 – Innovative Strategies to Reduce Legacy P
•
Defined Legacy P
•
Watershed-Based Strategies
o
Critical Source Areas
o
USDA-NRCS ACT Framework (Avoiding, Controlling, Trapping Practices)
•
Lake-Based Strategies
o
Physical Treatments – Sediment Removal and Aeration
o
Chemical Treatments
o
Biological Treatments
•
Long-Term Monitoring and Maintenance
o
Long-term Monitoring
o
Long-term Funding
3
Theme 2 – Innovative Strategies to Reduce Excess
Nutrients
•
Defined Excess Nutrients (P)
•
Critical Source Areas
•
Structural Nutrient Removal Systems (ACT)
o
Innovative Technologies/Nutrient Removal Systems –
Pending TBD
•
Non-Structural Practices, Planning, Market-Based Incentives (ACT)
o
Land-Use/Watershed Planning
o
Market-Based Strategies
•
Governance and Regulatory Considerations
o
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL)
o
Distributed Load/9-Element NPS-IS Plans
o
Home Septic Treatment Systems (HSTS)
4
I
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
d
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
T
h
e
m
e
s
1
a
n
d
2
)
Watershed-Based Strategies
1.
Identify
Critical Source Areas
for both Legacy P and excess nutrients (P)
•
GLRI to support regional project(s) to identify Critical Source Areas in the watershed that
contribute a disproportionately large amount of legacy P to nutrient load. GLRI to use Critical
Source Area information to prioritize and more effectively target legacy P management
strategies to maximize removal of legacy P and excess nutrients (P) from the system.
2.
Develop regional tools to evaluate and implement the most effective
combinations of ACT practices to maximize legacy P and excess nutrient (P)
reductions.
•
Coordinate GLRI funding and technical expertise to develop regional tools to implement the
most effective combination of Avoiding, Controlling, and Trapping practices at federal, state,
and local level as identified in the USDA-NRCS ACT program to maximize legacy P and excess
nutrient (P) and sediment reduction at HUC-12 watershed scales.
5
Watershed-Based Strategies
3.
Fund and implement a
long-term comprehensive monitoring program
.
•
To evaluate the performance and costs of individual and/or combinations of ACT
conservation practices to guide GLRI funding decisions to maximize legacy P and excess
nutrient (P) reduction. (
practice
)
•
To assess GLRI-funded project performance and provide the information necessary to guide
future GLRI investments in water quality and more effectively manage nutrient pollution in
the Great Lakes. (
project
)
•
Continue to fund existing broader monitoring efforts to assess regional benefits of the GLRI-
funded portfolio of nutrient reduction projects within the Great Lakes basin. (
regional
)
4.
GLRI to create an endowment fund (or funds) to provide a stable long-term
funding source to support continued (and new) monitoring and assessment
work of GLRI-funded nutrient reduction practices and projects.
I
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
d
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
T
h
e
m
e
s
1
a
n
d
2
)
6
Watershed-Based Strategies
5.
GLRI support and fund projects that evaluate the relative contributions of soil
legacy P and applied P to total P loss.
•
A recent analysis of the data collected at Ohio USDA-ARS edge-of-field monitoring locations
indicate that soil legacy P contributes 80% of the P loss and newly applied (excess P) from
fertilizer/manure contributes the remaining 20%
.
Lake-Based Strategies
6.
GLRI to support physical removal or chemical/biological sequestration of
legacy P–laden sediments as an effective method to remove legacy P from
the environment.
•
Encourage GLRI coordination with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, states, local
communities, and other partners to develop innovative ways to sequester
(trap/chemically/biologically inactivate) and/or beneficially reuse dredge sediment for
agricultural field placement, habitat restoration, or other environmentally suitable uses.
T
h
e
m
e
1
L
e
g
a
c
y
P
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
!
7
T
h
e
m
e
2
E
x
c
e
s
s
N
u
t
r
i
e
n
t
(
P
)
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
Structural Nutrient Removal Strategies
7.
GLRI to support and fund innovative technology/nutrient removal systems
along with innovative funding strategies to support long-term monitoring and
assessment of these technologies to evaluate their effectiveness.
•
Pending – TBD
. Recommend forming a review/assessment panel/process to evaluate
feasibility and effectiveness of innovative technologies and nutrient removal systems.
8.
GLRI to encourage, support, and fund larger-scale nutrient reduction projects
within lower watershed tributaries near, or adjacent to, receiving water
bodies to maximize potential nutrient reduction benefits.
•
Investments in larger nutrient reduction projects located within lower watershed tributaries
and/or adjacent to receiving water bodies will result in increased nutrient (excess P) removal
at a lower cost when compared to multiple smaller projects in the upper watershed.
!
!
8
T
h
e
m
e
2
E
x
c
e
s
s
N
u
t
r
i
e
n
t
(
P
)
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
Non-Structural Market-Based Strategies
9.
GLRI to support the development of an incentive-based ecosystem credit
marketplace that
connects
buyers and sellers of ecosystem credits.
•
Ecosystem Service Credits
– GLRI explore
opportunities to link these markets to the Blue
Accounting
project
with an emphasis on excess nutrient reduction and water quality
improvement.
•
Tradable Permit Model
– GLRI explore opportunities to link Tradable Permit Model to
TMDL/Distributed Load watersheds and potential regulatory/governance changes in NPDES
permits.
10.
GLRI to consider opportunities to support and develop mechanisms to
leverage GLRI resources with public-private and/or pay for performance funds
to implement in nutrient reduction practices in the basin.
Long-term market-based incentives provide the opportunity to leverage local, state, and
federal funds with corporate and private funds.
Identify c
orporate sustainability programs to
invest in environmentally sustainable development projects and ecosystem service credit
markets.
!
!
9
T
h
e
m
e
2
E
x
c
e
s
s
N
u
t
r
i
e
n
t
(
P
)
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
Non-Structural Governance and Regulatory Strategies
11.
GLRI to support and fund watershed land-use plans and conservation
practices that protect and maintain existing high-quality watersheds (i.e.,
protect and preserve what is already working).
12.
GLRI to support and fund regional TMDL implementation using a distributed
mass balance approach applied at the HUC-12 subwatershed scale.
•
S
upport and fund
9-element Nonpoint Source Implementation Strategies (NPS-IS plans) as an
effective way to link local subwatershed nutrient reduction projects (BMPs) to regional
TMDL/distributed load water quality targets.
13.
GLRI to develop mechanisms to foster cross-jurisdictional coordination and
fund regional coordination efforts to identify Critical Source Areas and
implement regionally coordinated watershed scale structural nutrient
reduction practices (by applying landscape conservation design principles).
!
!
10
T
h
e
m
e
1
–
I
n
n
o
v
a
t
i
v
e
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
e
s
t
o
A
d
d
r
e
s
s
L
e
g
a
c
y
P
h
o
s
p
h
o
r
u
s
T
h
e
m
e
2
–
M
a
n
a
g
i
n
g
E
x
c
e
s
s
N
u
t
r
i
e
n
t
s
Discussion Prompts
•
What topics, processes, tools, practices are we are missing?
•
Mechanisms for Stakeholder Input
•
New Innovative Ideas or Approaches (watershed, lake, structural, non-
structural, governance, regulatory)
•
Ongoing Efforts (are we duplicative?)
•
Strategies - Feasibility, Implementation, and Constructability
•
Criteria to Prioritize Recommendations
“
Insomnia
is a
sleep disorder
in which you have trouble falling and/or staying asleep.”
11
Seeking advice and recommendations on reducing legacy phosphorus and managing excess nutrients in the Lake Erie watershed to improve water quality, addressing critical source areas, employing innovative technologies, and exploring governance and regulatory considerations for sustainable solutions.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Theme 1: Seek Advice and Recommendations on Innovative Strategies to Address Legacy Phosphorus Charge Question to GLAB: Please identify any strategies, using traditional or innovative technologies or methods, to reduce legacy phosphorus within the Lake Erie watershed (and other Great Lakes and tributaries thereto). Nutrient Workgroup Members: Larry Antosch Larry Antosch Lisa Frede Lisa Frede Scudder Mackey, chair Scudder Mackey, chair Brian Miller Brian Miller Al Steinman Al Steinman 1
Theme 2: Seek Advice and Recommendations on Managing Excess Nutrients Charge Question to GLAB: Balancing the need for the continued production of agricultural commodities in the Great Lakes region, the contribution to excess nutrient loading in Lake Erie associated with agricultural production activities, and the need to significantly reduce the extent and duration of HABs on Lake Erie, what innovative actions could reasonably be taken to accelerate the reduction of excess nutrients and HABs or duration of HAB events in Lake Erie? Consider if there are new or different applications of traditional federal funding sources, opportunities to partner with the private sector (including tourism, drinking water systems, and others affected by HABs), or community-driven or market-based approaches to financing water quality improvements. 2
Theme 1 Innovative Strategies to Reduce Legacy P Defined Legacy P Watershed-Based Strategies o Critical Source Areas o USDA-NRCS ACT Framework (Avoiding, Controlling, Trapping Practices) Lake-Based Strategies oPhysical Treatments Sediment Removal and Aeration oChemical Treatments oBiological Treatments Long-Term Monitoring and Maintenance oLong-term Monitoring oLong-term Funding 3
Theme 2 Innovative Strategies to Reduce Excess Nutrients Defined Excess Nutrients (P) Critical Source Areas Structural Nutrient Removal Systems (ACT) oInnovative Technologies/Nutrient Removal Systems Pending TBD Non-Structural Practices, Planning, Market-Based Incentives (ACT) oLand-Use/Watershed Planning oMarket-Based Strategies Governance and Regulatory Considerations oTotal Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) oDistributed Load/9-Element NPS-IS Plans oHome Septic Treatment Systems (HSTS) 4
Integrated Recommendations (Themes 1 and 2) Integrated Recommendations (Themes 1 and 2) Watershed-Based Strategies 1. Identify Critical Source Areas for both Legacy P and excess nutrients (P) GLRI to support regional project(s) to identify Critical Source Areas in the watershed that contribute a disproportionately large amount of legacy P to nutrient load. GLRI to use Critical Source Area information to prioritize and more effectively target legacy P management strategies to maximize removal of legacy P and excess nutrients (P) from the system. 2. Develop regional tools to evaluate and implement the most effective combinations of ACT practices to maximize legacy P and excess nutrient (P) reductions. Coordinate GLRI funding and technical expertise to develop regional tools to implement the most effective combination of Avoiding, Controlling, and Trapping practices at federal, state, and local level as identified in the USDA-NRCS ACT program to maximize legacy P and excess nutrient (P) and sediment reduction at HUC-12 watershed scales. 5
Integrated Recommendations (Themes 1 and 2) Integrated Recommendations (Themes 1 and 2) Watershed-Based Strategies 3. Fund and implement a long-term comprehensive monitoring program. To evaluate the performance and costs of individual and/or combinations of ACT conservation practices to guide GLRI funding decisions to maximize legacy P and excess nutrient (P) reduction. (practice) To assess GLRI-funded project performance and provide the information necessary to guide future GLRI investments in water quality and more effectively manage nutrient pollution in the Great Lakes. (project) Continue to fund existing broader monitoring efforts to assess regional benefits of the GLRI- funded portfolio of nutrient reduction projects within the Great Lakes basin. (regional) 4. GLRI to create an endowment fund (or funds) to provide a stable long-term funding source to support continued (and new) monitoring and assessment work of GLRI-funded nutrient reduction practices and projects. 6
Theme 1 Legacy P Recommendations Theme 1 Legacy P Recommendations Watershed-Based Strategies 5. GLRI support and fund projects that evaluate the relative contributions of soil legacy P and applied P to total P loss. A recent analysis of the data collected at Ohio USDA-ARS edge-of-field monitoring locations indicate that soil legacy P contributes 80% of the P loss and newly applied (excess P) from fertilizer/manure contributes the remaining 20%. Lake-Based Strategies ! 6. GLRI to support physical removal or chemical/biological sequestration of legacy P laden sediments as an effective method to remove legacy P from the environment. Encourage GLRI coordination with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, states, local communities, and other partners to develop innovative ways to sequester (trap/chemically/biologically inactivate) and/or beneficially reuse dredge sediment for agricultural field placement, habitat restoration, or other environmentally suitable uses. 7
Theme 2 Excess Nutrient (P) Recommendations Theme 2 Excess Nutrient (P) Recommendations Structural Nutrient Removal Strategies ! 7. GLRI to support and fund innovative technology/nutrient removal systems along with innovative funding strategies to support long-term monitoring and assessment of these technologies to evaluate their effectiveness. Pending TBD. Recommend forming a review/assessment panel/process to evaluate feasibility and effectiveness of innovative technologies and nutrient removal systems. GLRI to encourage, support, and fund larger-scale nutrient reduction projects within lower watershed tributaries near, or adjacent to, receiving water bodies to maximize potential nutrient reduction benefits. Investments in larger nutrient reduction projects located within lower watershed tributaries and/or adjacent to receiving water bodies will result in increased nutrient (excess P) removal at a lower cost when compared to multiple smaller projects in the upper watershed. ! 8. 8
Theme 2 Excess Nutrient (P) Recommendations Theme 2 Excess Nutrient (P) Recommendations Non-Structural Market-Based Strategies ! 9. GLRI to support the development of an incentive-based ecosystem credit marketplace that connects buyers and sellers of ecosystem credits. Ecosystem Service Credits GLRI explore opportunities to link these markets to the Blue Accounting project with an emphasis on excess nutrient reduction and water quality improvement. Tradable Permit Model GLRI explore opportunities to link Tradable Permit Model to TMDL/Distributed Load watersheds and potential regulatory/governance changes in NPDES permits. ! 10. GLRI to consider opportunities to support and develop mechanisms to leverage GLRI resources with public-private and/or pay for performance funds to implement in nutrient reduction practices in the basin. Long-term market-based incentives provide the opportunity to leverage local, state, and federal funds with corporate and private funds. Identify corporate sustainability programs to invest in environmentally sustainable development projects and ecosystem service credit markets. 9
Theme 2 Excess Nutrient (P) Recommendations Theme 2 Excess Nutrient (P) Recommendations Non-Structural Governance and Regulatory Strategies ! 11. GLRI to support and fund watershed land-use plans and conservation practices that protect and maintain existing high-quality watersheds (i.e., protect and preserve what is already working). ! 12. GLRI to support and fund regional TMDL implementation using a distributed mass balance approach applied at the HUC-12 subwatershed scale. Support and fund 9-element Nonpoint Source Implementation Strategies (NPS-IS plans) as an effective way to link local subwatershed nutrient reduction projects (BMPs) to regional TMDL/distributed load water quality targets. 13. GLRI to develop mechanisms to foster cross-jurisdictional coordination and fund regional coordination efforts to identify Critical Source Areas and implement regionally coordinated watershed scale structural nutrient reduction practices (by applying landscape conservation design principles). 10
Theme 1 Theme 1 Innovative Strategies to Address Legacy Phosphorus Innovative Strategies to Address Legacy Phosphorus Theme 2 Theme 2 Managing Excess Nutrients Managing Excess Nutrients Discussion Prompts What topics, processes, tools, practices are we are missing? Mechanisms for Stakeholder Input New Innovative Ideas or Approaches (watershed, lake, structural, non- structural, governance, regulatory) Ongoing Efforts (are we duplicative?) Strategies - Feasibility, Implementation, and Constructability Criteria to Prioritize Recommendations Insomniais a sleep disorder in which you have trouble falling and/or staying asleep. 11
