Infrastructure Funding Framework and Delivery Plan

Slide Note
Embed
Share

This document outlines the mechanisms for funding community infrastructure through tools such as Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) and Section 106 agreements. It also details financial contributions received since 2010/11, setting spending priorities, and the LBWF Infrastructure Delivery Plan. The focus is on how these funding models support local growth and development by investing in essential infrastructure.


Uploaded on Oct 05, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Section Break The Housing Commission Planning Obligations and Infrastructure Delivery

  2. Community Infrastructure Levy tool for Councils to invest in local areas by funding infrastructure to support growth Developers pay set rate per square metre, based on type of development (in accordance with CIL charging schedule) Non-negotiable - although relief applies to affordable housing, charities and self builders rates must have regard to the actual and expected cost of infrastructure and the viability of development

  3. Section 106 agreements site-specific legally-binding agreements with a landowner as part of the granting of planning permission. a way of delivering or addressing matters that are necessary to make a development acceptable in planning term can be used to support the provision of services and infrastructure, such as highways, recreational facilities, education, health and affordable housing. Can be monetary or non financial (for example affordable housing)

  4. Financial Contributions received since 2010/11 Financial Year 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 Total * CIL was introduced in March 2014 Total contributions 802,884.72 2,860,260.19 2,521,273.81 5,973,015.51 4,074,989.34 4,708,384.39 4,456,006.17 12,322,768.03 8,360,278.39 10,769,784.87 2,466,260.33 10,154,732.88 11,678,035.05 81,148,673.68 Section 106 802,884.72 2,860,260.19 2,521,273.81 5,973,015.51 4,036,998.74 4,611,902.40 2,555,246.71 5,616,594.46 3,461,666.16 7,856,239.10 759,742.46 6,202,067.04 6,121,792.87 53,379,684.17 LBWF CIL* 1,900,759.46 6,706,173.57 4,898,612.23 2,913,545.77 1,706,517.87 3,952,665.84 5,556,242.18 27,768,989.51 - - - - 37,990.60 96,481.99 Your Sub head goes here in 42pt text. Keep to a maximum of three lines where possible CIL can be spent on any type of infrastructure while Section 106 payments are collected for a specific purpose/project. CIL can not be spent on affordable housing. Since the introduction of CIL in 2014, it replaced tariff based Section 106 contributions addressing cumulative impact of development across the borough.

  5. Setting spending priorities The LBWF Infrastructure Delivery Plan sets out details of the infrastructure required to support planned growth set out in the new Local Plan, including when and where it should be delivered. The Infrastructure Delivery Schedule lists individual projects to be delivered. The Infrastructure Delivery Plan is reviewed regularly, with the next review planned for this year. As required, the Infrastructure Funding Statement identifies direct spending priorities on an annual basis. All planning contributions spending is expected to align with the Capital Investment Strategy. A new Developer Contributions Supplementary Planning Document will identify investment priorities in local growth areas. Your Sub head goes here in 42pt text. Keep to a maximum of three lines where possible

  6. Governance - Developer Contributions Board Chaired by the Strategic Director of Place Held at least quarterly Provides strategic oversight on the combined use of developer contributions Identifies priorities for funding Makes recommendations and delegated decisions on use of Strategic CIL and flexible Section 106 financial contributions Reviews annual reports, including Infrastructure Funding Statement (IFS) Portfolio Lead Member and Cabinet make and review final decisions

  7. Funding Infrastructure - CIL CIL funds various types of physical and social infrastructure, including (but not limited to) major capacity improvements to public transport, green spaces, healthcare, culture, digital infrastructure and play spaces List of biggest CIL allocations* since the introduction of CIL charging schedule in March 2014: List of biggest CIL spends since the introduction of CIL charging schedule in March 2014: by amount of CIL spent to date Project Name Reopening Lea Bridge Station Lea Bridge Station Enhancements Borough Of Culture Parks Improvement Programme Lea Bridge Library Rejuvenating Friendships Gardens, Drapers Field 3G Pitch replacement Bike Hangars Play Improvement Programme Violence Reduction Partnership at Whipps Cross Hospital other By amount of CIL allocated Project Name Leyton Tube station Lea Bridge Station Sites Reopening Lea Bridge Station Walthamstow Central Station Improvements Lea Bridge Station Enhancements Borough Wide Connectivity (Broadband) Parks Improvement Programme Borough Of Culture Lea Bridge Library Play Improvement Programme Type transport transport culture green spaces culture green spaces green spaces transport green spaces Spent 3,034,962.00 656,586.00 450,000.00 446,142.25 400,020.00 250,001.00 162,430.52 132,499.80 124,318.15 106,000.00 Type transport utilities transport transport transport digital green spaces culture culture green spaces Allocated 9,000,000.00 3,500,000.00 3,034,962.00 1,312,190.00 660,000.00 643,000.00 565,000.00 450,000.00 400,020.00 360,000.00 * Allocations refer to formal decision having been made to fund a project through CIL, but the funding may not yet have been spent

  8. Funding Infrastructure Section 106 S106 financial contributions fund scheme-specific matters that are necessary to make a development acceptable in planning terms. They can be used to support the provision of services and infrastructure, such as highways, recreational facilities, education, health and affordable housing. S106 agreements also secure non financial planning obligations including the delivery of on site affordable housing. S106 spend in 2021/22 by service area ( 50K or more) Service Area Affordable Housing (payment in lieu) Employment and Training Local Infrastructure Healthcare Carbon Offset Measures Highways Tree Planting Education Wetlands Improvements Air Quality CCTV Spend 1,599,747.16 844,136.83 631,451.70 466,150.57 451,239.48 353,761.77 313,910.10 215,090.74 92,568.95 79,049.78 67,974.81

  9. Affordable Housing Net Self-Contained Housing Delivery 2012-2022 Our preferred policy approach to affordable housing is on site delivery and Section 106 agreements are used to secure the appropriate tenure mix. In exceptional situations where on site delivery is not viable, we may accept an off site affordable housing financial contribution instead Each Section 106 agreement involves site specific negotiations and may be subject to a site-specific viability assessment .

  10. Funding Off Site Affordable Housing Financial contributions secured towards the provision of affordable housing within the borough (as of Feb 2023): Available: Date of Agreement Date received Site Address App ref Amount The Mall, 45 Selborne Road, Walthamstow, London E17 245 Wood Street E17 Naseberry Court E4 80 Ruckholt Road, London, E10 2011/0876 G 27/09/2012 Total 3,834,026.63 1,050,000.00 587,451.68 348,445.00 5,819,923.31 202491 E 194184 G 182249 G 21/10/2021 15/09/2020 25/01/2019 Dec-22 Sep-22 Mar-22 Jan-23 Expected: Date to be received 22/23 Date of Agreement Site Address App ref Amount 162 - 168 Lea Bridge Road The Mall, 45 Selborne Road, Walthamstow, London E17 The Mall, 45 Selborne Road, Walthamstow, London E17 Total 172,133.00 202491 21/10/2021 23/24 3,650,000.00 202491 21/10/2021 24/25 291,728.50 4,113,861.50

  11. Late stage viability reviews A viability reappraisal can result in: Where the initial financial viability appraisal (FVA) produced at the planning application stage shows that a scheme would not be viable if fully policy compliant, the Council may seek a viability reappraisal at a later stage. (a)additional affordable units being offered. (b) additional payment (in lieu of affordable housing known as PIL); (c) no further action - the scheme being demonstrated as not viable to contribute anything beyond what it has already contributed as part of the initial FVA. Reappraisals analysis based on 51 permissions subject to late stage viability appraisal granted between 2011 and 2020: 12 schemes have fulfilled their obligations by increasing the number of affordable homes on site, totalling 461 additional homes. 8 schemes have made (or agreed to make) a payment in lieu of affordable housing offsite, totalling 5,993,400.68. 6 schemes are currently in negotiations with the council. 17 other schemes have not yet submitted their reappraisal as the trigger has not yet been reached.

  12. Developers contributions also support the provision of affordable housing The vast majority of the RP delivery comes from developer led s106 schemes. There are currently 3 main developer-led schemes with an RP in place (South Grove, Blackhorse Road Station Car park, Former Homebase - Fulbourne Road). Once complete, these will deliver 556 new affordable homes. RPs will also pick up the affordable housing on S106 schemes being led on by the Council s Capital Delivery Team. These are: The Town Hall Campus where lead developer is Countryside and One Housing Group is the RP. There are 195 affordable homes proposed across this development. Coronation Square where the lead developer is Taylor Wimpey and Sage Housing Association are the RP. There are 358 affordable homes proposed across this scheme. Lea Bridge Station Sites where the lead developer is London Square Ltd. An RP has not yet been secured yet but the scheme achieved planning approval just last month. There will be 160 affordable homes on this scheme.

  13. Appendix 1 - Section 106 vs CIL Your Sub head goes here in 42pt text. Keep to a maximum of three lines where possible

Related


More Related Content