Human Rights in the Nigerian Context: Gender, Oil & Resistance in the Niger Delta

undefined
Laine Strutton, PhD
48
th
 Human Rights Workshop
SSK Human Rights Forum
December 8, 2016
Yonsei University,  Yeonhee-kwan, Room 218
Human Rights in the Nigerian Context:
Gender, Oil & Resistance in the Niger Delta
 
2
A rise in women’s resistance against
human rights violations?
Overview
I.
Background on the Niger Delta
II.
Background on the oil conflict and women’s protests
III.
Two basic questions
IV.
First finding on women’s oil protests
V.
Second finding on women’s view of law
VI.
Conclusion
3
I. Background on the Niger Delta
                                   Image credit: U.S. Institute for Peace
4
I. Background on the Niger Delta
Small geographic area, highly diverse, dense creek cultures
High poverty rate but economically vital to Nigeria
Palm oil to petroleum 
 
Three tiers of governance: federal, state, chiefdoms
                                                  Image credit: LS
5
I. Background on the Niger Delta
6
1958: Eureka! Black gold!
1960: Eureka! National independence!
1967: 3-year Biafran War starts
1977: Nigerian National Petroleum Corp. (NNPC) founded
1995: Death of Saro-Wiwa diminishes protests
2000: Democratic transition to 4th Republic
2002: Women begin oil installation takeovers
2006: Violent insurgency hits all-time high
II. Background on the Oil Conflict
7
Human rights violations
: appropriation of informally held
land, exploding pipelines, extrajudicial killings, etc.
Grievances: 
broken contracts, pollution
Demands: 
male employment, some cleanup, compensation,
economic development
II. Background on the Oil Conflict
  Water & Food Source Pollution
Air Pollution
8
                  
Image credit: Amnesty International
                                                   Image credit: LS
II. Background on the Oil Conflict
  Lack of employment
    Lack of basic amenities
9
                                                   Image credit: LS
                                          Image credit: LS
II. Background on the Oil Conflict
1958-1970s: Little to no oil resistance
1970s-2000: Men resisted only violently until Wiwa in 1990s
2000-present: Women join movement
                                                Image credit: LS
10
II. Background on the Oil Conflict
Women joined men’s rights movement circa 2000
1.
Women joined a movement led by men 
 gender change
2.
Women joined using peaceful tactics in an otherwise
violent environment 
 tactical change
3.
Men had been illegal, women were “extralegal” 
11
III. Two Basic Questions
Q1: What is the role of women in determining the
resistance preferences within the anti-oil mobilization
after 2002?
Q2: How do common conceptions of law among women
inform such rights mobilizations?
Methods: Constructivist grounded theory using Atlas.ti
software based on interviews in 3 communities, observations
& archives
12
IV. First Finding on Protests
What is the role of women in determining the resistance preferences
within the anti-oil mobilization after 2002?
Women assist male negotiations:
 Initiate and then support dialogue among men through
protests
Women’s protests as a tool to solve a male collective action
problem
13
IV. First Finding on Protests
Why
 women assist male negotiations
1.
“Men, they are begging us”: Men had failed
2.
“Men, they see us in our numbers”: Logic of numbers and
peer pressure
14
IV. First Finding on Protests
How
 women assist male negotiations
1.
Town criers
2.
Women’s community networks furthering the call
3.
Peaceful protests a singular option
15
V. Second Finding on Law
How do (constitutive) conceptions of law among women inform such
rights mobilizations?
Mostly good laws, sometimes bad chiefs:
“A good thing on paper…a different thing on the ground”
“People up at the top…I don’t understand that down here”
“Chief is law”
16
V. Second Finding on Law
17
                                                                                                      
Image Credit: LS                                                              Image credit: LS
V. Seconding Finding on Law
Obstacles to using the law to further human rights
1.
Low chance of success  and anti-establishment framing
2.
Colonial and indigenous legal constructs
3.
Justice and law unrelated
4.
Law as good and individuals as bad
18
V. Second Finding on Law
Chiefs as gatekeepers in a perceived law binary
Historical and spiritual power
Centrally positioned within the social structure
Chiefs benefits from this position, regardless of outcome
19
V. Second Finding on Law
20
VII. Conclusion
Seeming human rights mobilizations as an instrument for the
powerful
Just as important to study when a human rights movement
“fails” as when it succeeds
Possible beneficial secondary effects of compelled or co-
opted rights mobilizations
21
Thank You
Questions or comments?
Contact: Laine Strutton, 
lps247@nyu.edu
Oil Activists in Bane, Niger Delta
22
Slide Note
Embed
Share

This presentation explores the dynamics of human rights, gender issues, oil conflicts, and women's resistance in the Niger Delta region of Nigeria. It delves into the historical background, women's protests, viewpoints on the law, and key events shaping the socio-political landscape. The narrative sheds light on the challenges faced by women in advocating for their rights amidst complex issues of governance, resource exploitation, and environmental degradation.

  • Human Rights
  • Gender
  • Nigeria
  • Oil Conflict
  • Womens Resistance

Uploaded on Oct 02, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Human Rights in the Nigerian Context: Gender, Oil & Resistance in the Niger Delta Laine Strutton, PhD 48thHuman Rights Workshop SSK Human Rights Forum December 8, 2016 Yonsei University, Yeonhee-kwan, Room 218

  2. A rise in womens resistance against human rights violations? 2

  3. Overview Background on the Niger Delta Background on the oil conflict and women s protests III. Two basic questions IV. First finding on women s oil protests V. Second finding on women s view of law VI. Conclusion I. II. 3

  4. I. Background on the Niger Delta Image credit: U.S. Institute for Peace 4

  5. I. Background on the Niger Delta Small geographic area, highly diverse, dense creek cultures High poverty rate but economically vital to Nigeria Palm oil to petroleum Three tiers of governance: federal, state, chiefdoms Image credit: LS 5

  6. I. Background on the Niger Delta 1958: Eureka! Black gold! 1960: Eureka! National independence! 1967: 3-year Biafran War starts 1977: Nigerian National Petroleum Corp. (NNPC) founded 1995: Death of Saro-Wiwa diminishes protests 2000: Democratic transition to 4th Republic 2002: Women begin oil installation takeovers 2006: Violent insurgency hits all-time high 6

  7. II. Background on the Oil Conflict Human rights violations: appropriation of informally held land, exploding pipelines, extrajudicial killings, etc. Grievances: broken contracts, pollution Demands: male employment, some cleanup, compensation, economic development 7

  8. II. Background on the Oil Conflict Water & Food Source Pollution Water & Food Source Pollution Air Air Pollution Pollution Image credit: Amnesty International Image credit: LS 8

  9. II. Background on the Oil Conflict Lack of employment Lack of employment Lack of basic amenities Lack of basic amenities Image credit: LS Image credit: LS 9

  10. II. Background on the Oil Conflict 1958-1970s: Little to no oil resistance 1970s-2000: Men resisted only violently until Wiwa in 1990s 2000-present: Women join movement Image credit: LS 10

  11. II. Background on the Oil Conflict Women joined men s rights movement circa 2000 Women joined a movement led by men gender change 2. Women joined using peaceful tactics in an otherwise violent environment tactical change 3. Men had been illegal, women were extralegal 1. 11

  12. III. Two Basic Questions Q1: What is the role of women in determining the resistance preferences within the anti-oil mobilization after 2002? Q2: How do common conceptions of law among women inform such rights mobilizations? Methods: Constructivist grounded theory using Atlas.ti software based on interviews in 3 communities, observations & archives 12

  13. IV. First Finding on Protests What is the role of women in determining the resistance preferences within the anti-oil mobilization after 2002? Women assist male negotiations: Initiate and then support dialogue among men through protests Women s protests as a tool to solve a male collective action problem 13

  14. IV. First Finding on Protests Why women assist male negotiations 1. Men, they are begging us : Men had failed 2. Men, they see us in our numbers : Logic of numbers and peer pressure 14

  15. IV. First Finding on Protests How women assist male negotiations 1. Town criers 2. Women s community networks furthering the call 3. Peaceful protests a singular option 15

  16. V. Second Finding on Law How do (constitutive) conceptions of law among women inform such rights mobilizations? Mostly good laws, sometimes bad chiefs: A good thing on paper a different thing on the ground People up at the top I don t understand that down here Chief is law 16

  17. V. Second Finding on Law Image Credit: LS Image credit: LS 17

  18. V. Seconding Finding on Law Obstacles to using the law to further human rights 1. Low chance of success and anti-establishment framing 2. Colonial and indigenous legal constructs 3. Justice and law unrelated 4. Law as good and individuals as bad 18

  19. V. Second Finding on Law Chiefs as gatekeepers in a perceived law binary Historical and spiritual power Centrally positioned within the social structure Chiefs benefits from this position, regardless of outcome 19

  20. V. Second Finding on Law 20

  21. VII. Conclusion Seeming human rights mobilizations as an instrument for the powerful Just as important to study when a human rights movement fails as when it succeeds Possible beneficial secondary effects of compelled or co- opted rights mobilizations 21

  22. Thank You Questions or comments? Contact: Laine Strutton, lps247@nyu.edu Oil Activists in Bane, Niger Delta 22

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#