Hallucinations through Ecological Perception and Neurological Evidence

 
Hallucination as a Response
to the Ecological Approach to
Perception
 
Zach Montes
Direct vs Indirect Realism
 
Realism: Reality exists independently from
our minds
Mind-Body Problem
Indirectly perceive via mental representation
Directly perceive without it
Ecological Perception
 
Influenced by Empiricism,
Gestalt Psychology
Designed theory based on
interaction with environment
Focused on Visual Perception
Affordances: actions that
objects allow you to take
James J Gibson
How It Explains Hallucinations
 
Integrates physics and light dynamics
Explains optical illusions very well
Denies the existence of hallucinations
Working with a lack of physical evidence
My Argument
 
Using current techniques and technology, we
now have neurological evidence linked to the
existence of hallucinations
If perception exists without mind-independent
stimuli, hallucinations are internally generated
and understood as mental representations
What is a Hallucination
 
“A strictly sensational form of consciousness, as
good and true a sensation as there were a real
object there. The object happens not to be
there, that is all.”
William James, 1890
Types of Hallucinations
 
There is no coherent taxonomy of
hallucinations
Visual Hallucinations
Simple and Complex Hallucinations
Meta-awareness, cognizant there is no
external stimulus
Charles Bonnet Syndrome
 
Failing eyesight or non-
congenitally blind
Patients are mentally
healthy
Lack of input leads to
spontaneous release of
neurotransmitters
Sensory Deprivation
 
Total visual deprivation
Hallucinations include faces, people,
integrated scenes of animals in landscapes
Occipital and Ventral pathways involved
Migraine Hallucinations
 
Neurons are initially hyperexcitable, followed
by cortical spreading depression
Evidence suggesting autonomous pattern
formation in visual cortex
Bayesian theory and top-down control
Back to Gibson’s Approach
 
Even though exact pathways are not known,
hallucinations do occur
Perception without mind-independent
objects
People who hallucinate are perceiving mental
representations
However, wrong ≠ unhelpful
 
Gibson’s work about optic flow
Contemporary research in Artificial
Intelligence
Development of theory in which the observer
and environment form an inseparable system
Future Directions
 
Continued research on hallucinations
Development of new perceptual theories
leads to advances in technology in addition to
academic pursuits
Integration of direct and indirect perception
in perceptual theories
 
References
 
Adolph, K., & Kretch, K. (2015). Gibson's theory of perceptual learning. 
Wrigh, J.D.
(Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences
. 127–134. doi:
10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.23096-1.
Billock, V. A., & Tsou, B. H. (2012). Elementary visual hallucinations and their
relationships to neural pattern-forming mechanisms. 
Psychological Bulletin,
138
(4), 744-774. doi: 10.1037/a0027580
Collerton, D., Mosimann, U. P., & Perry, E. K. (2015). 
The neuroscience of visual
hallucinations
. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley Blackwell.
Ffytche, D. H. (2005). Visual hallucinations and the charles bonnet syndrome.
Current Psychiatry Reports,
 
7
(3), 168-179. doi: 10.1007/s11920-005-0050-3
 
References
 
Fish, W. (2004). The Direct/Indirect Distinction in Contemporary Philosophy of Perception. 
Essays
in Philosophy
, 
5
(1).
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The Theory of Affordances. In 
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception,
127-143. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group.
Guberman, S., Maximov, V. V., & Pashintsev, A. (2012). Gestalt and image understanding. 
Gestalt
Theory
. 
34
(2). 143-166
James, W. (1890). The Perception of ‘Things.’ 
The Principles of Psychology
 (pp. 115). doi:
10.1037/11059-000
Jenkins, H. S. (2008). Gibson’s “Affordances”: Evolution of a Pivotal Concept. 
Journal of Scientific
Psychology
, 
December
, 34-45.
Käufer, S., & Chemero, A. (2015). 
Phenomenology: An Introduction
. Cambridge: Polity.
http://www.azquotes.com/author/41745-James_J_Gibson
 
Thank you
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Exploring the phenomenon of hallucinations in relation to the ecological approach to perception, direct vs. indirect realism, and the concept of affordances in visual perception. Delving into the types of hallucinations, such as visual and complex hallucinations, and conditions like Charles Bonnet Syndrome and sensory deprivation. The discussion includes the integration of physics and light dynamics in explaining hallucinations and the role of neurological evidence in understanding their existence.

  • Hallucinations
  • Ecological Perception
  • Neurological Evidence
  • Visual Perception
  • Charles Bonnet Syndrome

Uploaded on Oct 02, 2024 | 1 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Hallucination as a Response to the Ecological Approach to Perception Zach Montes

  2. Direct vs Indirect Realism Realism: Reality exists independently from our minds Mind-Body Problem Indirectly perceive via mental representation Directly perceive without it

  3. Ecological Perception Influenced by Empiricism, Gestalt Psychology Designed theory based on interaction with environment Focused on Visual Perception Affordances: actions that objects allow you to take James J Gibson

  4. How It Explains Hallucinations Integrates physics and light dynamics Explains optical illusions very well Denies the existence of hallucinations Working with a lack of physical evidence

  5. My Argument Using current techniques and technology, we now have neurological evidence linked to the existence of hallucinations If perception exists without mind-independent stimuli, hallucinations are internally generated and understood as mental representations

  6. What is a Hallucination A strictly sensational form of consciousness, as good and true a sensation as there were a real object there. The object happens not to be there, that is all. William James, 1890

  7. Types of Hallucinations There is no coherent taxonomy of hallucinations Visual Hallucinations Simple and Complex Hallucinations Meta-awareness, cognizant there is no external stimulus

  8. Charles Bonnet Syndrome Failing eyesight or non- congenitally blind Patients are mentally healthy Lack of input leads to spontaneous release of neurotransmitters

  9. Sensory Deprivation Total visual deprivation Hallucinations include faces, people, integrated scenes of animals in landscapes Occipital and Ventral pathways involved

  10. Migraine Hallucinations Neurons are initially hyperexcitable, followed by cortical spreading depression Evidence suggesting autonomous pattern formation in visual cortex Bayesian theory and top-down control

  11. Back to Gibsons Approach Even though exact pathways are not known, hallucinations do occur Perception without mind-independent objects People who hallucinate are perceiving mental representations

  12. However, wrong unhelpful Gibson s work about optic flow Contemporary research in Artificial Intelligence Development of theory in which the observer and environment form an inseparable system

  13. Future Directions Continued research on hallucinations Development of new perceptual theories leads to advances in technology in addition to academic pursuits Integration of direct and indirect perception in perceptual theories

  14. References Adolph, K., & Kretch, K. (2015). Gibson's theory of perceptual learning. Wrigh, J.D. (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. 127 134. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.23096-1. Billock, V. A., & Tsou, B. H. (2012). Elementary visual hallucinations and their relationships to neural pattern-forming mechanisms. Psychological Bulletin, 138(4), 744-774. doi: 10.1037/a0027580 Collerton, D., Mosimann, U. P., & Perry, E. K. (2015). The neuroscience of visual hallucinations. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley Blackwell. Ffytche, D. H. (2005). Visual hallucinations and the charlesbonnet syndrome. Current Psychiatry Reports, 7(3), 168-179. doi: 10.1007/s11920-005-0050-3

  15. References Fish, W. (2004). The Direct/Indirect Distinction in Contemporary Philosophy of Perception. Essays in Philosophy, 5(1). Gibson, J. J. (1979). The Theory of Affordances. In The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, 127-143. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group. Guberman, S., Maximov, V. V., & Pashintsev, A. (2012). Gestalt and image understanding. Gestalt Theory. 34(2). 143-166 James, W. (1890). The Perception of Things. The Principles of Psychology (pp. 115). doi: 10.1037/11059-000 Jenkins, H. S. (2008). Gibson s Affordances : Evolution of a Pivotal Concept. Journal of Scientific Psychology, December, 34-45. Ka ufer, S., & Chemero, A. (2015). Phenomenology: An Introduction. Cambridge: Polity. http://www.azquotes.com/author/41745-James_J_Gibson

  16. Thank you

More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#