Indian Contributions to General Relativity Post-Independence Era

 
GR Research: Indian Contributions
 
 
Post Independence Era
 
Within the limitations of my understanding and
perception I would attempt to review the
important contributions.  Let me apologize at
the outset to who think their contributions
were important but 
I might have missed them.
 
Important  Problems
 
Big  -  Bang  Singularity
Gravitational  Collapse
Black  Holes
Gravitational  waves
GR  and  Beyond
Quantum  Aspects
Exact  Solutions
 
BIG  - BANG:  COSMOLOGY
 
AKR:   Raychaudhury Equation governing
dynamics of the Universe. Perhaps the most
important equation that inspired the famous
Singularity theorems. Undoubtedly the most
outstanding contribution to GR.
JVN:  Hoyle  - Narlikar theory  - new theory of
gravitation. A brilliant attempt of incorporating
Mach’s Principle. Unfortunately supported
observationally  unfavoured Steady State
Cosmology.
Cosmology
 
Senovilla:   Singularity  Free  Solutions - cylindrical
LK Patel, RS Tikekar, ND,  & AKR, ND - spherical
 
AKR:  Attempted to formulate criterion for singularity free
models by asking space – time  averages of matter
distribution should vanish.
 
Following that Senovilla has recently proposed positivity
of energy is respected globally only on the average;i.e.
With Violation allowed locally he claims to have
succeeded in what AKR had conjectured. A criterion for
non-occurrence of Big—Bang Singularity.
Gravitational  Collapse
 
Datt (1938),  Oppenheimer – Snyder (1939)
homogeneous collapse
AKR: Unaware of the earlier work
rediscovered D-OS collapse matching it with
exterior empty space which was not done by
D-OS.
Singularity theorems and Penrose’s conjecture
Of no naked singularity – always covered by
horizon.
Gravitational  Collapse
 
Attempts to prove or disprove Penrose’s
conjecture, constructing models.
Christodoulou in 1983 raised the first doubt that
inhomogeneous collapse may lead to NS
Can a null ray come out from singularity before
formation of apparent horizon? Could you take
back a null ray to end at the singularity?
PSJ: It is the latter that has been mastered. A
large number of examples of NS have been
worked out by him and his collaborators, and also
by large number of university workers.
Naked  Singularity
 
Joshi and Dwivedi showed that there exists
enough choice in the initial data for BH & NS.
Shear plays determining role, (PSJ, Rituparna,
Roy, ND)
GRBs birth cries of BHs (Roy, PSJ, ND)
Question: Could we bring out a null ray
emanating from NS? Field is diverging there,
photon should get trapped, they shouldn’t be
able to come out or infinitely red-shifted!
Black  Holes
 
Schwarzschild singularity became BH
Singularity Theorems
Eddington-Finkelstein-Kruskal coordinates
illuminated the darkest object, BH!
They became astrophysical objects, stability?
Vishu in 1970 established stability of
Schwarzschild BH and pioneered the quasi
normal mode analysis –  BH music – Vishu
Harmonic.
Black Hole Energetics
 
Kerr Rotating BH – Ergosphere
Penrose Process  --  Energy extraction --
powering high energy objects, Quasars, AGNs
A particle coming from infinity may split into two
in the ergosphere where one of the fragments
may attain negative energy and falls into the hole
and then the other comes out with energy >
incident particle.
That’s how rotational energy of BH could be
extracted and may power quasars.
 
Magenetic Penrose process
 
PP’s  Astrophysical Viability: Relative velocity
between fragments  > c/2 – astrophysically not
viable.
 
MPP(ND, Wagh, Dhurandhar) Rotating BH sits in
magnetic field and the energy required to put a
particle on negative energy state can now come
from electromagnetic field making no demand on
relative velocity.
 
Magenetic Penrose process
 
Thus was MPP revived, Efficiency  > 100%. It was
all established in discrete particle accretion.
Would it stand the test of realistic hydrodynamic
accretion?
MPP in high magnetic field limit is similar to
Blandford –Znajek process in which magnetic
field threading the horizon gets wound up due to
rotation and generates a quadrupole electric
potential difference between poles and equator
and energy flux is driven out as it discharges. In
both cases, magnetic field plays as a catalytic
agent to mine rotational energy .
MPP
 
The current investigations bear out MPP’s promise of
efficiency exceeding 100% (this was first time predicted
for MPP in 1985 (Ramesh’s talk) has been borne out in
the realistic hydrodynamic accretion – a viable
powering engine for quasars!
It is a different matter that now MPP is being called as
BZ process. They are different in the sense --- in   zero
magnetic field limit there is no extraction for BZ while
MPP goes over to PP.
May what that be, MPP as such was first considered by
us in 1985.
Electromagnetics in curved spacetime
 
Several authors have studied electromagnetic
field in black hole spacetimes. RK Verma,
Prasanna, Vishu, ...,
An excellent  review by AR Prasanna has just
appeared summarizing an extensive body of
work.
There have also been attempts to couple
Riemann tensor  with two Maxwell tensors and
then study its semi-classical consequences.
Prasanna, S. Mohanty and others.
 
Compact Objects  ...
 
Pulsars: Rotating  Neutron Stars
 
Indirect  Evidence  of  GW
 
Milli  Second Pulsars : Srinivasan &
Radhakrishnan  -- first models
 
Several others: Panchu, Haridass, Vikram Soni, ...
 
 
Gravitational Lensing
 
GR --  Hard  Core  Astrophysics
 
Initial Work:  JVN, Kumar Chitre,  Kandu, D
Narasimha, ...
 
Indian contributions were  at   the  pioneering
stages
Gravitational waves
 
Gravitational Wave: To Be or Not to Be?
Bondi cleared the air with his information
function
In 1987-88: Dhurandhar goes to Schutz as a
postdoc.  BS Sathyaprakash, and several students
follow. Leading group in  GW Data Analysis comes
up.
Parallely Bala Iyer – Damour, Blanchet, mastering
the techniques of post-Lorentzian approximations
and study of GW waveform .
GW
 
Sathya is today one of the world leaders in
GW community and over two dozen students
trained at the hands of Sanjeev and Bala are
Sprinkled all around in gravity wave groups.
 
Ligo – India  is the due recognition of this
small but highly influencial group  globally.
GR and Beyond
 
Palatini derivation for arbitrary connection. In
1925 Einstein assumed vanishing of torsion to
get GR equation, and several authors have
worked on this since then.
J Pons and ND have shown that Einstein
condition is really a gauge condition and
hence we can obtain GR equation for arbitrary
connection. It is the equation of motion for
connection that demands it to be symmetric.
Gravity and Thermodynamics
 
In 1992, Ted Jacobson brought out remarkable
association between Einstein equation for
spacetime admitting horizon and
thermodynamical law. Reminiscent of Black hole
area and entropy – Laws of black hole physics.
Paddy enormously extended this programme to
Lovelock gravity and put it on solid footing.
Makes a strong case for  gravity being an
emergent force.
Surface terms in action
 
In derivation of GR equation by varying action, we ultimately convert
variation of Ricci tensor which  contains  gravitational dynamics into a
surface term – a total derivative and throw it away. GR equation results
from essentially variation of volume element. This is strange.
 
Surface terms though classically irrelevant but are very relevant for
quantum considerations.
 
Most remarkably Paddy derives alternatively GR equation by manipulating
surface term, and also connects the two through an interesting relation.
 
This relation between bulk and surface is responsible for Holography.
Gravity is universal and hence it cannot be shielded from any region. If
separating boundary is null,  it must have the imprint of what is blocked
out.
Barbero – Immirzi Parameter
 
Surface terms: Euler, Pontryagin and Nieh –Yan
R Kaul, Shyam Date & S Sengupta showed N-Y is
topological and its coupling is Barbero-Immirzi
parameter.
Kaul formulated gauge theory of gravity and
supergravity. Gauge is a tricky business for
gravity.
 Ashtekar Variables (1986), B-I parameter needed
to cast the formalism with real variables.
Samuel gave the Lagrangian formulation
Quantum Aspects
 
JVN & Paddy:  Quantizing conformal dgeree of freedom
showed Big-Bang avoidance
 
Special case of symmetry, LQC motivated by  LQG which has
a formal field theoretic backup  also essentially does this.
 
Recently LQC has been addressing anisotropy but not
inhomogeneity as yet.
 
A quantum Raychaudhury Equation Required ?
 Quantum  Aspects
 
Kaul: Computed entropy of quantum BHs
Kaul& Sengupta: Torsional instantons in
quantum gravity
TP Singh: Role of gravity in collapse of wave
function
Madhavan: Anamoly free quantum dynamics
LQC: Shyam Date, Amit Ghosh,  Golam
Hossain, Parampreet Singh,...
 
Higher Dimensions and Lovelock
 
High energy effects  perhaps point to higher
dimensions.
What should be gravitational Equation in
higher dimension?
Is there any property that has yet remained
unexplored which may point the direction?
Einstein gravity is kinematic in 3D;i.e. Ricci =0
implies Riemann =0. Could this be
universalized?
Pure Lovelock
 
Recently ND has made a case for pure
Lovelock for higher dimensions.
Define Nth order Riemann and Ricci, then in
all odd, D=2N+1, Ricci = 0 implies Riemann =0.
It singles out pure Lovelock which has only
one Nth order term, no summation.
For pure Lovelock bound orbits exist in all
even, D=2N+2, while for Einstein they exist
only for D=4.
Braneworld   Gravity
 
Randall—Sundrum braneworld: Curvature of
bulk is used to make extra dimension small and
then junction condition project bulk Weyl on the
3-brane.
Black Hole on the brane is described by R-N
charged BH metric (Roy Maartens, P
Papadopoulous, V Rezania & ND)
Sayan Kar and collaborators, and others have
investigated various aspects of braneworld
gravity.
Exact solutions
 
S Majumdar (1947) Cylindrical Einstein-
Maxwell solution: Papapetrou-Majumdar
Radiating Kerr BH: Take Kerr metric transform
to Eddington time, and then make mass
function of the retarded time. But it doesn’t
satisfy the equation of null dust. But the
solution has all desirable properties.
 Vaidya&Patel obtained two solutions
Exact Solutions
 
Vaidya-Tikekar assumed t=const. Surface is
spheriodal and instead of sphere and then built a
model for star with satisfactory physical
properties.
S Mukherjee, et al obtained the general solution
in this setting
N Banerjee & S Sen: BD goes to GR limit only for
traceful matter distribution, T non-zero.
 Few representatives names: A Banerjee, S
Banerji, LK Patel, Tikekar, MC Durgapal, N
Banerjee, BC Paul, ...
Prospects
 
GR is now fully matured and well engrained
theory for high energy physics, cosmology and
astrophysics.
GW: Will give rise to new view of the Universe,
GW astronomy.
Numerical  Relativity
$\Lambda$, Quantum spacetime/gravity
Higher Dimensions, non-commutativity, ???
Singularity: Big-Bang, BH.
 
What made Difference
 
ICGC  series  started  in  Dec. 1987
 
Summer Schools helped in grounding GR in
Physics mid 80’s
 
GR groups emerging in Institutes
 
Regular IAGRG meetings and Many more
 
FTAG began in 2001,  growing  strong
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Indian scholars have made significant contributions to the field of General Relativity post-independence, focusing on important problems like Big Bang singularity, gravitational collapse, black holes, gravitational waves, and quantum aspects. Notable achievements include AKR's Raychaudhury Equation, Hoyle-Narlikar theory, Senovilla's singularity-free solutions, and research on gravitational collapse and naked singularities. These efforts have advanced cosmology and our understanding of the dynamics of the universe.

  • Indian science
  • General Relativity
  • Post-Independence Era
  • Cosmology
  • Gravitational collapse

Uploaded on Sep 02, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. GR Research: Indian Contributions Post Independence Era Within the limitations of my understanding and perception I would attempt to review the important contributions. Let me apologize at the outset to who think their contributions were important but I might have missed them.

  2. Important Problems Big - Bang Singularity Gravitational Collapse Black Holes Gravitational waves GR and Beyond Quantum Aspects Exact Solutions

  3. BIG - BANG: COSMOLOGY AKR: Raychaudhury Equation governing dynamics of the Universe. Perhaps the most important equation that inspired the famous Singularity theorems. Undoubtedly the most outstanding contribution to GR. JVN: Hoyle - Narlikar theory - new theory of gravitation. A brilliant attempt of incorporating Mach s Principle. Unfortunately supported observationally unfavoured Steady State Cosmology.

  4. Cosmology Senovilla: Singularity Free Solutions - cylindrical LK Patel, RS Tikekar, ND, & AKR, ND - spherical AKR: Attempted to formulate criterion for singularity free models by asking space time averages of matter distribution should vanish. Following that Senovilla has recently proposed positivity of energy is respected globally only on the average;i.e. With Violation allowed locally he claims to have succeeded in what AKR had conjectured. A criterion for non-occurrence of Big Bang Singularity.

  5. Gravitational Collapse Datt (1938), Oppenheimer Snyder (1939) homogeneous collapse AKR: Unaware of the earlier work rediscovered D-OS collapse matching it with exterior empty space which was not done by D-OS. Singularity theorems and Penrose s conjecture Of no naked singularity always covered by horizon.

  6. Gravitational Collapse Attempts to prove or disprove Penrose s conjecture, constructing models. Christodoulou in 1983 raised the first doubt that inhomogeneous collapse may lead to NS Can a null ray come out from singularity before formation of apparent horizon? Could you take back a null ray to end at the singularity? PSJ: It is the latter that has been mastered. A large number of examples of NS have been worked out by him and his collaborators, and also by large number of university workers.

  7. Naked Singularity Joshi and Dwivedi showed that there exists enough choice in the initial data for BH & NS. Shear plays determining role, (PSJ, Rituparna, Roy, ND) GRBs birth cries of BHs (Roy, PSJ, ND) Question: Could we bring out a null ray emanating from NS? Field is diverging there, photon should get trapped, they shouldn t be able to come out or infinitely red-shifted!

  8. Black Holes Schwarzschild singularity became BH Singularity Theorems Eddington-Finkelstein-Kruskal coordinates illuminated the darkest object, BH! They became astrophysical objects, stability? Vishu in 1970 established stability of Schwarzschild BH and pioneered the quasi normal mode analysis BH music Vishu Harmonic.

  9. Black Hole Energetics Kerr Rotating BH Ergosphere Penrose Process -- Energy extraction -- powering high energy objects, Quasars, AGNs A particle coming from infinity may split into two in the ergosphere where one of the fragments may attain negative energy and falls into the hole and then the other comes out with energy > incident particle. That s how rotational energy of BH could be extracted and may power quasars.

  10. Magenetic Penrose process PP s Astrophysical Viability: Relative velocity between fragments > c/2 astrophysically not viable. MPP(ND, Wagh, Dhurandhar) Rotating BH sits in magnetic field and the energy required to put a particle on negative energy state can now come from electromagnetic field making no demand on relative velocity.

  11. Magenetic Penrose process Thus was MPP revived, Efficiency > 100%. It was all established in discrete particle accretion. Would it stand the test of realistic hydrodynamic accretion? MPP in high magnetic field limit is similar to Blandford Znajek process in which magnetic field threading the horizon gets wound up due to rotation and generates a quadrupole electric potential difference between poles and equator and energy flux is driven out as it discharges. In both cases, magnetic field plays as a catalytic agent to mine rotational energy .

  12. MPP The current investigations bear out MPP s promise of efficiency exceeding 100% (this was first time predicted for MPP in 1985 (Ramesh s talk) has been borne out in the realistic hydrodynamic accretion a viable powering engine for quasars! It is a different matter that now MPP is being called as BZ process. They are different in the sense --- in zero magnetic field limit there is no extraction for BZ while MPP goes over to PP. May what that be, MPP as such was first considered by us in 1985.

  13. Electromagnetics in curved spacetime Several authors have studied electromagnetic field in black hole spacetimes. RK Verma, Prasanna, Vishu, ..., An excellent review by AR Prasanna has just appeared summarizing an extensive body of work. There have also been attempts to couple Riemann tensor with two Maxwell tensors and then study its semi-classical consequences. Prasanna, S. Mohanty and others.

  14. Compact Objects ... Pulsars: Rotating Neutron Stars Indirect Evidence of GW Milli Second Pulsars : Srinivasan & Radhakrishnan -- first models Several others: Panchu, Haridass, Vikram Soni, ...

  15. Gravitational Lensing GR -- Hard Core Astrophysics Initial Work: JVN, Kumar Chitre, Kandu, D Narasimha, ... Indian contributions were at the pioneering stages

  16. Gravitational waves Gravitational Wave: To Be or Not to Be? Bondi cleared the air with his information function In 1987-88: Dhurandhar goes to Schutz as a postdoc. BS Sathyaprakash, and several students follow. Leading group in GW Data Analysis comes up. Parallely Bala Iyer Damour, Blanchet, mastering the techniques of post-Lorentzian approximations and study of GW waveform .

  17. GW Sathya is today one of the world leaders in GW community and over two dozen students trained at the hands of Sanjeev and Bala are Sprinkled all around in gravity wave groups. Ligo India is the due recognition of this small but highly influencial group globally.

  18. GR and Beyond Palatini derivation for arbitrary connection. In 1925 Einstein assumed vanishing of torsion to get GR equation, and several authors have worked on this since then. J Pons and ND have shown that Einstein condition is really a gauge condition and hence we can obtain GR equation for arbitrary connection. It is the equation of motion for connection that demands it to be symmetric.

  19. Gravity and Thermodynamics In 1992, Ted Jacobson brought out remarkable association between Einstein equation for spacetime admitting horizon and thermodynamical law. Reminiscent of Black hole area and entropy Laws of black hole physics. Paddy enormously extended this programme to Lovelock gravity and put it on solid footing. Makes a strong case for gravity being an emergent force.

  20. Surface terms in action In derivation of GR equation by varying action, we ultimately convert variation of Ricci tensor which contains gravitational dynamics into a surface term a total derivative and throw it away. GR equation results from essentially variation of volume element. This is strange. Surface terms though classically irrelevant but are very relevant for quantum considerations. Most remarkably Paddy derives alternatively GR equation by manipulating surface term, and also connects the two through an interesting relation. This relation between bulk and surface is responsible for Holography. Gravity is universal and hence it cannot be shielded from any region. If separating boundary is null, it must have the imprint of what is blocked out.

  21. Barbero Immirzi Parameter Surface terms: Euler, Pontryagin and Nieh Yan R Kaul, Shyam Date & S Sengupta showed N-Y is topological and its coupling is Barbero-Immirzi parameter. Kaul formulated gauge theory of gravity and supergravity. Gauge is a tricky business for gravity. Ashtekar Variables (1986), B-I parameter needed to cast the formalism with real variables. Samuel gave the Lagrangian formulation

  22. Quantum Aspects JVN & Paddy: Quantizing conformal dgeree of freedom showed Big-Bang avoidance Special case of symmetry, LQC motivated by LQG which has a formal field theoretic backup also essentially does this. Recently LQC has been addressing anisotropy but not inhomogeneity as yet. A quantum Raychaudhury Equation Required ?

  23. Quantum Aspects Kaul: Computed entropy of quantum BHs Kaul& Sengupta: Torsional instantons in quantum gravity TP Singh: Role of gravity in collapse of wave function Madhavan: Anamoly free quantum dynamics LQC: Shyam Date, Amit Ghosh, Golam Hossain, Parampreet Singh,...

  24. Higher Dimensions and Lovelock High energy effects perhaps point to higher dimensions. What should be gravitational Equation in higher dimension? Is there any property that has yet remained unexplored which may point the direction? Einstein gravity is kinematic in 3D;i.e. Ricci =0 implies Riemann =0. Could this be universalized?

  25. Pure Lovelock Recently ND has made a case for pure Lovelock for higher dimensions. Define Nth order Riemann and Ricci, then in all odd, D=2N+1, Ricci = 0 implies Riemann =0. It singles out pure Lovelock which has only one Nth order term, no summation. For pure Lovelock bound orbits exist in all even, D=2N+2, while for Einstein they exist only for D=4.

  26. Braneworld Gravity Randall Sundrum braneworld: Curvature of bulk is used to make extra dimension small and then junction condition project bulk Weyl on the 3-brane. Black Hole on the brane is described by R-N charged BH metric (Roy Maartens, P Papadopoulous, V Rezania & ND) Sayan Kar and collaborators, and others have investigated various aspects of braneworld gravity.

  27. Exact solutions S Majumdar (1947) Cylindrical Einstein- Maxwell solution: Papapetrou-Majumdar Radiating Kerr BH: Take Kerr metric transform to Eddington time, and then make mass function of the retarded time. But it doesn t satisfy the equation of null dust. But the solution has all desirable properties. Vaidya&Patel obtained two solutions

  28. Exact Solutions Vaidya-Tikekar assumed t=const. Surface is spheriodal and instead of sphere and then built a model for star with satisfactory physical properties. S Mukherjee, et al obtained the general solution in this setting N Banerjee & S Sen: BD goes to GR limit only for traceful matter distribution, T non-zero. Few representatives names: A Banerjee, S Banerji, LK Patel, Tikekar, MC Durgapal, N Banerjee, BC Paul, ...

  29. Prospects GR is now fully matured and well engrained theory for high energy physics, cosmology and astrophysics. GW: Will give rise to new view of the Universe, GW astronomy. Numerical Relativity $\Lambda$, Quantum spacetime/gravity Higher Dimensions, non-commutativity, ??? Singularity: Big-Bang, BH.

  30. What made Difference ICGC series started in Dec. 1987 Summer Schools helped in grounding GR in Physics mid 80 s GR groups emerging in Institutes Regular IAGRG meetings and Many more FTAG began in 2001, growing strong

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#