Government Scrutiny in the USA: A Comprehensive Overview

 
Scrutiny in the USA
Scrutiny in the USA
Government Scrutiny
Government Scrutiny
 
Like the UK, most
scrutiny of the
executive is carried
out by the legislative
branch.
 
As well as its
legislative role, one of
the most important
functions of Congress
is to 
investigate and
oversee the
EXECUTIVE.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
There are also other
‘outside’ factors which
contribute to
scrutinising the
executive
 
U.S. Congress
U.S. Congress
 
 
Congress can scrutinise
the Executive &
government through its
Committees
 
Importantly, 
Congress
also has the exclusive
power of removal 
– of
the President
(impeachment), federal
judges and other
federal officers.
US Government Scrutiny
US Government Scrutiny
 
1 – Congressional Committees
Committees have a wide range of powers to 
call witnesses and see
papers
 – Freedom of Information Act ensures the right to see
official documents
Like the UK there are different types of committees in the USA,
select committees and standing committees
Generally, a committee’s job is to investigate and oversee the
executive
Committees tend to focus on a particular area i.e. Defence
Spending committee
 
Crash Course -
Committees
 
It could be argued that
standing committees 
in the US
have more power at the
legislative process as they can
kill a bill
’ .
 
For example, (Former) MP
George Galloway was called
before a senate committee
over allegations of oil trading
with Saddam Hussein
 
Comedian Stephen Colbert
gave advice to a
congressional committee
after highlighting
immigration on his TV show
US Government Scrutiny
US Government Scrutiny
Government Scrutiny
Government Scrutiny
 
For example, Obama
struggled to appoint a head to
the ATF ( a federal agency)
for over 6 years as his
nominations were consistently
blocked by the senate
President  G. W. Bush had to
back down from deciding to
nominate Harriet Myers (head
of Texas gaming commission)
as a supreme court judge
after outrage from Congress
 
2 – Senate approval
One important function of the
executive is to be able to appoint
Government members to help run
the executive branch i.e. The
President selects the US Defence
Secretary
The President also has the power to
select members of the SUPREME
court if a position becomes available
(as well as appoint the VP)
However, the SENATE can
scrutinise any appointment as all
appointees are subject to senate
approval
The Senate therefore has the power
to block presidential appointments
or force the President to nominate
someone else.
Government Scrutiny
Government Scrutiny
 
3 – No ‘collective
responsibility’
Unlike the UK, the US
executive has no doctrine of
collective responsibility
In the UK cabinet ministers
are expected to ‘toe the party
line’ and ‘stick together’ (most
of the time)
In the USA scrutiny can come
from within – as US cabinet
ministers are responsible for
their own dept, they can be
much more frank with each
other than the UK
 
For Example, the Obama
administration stalled with
differences relating to Israel
Former Defence Secretary
Chuck Hagel was critical of
Obama on Iraq and Syria
Republican state governors and
members of Congress can/are
openly critical of Donald
Trump – for example over his
pardoning of Sheriff Joe
Apario
Republicans criticise Trump over pardon
GoP splintering
Government Scrutiny
Government Scrutiny
 
4 – Publicity/Media
This relates to congress in
that important congressional
hearings can receive a lot of
publicity
This in turn can lead to intense
media scrutiny of the
government over certain
issues.
The network ‘c-span’ is
dedicated to reporting on
congressional and political
matters
For example, FOX news was
fiercely critical of President
Obama,  particularly over his
healthcare plan and
immigration reforms
https://www.youtube.com/wat
ch?v=CwQZbQ54iOo
 
 
Government Scrutiny
Government Scrutiny
 
 
4.5 - Public officials
In the UK, public officials and the civil
service are ‘
A- political
’ meaning that
they don’t and aren’t supposed to
demonstrate any political allegiance
However, in the USA public officials
are freer to express their views and
demonstrate political opinion.
This allows more open criticism even
from within
Unlike the UK civil service, USA
officials will be members of a political
party i.e. The dog catcher may be a
Democrat whereas the governor of the
water board may be a Republican.
 
For Example, many public officials have
been openly critical about issues
surrounding the US VA (dept of
Veteran Affairs)
Obama was openly criticised by some
officials over his comments regarding
the Armenian Genocide
Task 1: Comparing Committees
Task 1: Comparing Committees
in UK and US
in UK and US
 
You will receive a hand-out comparing the Committee
systems in the UK and US.
Learn the key differences between scrutiny in the UK
and US.
In your opinion, which system is better? Explain your
answer using examples.
Task 2: Comparing Scrutiny
Task 2: Comparing Scrutiny
 
 
Having looked at scrutiny of the executive in the UK and the
USA draw up your own comparison table, like the one you
were handed out for committees. Include: 
Questions
,
debates
, 
Legislation process 
(UK) and Senate approval, Lack
of 
collective responsibility
, media/publicity and public
officials (USA).
Slide Note
Embed
Share

The scrutiny of the US government, much like the UK, primarily falls under the purview of the legislative branch, specifically Congress. This scrutiny involves investigation, oversight of the executive branch, and the power of impeachment. Congressional committees play a crucial role in scrutinizing the government, with the Senate having the authority to approve appointments made by the President. The process ensures transparency and accountability in the US government.

  • USA
  • Government Scrutiny
  • Legislative Branch
  • Congressional Committees
  • Senate Approval

Uploaded on Jul 30, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Scrutiny in the USA http://farm7.staticflickr.com/6186/6080137063_71b986b12f_b_d.jpg

  2. Government Scrutiny Like the UK, most scrutiny of the executive is carried out by the legislative branch. As well as its legislative role, one of the most important functions of Congress is to investigate and oversee the EXECUTIVE. There are also other outside factors which contribute to scrutinising the executive

  3. U.S. Congress http://images.politico.com/global/2013/02/05/130205_sotu_2011_605.jpg Congress can scrutinise the Executive & government through its Committees Importantly, Congress also has the exclusive power of removal of the President (impeachment), federal judges and other federal officers.

  4. US Government Scrutiny 1 Congressional Committees Committees have a wide range of powers to call witnesses and see papers Freedom of Information Act ensures the right to see official documents Like the UK there are different types of committees in the USA, select committees and standing committees Generally, a committee s job is to investigate and oversee the executive Committees tend to focus on a particular area i.e. Defence Spending committee Image result for congressional committees Crash Course - Committees

  5. US Government Scrutiny It could be argued that standing committees in the US have more power at the legislative process as they can kill a bill . For example, (Former) MP George Galloway was called before a senate committee over allegations of oil trading with Saddam Hussein Comedian Stephen Colbert gave advice to a congressional committee after highlighting immigration on his TV show

  6. Government Scrutiny http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/7221/1676/320/Harriet%20and%20George.jpg http://truthaboutguns-zippykid.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/courtesy-nbcdfw.com_.jpg 2 Senate approval One important function of the executive is to be able to appoint Government members to help run the executive branch i.e. The President selects the US Defence Secretary The President also has the power to select members of the SUPREME court if a position becomes available (as well as appoint the VP) However, the SENATE can scrutinise any appointment as all appointees are subject to senate approval The Senate therefore has the power to block presidential appointments or force the President to nominate someone else. For example, Obama struggled to appoint a head to the ATF ( a federal agency) for over 6 years as his nominations were consistently blocked by the senate President G. W. Bush had to back down from deciding to nominate Harriet Myers (head of Texas gaming commission) as a supreme court judge after outrage from Congress

  7. Government Scrutiny 3 No collective responsibility Unlike the UK, the US executive has no doctrine of collective responsibility In the UK cabinet ministers are expected to toe the party line and stick together (most of the time) In the USA scrutiny can come from within as US cabinet ministers are responsible for their own dept, they can be much more frank with each other than the UK For Example, the Obama administration stalled with differences relating to Israel Former Defence Secretary Chuck Hagel was critical of Obama on Iraq and Syria Republican state governors and members of Congress can/are openly critical of Donald Trump for example over his pardoning of Sheriff Joe Apario Republicans criticise Trump over pardon GoP splintering

  8. Government Scrutiny 4 Publicity/Media This relates to congress in that important congressional hearings can receive a lot of publicity This in turn can lead to intense media scrutiny of the government over certain issues. The network c-span is dedicated to reporting on congressional and political matters For example, FOX news was fiercely critical of President Obama, particularly over his healthcare plan and immigration reforms https://www.youtube.com/wat ch?v=CwQZbQ54iOo http://cloudfront.mediamatters.org/static/uploader/image/2014/06/03/megyn-kelly-terrorists.jpg http://crooksandliars.com/files/mediaposters/2015/05/31525.jpg

  9. Government Scrutiny 4.5 - Public officials In the UK, public officials and the civil service are A- political meaning that they don t and aren t supposed to demonstrate any political allegiance However, in the USA public officials are freer to express their views and demonstrate political opinion. This allows more open criticism even from within Unlike the UK civil service, USA officials will be members of a political party i.e. The dog catcher may be a Democrat whereas the governor of the water board may be a Republican. http://www.benefits.va.gov/va_files/2012/images/header-logo.png http://mrmc.amedd.army.mil/assets/images/articles/veterans_hospital_visit.jpg http://i.ytimg.com/vi/iI2CkGvkMls/hqdefault.jpg For Example, many public officials have been openly critical about issues surrounding the US VA (dept of Veteran Affairs) Obama was openly criticised by some officials over his comments regarding the Armenian Genocide

  10. Task 1: Comparing Committees in UK and US You will receive a hand-out comparing the Committee systems in the UK and US. Learn the key differences between scrutiny in the UK and US. In your opinion, which system is better? Explain your answer using examples. Task 2: Comparing Scrutiny Having looked at scrutiny of the executive in the UK and the USA draw up your own comparison table, like the one you were handed out for committees. Include: Questions, debates, Legislation process (UK) and Senate approval, Lack of collective responsibility, media/publicity and public officials (USA).

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#