Evolutionary Relationships in Phylogeny

undefined
CHAPTER 26
PHYLOGENY AND SYSTEMATICS
1
 
2
 
What are the evolutionary
 
relationships between a
 
human, a mushroom, and
 
a flower?
A phylogeny based on
 
DNA data reveals that
 
animals (including
 
humans) and fungi
 
(including mushrooms)
 
are more closely related
 
to each other than to
 
plants.
OVERVIEW
 
Phylogeny
 is the evolutionary history of a species or group
of species.
The discipline of 
systematics
 classifies organisms and
determines evolutionary relationships of living and extinct
organisms.
Systematists use fossil, molecular, and genetic data to infer
evolutionary relationships
3
I. Concept 26.1: Classification
4
 
A.  Taxonomy
The ordered division of organisms into categories
based similarities and differences
  
-useful component of systematics
B.  Binomial Nomenclature (two word name)
1. First proposed by 
Carolus Linnaeus 
in 18
th
 century
2. Two main characteristics:
  
a.  Each species has a two-part name.
  
b.  Species are organized hierarchically into broader
  
and broader groups of organisms.
 
5
 
 
3.  The first part of the name is the 
genus
.
 
4.  The second part, called the specific epithet, is
  
unique for each species within the genus.
 
5.  Ex:  Human—
Homo sapiens 
which means wise man
C.  Hierarchical Classification
 
1.  Groups species into increasingly broad taxonomic
  
categories
 
2.  Taxonomic groups from broad to narrow are:
  
domain, kingdom, phylum, class, order, family,
  
genus, 
and 
species
 
3.  A taxonomic unit at any level of hierarchy is called a
  
taxon
 
6
 
7
 
D.  Phylogenetic Tree
 
1. Diagram used to show
 
the evolutionary
 
history of a group of
 
organisms
 
2. Can provide important
 
information about
 
similar characteristics
 
in closely related
 
species
 
II. Concept 26. 2:  Morphological and
Molecular Data
8
 
A. To infer relationships, systematists gather information
about morphologies, genes, and biochemistry of living
organisms
B. Organisms with similar morphologies or DNA sequences
are likely to be more closely related than organisms with
different structures or sequences
C. When constructing a phylogeny, systematists need to
distinguish whether a similarity is the result of 
homology
or 
analogy
 
1.  Homology 
is similarity due to shared ancestry
Ex:  bones of a whale’s flipper and a tiger’s paw
 
9
 
 
2.  Analogy 
is similarity due to convergent evolution
Convergent evolution 
occurs when two organisms developed
similarities as they adapted to similar environmental
challenges—not because they evolved from a common
ancestor
Ex:  wing of a butterfly is analogous to wing of a bat because
both are adaptations for flight
 
3. Analogous structures or molecular sequences that evolved
 
independently are also called 
homoplasies
4. Homology can be distinguished from analogy by comparing
fossil evidence and the degree of complexity
5. The more complex two similar structures are, the more likely it
is that they are homologous
 
10
 
D. 
Molecular systematics 
uses DNA and other molecular
data to determine evolutionary relationships.
The more alike the DNA sequences of two organisms,
the more closely related they are evolutionarily.
III.  Concept 26.3:  Constructing
Phylogenetic Trees
11
 
A. Cladistics
 
1. Cladistics
 groups organisms by common descent
 
2. Once homologous characters have been identified,
 
they can be used to infer a phylogeny
 
3. A 
cladogram
 depicts patterns of shared characteristics
 
among taxa and forms the basis of a phylogenetic tree
 
4. A 
clade
 is a group of species that includes an ancestral
 
species and all its descendants
Not all groupings of organisms qualify as clades
 
5. A valid clade is 
monophyletic
, signifying that it consists
 
of the ancestor species and all its descendants
 
 
MONOPHYLETIC GROUP (CLADE)
12
 
Group I, consisting of 3
species (A, B, C) and their
common ancestor (1), is a
clade, also called a
monophyletic group
.
A 
monophyletic group
consists of an ancestral
species and 
all
 of its
descendants
1
PARAPHYLETIC GROUP
13
 
Group II is 
paraphyletic.
A paraphyletic 
grouping
consists of an ancestral
species and some, but not
all, of the descendants.
In this case Group II
consists of an ancestral
species (2) and some of its
descendants (species D, E,
F) but not all of them
(missing species G).
2
POLYPHYLETIC GROUP
14
 
Group III is 
polyphyletic.
A 
polyphyletic
 grouping
consists of various species
that lack a common
ancestor
In this case, species D, E, F,
and G share common
ancestor (2), but species C
has a different ancestor
(1).
1
2
 
15
 
B.  Shared Ancestral and Shared Derived Characters
 
1. A 
shared ancestral character 
is found not only in the
 
clade being analyzed but also in older clades
Ex:  Backbone in vertebrates
 
2. A 
shared derived character 
is unique to a particular
 
clade.
Ex:  Hair in mammals
 
3. A character can be both ancestral and derived,
 
depending on the context
 
4. When inferring evolutionary relationships, it is useful
 
to know in which clade a shared derived character
 
first appeared
Phylogenetic Tree
16
IV. Concept 26.4:  Genome
Documentation(Not on exam)
17
 
A. Comparing nucleic acids or other molecules to infer
relatedness is a valuable tool for tracing organisms’
evolutionary history
B. DNA that codes for 
ribosomal RNA 
changes relatively
slowly
 and is useful for investigating branching
points hundreds of millions of years ago
C. 
Mitochondrial (mt)DNA 
evolves 
rapidly
 and can be
used to explore recent evolutionary events
V.  Concept 26.5:  Molecular Clocks(not
on exam)
18
Molecular clocks are methods used to measure the
absolute time of evolutionary change based on the
observation that some genes and other regions of the
genome appear to evolve at constant rates.
VI. Concept 26.6:  Three-Domain
System
19
A.  Supported by data from many sequenced genomes
B.  A Comparison of the Three Domains of Life
 
20
You should now be able to:
1.
The taxonomic categories and how they indicate
relatedness
2.
How systematics is used to develop phylogenetic
trees
3.
The three domains of life including their similarities
and their differences
21
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Explore the evolutionary relationships between humans, mushrooms, and flowers based on DNA data, taxonomy, and phylogenetic trees. Understand how systematists classify organisms and infer ancestral connections using morphological and molecular data.

  • Evolution
  • Phylogeny
  • Taxonomy
  • Systematics
  • Morphological Data

Uploaded on Feb 25, 2025 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CHAPTER 26 PHYLOGENY AND SYSTEMATICS 1

  2. What are the evolutionary relationships between a human, a mushroom, and a flower? A phylogeny based on DNA data reveals that animals (including humans) and fungi (including mushrooms) are more closely related to each other than to plants. 2

  3. OVERVIEW Phylogeny is the evolutionary history of a species or group of species. The discipline of systematics classifies organisms and determines evolutionary relationships of living and extinct organisms. Systematists use fossil, molecular, and genetic data to infer evolutionary relationships 3

  4. I. Concept 26.1: Classification A. Taxonomy The ordered division of organisms into categories based similarities and differences -useful component of systematics B. Binomial Nomenclature (two word name) 1. First proposed by Carolus Linnaeus in 18th century 2. Two main characteristics: a. Each species has a two-part name. b. Species are organized hierarchically into broader and broader groups of organisms. 4

  5. 3. The first part of the name is the genus. 4. The second part, called the specific epithet, is unique for each species within the genus. 5. Ex: Human Homo sapiens which means wise man C. Hierarchical Classification 1. Groups species into increasingly broad taxonomic categories 2. Taxonomic groups from broad to narrow are: domain, kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus, and species 3. A taxonomic unit at any level of hierarchy is called a taxon 5

  6. 6

  7. D. Phylogenetic Tree 1. Diagram used to show the evolutionary history of a group of organisms 2. Can provide important information about similar characteristics in closely related species 7

  8. II. Concept 26. 2: Morphological and Molecular Data A. To infer relationships, systematists gather information about morphologies, genes, and biochemistry of living organisms B. Organisms with similar morphologies or DNA sequences are likely to be more closely related than organisms with different structures or sequences C. When constructing a phylogeny, systematists need to distinguish whether a similarity is the result of homology or analogy 1. Homology is similarity due to shared ancestry Ex: bones of a whale s flipper and a tiger s paw 8

  9. 2. Analogy is similarity due to convergent evolution Convergent evolution occurs when two organisms developed similarities as they adapted to similar environmental challenges not because they evolved from a common ancestor Ex: wing of a butterfly is analogous to wing of a bat because both are adaptations for flight 3. Analogous structures or molecular sequences that evolved independently are also called homoplasies 4. Homology can be distinguished from analogy by comparing fossil evidence and the degree of complexity 5. The more complex two similar structures are, the more likely it is that they are homologous 9

  10. D. Molecular systematics uses DNA and other molecular data to determine evolutionary relationships. The more alike the DNA sequences of two organisms, the more closely related they are evolutionarily. 10

  11. III. Concept 26.3: Constructing Phylogenetic Trees A. Cladistics 1. Cladistics groups organisms by common descent 2. Once homologous characters have been identified, they can be used to infer a phylogeny 3. A cladogram depicts patterns of shared characteristics among taxa and forms the basis of a phylogenetic tree 4. A clade is a group of species that includes an ancestral species and all its descendants Not all groupings of organisms qualify as clades 5. A valid clade is monophyletic, signifying that it consists of the ancestor species and all its descendants 11

  12. MONOPHYLETIC GROUP (CLADE) Group I, consisting of 3 species (A, B, C) and their common ancestor (1), is a clade, also called a monophyletic group. 1 A monophyletic group consists of an ancestral species and all of its descendants 12

  13. PARAPHYLETIC GROUP Group II is paraphyletic. A paraphyletic grouping consists of an ancestral species and some, but not all, of the descendants. In this case Group II consists of an ancestral species (2) and some of its descendants (species D, E, F) but not all of them (missing species G). 2 13

  14. POLYPHYLETIC GROUP Group III is polyphyletic. A polyphyletic grouping consists of various species that lack a common ancestor 1 In this case, species D, E, F, and G share common ancestor (2), but species C has a different ancestor (1). 2 14

  15. B. Shared Ancestral and Shared Derived Characters 1. A shared ancestral character is found not only in the clade being analyzed but also in older clades Ex: Backbone in vertebrates 2. A shared derived character is unique to a particular clade. Ex: Hair in mammals 3. A character can be both ancestral and derived, depending on the context 4. When inferring evolutionary relationships, it is useful to know in which clade a shared derived character first appeared 15

  16. Phylogenetic Tree 16

  17. IV. Concept 26.4: Genome Documentation(Not on exam) A. Comparing nucleic acids or other molecules to infer relatedness is a valuable tool for tracing organisms evolutionary history B. DNA that codes for ribosomal RNA changes relatively slowly and is useful for investigating branching points hundreds of millions of years ago C. Mitochondrial (mt)DNA evolves rapidly and can be used to explore recent evolutionary events 17

  18. V. Concept 26.5: Molecular Clocks(not on exam) Molecular clocks are methods used to measure the absolute time of evolutionary change based on the observation that some genes and other regions of the genome appear to evolve at constant rates. 18

  19. VI. Concept 26.6: Three-Domain System A. Supported by data from many sequenced genomes B. A Comparison of the Three Domains of Life Characteristics Bacteria Archaea Eukarya Nuclear Envelope No No Yes Membrane-enclosed organelles No No Yes Introns No Yes Yes Histone proteins associated with DNA No Yes Yes Circular Chromosome Yes Yes No 19

  20. 20

  21. You should now be able to: 1. The taxonomic categories and how they indicate relatedness 2. How systematics is used to develop phylogenetic trees 3. The three domains of life including their similarities and their differences 21

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#