Evaluation Forms and Global Comments by Arend Jan (AJ) Woittiez (NL) and Mollie Donohoe (UK)
The evaluation process for a course divided into lectures and workshops involved daily distribution of evaluation forms to collect feedback and free-text comments. Participants rated lectures and workshops on relevance, clarity, preparation, objectives, participation, and interaction. Overall, positive feedback was received with comments on stimulating participation and well-structured workshops, alongside suggestions for shorter days and clearer workshop instructions.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Evaluation forms and global comments Arend Jan(AJ)Woittiez (NL) Mollie Donohoe (UK)
Evaluation process The course is divided in 2 types of activities : All participants together : Lectures by the experts Participants in smal groups : Workshops Daily the 2 evaluation forms ( lectures evaluation, workshops evaluation) were distributed at the end of the day and collected on next morning. In addition, free text comments were encouraged
Evaluation forms: lectures 1. Overview and art of learning agree neutral disagree strongly disagree The topics of the lectures were relevant o o o o The contents were clear and easy to follow o o o o The lecturers were well prepared o o o o Free text comments:
Evaluation forms: workshops 2. Workshop 1: Needs, priorities and barriers agree neutral disagree strongly disagree The objectives of the workshop were clear o o o o The participation and interaction was good o o o o The topics covered were relevant o o o o Free text comments:
evaluations days 1 to 4 Lectures / Results / positive % Day 1 24 Day 2 38 Day 3 33 Day 4 31 Workshops 83% 84% 89% 92% 92% 89% 84% 99%
Comments, grouped day 0-4 Positive comments: Stimulation of participation of delegates Some workshops were clearly structured Charcot talk : Excellent All programmes in day 3 excellent with very interesting work shops Appreciated teaching on data collection Thank you to every one especially those who organised the work shops Each day is a new learning day .Thank you so much for organising this course Conference was well organised
Comments, grouped day 0-4 Suggested improvements Days are too long Live cases very interesting but too many Need time for rest and to allow us to reflect Some of the work shops missed clear intructions Industry talks at the end of the day were long and hard
Final evaluation (26) Final evaluation (26) 1.Objectives of course were practical and useful Agree/ neutral 100% 2.The course was stimulatiing Agree/ neutral 100% 3.Balance between work & breaks adequate Agree/ neutral 100% 4.Refreshments were sufficient Agree/ neutral 100% 5.Interaction with faculty was easy to get Agree/ neutral 100% 6.Time management was good Agree/ neutral 100%
Comments from delegates (as written) Comments from delegates (as written) What went well with this training course : All lectures good Course was arranged well Lectures good Work shops excellent and stimulating Every thing was excellent Clear discussions Interaction Education work shop excellent and interactive
Comments from delegates (as written) Comments from delegates (as written) What went well with this training course : Well arranged Punctuality Discipline Excellent in all aspects Every thing well planed and prepared very stimulating keep up good work it is a pleasure for us Training well planned and applicable Continue it is magnificent Local representation was great and put international expertise into context . Reinforced need for equity of care for people with diabetes in all places. Strong focus on team approach to optimize care
Comments from delegates (as written) Comments from delegates (as written) What could be improved with this training course : If possible make training compressed and shorter Limit topics to reduce length Time duration Follow up and frequent courses Improve coordination between faculty member/ speaker and moderators objectives were not always made clear enough
Comments from delegates (as written) Comments from delegates (as written) What could be improved with this training course : More workshops Addition of social program Pre course communication : more time needed. emails were not all activated immediately after registration Visa difficult Duration of course and time management May be setting the scene slides before the live patient presentations and outline of expected scenario
Key messages Key messages We all worked hard but there is always room for improvement. Suggestions please !
