Environmental Considerations in U.S. Oil and Gas Industry

 
Environmental
Considerations in Various
Plays Within the U.S. Oil and
Gas Industry
 
by Peter D. McKone, CWB
Weaver Consultants Group
 
Outline
 
Nationwide Issues
Regional Issues
Industry Examples
General Wildlife Impacts
Best Practices
Cultural Resources
 
2
 
 
Nationwide Issues
 
Federal Regulation –
The Endangered Species Act (ESA)
Threatened, endangered and candidate species
Section 7 consultation
Interagency consultation
May affect (informal consultation) or likely to
adversely affect (formal consultation)
Section 10 consultation
non-federal applicants
Biological assessments and biological opinions
Incidental take permits
 
3
 
 
IPaC
 
Information, Planning and Conservation System
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/
Assist in determining whether threatened and endangered
species, designated critical habitat, proposed critical habitat,
migratory birds and other natural resources may be affected
by project
Summarizes distribution of important biological resources
such as wetlands, refuges, critical habitat, etc.
Get a preliminary or official USFWS species list
 
 
Nationwide Issues
 
The Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA)
Protects all migratory birds
Exceptions include non-native birds such as house sparrows and
European starlings
Illegal for anyone to take, possess, import, export, transport, sell,
purchase, barter, or offer for sale, purchase, or barter, any
migratory bird, or the parts, nests, or eggs of such a bird except
under the terms of a valid permit issued pursuant to federal
regulations
Incidental take permits
Recent interpretation by President – only intentional take covered
 
The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA)
Provides long-term species management and protection in
addition to the ESA and MBTA
 
5
 
 
Regional Issues
 
State and Local Regulation
State-level threatened and endangered species regulation
States often provide varying degrees of species regulation
and/or have few resources for regulatory enforcement
Many state-listed species may also be federally listed or
federal candidate species
 
6
 
 
Regional Issues
(cont.)
 
The Barnett Shale – Golden-cheeked warbler, migratory birds
The Eagle Ford Shale – Texas tortoise, Texas horned lizard, spot-
tailed earless lizard
The Permian Basin – Dunes sagebrush lizard, migratory birds,
playa floodplains, public property in the western Permian, lesser
prairie-chicken
The Bakken Shale – Piping plovers, migratory birds, wintering elk,
public lands, grassland birds
The Haynesville Shale – Red-cockaded woodpecker, Louisiana
black bear, Louisiana pine snake
Oklahoma – American burying beetle, public lands, lesser prairie
chicken, Arkansas River shiner
The Marcellus Shale – Mussels, bats
 
7
 
 
Example
 
Dunes sagebrush lizard
Permian Basin = 39.6 million acres
Dunes sagebrush lizard occupies less than 2% of the basin
Effective Conservation Efforts
Candidate Conservation Agreements
2012 Texas Conservation Plan
Implement construction BMPs
Trench length/duration
Limit vegetation removal
Temporal construction limits
HDD
Proposal for listing was withdrawn by USFWS in 2012
Frac sand operations have heated up the issue
 
8
 
 
General Wildlife Impacts
 
Habitat loss, degradation, fragmentation
Occurs with any development (energy, residential, commercial,
industrial, etc.)
Cumulative effects of development can lead to reduction in
populations
Monarch butterflies, mussels
Behavioral modifications to populations as a result of
more wells, lease roads, etc.
Can diminish breeding success
Potential significant threats to population viability include
avoidance due to increased vehicle traffic, construction of new
roads or modification of existing ones, well pads and pipelines
Stressors during critical life cycle periods
Pronghorn antelope, lesser prairie chickens
 
9
 
 
General Wildlife Impacts
(cont.)
 
Impacts to watersheds
Mussels, fish
Loss of wintering ranges for ungulates in colder climates
Deer, elk
Loss of specialized habitat for specialists
 
10
 
 
Best Practices
 
Minimize habitat fragmentation by using existing roads
and corridors whenever possible.
Avoid or protect sensitive areas, seek qualified help
identifying these areas, and limit development and
disturbance to agreed-upon development corridors.
Monitor surface and subsurface water quality.
Prevent erosion and contamination of topsoil.
Prevent the introduction or spread of invasive and exotic
plants.
Use only locally adapted native seed when possible to reclaim
and re-vegetate sites.
Plan operations to minimize impacts to traditional land
uses during development.
 
11
 
 
Best Practices
(cont.)
 
Open pits
Birds and wildlife attracted to pits
Close containment systems
Deterrents (netting, eliminate pits, keep oil off open pits
or ponds)
Ineffective
Flagging
Reflectors
Strobe lights
Zon guns
 
 
National Historic Preservation Act
of 1966
 
National Register of Historic Places
State Historic Preservation Officers
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
 
 
NHPA (cont.)
 
Federal Undertaking
Any project that involves
Federal funds
Federal permits
Federal licenses
Federal approval
 
 
NHPA Consultation
 
Identify Area of Potential Effect (APE)
Identify historic properties (survey and
testing)
Assess the project’s effects on historic
properties
Consult to resolve adverse effects
Allow Advisory Council on Historic
Preservation an opportunity to comment
 
 
Area of Potential Effect
 
The geographic area or areas within which an
undertaking may cause changes in the
character or use of historic properties
 
 
Questions
 
Peter D. McKone, CWB
Weaver Consultants Group
pmckone@wcgrp.com
 
Slide Note

Jeff

Embed
Share

This presentation delves into the various environmental considerations within the U.S. oil and gas industry, covering nationwide and regional issues, industry examples, wildlife impacts, best practices, and cultural resources. It emphasizes federal regulations such as the Endangered Species Act and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, as well as state and local regulations affecting threatened and endangered species. The importance of tools like IPaC for project planning and conservation is also highlighted.

  • Oil and Gas Industry
  • Environmental Considerations
  • Federal Regulations
  • Endangered Species
  • Wildlife Impacts

Uploaded on Sep 26, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Environmental Considerations in Various Plays Within the U.S. Oil and Gas Industry by Peter D. McKone, CWB Weaver Consultants Group

  2. Outline Nationwide Issues Regional Issues Industry Examples General Wildlife Impacts Best Practices Cultural Resources 2

  3. Nationwide Issues Federal Regulation The Endangered Species Act (ESA) Threatened, endangered and candidate species Section 7 consultation Interagency consultation May affect (informal consultation) or likely to adversely affect (formal consultation) Section 10 consultation non-federal applicants Biological assessments and biological opinions Incidental take permits 3

  4. IPaC Information, Planning and Conservation System https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/ Assist in determining whether threatened and endangered species, designated critical habitat, proposed critical habitat, migratory birds and other natural resources may be affected by project Summarizes distribution of important biological resources such as wetlands, refuges, critical habitat, etc. Get a preliminary or official USFWS species list

  5. Nationwide Issues The Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) Protects all migratory birds Exceptions include non-native birds such as house sparrows and European starlings Illegal for anyone to take, possess, import, export, transport, sell, purchase, barter, or offer for sale, purchase, or barter, any migratory bird, or the parts, nests, or eggs of such a bird except under the terms of a valid permit issued pursuant to federal regulations Incidental take permits Recent interpretation by President only intentional take covered The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) Provides long-term species management and protection in addition to the ESA and MBTA 5

  6. Regional Issues State and Local Regulation State-level threatened and endangered species regulation States often provide varying degrees of species regulation and/or have few resources for regulatory enforcement Many state-listed species may also be federally listed or federal candidate species 6

  7. Regional Issues (cont.) The Barnett Shale Golden-cheeked warbler, migratory birds The Eagle Ford Shale Texas tortoise, Texas horned lizard, spot- tailed earless lizard The Permian Basin Dunes sagebrush lizard, migratory birds, playa floodplains, public property in the western Permian, lesser prairie-chicken The Bakken Shale Piping plovers, migratory birds, wintering elk, public lands, grassland birds The Haynesville Shale Red-cockaded woodpecker, Louisiana black bear, Louisiana pine snake Oklahoma American burying beetle, public lands, lesser prairie chicken, Arkansas River shiner The Marcellus Shale Mussels, bats 7

  8. Example Dunes sagebrush lizard Permian Basin = 39.6 million acres Dunes sagebrush lizard occupies less than 2% of the basin Effective Conservation Efforts Candidate Conservation Agreements 2012 Texas Conservation Plan Implement construction BMPs Trench length/duration Limit vegetation removal Temporal construction limits HDD Proposal for listing was withdrawn by USFWS in 2012 Frac sand operations have heated up the issue 8

  9. General Wildlife Impacts Habitat loss, degradation, fragmentation Occurs with any development (energy, residential, commercial, industrial, etc.) Cumulative effects of development can lead to reduction in populations Monarch butterflies, mussels Behavioral modifications to populations as a result of more wells, lease roads, etc. Can diminish breeding success Potential significant threats to population viability include avoidance due to increased vehicle traffic, construction of new roads or modification of existing ones, well pads and pipelines Stressors during critical life cycle periods Pronghorn antelope, lesser prairie chickens 9

  10. General Wildlife Impacts (cont.) Impacts to watersheds Mussels, fish Loss of wintering ranges for ungulates in colder climates Deer, elk Loss of specialized habitat for specialists 10

  11. Best Practices Minimize habitat fragmentation by using existing roads and corridors whenever possible. Avoid or protect sensitive areas, seek qualified help identifying these areas, and limit development and disturbance to agreed-upon development corridors. Monitor surface and subsurface water quality. Prevent erosion and contamination of topsoil. Prevent the introduction or spread of invasive and exotic plants. Use only locally adapted native seed when possible to reclaim and re-vegetate sites. Plan operations to minimize impacts to traditional land uses during development. 11

  12. Best Practices (cont.) Open pits Birds and wildlife attracted to pits Close containment systems Deterrents (netting, eliminate pits, keep oil off open pits or ponds) Ineffective Flagging Reflectors Strobe lights Zon guns

  13. National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 National Register of Historic Places State Historic Preservation Officers Advisory Council on Historic Preservation

  14. NHPA (cont.) Federal Undertaking Any project that involves Federal funds Federal permits Federal licenses Federal approval

  15. NHPA Consultation Identify Area of Potential Effect (APE) Identify historic properties (survey and testing) Assess the project s effects on historic properties Consult to resolve adverse effects Allow Advisory Council on Historic Preservation an opportunity to comment

  16. Area of Potential Effect The geographic area or areas within which an undertaking may cause changes in the character or use of historic properties

  17. Questions Peter D. McKone, CWB Weaver Consultants Group pmckone@wcgrp.com

More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#