Enhancing Interventions for Sex Offenders: The Dynamic Risk Guide

undefined
The Dynamic Risk Guide
Identifying sex offender risks and using tools to enhance skills and address
interventions.
SOUP Group-OSCI  October 17th, 2019
What are the Principles of Effective
Interventions?
What are agents currently looking at to address sex offender needs
and reduce their risk?
  
 
Effective Interventions
 
What does the offender need to target the problem?
 
Top 4 Criminogenic Need areas:
    Anti-social Cognition
    Anti-social Personality
    Anti-social Peers
    Family/Marital
 
What about
the specific
sex offender
needs?
 
How are we incorporating
the Dynamic Risk Factors
into our interventions?
What can we do to continue to build
the bridge?
Initial survey says……..
11 agents were surveyed and the following results were found:
78% of agents asked were not currently structuring
appointments around dynamic risk factors
78% revealed they did not feel confident in skill
building around dynamic risk factors of sex offenders.
67% of the agents indicated they did not have a guide
to link the needs with the tools for either skill building
or providing interventions specific to sex offenders
What is the Dynamic Risk Guide?
A newly developed tool that correlates known predictors of sexual recidivism
to criminogenic needs which aid agents in determining the most appropriate
intervention for sex offenders
Dynamic Risk Factors
What are dynamic risk factors?
Stable dynamic risk factors are statistically relevant personality
characteristics, skill deficits, and learned behaviors that relate to risk for
sexual recidivism that may be changed through intervention
Why are they important?
Assist agents to focus on relevant risk factors and ignore those that are
not related to the risk of sexual re-offending
Address key questions such as “What should I target?” and “When should I
intervene?”
Stable 2007
Significant Social Influences
Intimacy Deficits
 
•Capacity for relationship stability
 
•Emotional identification with children
 
•Hostility towards women
 
•General social rejection/loneliness
 
•Lack of concern for others
Sexual Self-Regulation
 
•Sexual drive/pre-occupation
 
•Sex as coping
 
•Deviant sexual interest
General Self-Regulation
 
•Impulsive acts
 
•Poor cognitive problem solving
 
•Negative emotionality/hostility
Cooperation with Supervision
Acute Risk Factors
Victim access
Sexual preoccupation
Hostility
Rejection of supervision
Emotional collapse
Collapse of social supports
Substance abuse
The Dynamic Risk Guide
Anti-social Cognition
Offense supportive attitudes
Grievance/Hostility
Hostility to Women
Machiavellianism combines
Anti-Social Associates Family
Emotional Congruence w/ Children
Lack of Emotional Relationships w/ Adults
Negative Social Relationships
Callous/Lack of Concern for Others
The Dynamic Risk Guide
Anti-social Personality
Lifestyle Impulsiveness
Poor Problem Solving
Resistant to Rules/Supervision
Dysfunctional Coping
Sexual Interests
Sexual Interest in Children (13 or younger)
Sexual preoccupation
Sexualized violence
Multiple paraphilia
Region 8 Trial Team
de-briefing
July 9-
Aug 15
DRG introduced to
eleven Region 8
Agents for testing
phase
July
9-13
DRG initial survey
July 7-
10
DRG concept
approved by Region
8 Chief
Late
June
DRG developed from
SMART Grant
interactions
Early
June
The Dynamic Risk Guide Progression
Region 7 Waukesha Sex
Offender Unit 710
trained on the DRG
Nov
14
Region 8 Staff Trained
and DRG may be used
throughout Region
Oct
11
Region 8 Field
Supervisors updated on
Roll Out plan and
introduced to the DRG as
a tool
Sept
13
DRG 2.0 Produced
Sept
10
Region 8 Chiefs were
debriefed with Summary
and Proposed Roll Out
approved
Aug
23
The Dynamic Risk Guide Progression
The Dynamic Risk Guide Progression
Feb
28
Mar
8
Feb
26
Mar
12
Apr
18
Region 6
Management Team
trained
Region 5
Management Team
trained
Region 1
Management Team
trained
Region 3 Executive
Team  & S/O Unit
CFS’s trained
 
Region 1 Unit 104
and 112 Sex
Offender Units
trained
Final survey results after using the
Dynamic Risk Guide…..
73% of the participants indicated the DRG helped them in structuring their
appointments around their offenders’ dynamic risks and helped raise their
awareness of specific sex offender risk factors
100% of the participants reported that they felt 
DRG 
should be made available
to other agents for use with the sex offender population
How do we use the DRG to improve our
interventions?
When addressing skill deficits:
Introduce the skill you are teaching
Obtain the offender’s buy-in to the skill
Teach the steps of the skill to the offender
Demonstrate the steps of the skill to the offender
Practice the steps of the skill to the offender
Give the offender feedback about their practice with the skill
Lets try an example:
An offender reports in and admits to the reports you have received on
him that he has been hanging around his teenage nephews and says “They
just understand me better.”  Additionally, the only other person he says
he has been hanging around is the neighbor down the hall who is on
Federal supervision.
 
1. What risk factors are standing out to you with this information?
 
2. What area does this fall into on the DRG?
 
3. What tool do you think you would use in an attempt to effectively address
 
these risk factors?
Second example:
During SOT in the community an offender in a Special Needs group reports
that he feels his agent is out to get him and the agent is constantly asking
questions and getting in his business.  This continues over the course of
several groups and is becoming disruptive to the group as a whole.  This
information is shared with you from the treatment provider during weekly
staffings.
 
1. What risk factors are standing out to you with this information?
 
2. What area does this fall into on the DRG?
 
3. What tool do you think you would use in an attempt to effectively address
 
these risk factors?
Another example:
During an office visit, an offender discloses to you during an office visit that
he and his live-in girlfriend regularly like to watch Elmo together and they
always talk to each other like babies.
Would you use the DRG for this?
If so,  what direction would you take it?
If not, what would you do?
What scenarios have you encountered?
Let’s try some real examples you have had…
During an Office visit?
During a Home Visit?
Jail contact?
What are the agents saying about
the Dynamic Risk Guide?
“This is perfect! Thanks.”  Region 8 Agent October 11, 2018
“We have been waiting for something like this on how to understand this and
apply it to sex offenders” Region 7 Agent  November 14
th
, 2018
“We can use this in our weekly staffings to help determine better interventions.”
Region 7 Agent  November 14
th
, 2018
undefined
We are interested in
your feedback….
 
Slide Note

DAN:

Handout the DRG

Attendance Roster

Welcome

Agenda- timing ½ of this presentation and ½ w/ the Monitoring Center

Include a discussion about how this is a team approach and feedback is crucial

Embed
Share

Explore the principles of effective interventions, current strategies for addressing sex offender needs, and incorporating dynamic risk factors to provide targeted interventions. Uncover insights from a survey highlighting areas for improvement and learn about the Dynamic Risk Guide tool aiding agents in determining appropriate interventions for sex offenders.

  • Interventions
  • Sex Offenders
  • Dynamic Risk Guide
  • Risk Factors
  • Effective Strategies

Uploaded on Sep 25, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Dynamic Risk Guide The Dynamic Risk Guide Identifying sex offender risks and using tools to enhance skills and address interventions. SOUP Group-OSCI October 17th, 2019

  2. What are the Principles of Effective Interventions? Risk Need Responsivity How? Who? What?

  3. What are agents currently looking at to address sex offender needs and reduce their risk?

  4. Effective Interventions What does the offender need to target the problem? What about the specific sex offender needs? Top 4 Criminogenic Need areas: Anti-social Cognition Anti-social Personality Anti-social Peers Family/Marital How are we incorporating the Dynamic Risk Factors into our interventions?

  5. What can we do to continue to build the bridge?

  6. Initial survey says.. 11 agents were surveyed and the following results were found: 78% of agents asked were not currently structuring appointments around dynamic risk factors 78% revealed they did not feel confident in skill building around dynamic risk factors of sex offenders. 67% of the agents indicated they did not have a guide to link the needs with the tools for either skill building or providing interventions specific to sex offenders

  7. What is the Dynamic Risk Guide? A newly developed tool that correlates known predictors of sexual recidivism to criminogenic needs which aid agents in determining the most appropriate intervention for sex offenders

  8. Dynamic Risk Factors What are dynamic risk factors? Stable dynamic risk factors are statistically relevant personality characteristics, skill deficits, and learned behaviors that relate to risk for sexual recidivism that may be changed through intervention Why are they important? Assist agents to focus on relevant risk factors and ignore those that are not related to the risk of sexual re-offending Address key questions such as What should I target? and When should I intervene?

  9. Stable 2007 Significant Social Influences Intimacy Deficits Capacity for relationship stability Emotional identification with children Hostility towards women General social rejection/loneliness Lack of concern for others Sexual Self-Regulation Sexual drive/pre-occupation Sex as coping Deviant sexual interest General Self-Regulation Impulsive acts Poor cognitive problem solving Negative emotionality/hostility Cooperation with Supervision

  10. Acute Risk Factors Victim access Sexual preoccupation Hostility Rejection of supervision Emotional collapse Collapse of social supports Substance abuse

  11. The Dynamic Risk Guide Anti-social Cognition Offense supportive attitudes Grievance/Hostility Hostility to Women Machiavellianism combines Anti-Social Associates Family Emotional Congruence w/ Children Lack of Emotional Relationships w/ Adults Negative Social Relationships Callous/Lack of Concern for Others

  12. The Dynamic Risk Guide Anti-social Personality Lifestyle Impulsiveness Poor Problem Solving Resistant to Rules/Supervision Dysfunctional Coping Sexual Interests Sexual Interest in Children (13 or younger) Sexual preoccupation Sexualized violence Multiple paraphilia

  13. The Dynamic Risk Guide Progression DRG concept approved by Region 8 Chief DRG introduced to eleven Region 8 Agents for testing phase July 9 July 9- - Aug 15 Aug 15 July 7 July 7- - 10 10 July July 9 9- -13 13 Late Late June June Early Early June June Region 8 Trial Team de-briefing DRG initial survey DRG developed from SMART Grant interactions

  14. The Dynamic Risk Guide Progression Region 8 Staff Trained and DRG may be used throughout Region DRG 2.0 Produced Aug Aug 23 23 Nov Nov 14 14 Oct Oct 11 11 Sept Sept 10 10 Sept Sept 13 13 Region 7 Waukesha Sex Offender Unit 710 trained on the DRG Region 8 Field Supervisors updated on Roll Out plan and introduced to the DRG as a tool Region 8 Chiefs were debriefed with Summary and Proposed Roll Out approved

  15. The Dynamic Risk Guide Progression The Dynamic Risk Guide Progression Region 5 Region 5 Management Team Management Team trained trained Region 1 Region 1 Management Team Management Team trained trained Feb Mar Mar 8 8 Apr Apr 18 18 Feb 26 26 Feb Feb 28 28 Mar Mar 12 12 Region 1 Unit 104 Region 1 Unit 104 and 112 Sex and 112 Sex Offender Units Offender Units trained trained Region 3 Executive Region 3 Executive Team & S/O Unit Team & S/O Unit CFS s trained CFS s trained Region 6 Region 6 Management Team Management Team trained trained

  16. Final survey results after using the Dynamic Risk Guide .. 73% of the participants indicated the DRG helped them in structuring their appointments around their offenders dynamic risks and helped raise their awareness of specific sex offender risk factors 100% of the participants reported that they felt DRG should be made available to other agents for use with the sex offender population

  17. How do we use the DRG to improve our interventions?

  18. When addressing skill deficits: Introduce the skill you are teaching Obtain the offender s buy-in to the skill Teach the steps of the skill to the offender Demonstrate the steps of the skill to the offender Practice the steps of the skill to the offender Give the offender feedback about their practice with the skill

  19. Lets try an example: An offender reports in and admits to the reports you have received on him that he has been hanging around his teenage nephews and says They just understand me better. Additionally, the only other person he says he has been hanging around is the neighbor down the hall who is on Federal supervision. 1. What risk factors are standing out to you with this information? 2. What area does this fall into on the DRG? 3. What tool do you think you would use in an attempt to effectively address these risk factors?

  20. Second example: During SOT in the community an offender in a Special Needs group reports that he feels his agent is out to get him and the agent is constantly asking questions and getting in his business. This continues over the course of several groups and is becoming disruptive to the group as a whole. This information is shared with you from the treatment provider during weekly staffings. 1. What risk factors are standing out to you with this information? 2. What area does this fall into on the DRG? 3. What tool do you think you would use in an attempt to effectively address these risk factors?

  21. Another example: During an office visit, an offender discloses to you during an office visit that he and his live-in girlfriend regularly like to watch Elmo together and they always talk to each other like babies. Would you use the DRG for this? If so, what direction would you take it? If not, what would you do?

  22. What scenarios have you encountered? Let s try some real examples you have had During an Office visit? During a Home Visit? Jail contact?

  23. What are the agents saying about the Dynamic Risk Guide? This is perfect! Thanks. Region 8 Agent October 11, 2018 We have been waiting for something like this on how to understand this and apply it to sex offenders Region 7 Agent November 14th, 2018 We can use this in our weekly staffings to help determine better interventions. Region 7 Agent November 14th, 2018

  24. We are interested in your feedback .

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#