Enhancing Informed Consent for Transmittable Conditions in Transplant Procedures

Slide Note
Embed
Share

Proposing solutions to improve the informed consent process for transplant recipients in cases where donors have known transmittable medical conditions. The current policy is vague and burdensome, requiring individual consent for each positive test result, leading to monitoring and enforcement challenges. The proposed changes aim to clarify consent requirements and streamline the process for both donors and recipients.


Uploaded on Nov 15, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Clarify Informed Consent of Transmittable Conditions Ad Hoc Disease Transmission Advisory Committee (DTAC) 1

  2. What problem will the proposal solve? Current informed consent policy prior to transplant is vague Specific consent required prior to transplant when the donor has a known medical condition that may, in the transplant hospital s medical judgment, be transmissible to the recipient MPSC concerned policy implies need for individual consent for every positive test result Might not be reasonable and cause undue burden for programs Difficult to monitor and enforce 2

  3. What are the proposed solutions? Rearrange policy order to emphasize the education requirement of potential candidates at the time of listing Add clause to general consent policy at time of wait listing that results can affect post-transplant care and management Tie the consent process to conditions screened by UNetsm Tests named in current OPTN policy 5.3.B Provides clear and enforceable policy Keep other informed consent requirements when using donor organs: 3

  4. What are the proposed solutions? Adapted from Table 5-1: Donor Infectious Disease Screening Options If the donor tests positive for: Then pre-transplant informed consent would be required for the following organs: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb) Intestine Heart, Intestine, Kidney, Liver, Lung, Pancreas, Heart-Lung, Kidney-Pancreas Heart, Intestine, Kidney, Liver, Lung, Pancreas, Heart-Lung, Kidney-Pancreas Heart, Intestine, Kidney, Liver, Lung, Pancreas, Heart-Lung, Kidney-Pancreas Heart, Intestine, Kidney, Liver, Lung, Pancreas, Heart-Lung, Kidney-Pancreas Kidney, Liver; Use of HIV positive donor organs is only permissible for kidney and liver transplantation at this time. Hepatitis B Nucleic Acid Test (NAT) Hepatitis C (HCV) Antibody Hepatitis C Nucleic Acid Test (NAT) Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV); Organs from HIV positive donors may only be recovered and transplanted according to the requirements in the Final Rule. 4

  5. Supporting Evidence 5

  6. EBV and CMV positive donors are the norm not the exception Out of 10,326 deceased donors from whom at least one organ was recovered for transplant: 9,205 (89%) tested positive for EBV (IgG or IgM) 6,283 (61%) tested positive for CMV Data Source: UNet data from October 1, 2016 and September 30, 2017 6

  7. EBV and CMV are standard EBV Mismatches: 85% of EBV-negative recipients received an EBV-positive donor organ 2,289 out of 2,691 EBV-negative recipients CMV Mismatches: 57% of CMV-negative recipients received a CMV-positive donor organ 5,687 out of 10,003 CMV-negative recipients Data Source: UNet data from October 1, 2016 and September 30, 2017 7

  8. HCV and HBV positive donors Out of 10,326 deceased donors from whom at least one organ was recovered for transplant: 744 (7.2%) tested positive for HCV antibody 495 (4.8%) tested positive for HCV NAT 478 (4.6%) tested positive for HBV core antibody 15 (0.1%) tested positive for HBV NAT Data Source: UNet data from October 1, 2016 and September 30, 2017 8

  9. What about other conditions? Can still obtain informed consent if warranted Transplant hospitals must still meet applicable informed consent requirements for: State laws CMS Conditions of Participation 9

  10. How will members implement this proposal? Transplant hospitals will need to: Examine and possibly revise their consent protocols and practices to comply with the revised policies Examine practices at both time of listing a potential transplant recipient & at the time of organ offer Provide staff training to understand and comply with the revised policies Possibly revise their current informed consent form or documentation 10

  11. Specific Feedback Two questions Should policy specify patient signature or documentation of discussion in medical record? Are conditions named in policy for candidate screening and re- executing the match run still applicable and complete? 11

  12. How will the OPTN implement this proposal? Anticipated Board Review date: June 11-12, 2018 Anticipated Implementation date: September 1, 2018 No programming in UNetSM 12

  13. How will the OPTN implement this proposal? Evaluation for compliance (site survey new): Medical record documentation that a potential recipient or recipient s agent gave consent before transplant when: An organ was accepted from a donor who tested positive for: Hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb) Hepatitis B nucleic acid test (NAT) Hepatitis C (HCV) antibody Hepatitis C nucleic acid test (NAT) An intestine was accepted from a donor who tested positive for cytomegalovirus (CMV) 13

  14. Questions? Cameron Wolfe, MBBS(Hons), MPH, FIDSA Ad Hoc Disease Transmission Advisory Committee Chair cameron.wolfe@duke.edu Susan Tlusty Ad Hoc Disease Transmission Advisory Committee Liaison Susan.tlusty@unos.org 14

  15. Extra Slides 15

  16. Reporting table Donor: HCV Test Results Recipient: Post-Transplant HCV Test Conversion Report to OPTN? Serology NAT Situation 1: Negative Positive Positive Serology or NAT Do Not Report: Expected Transmission Situation 2: Positive Positive Positive Serology or NAT Do Not Report: Expected Transmission Situation 3: Positive Negative Positive NAT Do Report: Unexpected Transmission Situation 4: Positive Negative Positive Serology but Negative NAT Do Report: Unexpected Transmission 16

  17. Willingness to accept HBV or HCV positive organs varies Out of 116,350 patients on the waitlist, the following would accept an organ: 71,318 (61.3%) from a HBV core positive donor; 8,021 (6.9%) from a HBV NAT positive donor; 8,083 (6.9%) from a HCV antibody positive donor; 1,931 (1.7%) from a HCV NAT positive donor. Out of 272 patients registered as waiting for an intestine: 159 (58.5%) would accept an intestine from a CMV antibody positive donor. Data Source: UNet data as of September 30, 2017 17

  18. Increasing use of HBV and HCV positive organs HBV Mismatches: 774 HBV-negative recipients received an organ from a donor with at least one positive HBV test (among 24,883 HBV- negative recipients) HCV Mismatches: 342 HCV-negative recipients received an organ from a donor with at least one positive HCV test (among 23,879 HCV- negative recipients) CMV Mismatches (Intestines only): 21 CMV-negative recipients received donated intestines from a CMV-positive donor (among a total of 57 CMV-negative intestine recipients and a total of 110 intestine recipients) 18

  19. OPTN Bylaws Appendix L.15. OPTN Determinations and Actions OPTN actions may be imposed when a member: 1. Fails to comply with OPTN Obligations as described in L.1. Member Compliance. Fails to submit or follow a corrective action plan or plan for quality improvement. 2. 3. Fails to meet personnel requirements. 4. Acts in a way that poses a risk to patient health or public safety. 5. Fails to act as necessary to avoid risk to patient health or public safety.

Related


More Related Content