Enhancing Customs Enforcement for Intellectual Property Rights Protection

 
EU Regulation
608/2013
 
 
Gyula Almasi
Gyula Almasi
Chisinau, 
Chisinau, 
February 2018
February 2018
 
This project is funded by
This project is funded by
the European Union
the European Union
 
Role of customs in IPR enforcement
 
Customs enforcement
External border
Airport (travellers, post, express couriers)
Inland controls
Marketplaces, warehouses, shops, vehicles, etc.
Criminal investigations
All IPR related cases
Exception: medicines
 
2
 
Customs enforcement
 
New EU and national regulation as of
01/01/2014
Regulation (EU) No. 608/2013 of the European
Parliament and of the Council
Regulation (EU) No. 1352/2013 of the European
Commission
556/2013. (XII. 31.) Government decree
Changes for both the customs and the right
holders
Information material, trainings
Detailed internal directions on procedure
 
 
3
 
Customs enforcement
 
 
On request (AFA) OR ex-officio
Goods suspected of infringing an IPR
(according to Art. 2. point 1 of the
Reg.)
Goods subject to customs supervision
or customs control (within the customs
territory of the EU)
 
4
 
 
Exceptions:
 
Overrun
Parallel importation
Goods contained in travellers’
personal luggage (of a non-
commercial nature)
 
5
 
Customs enforcement
 
Major changes
 
Shorter procedures
 
Destruction: part of normal
procedure (obligatory)
On consent of relevant parties
 
No need to determine
infringement of IPR based on
national law
 
6
 
Major changes
 
Special procedure for small
consignments
 
Postal or express courier consignments
3 units or less OR less than 2 kg
Destruction: on request (in the AFA)
Exception: perishable goods
Reducing administrative burden and costs
Increased efficiency
 
7
 
Application for Action (AFA)
 
Forms set out in Commission Implementing
Regulation (EU) No 1352/2013 (application and
request for extension)
Union / National application
Entitlement for submission (persons and entities)
Submission to a designated customs department
Decision within 30 working days
Validity max. 1 year
Free of charge
Contains all relevant data and undertakings
 
8
Procedure
Suspension of
release /
detention of
goods
Notification
of declarant
or holder of
goods / RH
Suspicion
during customs
control
Release of goods
Continue
customs
procedure
Continue customs
procedure
Destruction
Legal procedure
§
 
Y
 
N
9
 
Timeline of procedure – on request
 
 
Timeline of procedure – small consignments
 
 
11
 
Destruction of goods
 
In procedures on request or ex-officio
Based on the consent of involved parties
Agreement to destruction may be deemed
Any type of goods
For small consignments
RH requests use of procedure in the AFA
Based on the consent of involved parties
Goods suspected of being counterfeit,
transported in small consignments
Non-perishable goods
 
 
 
 
12
 
Destruction of goods
 
Possibility to forward goods
On the request of the RH
Within the EU
Transit procedure (supervision)
Responsibilities
Responsibility on RH
Under customs supervision
Costs: RH
Samples
Eg. for training purposes
Release into free circulation
 
13
 
Legal proceedings
 
When?
No agreement on destruction
Within 10 (+10) working days from notification
Possibilities of the RH:
Court proceeding
Civil law
Infringement or criminal proceeding
Private motion (complaint by the injured party)
Information for customs
Consequence: release of goods
 
14
 
Obligations of right holders
 
Undertakings in the AFA
Notifications
Updated information
Liability
Bearing costs
 
Quality information for customs
In the AFA
On request of customs
 
15
 
Sanctions
 
Misuse of information
Revoking the decision
Refusing to extend validity period
Suspension of taking actions within validity period
 
Other failures concerning
Notification of the competent customs department
Returning samples
Bearing costs and providing translations
Initiation of legal proceedings
Suspension of taking actions within validity period
 
16
 
 
Before destroying…
 
IF it is needed…
 
 
training purposes…
 
 
17
 
IPR trainings
 
Quarterly seminars
4 times a year
For designated customs officers
Presentations from RH and discussion
 
Thematic seminars
1-2 times a year
For a wider range of customs officers
Presentations from RH
Eg.: medicines, foodstuff, cosmetics, car industry, IT, sports
 
International trainings
Observatory (OHIM)
 
18
 
Legal means of the enforcement
of intellectual property rights
in practice
 
SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE:
 
Customs offices
are authorized - under certain conditions -
to order the destruction of the counterfeit
ed
products without court procedure
Border measures under EU Regulation
608/2013
There is a 
harmonized system
 for customs
applications
 in all EU countries since 2004
Despite the limited financial support 
:
 the 
number of seizures is significant
We are proud of the following:
The 
reputation of Hungarian customs
 is quite good
among trademark owners (in several cases the
activities of Hungarian Customs is also resulted in
successful seizures in the home country of the
supplier/addressee of the counterfeit products)
At 
certain customs offices it is almost impossible to
import
 counterfeit goods
Problems we are facing with:
Less than 
50 per cent
 of all customs offices are
active
 in this field
Though the legal system is the same in the whole
country, there are 
major differences in the practice
of the customs offices
Due to the 
competition of the customs authorities
of the 
EU 
member states the counterfeit importers
tend not to clear in Hungary
 
as Hungarian customs
is quite strict regarding IP rights.
Criminal and civil procedures
In the course of the 
criminal
 procedure 
IP
 rights
can be enforced 
faster
 and
 
cheaper
 than in the
course of the civil procedure
S
eizure
 of the
 counterfeit
 goods in the criminal
procedure can be made in a couple of days, while
in the course of the civil procedure it is almost
impossible
The 
IP right owner has limited rights
 in the criminal
procedure (i.e. the right owner is not entitled to
appeal the decision of the court)
Criminal procedure can be initiated only when the
infringement is straightforward
Sanctions
 in criminal procedures are high – but
the decisions 
did
 not deplete all of them
 
The (practical)
 
SOLUTION
 is
Fortunately 
civil courts
 usually bring 
proper and
professional decisions
, therefore
Combine
 
criminal procedure with civil
procedure
immediately after the seizure in the criminal
procedure
 
 
 
Case study
 
 
seizure under EU Regulation
608/2013
The trademark:
 
The products
Figurative EUTM
Case No. 1 - 
Simplified procedure
under EU Regulation 608/2013
Money box
 
February 25
: 140
 units of 
fake products
 are 
temporarily
seized
 by customs. The customs office notifies us on the
seizure 
and
 calls the importer, that the products can be
destroyed
,
 if the importer does not expressly object to
the destruction.
February 25
:
 
W
e 
inform the trademark owner
s
representative on the seizure.
March 24
:
The customs office
orders the destruction
of the counterfeit
products and
authorises our office to
carry out the
destruction
February 26
: The trademark owner confirms, that the
goods are counterfeit, so we 
request the destruction
of the products in the course of the simplified
procedure.
June 4
: The day of the destruction – the
counterfeit products are smashed into
pieces
 
The trademark owner is obliged to pay the storage
and destruction costs
 
 
 
Case study
 
 
domestic seizure under criminal
laws
 
 
 
The 
products
: counterfeit T-shirts found in the
shop of a supermarket chain
The first trace
:
the hangtag
 
with a
company name and
address
The 
investigation
:
Finding the place of
storage of the
counterfeits
 
 
 
Within 24
 (8)
 hours the
following items had been
done…
 
-
Seizure of the counterfeited goods
-
Secured the evidences (papers,
etc.)
-
Found one or more targeted
criminals
-
Case forwarded to the competent
investigation unit
Steps after the raid
(civil procedure has been initiated
)
Cease & desist letter
 to the
owner of the counterfeit
goods
In the letter we claimed:
 
 
information on the source
 Information on quantities
 Handing over the remaining stock
 Payment of damages
Court procedure…years
Time has passed….
Investigation procedure
Basic: 2 months
Could be extended
 
 
 
In summary…
 
-
Procedure will be
finished within 20 w.
days
 
-
3 stakeholders are
involved
-
Goods will be
destroyed within one
year
-
Costs covered by RH
 
EU 608/2013
 
Enforcement
 
-
Preparatory
procedure will be
finished within 1 day
(done?)
-
More stakeholders are
involved
-
Goods will be
destroyed at the end
of procedure
-
Costs covered by the
Gov.
 
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!
Slide Note
Embed
Share

This project, funded by the European Union, highlights the role of customs in enforcing intellectual property rights (IPR) regulations. It covers new EU and national regulations, outlining procedures for identifying and handling goods suspected of infringing IPR. Major changes include shorter procedures, special measures for small consignments, and simplified application processes for enforcement actions.

  • Customs Enforcement
  • Intellectual Property Rights
  • European Union
  • Regulations
  • Enforcement Actions

Uploaded on Aug 01, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. This project is funded by the European Union EU Regulation 608/2013 Gyula Almasi Chisinau, February 2018

  2. Role of customs in IPR enforcement Customs enforcement External border Airport (travellers, post, express couriers) Inland controls Marketplaces, warehouses, shops, vehicles, etc. Criminal investigations All IPR related cases Exception: medicines 2

  3. Customs enforcement New EU and national regulation as of 01/01/2014 Regulation (EU) No. 608/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council Regulation (EU) No. 1352/2013 of the European Commission 556/2013. (XII. 31.) Government decree Changes for both the customs and the right holders Information material, trainings Detailed internal directions on procedure 3

  4. Customs enforcement On request (AFA) OR ex-officio Goods suspected of infringing an IPR (according to Art. 2. point 1 of the Reg.) Goods subject to customs supervision or customs control (within the customs territory of the EU) 4

  5. Customs enforcement Exceptions: Overrun Parallel importation Goods contained in travellers personal luggage (of a non- commercial nature) 5

  6. Major changes Shorter procedures Destruction: part of normal procedure (obligatory) On consent of relevant parties No need to determine infringement of IPR based on national law 6

  7. Major changes Special procedure for small consignments Postal or express courier consignments 3 units or less OR less than 2 kg Destruction: on request (in the AFA) Exception: perishable goods Reducing administrative burden and costs Increased efficiency 7

  8. Application for Action (AFA) Forms set out in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1352/2013 (application and request for extension) Union / National application Entitlement for submission (persons and entities) Submission to a designated customs department Decision within 30 working days Validity max. 1 year Free of charge Contains all relevant data and undertakings 8

  9. Procedure Notification of declarant or holder of goods / RH Suspension of release / detention of goods Continue customs procedure Suspicion during customs control Release of goods Y N Destruction Continue customs procedure Legal procedure 9

  10. Timeline of procedure on request Monday 1 Tuesday 2 Wednesday 3 Thursday 4 Friday 5 Saturday 6 Sunday 7 Day of suspension of release or detention Notification to the declarant or the holder of the goods Notification to RH (AFA granted) (also possible on previous day) 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Bank holiday 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Answer from the declarant or the holder of the goods Answer from the RH, or request for extension of detention

  11. Timeline of procedure small consignments Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Day of suspension of release or detention Notification to the declarant or the holder of the goods 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Bank holiday 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Answer from the declarant or the holder of the goods Notification to RH if the declarant or the holder of the goods does not agree with destruction 11

  12. Destruction of goods In procedures on request or ex-officio Based on the consent of involved parties Agreement to destruction may be deemed Any type of goods For small consignments RH requests use of procedure in the AFA Based on the consent of involved parties Goods suspected of being counterfeit, transported in small consignments Non-perishable goods 12

  13. Destruction of goods Possibility to forward goods On the request of the RH Within the EU Transit procedure (supervision) Responsibilities Responsibility on RH Under customs supervision Costs: RH Samples Eg. for training purposes Release into free circulation 13

  14. Legal proceedings When? No agreement on destruction Within 10 (+10) working days from notification Possibilities of the RH: Court proceeding Civil law Infringement or criminal proceeding Private motion (complaint by the injured party) Information for customs Consequence: release of goods 14

  15. Obligations of right holders Undertakings in the AFA Notifications Updated information Liability Bearing costs Quality information for customs In the AFA On request of customs 15

  16. Sanctions Misuse of information Revoking the decision Refusing to extend validity period Suspension of taking actions within validity period Other failures concerning Notification of the competent customs department Returning samples Bearing costs and providing translations Initiation of legal proceedings Suspension of taking actions within validity period 16

  17. Before destroying IF it is needed training purposes 17

  18. IPR trainings Quarterly seminars 4 times a year For designated customs officers Presentations from RH and discussion Thematic seminars 1-2 times a year For a wider range of customs officers Presentations from RH Eg.: medicines, foodstuff, cosmetics, car industry, IT, sports International trainings Observatory (OHIM) 18

  19. Legal means of the enforcement of intellectual property rights in practice

  20. Border measures under EU Regulation 608/2013 There is a harmonized system for customs applications in all EU countries since 2004 SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE: Customs offices are authorized - under certain conditions - to order the destruction of the counterfeited products without court procedure

  21. We are proud of the following: Despite the limited financial support : the number of seizures is significant The reputation of Hungarian customs is quite good among trademark owners (in several cases the activities of Hungarian Customs is also resulted in successful seizures in the home country of the supplier/addressee of the counterfeit products) At certain customs offices it is almost impossible to import counterfeit goods

  22. Problems we are facing with: Less than 50 per cent of all customs offices are active in this field Though the legal system is the same in the whole country, there are major differences in the practice of the customs offices Due to the competition of the customs authorities of the EU member states the counterfeit importers tend not to clear in Hungary as Hungarian customs is quite strict regarding IP rights.

  23. Criminal and civil procedures In the course of the criminal procedure IP rights can be enforced faster and cheaper than in the course of the civil procedure Seizure of the counterfeit goods in the criminal procedure can be made in a couple of days, while in the course of the civil procedure it is almost impossible The IP right owner has limited rights in the criminal procedure (i.e. the right owner is not entitled to appeal the decision of the court)

  24. Sanctions in criminal procedures are high but the decisions did not deplete all of them Criminal procedure can be initiated only when the infringement is straightforward

  25. Fortunately civil courts usually bring proper and professional decisions, therefore The (practical) SOLUTION is Combine criminal procedure with civil procedure immediately after the seizure in the criminal procedure

  26. Case study seizure under EU Regulation 608/2013

  27. Case No. 1 - Simplified procedure under EU Regulation 608/2013 The trademark: The products Figurative EUTM Money box

  28. February 25: 140 units of fake products are temporarily seized by customs. The customs office notifies us on the seizure and calls the importer, that the products can be destroyed, if the importer does not expressly object to the destruction. February 25: We inform the trademark owner s representative on the seizure.

  29. February 26: The trademark owner confirms, that the goods are counterfeit, so we request the destruction of the products in the course of the simplified procedure. March 24: The customs office orders the destruction of the counterfeit products and authorises our office to carry out the destruction

  30. June 4: The day of the destruction the counterfeit products are smashed into pieces The trademark owner is obliged to pay the storage and destruction costs

  31. Case study domestic seizure under criminal laws

  32. The products: counterfeit T-shirts found in the shop of a supermarket chain

  33. The first trace: the hangtag with a company name and address The investigation : Finding the place of storage of the counterfeits

  34. Within 24 (8) hours the following items had been done - Seizure of the counterfeited goods Secured the evidences (papers, etc.) - Found one or more targeted criminals Case forwarded to the competent investigation unit - -

  35. Steps after the raid (civil procedure has been initiated) Cease & desist letter to the owner of the counterfeit goods In the letter we claimed: information on the source Information on quantities Handing over the remaining stock Payment of damages

  36. Investigation procedure Basic: 2 months Could be extended Court procedure years Time has passed .

  37. In summary EU 608/2013 Enforcement - Procedure will be finished within 20 w. days Preparatory procedure will be finished within 1 day (done?) More stakeholders are involved - Goods will be destroyed at the end of procedure Costs covered by the Gov. - - - 3 stakeholders are involved Goods will be destroyed within one year Costs covered by RH - - -

  38. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#