Electrocardiographic Abnormalities and Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Type 1 Diabetes

undefined
 
Electrocardiographic Abnormalities and
Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Type 1
Diabetes:  The Epidemiology of Diabetes
Interventions and Complications (EDIC) Study
 
Diabetes Care 2017;40:793–799
 
1
 
Elsayed Z. Soliman, Jye-Yu C. Backlund, Ionut Bebu, Trevor J. Orchard,
Bernard Zinman, John M. Lachin, and the DCCT/EDIC Research Group
Wan-Ting, Lin
2017/08/29
 
Introduction
 
Prior reports have shown that the
 
presence of these ECG
abnormalities in
 
populations without diabetes is associated
with an increased risk of CVD
 
events and all-cause mortality.
 
Similarly, in a small study with a relatively
 
short follow-up, the
presence of ECG
 
markers of myocardial ischemia in patients
with type 1 diabetes was predictive
 
of future coronary heart
disease.
 
However, no comprehensive reports
 
have described the
prognostic
 
significance of ECG abnormalities in patients
 
with
type 1 diabetes, in whom
 
CVD develops at least a decade
sooner
 
compared with the general population.
 
2
 
Aim
 
The purpose of this study
 
was to examine the association
between
 
the presence of 
ECG abnormalities 
and
 
incident
CVD
 events in patients with
 
type 1 diabetes enrolled in
the EDIC
 
Study, providing observational follow-up
 
of the
DCCT cohort.
 
3
 
 
4
the Diabetes Control
 
and
Complications Trial
 
(DCCT)
During 1983–1989
enrolled 1,441 individuals
aged 13–39
 
years old
 
Started in 1994
 
ECG
 
5
 
Major
 
ECG abnormalities
 
 
 
 
 
Minor ECG abnormalities
 
ECG abnormalities were classified as
 
major and
minor abnormalities using
 
the standards of the
Minnesota Code
 
(MC) for ECG classification.
 
Cardiovascular Event
 
All events were adjudicated by a
 
mortality
 
and morbidity
review committee
 
whose members were blinded to the
 
DCCT
treatment group and level of glycemia.
 
These events included
 
the first occurrence of either a nonfatal
myocardial infarction
 
including
Silent
 
myocardial infarction, stroke, confirmed
 
angina, coronary
artery revascularization,
 
and congestive heart failure
 
or death
from any CVD
 
6
 
Covariates
 
Demographic variables (age and sex), smoking, use of lipid-
lowering medications, and use of blood pressure-lowering
medications were self-reported.
 
Fasting lipid profile and albumin excretion were assessed
biennially, in alternate years, whereas HbA1c, BMI, and blood
pressure were measured annually.
as time-dependent covariates
The updated mean values were computed using weights
proportional to the time interval between values because of the
different visit schedules during DCCT and EDIC.
 
7
 
Statistical analysis
 
Clinical characteristics
Wilcoxon rank sum test
Chi-square test
 
The association between ECG abnormalities and CVD
abnormalities
Cox proportional hazard models
time-varying
per number of
 
visits (years)
 
8
 
Statistical analysis
 
Hazard ratio were calculated in
minimally adjusted model (model 1) included age and sex at
baseline (EDIC year 1)
fully adjusted model (model 2) included DCCT cohort and the
most significant time-varying traditional CVD risk factors
 
Participants were censored at the time of an event, death, or
31 December 2013 (the end of follow-up), whichever occurred
first.
 
9
 
 
 
10
 
 
 
11
 
 
12
 
 
 
13
 
 
Limitations
 
The majority of EDIC participants are Caucasian, which may limit
the generalizability of our results to other races/ ethnicities.
 
We used global classification of ECG abnormalities (major, minor)
rather than individual ECG abnormalities. Arguably, different
individual ECG abnormalities might have different associations
with CVD.
 
For example, HbA1c is monitored much more frequently in
contemporary practice than before. If we had used time-fixed
covariates, this could have raised concerns about the conclusions
of our study.
use time-dependent covariates
 
14
 
Strengths
 
The first comprehensive report of the prognostic significance of
ECG abnormalities in type 1 diabetes.
 
The uniform collection of data, including centrally read ECG
data, and the long-term follow-up of a cohort of patients with
type 1 diabetes with extensive phenotyping are just a few of
the many strengths of the EDIC study.
 
15
 
Conclusion
 
In conclusion, the presence of major ECG abnormalities during
the course of type 1 diabetes is associated with an increased
risk of CVD events.
Identifying risk markers/predictors such as ECG abnormalities in
type 1 diabetes could help guide future efforts toward the
development of risk stratification tools to identify those who may
benefit from closer follow-up and earlier, more aggressive risk
factor management.
 
16
Slide Note
Embed
Share

This study examines the association between ECG abnormalities and incident CVD events in patients with type 1 diabetes, focusing on the prognostic significance in a population where CVD develops earlier. Major and minor ECG abnormalities were classified, with cardiovascular events such as myocardial infarction, stroke, angina, and heart failure being monitored. Covariates like age, sex, smoking, and medications were considered in the analysis.

  • ECG abnormalities
  • Type 1 diabetes
  • Cardiovascular disease risk
  • DCCT trial
  • CVD events

Uploaded on Oct 02, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Electrocardiographic Abnormalities and Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Type 1 Diabetes: The Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) Study Elsayed Z. Soliman, Jye-Yu C. Backlund, Ionut Bebu, Trevor J. Orchard, Bernard Zinman, John M. Lachin, and the DCCT/EDIC Research Group Diabetes Care 2017;40:793 799 Wan-Ting, Lin 2017/08/29 1

  2. Introduction Prior reports have shown that the presence of these ECG abnormalities in populations without diabetes is associated with an increased risk of CVD events and all-cause mortality. Similarly, in a small study with a relatively short follow-up, the presence of ECG markers of myocardial ischemia in patients with type 1 diabetes was predictive of future coronary heart disease. However, no comprehensive reports have described the prognostic significance of ECG abnormalities in patients with type 1 diabetes, in whom CVD develops at least a decade sooner compared with the general population. 2

  3. Aim The purpose of this study was to examine the association between the presence of ECG abnormalities and incident CVD events in patients with type 1 diabetes enrolled in the EDIC Study, providing observational follow-up of the DCCT cohort. 3

  4. the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) During 1983 1989 enrolled 1,441 individuals aged 13 39 years old Started in 1994 4

  5. ECG ECG abnormalities were classified as major and minor abnormalities using the standards of the Minnesota Code (MC) for ECG classification. Major ECG abnormalities Minor ECG abnormalities 5

  6. Cardiovascular Event All events were adjudicated by a mortality and morbidity review committee whose members were blinded to the DCCT treatment group and level of glycemia. These events included the first occurrence of either a nonfatal myocardial infarction including Silent myocardial infarction, stroke, confirmed angina, coronary artery revascularization, and congestive heart failure or death from any CVD 6

  7. Covariates Demographic variables (age and sex), smoking, use of lipid- lowering medications, and use of blood pressure-lowering medications were self-reported. Fasting lipid profile and albumin excretion were assessed biennially, in alternate years, whereas HbA1c, BMI, and blood pressure were measured annually. as time-dependent covariates The updated mean values were computed using weights proportional to the time interval between values because of the different visit schedules during DCCT and EDIC. 7

  8. Statistical analysis Clinical characteristics Wilcoxon rank sum test Chi-square test The association between ECG abnormalities and CVD abnormalities Cox proportional hazard models time-varying per number of visits (years) 8

  9. Statistical analysis Hazard ratio were calculated in minimally adjusted model (model 1) included age and sex at baseline (EDIC year 1) fully adjusted model (model 2) included DCCT cohort and the most significant time-varying traditional CVD risk factors Participants were censored at the time of an event, death, or 31 December 2013 (the end of follow-up), whichever occurred first. 9

  10. 10

  11. 11

  12. 12

  13. 13

  14. Limitations The majority of EDIC participants are Caucasian, which may limit the generalizability of our results to other races/ ethnicities. We used global classification of ECG abnormalities (major, minor) rather than individual ECG abnormalities. Arguably, different individual ECG abnormalities might have different associations with CVD. For example, HbA1c is monitored much more frequently in contemporary practice than before. If we had used time-fixed covariates, this could have raised concerns about the conclusions of our study. use time-dependent covariates 14

  15. Strengths The first comprehensive report of the prognostic significance of ECG abnormalities in type 1 diabetes. The uniform collection of data, including centrally read ECG data, and the long-term follow-up of a cohort of patients with type 1 diabetes with extensive phenotyping are just a few of the many strengths of the EDIC study. 15

  16. Conclusion In conclusion, the presence of major ECG abnormalities during the course of type 1 diabetes is associated with an increased risk of CVD events. Identifying risk markers/predictors such as ECG abnormalities in type 1 diabetes could help guide future efforts toward the development of risk stratification tools to identify those who may benefit from closer follow-up and earlier, more aggressive risk factor management. 16

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#