EFL Teachers' Subjective Theories on Pronunciation Training

 
EFL Teachers’ Subjective Theories about
Pronunciation Training (Supported by
Internet Sources)
 
 
  Mgr. Juraj Datko
 
Supported by: KEGA 055UKF-4/2016
 
       UKF: UGA V/3/2016
 
Research aim and questions
 
The aim of the presented study is:
 
 
(1) to explore EFL teachers’ subjective theories (views, attitudes,
perceptions, practices, or suggestions) related to (Internet-
supported) pronunciation training
.
 
We formulated two research questions, namely:
 
 
(RQ1) What are the interviewed EFL teachers’ subjective theories of
pronunciation training?
 
 
(RQ2) What are the interviewed EFL teachers’ subjective theories of
Internet-supported pronunciation training?
 
Research methodology
 
Data collection:
Semi
-
structured interviews 
were used to reconstruct EFL teachers’
subjective theories.
 
The interviews were audio
-
recorded, while the researcher also took
notes.
 
Data analysis:
Qualitative content analysis 
was used to process the transcribed
interview data.
 
The coding framework is based on 
seven analytic categories
and
 
a set of 
twenty
-
eight codes
.
 
Research sample
 
11 high school EFL teachers
 
(5 teachers from Doln
ý Kubín and 6 
teachers from 
Nitra)
 
various lengths of pedagogical practice
 
(5 - 38 years of teaching experience)
 
 
Research analysis and results
 
Category I: 
Teachers’ attitudes towards the importance of pronunciation
training in EFL
classes
 
Category II: 
The goal of pronunciation training as set by EFL teachers
 
Category III: 
Topics to focus on in English pronunciation training
 
Category IV: 
Teachers’ methods of pronunciation training
 
Category V: 
Use of Internet resources in pronunciation training
 
Category VI: 
Teachers’ attitudes towards an Internet-based set of activities
aimed at pronunciation training
 
Category VII: 
Teachers’ suggestions about materials that should be included
in a collection of websites suitable for pronunciation training
 
Research conclusion
 
Ten interviewees
 agree 
that pronunciation training is important in EFL classrooms. On the other
hand, the remaining one respondent relies on students’ activities beyond
 the confines of the EFL
classroom.
 
A slight majority (namely six) of our research subjects (N=11) prefers the more realistic goal of
mutually intelligible pronunciation. The other five teachers attempt to achieve native-likeness.
 
We can deduce that a larger group of our research participants appears to be interested preferably
in prosodic features, i.e. in the topics that are vital for pronunciation training in communicative
approaches to foreign language teaching.
 
On the other hand, the 
referred teaching 
methods suggest that there still does not exist a general
consensus about how to address pronunciation communicatively, since our interview respondents
mentioned rather traditional methods of instruction, namely drilling and reading aloud. In case of ear
training, four of the seven research participants who claimed to employ this method for the purposes
of pronunciation teaching use it in relation to sound discrimination and not for perception of
prosody.
 
As for correction of mispronunciation, the recommended learner-led approach tends to be largely
ignored among the five research subjects who mentioned this technique of pronunciation training.
 
 
 
It seems that the traditional printed textbooks are dominant over electronic web sources for all of our
interviewees. Furthermore, course books represent the only resource for pronunciation work for
seven of our teacher interviewees
 
who also admitted to use only didactic materials for this kind of
training.
 
The other four teachers claim to use textbook-related and also web-based materials, namely the
online pronunciation sections of BBC and British Council, unspecified authentic audio and video
samples, and an online-based school library.
 
In terms of teachers’ attitudes towards web-based pronunciation activities, a group of seven teacher
respondents would appreciate and use such collection of activities in their teaching practice, while a
group of three interviewees would not. The remaining one teacher could not judge.
 
Five of the teacher respondents gave us no advice on what materials to include in
 such
an online-based set of activities
. Due to missing data, we can only deduce that their reluctance is
perhaps connected with an insufficient theoretical knowledge base for pronunciation teaching.
However, the other six interviewees recommend us to search the Internet for
 
videos,
 
audio-samples
(e.g. dialogues, reports, etc),
 
tongue twisters,
 
nursery rhymes, songs,
 
and jazz chants.
Slide Note

Supported by:

Embed
Share

This study delves into EFL teachers' subjective theories regarding pronunciation training, with a focus on Internet-supported practices. Through semi-structured interviews, 11 high school EFL teachers shared their views and attitudes on the importance of pronunciation training in EFL classrooms, as well as their goals in teaching pronunciation. Qualitative content analysis was used to process the data, revealing insights into teachers' perspectives on these aspects of language instruction.

  • EFL teachers
  • Pronunciation training
  • Subjective theories
  • Internet-supported
  • Language instruction

Uploaded on Sep 15, 2024 | 1 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. EFL Teachers Subjective Theories about Pronunciation Training (Supported by Internet Sources) Supported by: KEGA 055UKF-4/2016 UKF: UGA V/3/2016 Mgr. Juraj Datko

  2. Research aim and questions The aim of the presented study is: (1) to explore EFL teachers subjective theories (views, attitudes, perceptions, practices, or suggestions) related to (Internet- supported) pronunciation training. We formulated two research questions, namely: (RQ1) What are the interviewed EFL teachers subjective theories of pronunciation training? (RQ2) What are the interviewed EFL teachers subjective theories of Internet-supported pronunciation training?

  3. Research methodology Datacollection: Semi-structured interviews were used to reconstruct EFL teachers subjective theories. The interviews were audio-recorded, while the researcher also took notes. Dataanalysis: Qualitative content analysis was used to process the transcribed interview data. The coding framework is based on seven analytic categories and a set of twenty-eight codes.

  4. Research sample 11 high school EFLteachers (5 teachers from Doln Kub n and 6 teachers from Nitra) various lengths of pedagogical practice (5 - 38 years of teaching experience)

  5. Research analysis and results Category I: Teachers attitudes towards the importance of pronunciation training in EFL classes Code No. of teachers Example Pronunciation teaching is very important and unavoidable in EFL classrooms. Teachers should not expect their students to acquire correct pronunciation via exposure to English at home . I.) Pronunciation training is important in EFL classes. 4 Pronunciation training is an important element of foreign language teaching and learning, but I would say, that it is even more important for younger learners in the lower levels . II.) Pronunciation training is important in EFL classes, but it is even more important for younger learners starting to learn English. 3 Pronunciation practice is important to a certain degree in our EFL classrooms, but I have some students, no big intellectuals , whose pronunciation has improved through listening to authentic speech in movies and on the Internet . III.) Pronunciation training is important in EFL classes, but students can also benefit from exposure to English outside the classroom. 3 It is not important to focus on pronunciation training during English lessons. Learners train their pronunciation implicitly at home . IV.) Pronunciation training is not important in EFL classes. 1

  6. Category II: The goal of pronunciation training as set by EFL teachers Code No. of teachers Example Instead of striving after perfect pronunciation, the goal of English pronunciation teaching should be easily understandable pronunciation causing no misunderstandings . I.) Mutually intelligible pronunciation 6 The only goal for students of English as a foreign language should be to pronounce as native speakers . 5 II.) Native-like pronunciation

  7. Category III: Topics to focus on in English pronunciation training Code No. of teachers Example Intonation seems to be the most important topic of pronunciation teaching . 9 I.) Intonation I think that suprasegmentals, namely stress, should be highlighted . 8 II.) Stress Students should be exposed to different accents of English, but they should not be taught to imitate them . III.) Variations of English pronunciation 7 It is important to teach them how to produce sounds correctly . IV.) Correct articulation of individual sounds 6 Words must be pronounced correctly, otherwise there will be misunderstandings . V.) Correct pronunciation on the word level 5 /di:/ and /d / are one of the first things I focus on in pronunciation teaching . 2 VI.) Strong and weak forms

  8. Category IV: Teachersmethods of pronunciation training Code No. of teachers Examples 8 I.) Drilling Pronunciation training is a drill . Our students need to be aware of the differences between accents of English, since they often attend exchange programmes or find employment in a multi-cultural environment in foreign countries, where the ability to percept and understand the sound properties of a wider range of both native and non-native English accents is a must . 7 II.) Ear training 5 The participants mentioned the key word reading aloud . III.) Reading aloud I try to correct students pronunciation while reading aloud and during oral presentation in general . 5 IV.) Correction

  9. Category V: Use of Internet resources in pronunciation training Code No. of teachers Examples Recent textbooks are so well- equipped that it would be an enormous waste of time to search the Internet for suitable samples of authentic speech and prepare some other web-based activities . I.) I use only textbook-related resources in pronunciation training. 7 Besides textbook, I use songs, movie scenes, and documentaries found on the Internet . II.) I use both textbook-related and Internet- based resources in pronunciation training. 4

  10. Category VI: Teachers attitudes towards an Internet-based set of activities aimed at pronunciation training Code No. of teachers Examples It would be definitely a great help for teachers, particularly for those who teach beginners, as bad pronunciation habits acquired in the initial phases of foreign language learning are then difficult to root out in the later stages . I.) I would appreciate and use an Internet-based set of activities aimed at pronunciation training. 7 II.) I would not appreciate and use an Internet-based set of activities aimed at pronunciation training. Personally, I would not use it, but for my younger and technically more advanced colleagues, it would surely be a frequently used resource . 3 I cannot decide whether I would or would not use such activities during my lessons . 1 III.) I cannot judge.

  11. Category VII: Teachers suggestions about materials that should be included in a collection of websites suitable for pronunciation training Code No. of teachers Examples These teachers were not able to give us any advice about such materials. 5 I.) No suggestions Subtitled online videos might present a motivating way how to deal with pronunciation . 4 II.) Videos I would search the Internet for authentic audio material such as dialogues or reports . 2 III.) Audio samples 2 IV.) Tongue twisters There are lots of tongue twisters on the BBC website . 1 V.) Nursery rhymes Nursery rhymes, songs, and jazz chants would come in handy for younger pupils . 1 VI.) Songs 1 VII.) Jazz chants

  12. Research conclusion Ten interviewees agree that pronunciation training is important in EFL classrooms. On the other hand, the remaining one respondent relies on students activities beyond the confines of the EFL classroom. A slight majority (namely six) of our research subjects (N=11) prefers the more realistic goal of mutually intelligible pronunciation. The other five teachers attempt to achieve native-likeness. We can deduce that a larger group of our research participants appears to be interested preferably in prosodic features, i.e. in the topics that are vital for pronunciation training in communicative approaches to foreign language teaching. On the other hand, the referred teaching methods suggest that there still does not exist a general consensus about how to address pronunciation communicatively, since our interview respondents mentioned rather traditional methods of instruction, namely drilling and reading aloud. In case of ear training, four of the seven research participants who claimed to employ this method for the purposes of pronunciation teaching use it in relation to sound discrimination and not for perception of prosody. As for correction of mispronunciation, the recommended learner-led approach tends to be largely ignored among the five research subjects who mentioned this technique of pronunciation training.

  13. It seems that the traditional printed textbooks are dominant over electronic web sources for all of our interviewees. Furthermore, course books represent the only resource for pronunciation work for seven of our teacher interviewees who also admitted to use only didactic materials for this kind of training. The other four teachers claim to use textbook-related and also web-based materials, namely the online pronunciation sections of BBC and British Council, unspecified authentic audio and video samples, and an online-based school library. In terms of teachers attitudes towards web-based pronunciation activities, a group of seven teacher respondents would appreciate and use such collection of activities in their teaching practice, while a group of three interviewees would not. The remaining one teacher could not judge. Five of the teacher respondents gave us no advice on what materials to include in such an online-based set of activities. Due to missing data, we can only deduce that their reluctance is perhaps connected with an insufficient theoretical knowledge base for pronunciation teaching. However, the other six interviewees recommend us to search the Internet for videos, audio-samples (e.g. dialogues, reports, etc), tongue twisters, nursery rhymes, songs, and jazz chants.

More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#