- Effective Trial Advocacy: Strategies for Compelling Openings

 
EFFECTIVE TRIAL ADVOCACY:
OPENING ARGUMENT (YES!)
 
DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN
ISLANDS
MID-YEAR CONFERENCE
JULY 11, 2014
PROFESSOR STEPHEN A.
SALTZBURG
 
Opening Statement is An Argument
 
It is an Argument and Judges Who Tried Cases Know This
Nonetheless, Judges Expect that if They Ask, You Say Opening
Statement is What We Expect to Prove and then Argue as Much as the
Law Permits
It is Not Argumentative
We
ll show you that the defendant acted like a vicious animal
But it is powerful
, 
I will prove to you that the defendant stood over the victim, John
Jay, who lay unconscious on the ground, and the defendant took
careful aim, considered carefully his actions, and shot Mr. Jay twice in
the head with the premeditated intent to kill him.
Does it sound like the defendant acted like a vicious animal?
Yes, But You Did Not Say It
 
Openings are Harder than
Closings
 
You Open Before There is Any Evidence
The Jury Has Nothing on Which to Make
Up Its Mind But What You Say, How You
Say it, and Whether You are Able to Bolster
What You Say with Exhibits
Openings are Intended to Persuade; To Turn
a Neutral Juror Into a Committed Juror
Closings are to Confirm
 
Open Strong
 
No One Waits for Long to Begin to Make
Up His/Her Mind
Law Students are Evidence of This
Drop/Add
Right Now in this Room Students Are Deciding
Whether They Like This Course
Afterwards, Principles of Denial and
Rationalization Kick In
 
You Need to Open Strong If You Speak
Second
The Jurors Expect a Response
If You Think that the Jurors Will Wait Until
the Prosecutor or Plaintiff Finishes to Make
Up Their Minds, You Will Open Too Late
Don
t Waive Opening
 
Conn. Ct. App. Judge Douglas S. Lavine, 
The
persuasive power of understatement
, National
Law Journal, August 30, 2010
 
Studies have shown that people form
immediate, sometimes unconscious
opinions about other people within seconds
of meeting them.  We size people up based
on a wide array of factors—how they look,
what they wear, the way they walk and talk,
what they say and how they say it, to name
just a few.
 
Concerns
 
No golden rule reference
No statement of personal beliefs; vouching
No references to inadmissible evidence
No 
argument
 re applicable law
May state 
legal contentions
Careful; Opening may constitute legal
admission and result in a directed verdict
 
Choice of Words
 
I (or we) will prove
The evidence will show
There will be evidence to show
There will evidence from which you can
conclude
There will be evidence from which, I
submit, you can conclude
 
Words are Facilitators of Speech
 
Say it Strongly
You Have Nothing to Lose
If You Say, 
The Evidence Will Show
 the
Jurors Hear that as 
I Will Prove
They are More Likely to Believe You Will
Prove it if You Say it Strongly I
 
Three General Approaches
 
Chronological
Bad – Not An Argument
Witness by Witness
Bad – Not An Argument
One Central Theme
Only Way to Open
 
Nothing Can Stop You From Choosing The
Most Persuasive Techniques
 
You may combine story telling variations:
  
chronological, parallel, reverse…
You should avoid 
witness by witness
summaries
Identify major elements  and marshal details
 
to support each, weave in witnesses, 
 
weave
in less strong points
Begin and end strong
A clear theme lets you choose your organization
 
Prosecute Your Case
 
All Successful Cases are Prosecuted
The Side with the Burden Should Proclaim It
The Other Side Should Assume the Burden and
Move Forward
Even in a Criminal Case, the Defense Can
Promise to Prove that the D is Not Guilty
The Burden Does Not Shift Because You Make a
Statement
 
Going First and Second
 
The Person Who Goes First Has the Advantage – Can
Address Everything 1
st
Remember that the Jury Must Hear the Explanation
Before It Knows There is an Accusation
The Person Who Goes Second Must Listen with Great
Care and Use Omissions, Mistakes or Concessions by the
One Who Goes First
The Order of the Second Opening Should Never Be
Dictated by the Order of the First Opening
 
THE KEY: THE RIGHT
THEME
 
The Most Important Task of the Advocate is Choosing the
Right Theme
To Choose the Theme, You Must Account for all Facts
What are the Facts?
They Are What the Jury Will Believe at the End!
You Must Decide What at the Beginning What They Will
Believe, Not What You Hope or Wish They Will Believe
This is Also the Most Difficult Task for an Advocate
Requires Cold, Hard Judgment and 
RELIANCE ON THE
RULES AND LAWS OF PROBABILITY
 
4 Ways of Dealing with Bad Stuff
 
Lie about it – suicidal
Ignore it – open yourself to charge of
half-truths
Admit it – identifies it as a weakness
Make it fit your theme as much as
possible
 
Don
t Tell the Jury that an Opening is Not
Evidence
Don
t Waste Time Describing How the
Trial Will Proceed
If You are Concerned that the Jury May not
Understand the Trial Process, Ask the Judge
to Instruct Jurors 
Before You Open
Do Not Wind-Up
 
Don
t Read Your Opening
 
Boring
Does Not Establish Credibility
Lose Eye Contact
Judge May Restrict Your Time or Tell
You not to Open on a Point
 
Some Dos
 
Notes are Fine
Where to Stand in the Courtroom?
Use Pauses, Steps and Voice for
Emphasis
Use Exhibits if Permitted
 
Exhibits Span the Spectrum
 
Exhibits and demonstrative aids—
Video, power point, visual presenter, digital
 
documents
Active media--flip chart, black board, etc.
Actual  objects--heart valve, implants, pills, road
 
signs, prosthesis, contracts, receipts, etc.
Models, replicas (legal pads and paper cups--
  
Franklin Stainless Steel v. Marlo Transport)
Photos, blow-ups of photos, documents, etc.
Hard copy for jurors to hold
 
Civil and Criminal Cases are
Different
 
Criminal Case: Pros May Not Refer to What
the Defense Will Be
Pros Bears the Burden of Persuasion
5
th
 Amend Issues Abound
Civil Case: Pleadings are Admissions,
Either Side May Refer to What the Other
Has Claimed
Don
t Sound Defensive, However
Make Your Affirmative Case
 
Some Tips
 
Be full and complete
Hold back nothing essential
Not promise what you cannot deliver
Embrace your claims without reservation
Disclose and explain the bad and the ugly
  
…inoculate and preempt
Be honest and objective –no overreaching
Use common sense, rules and laws of probability
 
More Tips
 
Look ALL jurors in the eye
Appear and be organized
Use various media
Smile appropriately–imparts confidence even in a
case with serious and tragic facts
Body movement, gestures, position can all be used
to be interesting
Be prepared for the unexpected!  What?  How?
 
Some Themes
 
A broken promise
Asleep at the wheel
____ would not be here if________
Broken trust
A mothers pleas were ignored
A baby cannot speak but must be listened to
The short answer to  why are we here
 
Testing the Opening
 
Was it persuasive?
Can you identify the theme?
Can you identify and articulate the theory?
Can you identify a particular order and sequence?
Does the language used create visual
  
images of the scene and parties?
Do you believe it?
Do you believe it is compelling?
Were exhibits/media used meaningfully?
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Crafting a powerful opening statement in trial advocacy is crucial to persuading the jury and setting the tone for the case. This article emphasizes the importance of opening arguments, providing insights on how to structure and deliver them effectively. It discusses the significance of opening strong, avoiding waiver of openings, and the differences between openings and closings. Practical tips and expert advice from legal professionals are highlighted to help advocates master the art of compelling openings.

  • Trial advocacy
  • Opening statement
  • Persuasive techniques
  • Legal strategy
  • Courtroom tactics

Uploaded on Sep 17, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. EFFECTIVE TRIAL ADVOCACY: OPENING ARGUMENT (YES!) DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS MID-YEAR CONFERENCE JULY 11, 2014 PROFESSOR STEPHEN A. SALTZBURG

  2. Opening Statement is An Argument It is an Argument and Judges Who Tried Cases Know This Nonetheless, Judges Expect that if They Ask, You Say Opening Statement is What We Expect to Prove and then Argue as Much as the Law Permits It is Not Argumentative We ll show you that the defendant acted like a vicious animal But it is powerful , I will prove to you that the defendant stood over the victim, John Jay, who lay unconscious on the ground, and the defendant took careful aim, considered carefully his actions, and shot Mr. Jay twice in the head with the premeditated intent to kill him. Does it sound like the defendant acted like a vicious animal? Yes, But You Did Not Say It

  3. Openings are Harder than Closings You Open Before There is Any Evidence The Jury Has Nothing on Which to Make Up Its Mind But What You Say, How You Say it, and Whether You are Able to Bolster What You Say with Exhibits Openings are Intended to Persuade; To Turn a Neutral Juror Into a Committed Juror Closings are to Confirm

  4. Open Strong No One Waits for Long to Begin to Make Up His/Her Mind Law Students are Evidence of This Drop/Add Right Now in this Room Students Are Deciding Whether They Like This Course Afterwards, Principles of Denial and Rationalization Kick In

  5. Dont Waive Opening You Need to Open Strong If You Speak Second The Jurors Expect a Response If You Think that the Jurors Will Wait Until the Prosecutor or Plaintiff Finishes to Make Up Their Minds, You Will Open Too Late

  6. Conn. Ct. App. Judge Douglas S. Lavine, The persuasive power of understatement, National Law Journal, August 30, 2010 Studies have shown that people form immediate, sometimes unconscious opinions about other people within seconds of meeting them. We size people up based on a wide array of factors how they look, what they wear, the way they walk and talk, what they say and how they say it, to name just a few.

  7. Concerns No golden rule reference No statement of personal beliefs; vouching No references to inadmissible evidence No argument re applicable law May state legal contentions Careful; Opening may constitute legal admission and result in a directed verdict

  8. Choice of Words I (or we) will prove The evidence will show There will be evidence to show There will evidence from which you can conclude There will be evidence from which, I submit, you can conclude

  9. Words are Facilitators of Speech Say it Strongly You Have Nothing to Lose If You Say, The Evidence Will Show the Jurors Hear that as I Will Prove They are More Likely to Believe You Will Prove it if You Say it Strongly I

  10. Three General Approaches Chronological Bad Not An Argument Witness by Witness Bad Not An Argument One Central Theme Only Way to Open

  11. Nothing Can Stop You From Choosing The Most Persuasive Techniques You may combine story telling variations: chronological, parallel, reverse You should avoid witness by witness summaries Identify major elements and marshal details to support each, weave in witnesses, weave in less strong points Begin and end strong A clear theme lets you choose your organization

  12. Prosecute Your Case All Successful Cases are Prosecuted The Side with the Burden Should Proclaim It The Other Side Should Assume the Burden and Move Forward Even in a Criminal Case, the Defense Can Promise to Prove that the D is Not Guilty The Burden Does Not Shift Because You Make a Statement

  13. Going First and Second The Person Who Goes First Has the Advantage Can Address Everything 1st Remember that the Jury Must Hear the Explanation Before It Knows There is an Accusation The Person Who Goes Second Must Listen with Great Care and Use Omissions, Mistakes or Concessions by the One Who Goes First The Order of the Second Opening Should Never Be Dictated by the Order of the First Opening

  14. THE KEY: THE RIGHT THEME The Most Important Task of the Advocate is Choosing the Right Theme To Choose the Theme, You Must Account for all Facts What are the Facts? They Are What the Jury Will Believe at the End! You Must Decide What at the Beginning What They Will Believe, Not What You Hope or Wish They Will Believe This is Also the Most Difficult Task for an Advocate Requires Cold, Hard Judgment and RELIANCE ON THE RULES AND LAWS OF PROBABILITY

  15. 4 Ways of Dealing with Bad Stuff Lie about it suicidal Ignore it open yourself to charge of half-truths Admit it identifies it as a weakness Make it fit your theme as much as possible

  16. Do Not Wind-Up Don t Tell the Jury that an Opening is Not Evidence Don t Waste Time Describing How the Trial Will Proceed If You are Concerned that the Jury May not Understand the Trial Process, Ask the Judge to Instruct Jurors Before You Open

  17. Dont Read Your Opening Boring Does Not Establish Credibility Lose Eye Contact Judge May Restrict Your Time or Tell You not to Open on a Point

  18. Some Dos Notes are Fine Where to Stand in the Courtroom? Use Pauses, Steps and Voice for Emphasis Use Exhibits if Permitted

  19. Exhibits Span the Spectrum Exhibits and demonstrative aids Video, power point, visual presenter, digital documents Active media--flip chart, black board, etc. Actual objects--heart valve, implants, pills, road signs, prosthesis, contracts, receipts, etc. Models, replicas (legal pads and paper cups-- Franklin Stainless Steel v. Marlo Transport) Photos, blow-ups of photos, documents, etc. Hard copy for jurors to hold

  20. Civil and Criminal Cases are Different Criminal Case: Pros May Not Refer to What the Defense Will Be Pros Bears the Burden of Persuasion 5thAmend Issues Abound Civil Case: Pleadings are Admissions, Either Side May Refer to What the Other Has Claimed Don t Sound Defensive, However Make Your Affirmative Case

  21. Some Tips Be full and complete Hold back nothing essential Not promise what you cannot deliver Embrace your claims without reservation Disclose and explain the bad and the ugly inoculate and preempt Be honest and objective no overreaching Use common sense, rules and laws of probability

  22. More Tips Look ALL jurors in the eye Appear and be organized Use various media Smile appropriately imparts confidence even in a case with serious and tragic facts Body movement, gestures, position can all be used to be interesting Be prepared for the unexpected! What? How?

  23. Some Themes A broken promise Asleep at the wheel ____ would not be here if________ Broken trust A mothers pleas were ignored A baby cannot speak but must be listened to The short answer to why are we here

  24. Testing the Opening Was it persuasive? Can you identify the theme? Can you identify and articulate the theory? Can you identify a particular order and sequence? Does the language used create visual images of the scene and parties? Do you believe it? Do you believe it is compelling? Were exhibits/media used meaningfully?

More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#