Debates on the Mode of Production in Indian Agriculture
Dr. S. Mehdi Abbas Zaidi
Associate Professor
Department of Sociology
Shia P.G. College, Lucknow
E-mail -mehdi.abbas92@gmail.com
Contact No. - +91-9839287412
&
Ms. Bushra Fatima
Assistant Professor
DEBATES ON THE
MODE OF
PRODUCTION
Debates on the Mode of Production in
Indian Agriculture
•
The production process involves the interaction of three
elements with one another.
•
The first element is the ‘object of labour’ , that is, that which
is the objective of human activity.
•
It embraces two groups:
•
a) materials directly obtained in natural conditions and converted
into a product. It may be landas the universal object of labour,
deposits of minerals and oil, ores, fish in natural water reservoirs etc,
and
•
b) previously processed materials. These are called raw materials
(for instance, yarn in textile production, metals or plastics at an
engineering plant, etc..
Continuum
•
The second element is the ‘instruments of labour’ or the
‘implements of labour’, that is, that by means of which man
exerts an influence, whether directly or indirectly, on the
diverse objects of labour.
•
This includes the simplest instruments like the hammer and the
spade, and the most diverse machines, like tractors, excavators,
machine-tools, automatic lines and the most complicated
assemblies.
•
Among the instruments of labour exerting an indirect influence
on the process of production are buildings, factories and plants,
transport routes, airports and seaports, and storage facilities.
•
The objects of labour and the instruments of labour, taken
together, comprise the means of production.
Continuum
•
The interaction of these two elements or the means of
production with the third element that is, labour itself which
involves ‘people’s conscientious and purposeful activity by
which they alter natural objects, adapting them to satisfy their
own requirements’ taken together characterise the productive
power of labour, the productive forces of the society.
•
The relations of production correspond to a definite stage of
development of their material productive forces and hence
with different levels of development of the productive forces,
different relations of production are observed.
Continuum
•
These constitute an intricate and highly ramified system
covering the relations, which people establish with each other
in the process of production, distribution, exchange and
consumption of the goods of life.
•
They are the social form of production through which people
appropriate the objects of nature.
•
Central to the whole system of relations of production are the
relations of property in the means of production.
•
These are the relations that determine the existence of the
various classes and social groups, their status in the society,
and their living conditions
Continuum
•
Mode of production implies an ‘integrated complex’ or unity
of these two inter-dependent entities—productive forces or
forces of production and social relations of production.
•
Mode of production is ‘an articulated combination of relations
and forces of production’.
Types of Modes of Production
•
Pre capitalist mode of Production / Subsistence Agriculture
•
Petty production
•
Localised production, circulation and appropriation
•
Non-monetisation
•
Production for use rather than for exchange
•
Investment of capital in trade and usury
•
Absolute rent rather than ground rent
•
Rent in kind rather than rent in money
•
Low pace of technology and lack of Mechanisation
Continuum
•
Capitalist Mode of Production / Industrialized Agriculture
•
Free Wage Labourer
•
Market
•
Capital Reinvestment and Surplus Appropriation
•
Profit accumulation
•
Generalised Commodity Production
•
Class Contradiction
The Debate in Indian Agriculture
•
Debate has been raised in India on the nature of Indian
agrarian economy.
•
A study on differentiation of peasantry by
S C Gupta
(1962)
who classified farmers into:
•
a. Capitalist farmers
•
b. Market Oriented large Family farms
•
c. Small Holders
•
The publication of a study in 1969 on Big Farmers of Punjab by
Ashok Rudra, A Majid
and
B D Talib
carried out by the Agro-
Economic Research Centre of the University of Delhi.
Continuum
•
The study more for a search for capitalist farmer which are
identified by the following characteristics:
•
(a) A capitalist farmer will tend to cultivate his land himself rather
than give it out on lease;
•
(b) he would tend to use hired labour in a much greater proportion
than family labour;
•
(c) he would tend to use farm machinery;
•
(d) he would be market-oriented; i e, he would tend to market an
important share of his produce; and,
•
(e) he would be profit-minded; i.e, he would tend to so organise his
production as to yield a high rate of return on his investments.
Continuum
•
Daniel Thorner
, a longtime observer of India's agriculture,
and also
Kotovsky
in West Bengal earlier, who had concluded
from his own rural tours that a new era of capitalist
agriculture was beginning.
•
Then in 1971
Utsha Patnaik
argued, from her own study of
1969, that a new capitalist farmer class was indeed beginning
to emerge.
•
Rudra, Patnaik, Paresh Chattopadhyay, Ranjit Sau, Hamza
Alavi, Jairus Banraji,Harry Cleaver, Amit Bhaduri, Pradhan
Prasad
(1973, 74) and numerous other Indian and foreign
scholars became involved in these debates.
Continuum
•
Mc Eachernsums
up the debate around four indicators of
capitalist agriculture:
•
Generalised Commodity Production,
•
Emergence of free wage labour,
•
Capital Investment,
•
Irrevalence of share-cropping,
•
Usury and tenancy.
•
Amit Bhaduri
(1973) in his study of West Bengal characterised
the system as 'semi-feudalism’.
•
Pradhan Prasad
(1973-74) also found in his study of Bihar that
the social formation in rural Bihar is predominantly semi-
feudal.
Continuum
•
Prasad
lists four prominent features of semi-feudalism:
•
Sharecropping,
•
Perpetual indebtedness of the small tenants,
•
Concentration of two modes of exploitation, namely usury & land
ownership in the hands of the same economic class, and
•
Lack of access to the market by small farmers.
•
According to
Utsha Pattanaik
the distinction between pre-
capitalist/Feudal mode of Production and a capitalist variant
lies not in whether labour is free or un-free but rather on the
productive reinvestment of surplus and accumulation of
capital.
Continuum
•
Indian agriculture is largely pre-capitalist, though there exists
within a prevailing non-capitalist mode of production, a small
but growing class of capitalist.
•
Humza Alvi
and also
Jairus Bannerji
, point to a colonial mode
of production in agriculture.
•
The real changes happening in agriculture has its genesis in
the demands of imperialism and its agrarian policy.
•
The present changes in agriculture has a distinct colonial
legacy and hence it can be better understood as a colonial
mode of production.
Continuum
•
Gail Omvedt
is of the opinion that the debate over the 'mode
of production in Indian agriculture grew out of a milieu where
scholars steeped in classic Marxist notions of feudalism,
capitalism and imperialism confronted a changing empirical
reality.
•
In retrospect, it now appears that the data base of the whole
debate was scanty, though by the late 1960s, important
economic changes in agriculture had been initiated, and the
process of destroying pre-independence forms of landlordism
and laying of the foundations of an industrial and
infrastructural development that could supply inputs to
agriculture was beginning to produce real changes.
Continuum
•
Indian agriculture was becoming capitalist.
•
She argues that the mode of production in agriculture have
become all the more complex over the years and three classes
can be discerned today in agriculture, namely,
•
capitalist farmers,
•
middle Peasants, and
•
semi-Proletarianised poor peasants and labourers.
•
Omvedt
also point to the fact that the Capitalism we find
today is a capitalism that is developing within a post-colonial
economy totally bound up with imperialism affected in
specific ways.
Continuum
•
The still potent retrogressive impact of certain semi-feudal
features of Indian social organization, including caste and
oppression of women.
•
The 'mode of production' de-bate was provoked by real
changes occurring in Indian agriculture, expressed politically
in the Naxalbari revolt ,new organising of agricultural
labourers and the repression of this organising by the rural
elite.
Reference
•
Dr. Adhikary C.D. , Mode of Production Debate in Indian
Agriculture
THANK YOU
Dr. S. Mehdi Abbas Zaidi and Ms. Bushra Fatima discuss the elements of production in Indian agriculture, including the objects of labor, instruments of labor, and the role of labor itself. They explain how these components interact to form the productive power of labor and shape the relations of production in society, particularly in relation to property ownership.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
DEBATES ON THE MODE OF PRODUCTION Dr. S. Mehdi Abbas Zaidi Associate Professor Department of Sociology Shia P.G. College, Lucknow E-mail - mehdi.abbas92@gmail.com Contact No. - +91-9839287412 & Ms. Bushra Fatima Assistant Professor
Debates on the Mode of Production in Indian Agriculture The production process involves the interaction of three elements with one another. The first element is the object of labour , that is, that which is the objective of human activity. It embraces two groups: a) materials directly obtained in natural conditions and converted into a product. It may be landas the universal object of labour, deposits of minerals and oil, ores, fish in natural water reservoirs etc, and b) previously processed materials. These are called raw materials (for instance, yarn in textile production, metals or plastics at an engineering plant, etc..
Continuum The second element is the instruments of labour or the implements of labour , that is, that by means of which man exerts an influence, whether directly or indirectly, on the diverse objects of labour. This includes the simplest instruments like the hammer and the spade, and the most diverse machines, like tractors, excavators, machine-tools, automatic lines and the most complicated assemblies. Among the instruments of labour exerting an indirect influence on the process of production are buildings, factories and plants, transport routes, airports and seaports, and storage facilities. The objects of labour and the instruments of labour, taken together, comprise the means of production.
Continuum The interaction of these two elements or the means of production with the third element that is, labour itself which involves people s conscientious and purposeful activity by which they alter natural objects, adapting them to satisfy their own requirements taken together characterise the productive power of labour, the productive forces of the society. The relations of production correspond to a definite stage of development of their material productive forces and hence with different levels of development of the productive forces, different relations of production are observed.
Continuum These constitute an intricate and highly ramified system covering the relations, which people establish with each other in the process of production, distribution, exchange and consumption of the goods of life. They are the social form of production through which people appropriate the objects of nature. Central to the whole system of relations of production are the relations of property in the means of production. These are the relations that determine the existence of the various classes and social groups, their status in the society, and their living conditions
Continuum Mode of production implies an integrated complex or unity of these two inter-dependent entities productive forces or forces of production and social relations of production. Mode of production is an articulated combination of relations and forces of production .
Types of Modes of Production Pre capitalist mode of Production / Subsistence Agriculture Petty production Localised production, circulation and appropriation Non-monetisation Production for use rather than for exchange Investment of capital in trade and usury Absolute rent rather than ground rent Rent in kind rather than rent in money Low pace of technology and lack of Mechanisation
Continuum Capitalist Mode of Production / Industrialized Agriculture Free Wage Labourer Market Capital Reinvestment and Surplus Appropriation Profit accumulation Generalised Commodity Production Class Contradiction
The Debate in Indian Agriculture Debate has been raised in India on the nature of Indian agrarian economy. A study on differentiation of peasantry by S C Gupta (1962) who classified farmers into: a. Capitalist farmers b. Market Oriented large Family farms c. Small Holders The publication of a study in 1969 on Big Farmers of Punjab by Ashok Rudra, A Majid and B D Talib carried out by the Agro- Economic Research Centre of the University of Delhi.
Continuum The study more for a search for capitalist farmer which are identified by the following characteristics: (a) A capitalist farmer will tend to cultivate his land himself rather than give it out on lease; (b) he would tend to use hired labour in a much greater proportion than family labour; (c) he would tend to use farm machinery; (d) he would be market-oriented; i e, he would tend to market an important share of his produce; and, (e) he would be profit-minded; i.e, he would tend to so organise his production as to yield a high rate of return on his investments.
Continuum Daniel Thorner, a longtime observer of India's agriculture, and also Kotovsky in West Bengal earlier, who had concluded from his own rural tours that a new era of capitalist agriculture was beginning. Then in 1971 Utsha Patnaik argued, from her own study of 1969, that a new capitalist farmer class was indeed beginning to emerge. Rudra, Patnaik, Paresh Chattopadhyay, Ranjit Sau, Hamza Alavi, Jairus Banraji,Harry Cleaver, Amit Bhaduri, Pradhan Prasad (1973, 74) and numerous other Indian and foreign scholars became involved in these debates.
Continuum Mc Eachernsums up the debate around four indicators of capitalist agriculture: Generalised Commodity Production, Emergence of free wage labour, Capital Investment, Irrevalence of share-cropping, Usury and tenancy. Amit Bhaduri (1973) in his study of West Bengal characterised the system as 'semi-feudalism . Pradhan Prasad (1973-74) also found in his study of Bihar that the social formation in rural Bihar is predominantly semi- feudal.
Continuum Prasad lists four prominent features of semi-feudalism: Sharecropping, Perpetual indebtedness of the small tenants, Concentration of two modes of exploitation, namely usury & land ownership in the hands of the same economic class, and Lack of access to the market by small farmers. According to Utsha Pattanaikthe distinction between pre- capitalist/Feudal mode of Production and a capitalist variant lies not in whether labour is free or un-free but rather on the productive reinvestment of surplus and accumulation of capital.
Continuum Indian agriculture is largely pre-capitalist, though there exists within a prevailing non-capitalist mode of production, a small but growing class of capitalist. Humza Alvi and also Jairus Bannerji, point to a colonial mode of production in agriculture. The real changes happening in agriculture has its genesis in the demands of imperialism and its agrarian policy. The present changes in agriculture has a distinct colonial legacy and hence it can be better understood as a colonial mode of production.
Continuum Gail Omvedt is of the opinion that the debate over the 'mode of production in Indian agriculture grew out of a milieu where scholars steeped in classic Marxist notions of feudalism, capitalism and imperialism confronted a changing empirical reality. In retrospect, it now appears that the data base of the whole debate was scanty, though by the late 1960s, important economic changes in agriculture had been initiated, and the process of destroying pre-independence forms of landlordism and laying of the foundations of an industrial and infrastructural development that could supply inputs to agriculture was beginning to produce real changes.
Continuum Indian agriculture was becoming capitalist. She argues that the mode of production in agriculture have become all the more complex over the years and three classes can be discerned today in agriculture, namely, capitalist farmers, middle Peasants, and semi-Proletarianised poor peasants and labourers. Omvedt also point to the fact that the Capitalism we find today is a capitalism that is developing within a post-colonial economy totally bound up with imperialism affected in specific ways.
Continuum The still potent retrogressive impact of certain semi-feudal features of Indian social organization, including caste and oppression of women. The 'mode of production' de-bate was provoked by real changes occurring in Indian agriculture, expressed politically in the Naxalbari revolt ,new organising of agricultural labourers and the repression of this organising by the rural elite.
Reference Dr. Adhikary C.D. , Mode of Production Debate in Indian Agriculture
