Criticisms on Bentham's Utilitarianism Theory
Criticisms of Jeremy Bentham's utilitarianism theory include justifying any crime for the greater pleasure, impracticability due to individual knowledge constraints, neglecting moral consciousness, oversimplifying human nature, and focusing solely on material comforts over spiritual happiness. The theory also overlooks the qualitative aspect of pleasures, emphasizing only quantity.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
CRITICISMS ON BENTHAM S THEORY Presented by: Rinkey Sharma Assistant Professor of Law IILS
CRITICISMS 1. One Utilitarianism was that it justified any crime and even made it morally compulsory to achieve the satisfaction of pleasure for the greatest number. 2. According to Friedman, there are two shortcomings in the Bentham s theory. First, he over estimated the powers of the legislature and underestimated the need for individual discretion application of law. Second, his theory fails to balance individual interest and community. criticism against theory of Bentham s and flexibility in the social interest of the
3. Another complaint presented was that the theory is impracticable. The theory assumes that an individual information and knowledge to calculate the consequences of an act, evaluate their worth and make comparison with other alternative acts before taking actions. has sufficient time,
4. The moral and psychological basis of utilitarianism is not real: Utilitarianism is based on the notion that whatever functions should or should not be performed by the individual should be tested on the touch-stone of utility. If this notion is accepted, each individual will work only for his own pleasure. He will ignore benevolence, renunciation, service and sacrifice. This is the main drawback of Bentham s theory. That is why Carlyal said angrily, Bentham s theory is the theory of the pigs . He thought that man is also a fleshy body, who need only physical pleasure and nothing else. There is no place for a thing like moral consciousness in his conscience .
5. Against human nature: The utilitarian s are of the view that the individual does every work for the attainment of pleasure and for the avoidance of pain. But this analysis of human nature is one- sided. The fact is that human nature is complex. He has qualities like pity, faith, service, benevolence, love, sympathy, sacrifice and forgiveness in him. He fixes his high ideals on the basis of these qualities and bears every type of pain smilingly. For instance, when India was under the foreign rule, many people faced many hardships at the hands of Britishers. They did all these not for their personal pleasure but for their high ideals. Buddha, Christ, Shivaji, Guru Gobind Singh, V.D. Savarkar, B.G. Tilak, Subhash Chandra Bose and Mahatma Gandhi sacrificed everything not for any personal pleasure but for high ideal of benevolence.
6. Emphasis upon the material comforts only and ignored the spiritual happiness: The utilitarian s have cared only for physical comfort, and have ignored the suppression of sense and self-control. They have also no cared for the spiritual comfort which one derives from self-sacrifice for the sake of humanity. 7. It is improper to lay emphasis solely upon the quantity of pleasures: Bentham has stressed only upon the quantity of pleasure. He has not taken up the qualitative difference; therefore, John Stuart Mill has taken up the qualitative difference, which is appropriate.
