Contemplating the Divine: Teleological Arguments for Intelligent Design
“What could be more clear or obvious
when we look up to the sky and
contemplate the heavens, than that
there is some divinity or superior
intelligence?”
Cicero
(107 BCE-44 BCE)
DO NOT
LOOK DIRECTLY AT
THE SUN
IT WILL DAMAGE YOUR
EYES
DO NOT
TAKE PHOTOS ON
YOUR PHONE
IT WILL DAMAGE THE
CAMERA and YOUR EYES!
Some
teleological
(design)
arguments
for the
existence of
God
Sir Isaac Newton (1642-1726/7)
“Blind Fate could never make all the Planets move
one and the same way in concentric orbs.... Such a
wonderful Uniformity in the Planetary System …is
associated with the first Creation by the Counsel of
an intelligent Agent… it’s unphilosophical to seek for
any other Origin of the World, or to pretend that it
might arise out of a Chaos by the mere Laws of
Nature”.
(
Opticks
, 1717/1718)
Intelligent design or chance?
When Isaac Newton discovered the
existence of
gravity
, religious believers
saw it as part of God’s design to keep
the regular movement of the heavenly
bodies (planets/stars) in the universe.
Newton rejects the idea that the
Universe was created through chance
and that the order resulted from chaos.
He argues that there must have been an
‘intelligent agent’ which set this order in
place.
•
Paley used evidence from astronomy and
Newton’s laws of motion and gravity to prove
design in the universe.
•
He pointed to the rotation in the solar system
and how they obey the same laws universal
laws and hold their orbits due to gravity.
•
He believed and argued
that this could not
come about by chance.
•
He concluded an external agent must have
imposed order on the universe as a whole and
on its many parts and this agent is God.
William Paley (1743-1805)
Design qua regularity
argument
The Ozone layer- evidence of God?
C.20
th
philosopher
Arthur Brown agreed
with the design
argument based on
astronomy giving the
ozone layer as
evidence of design.
Far too unlikely for the world to exist
by chance?
The odds of life… would you bet?
Just one factor among many in the
cosmos, the difference between
expansive and contractive forces in
the expanding cosmos according to
one theory, depends upon an
extremely fine balance of the total
energy, the odds of which are:
10
60
: 1
John Polkinghorne
(a scientist and Church
of England minister)
This is equivalent to taking
aim from Earth and hitting an
inch-wide target at the
farthest reaches of the
observable universe.
1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000:1
When gazing at the heavens, the eloquent words of Cicero and the insights of Sir Isaac Newton and William Paley prompt contemplation on the existence of a divine or intelligent force shaping the universe. The discussion delves into teleological arguments, highlighting the order and design observed in celestial bodies as evidence of a deliberate creator rather than mere chance. These reflections on design in the cosmos prompt consideration of philosophical and religious perspectives on the origin and purpose of the universe.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
http://www.blazingcatfur.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/eclps11-620x419.jpghttp://www.blazingcatfur.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/eclps11-620x419.jpg What could be more clear or obvious when we look up to the sky and contemplate the heavens, than that there is some divinity or superior intelligence? Cicero (107 BCE-44 BCE)
http://www.independent.co.uk/incoming/article10069226.ece/alternates/w620/eclipse.jpghttp://www.independent.co.uk/incoming/article10069226.ece/alternates/w620/eclipse.jpg
Some teleological (design) arguments for the existence of God
Sir Isaac Newton (1642-1726/7) Blind Fate could never make all the Planets move one and the same way in concentric orbs.... Such a wonderful Uniformity in the Planetary System is associated with the first Creation by the Counsel of an intelligent Agent it s unphilosophical to seek for any other Origin of the World, or to pretend that it might arise out of a Chaos by the mere Laws of Nature . ( Opticks, 1717/1718)
Intelligent design or chance? When Isaac Newton discovered the existence of gravity, religious believers saw it as part of God s design to keep the regular movement of the heavenly bodies (planets/stars) in the universe. Newton rejects the idea that the Universe was created through chance and that the order resulted from chaos. He argues that there must have been an intelligent agent which set this order in place.
William Paley (1743-1805) Design qua regularity argument Paley used evidence from astronomy and Newton s laws of motion and gravity to prove design in the universe. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ed/William-Paley.png He pointed to the rotation in the solar system and how they obey the same laws universal laws and hold their orbits due to gravity. He believed and argued that this could not come about by chance. He concluded an external agent must have imposed order on the universe as a whole and on its many parts and this agent is God.
The Ozone layer- evidence of God? https://www.acs.org/content/acs/en/education/resources/highschool/chemmatters/past-issues/archive-2012-2013/ozone-layer-our-global-sunscreen/_jcr_content/mainContent/columnsbootstrap/column0/textimage_0/image.img.jpg/1368218980203.jpg C.20th philosopher Arthur Brown agreed with the design argument based on astronomy giving the ozone layer as evidence of design.
Far too unlikely for the world to exist by chance? The odds of life would you bet? John Polkinghorne (a scientist and Church of England minister) Just one factor among many in the cosmos, the difference between expansive and contractive forces in the expanding cosmos according to one theory, depends upon an extremely fine balance of the total energy, the odds of which are: http://www.wpclipart.com/recreation/playing/throwing_water_balloon.png 1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000:1 1060 : 1 This is equivalent to taking aim from Earth and hitting an inch-wide target at the farthest reaches of the observable universe.
