Comprehensive Assessment of - Updated January 2023

Within this detailed assessment report dated January 2023, an evaluation of is presented, covering aspects such as design, landscape integration, greenery provision, community well-being, sustainability, biodiversity conservation, and maintenance. The report includes self-assessed and assessor scores, along with images and descriptions for each criterion, aiming to provide a holistic view of the development's performance.

• Assessment
• Development
• Landscape
• Sustainability
• Community

kerri Follow

Uploaded on Sep 25, 2024 | 0 Views

Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Presentation Transcript

1. <Development Name> Prepared by: XXX Co. Assessment Date: 01 January 2021 new development updated 11 Jan 2023 1

2. Project Name: XXX Development Owner: XXX Type: Residential/Commercial/etc. Landscape Architect: XXX Address: XXX Architect: XXX Site Area: XXX Completion Date: XXX new development updated 11 Jan 2023 2

3. SCORES SUMMARY TOTAL APPLICABLE SCORE SELF-ASSESSED SCORE ASSESSORS SCORE S/N CRITERIA 1 DESIGN & LANDSCAPE 50 X 2 COMMUNITY WELLBEING & ENGAGEMENT 16 X 3 ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY 23 X 4 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION 34 X 5 MAINTENANCE 30 X 6 BONUS 5 X TOTAL XXX XXX Certified/Silver/ Gold/Platinum (XX%) new development updated 11 Jan 2023 3

4. Part 1: Design & Landscape 1.1 Overall Landscape Concept 1.1a Leveraging on existing site conditions Score Assessors Fair Considered site conditions in project's design and execution 1 Fairly Good 2 Retained or incorporated existing site conditions in project's design and execution to achieve purposeful objectives Good 3 Very Good Leveraged on existing site conditions in project's design and execution, using creative strategies to achieve purposeful objectives. 4 Excellent 5 Please include explanations, photos, documentation, statistics, etc. to support self-assessed score for each criteria For documents that are not convenient for including in presentation, please send the separate files You may send additional supporting documents separately, too For criteria that you deem to be not applicable, please also state reasons why new development updated 11 Jan 2023 4

5. Part 1: Design & Landscape 1.1 Overall Landscape Concept 1.1b Integration of landscape and architecture Score Assessors Corridors 2 Lobbies 2 Rooftop 2 Ancillary Structures 2 Fa ade 2 new development updated 11 Jan 2023 5

6. Part 1: Design & Landscape 1.2 Greenery Provision 1.2a Green Plot Ratio (GnPR) Entire Site Score Assessors 1.0 to <2.0 1 2.0 to <3.0 2 3.0 to <5.0 4 5.0 to <6.0 6 6.0 to <7.0 8 >7.0 10 1.2b Green Plot Ratio (GnPR) Green Buffer & Peripheral Planting Verge Score Assessors 10 to <15 1 15 to <20 2 20 to <25 3 25 to <30 4 >30 5 1.2c Percentage of ground-level landscaped area Score Assessors 1 to <20% 1 20 to <30% 2 30 to <40% 4 40 to <50% 6 50 to <60% 8 new development updated 11 Jan 2023 6 >60% 10

7. Part 1: Design & Landscape 1.2 Greenery Provision 1.2d Provision of skyrise greenery (rooftop or vertical) Score Assessors Fair 1 Implemented limited area of rooftop or vertical greenery Average 2 Good 3 Implemented moderate area rooftop or vertical greenery Very Good 4 Excellent Implemented extensive rooftop or vertical greenery 5 new development updated 11 Jan 2023 7

8. Part 1: Design & Landscape 1.3 Additional Buffer Planting 1.3a Green buffer and peripheral planting verge Score Assessors 1 to <5% 1 5 to <10% 2 10 to <15% 3 15 to <20% 4 >20% 5 new development updated 11 Jan 2023 8

9. Part 1: Design & Landscape TOTAL APPLICABLE SCORE SELF-ASSESSED SCORE ASSESSORS SCORE S/N CRITERIA 1.1 Overall Landscape Concept & Layout 15 X 1.2 Greenery Provision 30 X 1.3* Additional Buffer Planting 5 X TOTAL 50 X new development updated 11 Jan 2023 9

10. Part 2: Community Wellbeing & Engagement 2.1 Wellbeing 2.1a Understanding of users Score Assessors Fair Conducted basic study or research on limited user groups' behaviour and needs 1 Good Conducted comprehensive study or analysis on various user groups and different factors 2 new development updated 11 Jan 2023 10

11. Part 2: Community Wellbeing & Engagement 2.1 Wellbeing 2.1b Biophilic elements Score Assessors Fair Incorporated some biophilic elements 1 Fairly GoodIncorporated biophilic elements moderately Good 2 3 Very Good 4 Incorporated biophilic elements extensively and purposefully Excellent 5 new development updated 11 Jan 2023 11

12. Part 2: Community Wellbeing & Engagement 2.2 Universal Design 2.2a Universal Design Score Assessors Fair 1 Provided basic and minimal UD features Fairly Good 2 Good 3 Provided comprehensive UD features e.g. Inclusive playgrounds, routes for different user groups Very Good 4 Provided extensive UD features using integrated approach e.g. involved key stakeholders for feedback, used innovative features to enhance accessibility for all users Excellent 5 new development updated 11 Jan 2023 12

13. Part 2: Community Wellbeing & Engagement 2.3 Community Engagement 2.3a Community involvement in development Score Assessors Fair Engaged stakeholders minimally in part of development process 1 Engaged various stakeholders throughout entire project, from early design phases through to completion Good 2 new development updated 11 Jan 2023 13

14. Part 2: Community Wellbeing & Engagement 2.3 Community Engagement 2.3b Provision for community engagement Score Assessors Fair Incorporated simple provisions for future community engagement plans 1 Incorporated and designed purposeful features suitable for target users to encourage future community engagement plans e.g. allocated and designed space for community garden Good 2 new development updated 11 Jan 2023 14

15. PART 2: COMMUNITY WELLBEING AND ENGAGEMENT TOTAL APPLICABLE SCORE SELF-ASSESSED SCORE ASSESSORS SCORE S/N CRITERIA 7 X 2.1 Wellbeing 2.2 Universal Design 5 X 2.2* Community Engagement 4 X TOTAL 16 X new development updated 11 Jan 2023 15

16. Part 3: Environmental Sustainability 3.1 Management of Resources 3.1a Percentage of horticultural waste recycled Score Assessors >10% to 30% 1 >30% to 70% 2 >70% 3 3.1b On-site recycling of horticultural waste Score Assessors Fair Recycles some horticultural waste on-site 1 Good Recycles significant amount of horticultural waste on-site 2 new development updated 11 Jan 2023 16

17. Part 3: Environmental Sustainability 3.1 Management of Resources 3.1c Percentage of non-potable water used for irrigation Score Assessors 10 to <50% non-potable water for irrigation 1 50% non-potable water for irrigation 2 50% non-potable water for irrigation, and requires minimal irrigation for plants to thrive 3 3.1d Source of non-potable water Score Assessors Fair Collects some non-potable water on-site 1 Good Collects significant amount of non-potable water on-site 2 new development updated 11 Jan 2023 17

18. Part 3: Environmental Sustainability 3.2 Source of Materials 3.2a Score Assessors Acquired plants from nurseries under NParks Nursery Accreditation Scheme (NAS) 2 new development updated 11 Jan 2023 18

19. Part 3: Environmental Sustainability 3.2 Source of Materials 3.2b Sustainable source for construction and landscaping materials Score Assessors <10% of materials of applicable usage 1 10 to 50% of materials of applicable usage 2 >50% of materials of applicable usage 3 new development updated 11 Jan 2023 19

20. Part 3: Environmental Sustainability 3.3 Stormwater Management 3.3a Treatment of run-off through natural hydrological features Score Assessors <10% of total site area 1 10% to 25% of total site area 2 >25% of total site area, or if attained ABC Certified Gold 3 new development updated 11 Jan 2023 20

21. Part 3: Environmental Sustainability 3.3 Stormwater Management 3.3b Design of natural hydrological features Score Assessors Fair Requires high maintenance, choice of plants can be improved 1 Good Requires moderate maintenance 2 Excellent Designed for low maintenance, good functionality and choice of plants. 3 new development updated 11 Jan 2023 21

22. Part 3: Environmental Sustainability 3.3 Stormwater Management 3.3c Creative strategies for sustainable stormwater management Score Assessors Low impact Simple enhancements 1 High impact Use of creative strategies for space-efficiency, maintenance needs, multi-functionality 2 new development updated 11 Jan 2023 22

23. Part 3: Environmental Sustainability TOTAL APPLICABLE SCORE SELF-ASSESSED SCORE ASSESSORS SCORE S/N CRITERIA 10 X 3.1 Management of Resources 3.2 Source of Materials 5 X 3.3* Stormwater Management 8 X TOTAL 23 X new development updated 11 Jan 2023 23

24. Part 4: Biodiversity Conservation 4.1 Native Plants 4.1a Number of planted species that are native to Southeast Asia region Score Assessors 5% to <20% 1 20% to <40% 2 40% to <60% 3 >60% 4 4.1b Quantity of planted species that are native to Southeast Asia region Score Assessors 1% to <10% 1 10% to <20% 2 30% to <60% 3 >60% 4 new development updated 11 Jan 2023 24

25. Part 4: Biodiversity Conservation 4.2 Biodiversity-sensitive Planting & Design 4.2a Understanding of existing habitats, ecological processes and nearby environments Score Assessors Fair Conducted simple study on site conditions & features 1 Good Conducted comprehensive research or analysis to understand existing site conditions 2 Conducted comprehensive research or analysis to understand existing site conditions and impact of development on ecological networks beyond site Excellent 3 new development updated 11 Jan 2023 25

26. Part 4: Biodiversity Conservation 4.2 Biodiversity-sensitive Planting & Design 4.2b Habitat creation through planting design Score Assessors Fair 1 Incorporated small themed trails and plots based on existing planting. e.g. butterfly-attracting shrubs, bee trails Fairly Good 2 Good 3 Either enhanced existing habitats or created new moderately-sized habitats. e.g. grasslands, riverine, dragonfly ponds Very Good 4 Incorporated holistic considerations in project's design to emulate native landscapes or conserve existing habitats e.g. varying canopy heights, increasing food plants variety, features to link different landscape areas Excellent 5 new development updated 11 Jan 2023 26

27. Part 4: Biodiversity Conservation 4.2 Biodiversity-sensitive Planting & Design 4.2c Management of glass facades and lighting for wildlife Score Assessors Fair Design is able to minimise impact 1 Good Executed additional efforts purposefully, such as retrofitting and lighting management 2 Excellent Considered impact of glass fa ade and lighting on wildlife in design and operational phases 3 new development updated 11 Jan 2023 27

28. Part 4: Biodiversity Conservation 4.3 Tree Retention 4.3a Score Assessors Provided inventory of tree flora species, quantity and provenance 1 4.3b Percentage of retained existing mature trees Score Assessors 5% to <30% 1 30% to <60% 2 60% 3 new development updated 11 Jan 2023 28

29. Part 4: Biodiversity Conservation 4.3 Tree Retention 4.3c Design for retention of mature trees Score Assessors Fair Retained trees that do not obstruct building design 1 Good Simple alterations to design or layout to allow mature trees to be retained 2 Excellent Incorporated existing mature trees creatively and purposefully in design 3 new development updated 11 Jan 2023 29

30. Part 4: Biodiversity Conservation 4.3 Tree Retention 4.3d Health of retained mature tree Score Assessors Fair Tree health may be improved 1 Good Most trees are healthy 2 Excellent All trees are healthy and well retained 3 new development updated 11 Jan 2023 30

31. Part 4: Biodiversity Conservation 4.4 Conservation of Habitats 4.4a Biodiversity impact assessment Score Assessors Fair Provided list of flora and fauna species, numbers and provenance in existing site 1 Conducted BIA, with inventory of flora and fauna species, numbers and provenance in existing site, and impact assessment of planned development on biodiversity Good 2 new development updated 11 Jan 2023 31

32. Part 4: Biodiversity Conservation 4.4 Conservation of Habitats 4.4b Construction environment management plan Score Assessors Fair Demonstrated simple efforts to manage some impacts on identified flora and fauna during development 1 Demonstrated moderate efforts to manage impact during on identified flora and fauna during development Good 2 Demonstrated holistic management plan to mitigate potential impacts on identified flora and fauna from design to construction phase Excellent 3 new development updated 11 Jan 2023 32

33. Part 4: Biodiversity Conservation TOTAL APPLICABLE SCORE SELF-ASSESSED SCORE ASSESSORS SCORE S/N CRITERIA 8 X 4.1 Native Plants 4.2 Biodiversity-sensitive Planting & Design 11 X 4.3* Tree Retention 10 X 4.4* Conservation of Habitats 5 X TOTAL 34 X new development updated 11 Jan 2023 33

34. Part 5: Maintenance 5.1 Design for Landscape Maintainability 5.1a Plant species selection and placement Score Assessors Fair 1 Requires high frequency of softscape maintenance due to placement and choice of plant species Fairly Good 2 Good 3 Requires moderate frequency of softscape maintenance due to placement and choice of plant species Very Good 4 Requires minimal softscape maintenance across different weather conditions due to placement and choice of plant species Excellent 5 new development updated 11 Jan 2023 34

35. Part 5: Maintenance 5.1 Design for Landscape Maintainability 5.1b Hardscape elements Score Assessors Fair Requires high frequency of hardscape maintenance due to choice or design of hardscape elements 1 Good Requires moderate frequency of hardscape maintenance due to choice or design of hardscape elements 2 Excellent Requires minimal hardscape maintenance due to choice or design of hardscape elements 3 new development updated 11 Jan 2023 35

36. Part 5: Maintenance 5.1 Design for Landscape Maintainability 5.1c Ease of landscape maintenance access Score Assessors Low Impact Some landscaped areas can be easily accessed for inspection and maintenance 1 Moderate Impact Moderate amount of landscaped areas can be easily accessed for inspection and maintenance 2 High Impact Most landscaped areas can be easily accessed for inspection and maintenance 3 new development updated 11 Jan 2023 36

37. Part 5: Maintenance 5.1 Design for Landscape Maintainability 5.1d Irrigation efficiency Score Assessors Implemented auto-irrigation for <10% of landscape 1 Implemented auto-irrigation for 10% to <50% of landscape 2 Either 50% of auto-irrigated landscape, or minimal to no irrigation is required 3 new development updated 11 Jan 2023 37

38. Part 5: Maintenance 5.2 Maintenance Plans and Operations 5.2a Management plans for softscape and hardscape Score Assessors Fair Provided basic documentation 1 Good Provided comprehensive plans and documentation that cover various aspects 2 new development updated 11 Jan 2023 38

39. Part 5: Maintenance 5.2 Maintenance Plans and Operations 5.2b Safety and asset condition inspection reports for hardscape, features and facilities Score Assessors Fair Provided inspection reports and basic monitoring plans 1 Provided comprehensive investigation reports with tangible measures that have been or will be implemented Good 2 new development updated 11 Jan 2023 39

40. Part 5: Maintenance 5.2 Maintenance Plans and Operations 5.2c Smart operations Score Assessors Fair Implemented simple smart operations features 1 Good Implemented smart operations features extensively 2 new development updated 11 Jan 2023 40

41. Part 5: Maintenance 5.2 Maintenance Plans and Operations 5.2d Score Assessors Employs a Certified Practising Horticulturist (CPH) with currently valid certification in maintenance operations 1 new development updated 11 Jan 2023 41

42. Part 5: Maintenance 5.3 Design for Skyrise Greenery Maintenance 5.3a Maintainability of skyrise greenery Score Assessors Fair Requires high frequency of maintenance 1 Requires moderate maintenance frequency, or implemented strategies to reduce maintenance needs Good 2 Excellent Requires minimal maintenance 3 new development updated 11 Jan 2023 42

43. Part 5: Maintenance 5.3 Design for Skyrise Greenery Maintenance 5.3b Safety of skyrise greenery Score Assessors Fair Considered safety minimally during maintenance, or design and selection of plants 1 Good Considered safety moderately during maintenance, or design and selection of plants 2 Excellent Can be maintained safely, considered safety for design and selection of plants 3 new development updated 11 Jan 2023 43

44. Part 5: Maintenance TOTAL APPLICABLE SCORE SELF-ASSESSED SCORE ASSESSORS SCORE S/N CRITERIA 14 X 5.1 Design for Landscape Maintainability 5.2 Maintenance Plans and Operations 7 X 5.3* Design for Skyrise Greenery Maintenance 6 X TOTAL 27 X new development updated 11 Jan 2023 44

45. Bonus BONUS Score Assessors Any special efforts within below categories that were not scored for in criteria? - Design and landscape - Community wellbeing & engagement - Environmental sustainability - Biodiversity conservation - Maintenance 1 Low impact 2 3 Moderate impact 4 High impact 5 new development updated 11 Jan 2023 45

46. SCORES SUMMARY TOTAL APPLICABLE SCORE SELF-ASSESSED SCORE ASSESSORS SCORE S/N CRITERIA 1 DESIGN & LANDSCAPE 50 X 2 COMMUNITY WELLBEING & ENGAGEMENT 16 X 3 ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY 23 X 4 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION 34 X 5 MAINTENANCE 27 X 6 BONUS 5 X TOTAL XXX XXX Certified/Silver/ Gold/Platinum (XX%) new development updated 11 Jan 2023 46

47. Thank you new development updated 11 Jan 2023 47