Comparison of Green Industry Progress and Performance Indexes in Chinese Provinces
The content discusses the GIPro and GIPer Indexes, comparing the progress and performance in 18 Chinese provinces over the period of 2006-2015. It also provides policy recommendations and ranks the provinces based on various indicators. The analysis highlights the importance of these indexes in assessing green industry initiatives and policy priorities.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Green Industry Progress (GIPro) and Green Industry Performance (GIPer) Indexes Ralph (Skip) Luken Senior Green Industry Advisor Department of Environment United Nations Industrial Development Organization
GIPro (Green Industry Progress) GIPer (Green Industry Performance) Methodology CIP (Competitive Industrial Performance)/HDI GEP (Green Economy Progress) Indicators GIVA, GEMP, ENERGY, WATER, HWASTE, COD, SO2 GIVA, GEMP, ENERGY, WATER, HWASTE, COD, SO2 Data 18 Chinese provinces 18 Chinese provinces
Comparative ranking Progress (2006- 2015) Provinces GIPro GIPer 2006 GIPer 2015 Liaoning 1 11 8 Sichuan 2 13 9 Jilin 3 9 3 Guangdong 4 1 1 Tianjin 5 3 4 Inner Mongolia 6 16 14 Shanxi 7 14 15 Hebei 8 10 11 Ningxia 9 18 17 Fujian 10 4 6 Anhui 11 15 16 Henan 12 8 10 Jiangsu 13 6 12 Jiangxi 14 12 13 Shaanxi 15 5 5 Zhejiang 16 7 7 Qinghai 17 17 18 Shandong 18 2 2
Policy Recommendation Top three policy priorities for each provinces Top three priority indicators Provinces GIVA GEMP ENERGY WATER HWASTE COD SO2 0.134 0.128 HWASTE, GEMP, GIVA Liaoning 0.192 0.178 0.12 0.053 0.195 Sichuan 0.127 0.149 0.138 0.165 0.117 0.161 0.143 WATER, COD, GEMP 0.154 0.073 HWASTE, COD, GEMP Jilin 0.114 0.122 0.095 0.076 0.366 Top Five 0.072 0.073 HWASTE, GEMP, GIVA Guangdong 0.197 0.202 0.041 0.145 0.269 0.051 0.076 GEMP, GIVA, Tianjin 0.227 0.228 0.115 0.134 0.169 HWASTE 0.125 0.146 WATER, GEMP, GIVA Jiangxi 0.150 0.183 0.113 0.237 0.047 Shaanxi 0.159 0.196 0.116 0.068 0.079 0.159 0.224 SO2, GEMP, COD 0.135 0.093 GIVA, GEMP, Bottom Five Zhejiang 0.241 0.176 0.118 0.062 0.175 HWASTE 0.042 0.034 HWASTE, ENERGY, COD Qinghai 0.038 0.036 0.054 0.036 0.759 0.086 0.103 HWASTE, GIVA, GEMP Shandong 0.209 0.202 0.116 0.021 0.262
Global Application of GEP SDG9 Performance index SDG9 progress index Country Development group Progress ranking Performance Ranking Development group Country Germany Jordan DEVOT 1 IND 1 Slovakia IND 2 South Korea IND 2 Kyrgyzstan DEVOT 3 Switzerland IND 3 Trinidad and Tobago DEVOT 4 Czech Republic IND 4 Japan Qatar IND 5 IND 5 Bahrain IND 6 Singapore IND 6 Myanmar LDC 7 Ireland IND 7 Angola DEVOT 8 Slovakia IND 8 Czech Republic IND 9 Austria IND 9 Ethiopia LDC 10 Slovenia IND 10
Conclusions There are similarities and differences in rankings. GIPer compares levels whereas GIPro compares progress. GIPro provides more information on needed policy initiatives.
Policies for Greening Industry: A Training Course SDG Overview/Industry relevant SDGs Environment, Resource and Industry Trends (CIP Index) Sustainable Industrial Development/Green Industry/ Circular Economy Greening Industries Greening Services Resource Productivity (materials, water & energy) Materials Recovery (3Rs) and Remanufacturing Environmental Regulation Eco-design Responsible chemicals and hazardous waste management Corporate Social Responsibility Renewable and Efficient Energy Environmental services Economic Policies (Industry, Trade, FDI) Industrial Policies include upgrading to medium and high-tech industrial and (eco) industrial parks Green Industry Sustainable Progress (GISP) Index Green Industry Assessments 18/04/2017
